Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
The legal framework supports the inclusion of supplementary evidence like electronic records, reports, and technological evidence to prove domestic violence, especially given the clandestine nature of such acts ["Pillalamarri Jayalaxmi vs Smt. Pillalamari Srikalyani - Telangana"], ["Pillalamarri Jayalaxmi vs Smt. Pillalamari Srikalyani - Telangana"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["Omana Thomas W/o Late K.J. Thomas vs Ajith Prakash S/o Late K.J. Thomas - Kerala"]- ["M. Venkat Rao VS State of Orissa - Orissa"]- ["Abhijit Ankush Shelke VS Sau. Shubhangi Abhijit Shelke - Crimes"]- ["Pillalamarri Jayalaxmi vs Smt. Pillalamari Srikalyani - Telangana"]- ["Pillalamarri Jayalaxmi vs Smt. Pillalamari Srikalyani - Telangana"]- ["Pillalamarri Jayalaxmi vs Smt. Pillalamari Srikalyani - Telangana"]- ["IND_BOM0000115965"]
Domestic violence cases under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) can be emotionally charged and legally complex. Many parties wonder: Under which section can we file extra or additional evidence in a domestic violence appeal? This question arises frequently when new facts or proof emerge after the Magistrate's order. While the DV Act prioritizes swift protection for victims, its appeal process under Section 29 leaves evidentiary matters ambiguous. This post breaks down the legal landscape, drawing from key provisions and case law. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Appeals against a Magistrate's orders in DV proceedings lie to the Court of Session under Section 29 of the DV Act. This provision allows both the aggrieved person and the respondent to appeal within 30 days from the service of the order. As per the documents, Section 29 provides for an appeal to the Court of Session against any order passed by the Magistrate under the Act either at the instance of the aggrieved person or the respondent. Shalu Ojha VS Prashant Ojha - 2015 3 Supreme 569
However, the DV Act does not explicitly outline procedures for admitting additional evidence during these appeals. The focus remains on challenging the Magistrate's decision based on the existing record, with no mention of mechanisms for introducing new evidence. Shalu Ojha VS Prashant Ojha - 2015 3 Supreme 569Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi VS Vidhi Rawal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 873
DV Act proceedings are a hybrid, but predominantly civil in nature. Section 28 states that proceedings under Sections 12, 18, 19, 20, etc., are governed by the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) for certain trial stages. Yet, this applies mainly to the Magistrate level, not explicitly to appeals. Kunapareddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji VS Kunapareddy Swarna Kumari - 2016 4 Supreme 481Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi VS Vidhi Rawal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 873
Courts have emphasized this quasi-civil character. For instance, proceedings under the Act are quasi-civil, and a Magistrate has the power to compel voice samples under Section 28(2) in one case involving forensic verification of recorded conversations. Abhijit Ankush Shelke | Ankish Nana Shelke | Sau Bebi @ Nalini Ankush Shelke vs Sau.Shubhangi Abhijit Shelke | Shaurya @ Shambhu Abhijit Shelke - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 1782 This highlights flexibility at trial but doesn't extend to appellate evidence rules.
Section 28(2) allows courts to lay down its own procedure for trials, enabling amendments or affidavits, but appeals remain unaddressed. The Court permitted to lay down its own procedure is noted for trial flexibility, not appeals. Kunapareddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji VS Kunapareddy Swarna Kumari - 2016 4 Supreme 481
No document or provision directly permits filing extra or additional evidence in DV appeals. Evidence discussions are trial-focused:- Affidavits for interim reliefs: He may grant an ex parte order on the basis of the affidavit... of the aggrieved person. Shalu Ojha VS Prashant Ojha - 2015 3 Supreme 569- Sole testimony for breaches under Sections 31/32. Prabha Tyagi VS Kamlesh Devi - 2022 5 Supreme 542- Overall facts/circumstances under Section 3 Explanation II. Indra Sarma VS V. K. V. Sarma - 2013 8 Supreme 122
In appeals, analogies to CrPC (e.g., for trials) don't bridge this gap. DV applications aren't complaints under CrPC Section 2(d), using DV Rules Form VII notices instead. Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi VS Vidhi Rawal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 873 Potential CPC Order XLI Rule 27 (additional evidence in civil appeals) isn't supported by DV-specific texts, as proceedings aren't fully civil. Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi VS Vidhi Rawal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 873
Other rulings reinforce the civil-dominant view without appellate evidence protocols. Proceedings assume criminality only on breach (Section 31) or protection officer failure (Section 33). P. Ganesan VS Revathy Prema Rubarani - 2022 Supreme(Mad) 650
While no case directly answers additional evidence in DV appeals, precedents offer context:
These underscore trial-level evidentiary leeway but appellate restraint. For instance, Sessions Courts reassess trial evidence (e.g., tuition loss at Rs.10,000 restored with proof) without new admissions. Ann Menezes VS Shahajan Mohd.
