SANJAY YADAV, S.K.AWASTHI
Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
SANJAY YADAV, J.
This order shall dispose of bunch of review petitions bearing Review Petition Nos. 413/2017, 414/2017, 415/2017, 416/2017, 417/2017, 418/2017, 419/2017, 420/2017, 421/2017, 422/2017, 423/2017, 424/2017, 425/2017, 426/2017, 427/2017, 428/2017, 429/2017, 430/2017, 431/2017, 432/2017, 433/2017, 434/2017, 435/2017, 436/2017, 437/2017, 438/2017, 439/2017, 440/2017, 441/2017, 442/2017, 443/2017, 444/2017, 445/2017, 446/2017, 447/2017, 448/2017, 449/2017, 450/2017, 451/2017 and 452/2017 arising out of common order passed on 29-6-2017 whereby the writ appeals were allowed. The question of fact and law is common in all these review petitions.
2. The writ appeals were directed against the order passed in respective writ petitions whereby the learned Single Judge finding fault with power exercised by the Deputy Commissioner (Excise) under the Madhya Pradesh Foreign Liquor Rules, 1996 (For short, ‘the Rules of 1996’) had set aside the same on the finding that on the date of the order, it was not within the powers of the Deputy Commissioner to have imposed three times penalty under sub-rule (2) of Rule 19 of the Rules of 1996 which underwent amendment with effect from 29-3
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.