SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1372

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, SANJAY VASHISTH, JJ.
XXXXX - Appellant
Versus
XXXXX - Respondent
CRA No. D-7 (O&M) of 2022
Decided On : 13-12-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appearing Parties : Mr. R.N. Lohan Adv. , Mr. Vivek Suri Adv. , Mr. Apoorv Garg Sr. DAG, Haryana

The prosecution must provide sufficient evidence to establish charges beyond reasonable doubt; mere allegations, without corroboration, are insufficient for conviction.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 363 and 366 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act - Section 4 and Section 6 - Appeals by two convicts against convictions and sentences imposed for kidnapping and sexual offences. (Paras 1, 18)

(B) Duty of prosecution - The prosecution must establish foundational facts constituting the offence, and the court's inability to affirm guilt beyond reasonable doubt led to acquittal. (Paras 12, 24)

Facts of the case:
The victims, a 13-year-old girl, was reported missing, later recovered from a railway station. Multiple charges were laid against the appellants for offenses under IPC and POCSO Act, however, inconsistencies and lack of corroborative evidence emerged during the proceedings. (Paras 1, 24)

Findings of Court:
The court identified critical discrepancies between witness statements regarding the victim's recovery and her subsequent allegations, concluding insufficient evidence to support the prosecution's claims. Thus, the charges were not substantiated as per the legal standards required for conviction. (Paras 15, 24)

Issues: The primary issues included the credibility of victim's statements, the adequacy of evidence for the charges, and the legitimacy of the prosecution's investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court underscored the necessity of a robust evidentiary foundation for convictions, asserting the presumption under the POCSO Act was not applicable due to evidentiary shortcomings. (Paras 22, 24)

Result: Appeals allowed; accused acquitted of charges.

Table of Content
1. initial recovery of victim and allegations made. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding the victim's credibility and investigation flaws. (Para 6 , 8 , 11)
3. court's observations on discrepancies in statements. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
4. application of presumptions under pocso and burden of proof. (Para 20 , 22)
5. final decision leading to acquittal. (Para 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, J.

By way of this common judgment, appeals filed by two convicts, namely, Virender s/o Bharat Singh (CRA-D-7-2022) and Darshan s/o Ramphal (CRA-D-8-2022) are being decided which have been filed after they were held guilty by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences, Jind. The offences under which the appellants have been convicted and the period of sentence awarded is as under:

Name of convict

offence under section

Period of Sentence

Fine Imposed

Period of Sentence in default of payment of fine

Virender

363 IPC

RI for five years

Rs.20,000/-

SI for one year

366 IPC

RI for five years

Rs.20,000/-

SI for one year

4 of POCSO Act

RI for twenty years

Rs.100,000/-

SI for two years

Darshan

6 of POCSO Act

RI for twenty years

Rs.100,000/-

SI for two years

2. On account of the missing daughter of the complainant-Surender Jain one FIR No. 484 dated 04.09.2018, under Sections 363 and 366-A of INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’) was registered at Police Station City Jind, District Jind with the allegations that daughter of the complainant (hereinafter referred to as ‘victim’), aged 13 years, studying in 9" class and of the height of 5’ feet and having fair complexion, wearing Black Pant and Blue Shirt and also having hair style like boys is missing since 03.09.2018, 5:00 p.m. He apprehended that someone had kidnapped his daughter and she be traced out. FIR was registered at about 01:02 hrs on 04.09.2018 (the intervening night of 03.09.2018 and 04.09.2018).

As a pursuit of the police action, victim is shown to be recovered from Hindua Railway Station, Rajasthan at the instance of ASI Yashbir in the presence of L/C Monika on 04.09.2018 itself. Thereupon, on moving an application by SI Kamlesh Devi on 05.09.2018 statement of the victim was recorded by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jind, under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which she stated as under:

    “Mxxxx daughter of Surender Jain, Age-13 years, resident of Sunder Nagar, Jind

    I asked the police officials to leave the room so that she can make her statement without any pressure. I asked her the following questions:

    QI In which class do you study?

    Ans. I study in 9th Class at Apex High School.

    Q2. Are you pressurized by someone?

    Ans. No.

    Q3. I am satisfied that she voluntarily wishes to give her statement. Therefore I

    Proceed to record it as follows:-

    My heart had gone astray. I went to Delhi at my own will day before yesterday evening. Now I want to live with my family members. I met Virender in Delhi. I was living in the house of his namely Naresh. Then I went to Rajasthan with Virender.

    From there the police apprehended me. Now I want to live with my parents.

    RO&AC

    SD/- (In English)

SD/- (In Hindi)

Mxxxxx

05.09.2018"

(Shivani Rana)

JMIC, JIND

3. On the same day i.e. 05.09.2018 at 5:20 p.m. victim was medico legally examined by Dr. Jyoti and there also on being told by the victim, the previous history was recorded and same is reproduced herein below:

    “As per history told by herself in 2017 nearly May/June a person named Darshan Saini Electrician by occupation came to her house and they went to field where he did sexual intercourse with her. After that within 2-3 months 2-3 intercourse occur between them. He blackmailed her that he is having a video recording of their sexual intercourse and if she will not come when he call her, he will viral the video.

    She is wearing a blue colour

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top