Given the gaps:- File under Section 29 promptly, arguing on record evidence and broad Section 3 protections (overall facts and circumstances). Indra Sarma VS V. K. V. Sarma - 2013 8 Supreme 122- Seek trial amendments: Courts allow flexibility pre-appeal. Kunapareddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji VS Kunapareddy Swarna Kumari - 2016 4 Supreme 481- Invoke civil nature: Cite cases like Kunapareddy for Sessions discretion. Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi VS Vidhi Rawal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 873- Fresh applications: If new evidence exists, consider separate trial filings.- Full statutes: Review complete DV Act/CrPC/CPC, as excerpts lack details. SANDIP MRINMOY CHAKRABARTY VS RESHITA SANDIP CHAKRABARTY - 2021 Supreme(Bom) 429
Disclaimer: Appellate courts may exercise inherent powers, but success depends on facts. Professional advice is essential.
| Aspect | Details ||--------|---------|| Appeal Section | Section 29 to Sessions Court (30 days). Shalu Ojha VS Prashant Ojha - 2015 3 Supreme 569 || Additional Evidence | No specific provision; trial-focused rules apply. Kunapareddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji VS Kunapareddy Swarna Kumari - 2016 4 Supreme 481 || Nature | Predominantly civil, CrPC for trials only. Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi VS Vidhi Rawal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 873 || Strategy | Rely on record; seek trial fixes. |
In summary, while no underwear section (likely a query typo for under which section) mandates additional evidence in DV appeals, the civil tilt offers potential discretion. Stay informed, act swiftly, and prioritize protection. For tailored guidance, reach out to a legal expert.
References:1. Shalu Ojha VS Prashant Ojha - 2015 3 Supreme 569: Section 29 and procedural limits.2. Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi VS Vidhi Rawal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 873: CrPC debates, hybrid nature.3. Kunapareddy @ Nookala Shanka Balaji VS Kunapareddy Swarna Kumari - 2016 4 Supreme 481: Section 28 trial governance.4. Indra Sarma VS V. K. V. Sarma - 2013 8 Supreme 122: Section 3 evidentiary baseline.5. Additional sources as cited (e.g., Abhijit Ankush Shelke | Ankish Nana Shelke | Sau Bebi @ Nalini Ankush Shelke vs Sau.Shubhangi Abhijit Shelke | Shaurya @ Shambhu Abhijit Shelke - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 1782, Ann Menezes VS Shahajan Mohd.).
#DVActAppeal, #DomesticViolenceLaw, #LegalIndia
In the circumstances, Criminal Appeal No.286/2023 is remanded to the Additional Sessions Court-VIII. ... Under challenge in this Revision Petition is the judgment of the Additional Sessions Court-VIII, Ernakulam, in Crl.Appeal No.286/2023, which appeal was carried from the judgment in M.C.No.43/2022, of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court (E.O), Ernakulam, a proceeding initiated under ... Again, the term 'domestic violence' is defined ....
. — Judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bolangir, in Sessions Case No. 130/B of 1996-97 convicting the appellant under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentencing him to undergo R.I. for life is impugned in this Criminal Appeal. ... 2. ... ... Appeal allowed. ... Rao learned counsel for the appellant chal¬lenged the order of conviction and sentence on the ground that the evidence with regard to extra judicial confession is not at all acceptable and the only other evid....
As per Section 28(2) of domestic violence act, Magistrate has power to follow the procedure for disposal of application under Section 12 of PWDVA Act. There is no provisions to compel the party to the proceedings under domestic violence act to give voice sample. ... When High Court is considering the matter for direction to a person to give voice sample, it is permissible to have recourse to Section 482 of Cr.P.C. (Section 528 of B.N.S.S). Magistrate....
As per Section 28(2) of domestic violence act, Magistrate has power to follow the procedure for disposal of application under Section 12 of PWDVA Act. There is no provisions to compel the party to the proceedings under domestic violence act to give voice sample. ... When High Court is considering the matter for direction to a person to give voice sample, it is permissible to have recourse to Section 482 of Cr.P.C.(Section 528 of B.N.S.S). Magistrate ....
