ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Raj Bahadur Pastor – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This intra Court appeal is filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh through its officials, questioning the judgment and order dated 19.8.2021, passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 3660 of 2021, directing the appellant State to include the services rendered by respondent/petitioner from 1.1.1989 to 31.12.2018 i.e. prior to his regularization, towards qualifying service, and take a decision for payment of pension and other retiral dues. Aforesaid direction came to be issued after the appellant State had filed a counter-affidavit, opposing the prayer made in the writ, to which a rejoinder was also filed. The parties in the appeal are already represented and with their consent the dispute raised is being disposed of, at the admission stage itself, without calling for any further affidavits.
2. We have heard Sri Rama Nand Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the appellant State and Sri Bharat Pratap Singh for the respondent/petitioner and have perused the materials on record.
3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the case are that the respondent/petitioner was appointed on the post of Junior Engineer in the Minor Irrigation Department of Sta
Habib Khan vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others
Karnataka SRTC vs. Ashrafulla Khan
Prem Singh vs. State of U.P. and Others
State of Punjab vs. Renuka Singla
Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others vs. Uma Devi
State of U.P. vs. Harish Chandra
Union of India vs. Kirloskar Pneumatic Co. Ltd. (1996) 4 SCC 453 : AIR 1996 SC 3285
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.