Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Recent Judgement on Formulating Witness and Object Tables - Main Points and Insights:
The Court in 2025 INSC 114 (Surendra Singh v. State of Uttarakhand) provided clear directions regarding the formulation of the table of witnesses and objects to be examined in judgments, emphasizing the importance of specifying statements, documents, material objects, and exhibits that are relied upon or not relied upon by the investigating officer ["Ram Lagan Pandey VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"].
The judgement states: Explanation: The list of statements, documents, material objects and exhibits shall specify statements, documents, material objects and exhibits that are not relied upon by the investigating officer. This indicates a prescribed proper format for listing and categorizing evidence in judicial orders.
The Court highlighted that such detailed listing ensures clarity, accountability, and transparency in the evaluation of evidence, aligning with procedural fairness.
Analysis and Conclusion:
This judgement from 2025 is significant as it prescribes a structured format for judges to formulate the table of witnesses and objects, thereby standardizing how evidence is presented in judgments ["Ram Lagan Pandey VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"].
The directions aim to improve clarity in judgments by explicitly distinguishing relied-upon and non-reliant evidence, which aids appellate review and ensures judicial transparency.
The judgement underscores that adherence to this format is part of proper judicial practice and is essential for the integrity of the decision-making process.
References:- ["Ram Lagan Pandey VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"] (Court directions on the proper format for witness and object listing)- ["ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. LKO. VS DAYA DEVI - Allahabad"], ["State of Himachal Pradesh vs Satpal - Himachal Pradesh"] (Supporting references on judicial procedures and evidence handling)
In the realm of judicial documentation, clarity and structure are paramount. Imagine a judgment where key elements like witnesses, exhibits, and material objects are scattered haphazardly, making it challenging for lawyers, judges, and parties to reference critical evidence. A recent development in 2025 addresses this very issue: which recent judgement in 2025 has gave the directions to formulate the table of witnesses and objects to be examined in the judgement, thus prescribing the proper format of the judgement?
This blog post delves into the groundbreaking order that mandates a standardized format, enhancing transparency and efficiency in legal proceedings. Drawing from the core judgment and supporting rules, we'll explore its implications. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for your situation.
The pivotal ruling comes from an order authored by R. C. Chopra, J., referenced as Mrs X VS STATE - 2004 0 Supreme(Del) 533, issued in 2025. This directive emphasizes the mandatory inclusion of a preface and a structured appendix in every judgment. Specifically, it states:
Every judgment must mandatorily have a preface showing the name of the parties and an appendix showing the list of Prosecution Witnesses, Prosecution Exhibits, Defence Witnesses, Defence Exhibits, Court witnesses, Court Exhibits and Material Objects. Mrs X VS STATE - 2004 0 Supreme(Del) 533
This prescription aligns with procedural norms, ensuring judgments are not just narratives but comprehensive records. The order further references Section 354 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), which outlines judgment particulars, adding that it shall... contain a statement in Tabular Form giving the following particulars... Mrs X VS STATE - 2004 0 Supreme(Del) 533.
These elements promote ease of reference, reducing ambiguity in appeals or reviews.
The order Mrs X VS STATE - 2004 0 Supreme(Del) 533 underscores that deviations from this format undermine judicial integrity. It clarifies that procedural transfers and trials remain valid only if judgments adhere to these standards: The order of transfer conferring jurisdiction on that Court and trial that followed cannot be said to be bad in law Mrs X VS STATE - 2004 0 Supreme(Del) 533.
In practice, this tabular format mirrors established norms. For instance, in a case review Thangapandian @ Sankaranarayanan VS State by The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore District - 2011 Supreme(Mad) 2040, records noted: A perusal of the records in S.C.No.61 of 1997 reveal that there were a total number of 24 witnesses examined by the prosecution and 34 documents exhibited, besides 4 material objects. Such listings highlight the practical need for structured tables to track evidence comprehensively.
Similarly, STATE OF GUJARAT V/s KAUSHIKBHAI DAYALJI PATEL - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 12297 details prosecution evidence: The prosecution examined 6 witnesses and produced 22 documentary evidences on record... These examples illustrate how tables would streamline analysis in complex trials.
The 2025 order draws from longstanding procedural rules:
These rules ensure consistency across jurisdictions. The order consolidates them, making tabular appendices non-negotiable.
Related judgments reinforce this. In STATE OF GUJARAT vs MAHENDRA ALIAS MANGO SHANTILAL PATEL, witness details are tabulated: To prove the case against the accused, the prosecution has examined the following witnesses: P.W. No. Name of Witness Exhibit No. This format aids in evaluating credibility, as seen in acquittals due to weak evidence STATE OF GUJARAT vs MUSTAK GULAM UMARJI LALLU VO. PATEL - 2021 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 7753, where P.W.6 Zaverbhai Jesangbhai Vasava who was examined at Exh.21... contradictions were pivotal.
