SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Mad) 650

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M. DURAISWAMY, SUNDER MOHAN, JJ.
P. Ganesan & Others – Appellants
Versus
Revathy Prema Rubarani & Others – Respondents
C.R.P.PD (MD) Nos. 909, 896 & 915 of 2021 & Tr.C.M.P.(MD).No. 121 of 2021 & Tr.C.M.P.Nos. 478 & 632 of 2021, C.M.P.(MD)Nos. 5177, 5178, 5026, 5027, 5114, 5116, 2402 of 2021 & C.M.P.Nos. 12676 & 15892 of 2021
Decided on : 12-07-2022

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :I. Robert Chandrakumar, A. Victoria, G. Gokulraj, D. Veda, G. Selvi George, Advocates
For the Respondents:N. Pragalathan, M. Karunanithi, T.K.S. Gandhi, M. Aravindan, Advocates.

Proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are predominantly of civil nature and it is only when there is a breach of the protection order as is contemplated under section 31 and failure or refusal to discharge duty without any sufficient cause by the protection officer as contemplated under section 33, the proceedings assume the character of criminality.

Headnote:

Proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are predominantly of civil nature and it is only when there is a breach of the protection order as is contemplated under section 31 and failure or refusal to discharge duty without any sufficient cause by the protection officer as contemplated under section 33, the proceedings assume the character of criminality.

Fact of the Case:

None

Finding of the Court:

1. Proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are predominantly of civil nature and it is only when there is a breach of the protection order as is contemplated under section 31 and failure or refusal to discharge duty without any sufficient cause by the protection officer as contemplated under section 33, the proceedings assume the character of criminality. 2. Section 468 of Cr.P.C is not applicable for proceedings under Chapter IV of the Domestic Violence Act. 3. In the absence of law prescribing limitation for filing an Application under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act, we cannot, by a judicial exercise, fix the period of limitation in view of the unique nature of the Act. 4. Proceedings under Domestic Violence Act cannot be transferred from a Magistrate to a Civil or Family Court at the instance of the Respondent defined under 2 (q) of the Domestic Violence Act. However, the proceedings can be transferred at the instance of the applicants/ victim or with her consent.

Issues: 1. Whether the proceedings initiated under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act before the Magistrate Courts are Civil proceedings or Criminal proceedings? 2. Assuming that the proceedings are civil in nature, whether the High Court can exercise its power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, in respect of the said proceedings? 3. Whether the provisions of Section 468 of Cr.P.C, are applicable for the proceedings initiated under the Domestic Violence Act? 4. Assuming that Section 468 Cr.P.C, is not applicable, what is the period of limitation for initiating the proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act? 5. Whether the proceedings initiated under the Domestic Violence Act and pending before the Magistrate Court can be transferred to the Civil Court or Family Court, by invoking Article 227 of Constitution of India.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The nature of the proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act is determined by the nature of the rights violated and the appropriate relief which may be claimed. A civil proceeding is one in which a person seeks to enforce by appropriate relief the alleged infringement of his civil rights against another person or the State, and which if the claim is proved would result in the declaration express or implied of the right claimed and relief such as payment of debt, damages, compensation, delivery of specific property, enforcement of personal rights, determination of status etc. 2. The Domestic Violence Act provides for a host of Civil rights and all the Civil rights are to be dealt with by applying the provisions of Criminal Procedure. The reason being obvious that the Parliament wanted to enforce these Civil rights in a more effective and forceful manner. The fear of Criminal Procedure and that of the Magistrate may be an effective tool to enforce the provisions of Domestic Violence Act. 3. The intention of the Legislature clearly appears to provide for a host of Civil rights and all the Civil rights are to be dealt with by applying the provisions of Criminal Procedure. The reason being obvious that the Parliament wanted to provide for an effective and quick remedy in terms of adjudication and in terms of enforcement of the orders.

Final Decision: None

JUDGMENT :

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

(Prayer: C.R.P.PD(MD) No.909 of 2021 : Civil Revision Petition filed Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the records pertaining to the petition in DVC No.26 of 2020 on the file of the against the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli and set aside the same and consequently allow this Revision.

C.R.P.No.PD(MD) No.896 of 2021: Civil Revision Petition filed Article 227 of Constitution of India, to quash the proceedings in D.V.O.P.No.11 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Tirunelveli.

C.R.P.No.PD(MD)No.915 of 2021: Civil Revision Petition filed Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the Petition in DVC No.8 of 2021 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kovilpatti.

Tr.C.M.P.(MD)No.121 of 2021: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 24 of CPC, to withdraw the case in D.V.C.No.32 of 2020 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Cum Additional Mahila Court, Thanjavur and transfer the same to the file of Family Court, Thanjavur.

Tr.C.M.P.No.632 of 2021: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 24 of CPC to withdraw Domestic Violence Case No.26 of 2020 which is pending on the file of 23rd Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Saidapet, Chennai and transfer the same to Ist Additional Family Court, Chennai to be tried along with H.M.O.P.No.3027 of 2020 and H.M.O.P.No.2597 of 2020.)

The Civil Revision Petitions and the Tr. C.M.Ps were listed before us pursuant to the orders of the Hon’ble Chief Justice on a reference made by two of our Learned Brothers Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Subramanian and Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Murali Shankar.

2. Hon’ble Mr.Justice.K. Murali Shankar, by an order dated 27.09.2021 in C.R.P.PD (MD) Nos. 909 and 915 of 2021 has raised the following questions to be answered on reference.

    (i) Whether the proceedings initiated under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act before the Magistrate Courts are Civil proceedings or Criminal proceedings?

(ii) Assuming that the proceedings are civil in nature, whether the High Court can exercise its power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, in respect of the said proceedings?

(iii) Whether the provisions of Section 468 of Cr.P.C, are applicable for the proceedings initiated under the Domestic Violence Act?

(iv) Assuming that Section 468 Cr.P.C, is not applicable, what is the period of limitation for initiating the proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act?

(v) Whether the proceedings initiated under the Domestic Violence Act and pending before the Magistrate Court can be transferred to Civil Court or Family Court, by invoking Article 227 of Constitution of India.?

3. Hon’ble Mr.Justice.R. Subramanian, in his reference made in Tr.C.M.P. No. 478 of 2021 and C.M.P. No. 12676 of 2021 dated 06.12.2021 has observed as follows:

    “In this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition, the husband seeks transfer of proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act pending before the Magistrate to the Family Court to be tried along with HMOP.

2. In Crl.O.P.No.17235 of 2016, the Hon’ble Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira had after concluding that the power under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be used to transfer of proceeding pending before the Magistrate to the Family Court, invoked the power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and transferred the proceedings before the Magistrate to the Family Court. However, subsequently in TR.CMP.SR.No.15785 of 2021, Hon’ble Justice S.M.Subramaniam has held that the power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cannot be invoked for transfer of cases.

3. He further went on to conclude that Section 24 cannot be invoked for transfer of Criminal cases to the Family Court to be tried along with HMOPs or Guardian O.P.s or other matrimonial proceedings.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner also relies upon a judgment of the Hon’ble Justice S.Vaidyanathan in Mohana Seshathri

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon Back to top