Considering the evidence, the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, partly allowed the application and granted maintenance at the rate of Rs. 2000/- per month to the applicant under Section 20 of the Domestic Violence Act. The order was carried in appeal before the District Court, Akola. ... or under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act. ... A woman, who is married, cannot enter into a domestic relationship as contemplated under ....
On mere perusal of the provisions of Section 27 of the Domestic Violence Act will reflects that any aggrieved person who is temporarily residing or carrying business or is employed within the local limit of the jurisdiction of the Magistrate concerned can file a proceeding under Section 12 of the Domestic ... So far as the territorial jurisdiction of a Magistrate to entertain a petition U/S 12 of the Domestic Violence Act it is relevant to quote the ....
violence as envisaged in Section 3 of the said Act. ... The learned JMFC therefore, considering the ingredients of domestic violence as postulated in Section 3 of The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, reached a conclusion that, in the instance case, all the ingredients of domestic violence were proved. ... However, thereafter, the respondent subjected the petitioner to domestic violence. It is alleged by the petitioner....
violence filed by her. ... Sarkar, learned senior counsel has further submitted that when the Additional Judge, Family Court referred the case relating to domestic violence ... The petitioner in her evidence stated that she filed a case of domestic violence against the respondent the appellant did not generate confidence to lay trust on those evidence. ... That apart, in the cross-examination, the appellant had stated that the case filed by....
302 and Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code. ... Hence this appeal ... ( 3 ) THE prosecution has learned heavily on an extra Judicial confession allegedly made by the appellant on August 5, at about 6 a. m before Hari Ram (Public Witness -2) and on the statement of Som Nath (Public Witness ... In view of the report serologist that the blood found on the underwear was insufficient for grouping, we feel it is a case of much ado about nothing. be relied upon unless corroborated by some other credible evidence#HL_....
This appeal is directed against judgment dated 15-4-2011 passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surguja (Ambikapur) in Sessions Trial No.93/ 2008. ... The evidence of extra-judicial confession, memorandum statement of the appellant and recovery of underwear of the deceased and recovery of the underwear of the appellant at his instance are not of conclusive nature and tendency. ... ... Appeal Allowed. ... In the instant case, the so called extra-j....
Thus, providing visible evidence by the victim of domestic violence may not be easily forthcoming and producing direct evidence may be hard and arduous, which does not necessarily mean that domestic violence does not occur. In fact, to deal with this pernicious phenomenon, stringent statutes like the Protection from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, have been enacted with a very expansive meaning and scope of what amounts to domestic violence. 33. It goes without saying that genuine cases of cruelty and violence in the domestic sphere, which do happen, ought to be handled with u....
33. It goes without saying that genuine cases of cruelty and violence in the domestic sphere, which do happen, ought to be handled with utmost sensitivity. Domestic violence typically happens within the four walls of the house and not in the public gaze. Therefore, such violence is not noticed by the public at large, except perhaps by the immediate neighbours. The purpose and mandate of the law to protect the victims of domestic violence is of paramount importance, and as such, a balance has to be struck by ensuring that while perpetrators are brought to book, all the family members or relat....
Hence, the proceedings cannot be transferred at the instances of Respondents (Respondent is defined in Section 2(q) of the Domestic Violence Act). Provided that an aggrieved wife or female living in a relationship in the nature of a marriage may also file a complaint against a relative of the husband or the male partner;” Section 2(q) of the Domestic Violence Act is extracted hereunder: 2......(q) respondent” means any adult male person who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person and against whom the aggrieved person has sought any relief under....
He submits that the remedy of appeal provided under section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act could have been availed by filing an appeal to the Court of Sessions only if such order on application made by the respondent under the provisions of the said Domestic Violence Act would have been heard by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class and not in case of an order passed by the Family Court. He submits that in this case the said proceedings initially filed by the respondent under section 12 of the said Domestic Violence Act though filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class....
Act enables the court to permit the parties to file affidavit-in-evidence in the proceedings filed under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act. The question in the instant case is whether section 28(2) of the D.V. A cumulative reading of Sub-section (1) of Section 28 r/w. Sub Rule (5) of Rule 6 indicates that in deciding the application under Section 12, the Court has to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 126 of the Cr.P.C. and thus, record evidence in presence of the parties. It is however to be noted that Sub-section (2) of Section 28 clearly provides that-”N....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