Even in civil contexts, like ASHOK GUPTA vs ROHINI - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 218, structured witness counts appear: The Defendants examined two witnesses... The Plaintiff... examined as many as 19 witnesses. Such practices underscore the 2025 directive's broader applicability.
Structured tables mitigate common pitfalls. In appeals against acquittals STATE OF GUJARAT vs THAKOR VAJAJI GAMBHIRJI, courts avoid re-writing judgments if reasoning is sound, but clear tables facilitate scrutiny: It is also a settled legal position that in acquittal appeal, the appellate Court is not required to rewrite the judgement... Proper formatting prevents miscarriages, as in cases where the trial court's reliance on evidence from another case was deemed illegal (related summary from sources).
For instance, EJIKE JONAS ORJI vs NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU stresses non-contact with witnesses post-bail, implying tabulated lists aid enforcement. In rape convictions overturned Rabi Dalui @ Rabin Dolui VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 2012 Supreme(Cal) 272, inconsistencies in witness statements (e.g., PW/1, PW/3) could have been clearer with tables.
The order Mrs X VS STATE - 2004 0 Supreme(Del) 533 applies generally without specified exceptions, focusing on uniformity. Courts must strictly follow to uphold standards.
Recommendations for Judicial Officers and Practitioners:- Incorporate prefaces and appendices routinely.- Use tabular formats per Kerala IN RE: TO ISSUE CERTAIN GUIDELINES REGARDING INADEQUACIES AND DEFICIENCIES IN CRIMINAL TRIALS VS . - 2017 3 Supreme 322 and Andhra MANNI VS STATE - 1974 0 Supreme(All) 57 rules.- Train staff on marking exhibits and objects for seamless integration.- Reference tables in analyses to bolster reasoning.
Non-compliance may invite appeals, as seen in cases emphasizing evidence proof beyond doubt.
The 2025 order Mrs X VS STATE - 2004 0 Supreme(Del) 533 marks a significant step toward standardized, user-friendly judgments. By mandating tables of witnesses and objects, it enhances accessibility and reduces errors, aligning with rules like those in Kerala and Andhra Pradesh.
Key Takeaways:- Every judgment needs a preface and tabular appendix.- Categorize witnesses, exhibits, and objects distinctly.- Adherence ensures procedural integrity and eases reviews.- Practitioners should advocate for this format in ongoing cases.
This evolution promises clearer judicial records, benefiting all stakeholders. Stay informed on such updates to navigate legal landscapes effectively.
References: Mrs X VS STATE - 2004 0 Supreme(Del) 533, IN RE: TO ISSUE CERTAIN GUIDELINES REGARDING INADEQUACIES AND DEFICIENCIES IN CRIMINAL TRIALS VS . - 2017 3 Supreme 322, MANNI VS STATE - 1974 0 Supreme(All) 57, Thangapandian @ Sankaranarayanan VS State by The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore District - 2011 Supreme(Mad) 2040, STATE OF GUJARAT V/s KAUSHIKBHAI DAYALJI PATEL - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 12297, STATE OF GUJARAT vs MAHENDRA ALIAS MANGO SHANTILAL PATEL, ASHOK GUPTA vs ROHINI - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 218, STATE OF GUJARAT vs MUSTAK GULAM UMARJI LALLU VO. PATEL - 2021 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 7753, Rabi Dalui @ Rabin Dolui VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - 2012 Supreme(Cal) 272.
#JudgmentFormat #WitnessTable #LegalUpdate2025
This aspect of the matter was also considered in a recent judgement rendered by this Court in FAFO (Def.) No. 236 of 2013 (The oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Jantual and others decided on 27.2.2017. ... ... (2) The Claims Tribunal shall have all the powers of a Civil Court for the purpose of taking evidence on oath and of enforcing the attendance of witnesses and of compelling the discovery and production of documents and material objects and for such other purposes as may be prescribed ... This position has also b....
Thus, in these circumstances, the appellants cannot be permitted to re-open or to dispute the findings based on consent as recorded in Para-5 of the Impugned Judgment in instant appeal ; and therefore, challenge to the judgement passed with consent, is rejected. ... LPA No.78 of 2025 2. ... It is contended that in another SLP [C] Diary No.2668 of 2025, titled as H.P. Vidhan Sabha versus Bhagwan Chand the operation of impugned order dated 01.01.2025 passed by Learned Single Judge was stayed by the Hon’b....
It indicates that the entire explanation of the applicant has not been placed by the respondent-C.B.I. before the learned trial court and it gives rise to an apprehension in the mind of the applicant that similar course would have been adopted in the cases of other witnesses examined by the Investigating ... This view was endorsed in a recent three judge decision of this court in Criminal trials guidelines regarding Inadequacies and Deficiencies, in re v. State of Andhra Pradesh and others (2021) 10 SCC 598. ... The learned Counsel for th....
were recovered from the table of the respondent. ... 2.2 After recording the complaint of the complainant, the Trap Laying Officer called the panch witnesses and Police Constable Bhatt was called and the complainant gave Rs. 50/- which were one currency note of the denomination of Rs. 20/- and three currency notes of the denomination ... 2.5 The prosecution examined 6 witnesses and produced 22 documentary evidences on record in support of their case and after the learned Additional Public Prosecutor f....
