Back
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, SANJAY VASHISTH
Virender – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay Vashisth, J.
By way of this common judgment, appeals filed by two convicts, namely, Virender s/o Bharat Singh (CRA-D-7-2022) and Darshan s/o Ramphal (CRA-D-8-2022) are being decided which have been filed after they were held guilty by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Special Court, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences, Jind. The offences under which the appellants have been convicted and the period of sentence awarded is as under:
Name of Convict | Offence under Section | Period of Sentence | Fine Imposed | Period of sentence in default of payment of fine |
Virender | 363 IPC | RI for five years | Rs.20,000/- | SI for one year |
366 IPC | RI for five years | Rs.20,000/- | SI for one year | |
4 of POCSO Act | RI for twenty years | Rs.100,000/- | SI for two years | |
Darshan | 6 of POCSO | RI for twenty years | Rs.100,000/- | SI for two years |
2. On account of the missing daughter of the complainant-Surender Jain one FIR No. 484 dated 04.09.2018, under Sections 363 and 366-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, 'IPC') was registered at Police Station City Jind, District Jind with the allegations that daughter of the complainant (hereinafter referred to as 'victim'), aged 13 years, studying in 9th class an
The prosecution must provide sufficient evidence to establish charges beyond reasonable doubt; mere allegations, without corroboration, are insufficient for conviction.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for foundational facts to activate the statutory presumption under Section 29 of the POCSO Act and the need for the accused to crea....
The prosecution must prove foundational facts beyond reasonable doubt, and the presumption of guilt under the POCSO Act does not relieve it of this burden.
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt; contradictions and lack of medical evidence led to the acquittal of the accused.
The conviction was quashed due to insufficient evidence and credibility issues with the victim, highlighting the necessity of establishing a solid evidentiary foundation in sexual assault cases.
The prosecution must prove foundational facts, including the victim's age and the occurrence of the alleged crime, beyond reasonable doubt for a conviction under the POCSO Act.
The prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt, and evidence must be corroborated with medical evidence and other reliable sources.
The prosecution must prove foundational facts of age and sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt, even with statutory presumptions under the POCSO Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