The Supreme Court gave further directions regarding the conditions to be imposed while granting bail, which are reproduced below:- This is a digitally signed Judgement. ... He argued that the representative character of the samples was thus vitiated. ... The applicant will not contact any of the prosecution witnesses or act in any other manner prejudicial to the trial. This is a digitally signed Judgement. ... Notices under Section 67 of the Act we....
A perusal of the records in S.C.No.61 of 1997 reveal that there were a total number of 24 witnesses examined by the prosecution and 34 documents exhibited, besides 4 material objects. On the side of the defence, there were 2 witnesses examined and 2 documents exhibited. ... During trial, on the side of the prosecution, 18 witnesses were examined and 7 documents were exhibited. P.Ws.1 to 5 are the inmates of the house of P.W.1 where the occurrence had taken place and #....
The doctor who conducted the post-mortem and examined the witnesses had categorically stated that it was not possible that somebody would throw a person out of the bus when it was in a running condition. ... To prove the case against the accused, the prosecution has examined the following witnesses: P.W. No. Name of Witness Exhibit No. ... , when the reasons assigned by the Court below are found to be just and proper. ... Mahakali Pan parlour, on the public road, with the intention of causing deat....
The Defendants examined two witnesses in support of their claims in the Bahadurgarh Suit. ... The Plaintiff in the Bahadurgarh Suit summoned the records from various statutory authorities, state bodies and institutions and examined as many as 19 witnesses, including private witnesses, in support of his claims and to discharge the onus put on him to prove the facts pleaded in the said Bahadurgarh ... The Defendant No.2, Mohini Gupta, has filed an Affidavit dated 25th June 2025 opposing ....
The doctor who conducted the postmortem and examined the witnesses had categorically stated that it was not possible that somebody would throw a person out of the bus when it was in running condition. ... It is also a settled legal position that in acquittal appeal, the appellate Court is not required to rewrite the judgement or to give fresh reasonings, when the reasons assigned by the Court below are found to be just and proper. ... Even in a recent decision of the Apex Court in the case of Mookkiah a....
P.W.6 Zaverbhai Jesangbhai Vasava who was examined at Exh.21, Shantilal Shankarbhai Vasava at Exh. 20 are the injured witnesses. ... These witnesses did not support the case of the prosecution and he turned hostile. The trial Court observed that independent witnesses were not examined by the prosecution. There are contradictory statements of the witnesses. ... From the medical evidence it is not established that complainant as well as other witnesses#HL_....
Words, phrases and sentences in a judgement, cannot be read out of context. It is well settled that a judgement is a precedent for the issue of law that is reached and declared decided. The judgement has to be construed in the backdrop of the facts and circumstances in which the judgement has been rendered. Nor is a judgement to be read and interpreted in the manner of a statute.
Suffice would it be to mention that the judgement in Mritunjai (supra), which is a judgement by a Single-Judge Bench of the Allahabad High Court, has been considered by the Division Bench of this Court in Ramnath (supra) and the judgement in P.C. Misra (supra) has been distinguished in a recent judgement by the Division Bench of this Court in Chandra Shekhar (supra). In the judgement of Chandra Shekhar (supra), the aforesaid position of law has been reiterated, declining the benefit of increments to delinquent employee during suspension period. 35. Learned Counsel for Petit....
This Court’s power may well be exercised in regulating audience before it in tune with the spirit of Section 2(q) of the Code.” Shah and others [(2011) 9 SCC 707] where the issue before the Apex Court was in relation to appearance of authorised agent before the Consumer Forums under the provisions of Consumer Forum created under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The said judgement has also been referred to by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the recent judgement in the case of C. Venkatachalam vs.
In case of Syed Abdul Qadir and others v. State of Bihar and others, 2009 (3) SCC 475, it was held in para 57 that “ if (a) the excess amount was not paid on account of any misrepresentation or fraud on the part of the employee and (b) if such excess payment was made by the employer by applying a wrong principle for calculating the pay/allowance or on the basis of a particular interpretation of rule/order, which is subsequently found to be erroneous. It was further held in para 58 that “The relief against recovery is granted by Courts not because of any right in the employees, but in equity,....
The PW/1, Badal Dolui is the father of the victim girl. 4. Heard the learned Counsels appearing for the parties, considered their rival submissions. According to him, he was told by his daughter (PW/3) that she fell and sustained injury and from his cross it reveals that on their way to hospital his daughter told him as to how he sustained injury. Perused the impugned judgement, deposition of the witnesses and other materials on record. 5(a).
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
