Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Certified Copies as Public Documents - Under Section 57 of the Registration Act, copies of registered sale deeds are public documents, and certified copies can be issued by the registration office. These certified copies are admissible as evidence without the need for calling the registrar as a witness ["2021 0 Supreme(Ori) 213"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 1587"].
Proof of Sale Deed Validity - Certified copies of sale deeds, especially registered ones, are recognized as valid secondary evidence to prove the existence, contents, and registration details of the original document. They are considered reliable and sufficient for evidentiary purposes in court ["2021 0 Supreme(Ori) 213"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1112"], ["RAJINDER SINGH Vs ASHOK KUMAR AND ANOTHER - Punjab and Haryana"].
Secondary Evidence and Its Admissibility - Secondary evidence includes certified copies obtained under law, photocopies (when certified), and copies made from the original. Only certified copies are deemed trustworthy for proving the contents of the original documents, especially when the original is unavailable ["RAJINDER SINGH Vs ASHOK KUMAR AND ANOTHER - Punjab and Haryana"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1112"].
Proof of Execution and Genuineness - While certified copies are admissible, the proof of execution (signatures, acknowledgment) must still be established through appropriate legal procedures. The genuineness of documents like sale deeds or wills can be challenged, but certified copies generally suffice unless their authenticity is disputed ["2021 0 Supreme(Ori) 213"], ["2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 11127"], ["2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 651"].
Special Considerations for Wills and Settlement Deeds - Certified copies of wills and settlement deeds, even if not original, are admissible as public documents. The absence of the original does not automatically invalidate the document, provided the certification and registration are proper. The whereabouts of the original need not be explained if the certified copy is properly proved ["RAJINDER SINGH Vs ASHOK KUMAR AND ANOTHER - Punjab and Haryana"], ["2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 651"].
Analysis and Conclusion:Certified copies of sale deeds from the year 1937, when properly issued by the registration office under Section 57 of the Registration Act, are admissible as secondary evidence in legal proceedings. They serve as reliable proof of the existence, registration, and contents of the original sale deeds. To prove such documents in court, the certified copy must be properly issued, and the authenticity of the document can be challenged only on grounds of fraud or forgery, which require further proof. Overall, certified copies are the primary form of secondary evidence accepted for sale deeds and other public documents when the original is unavailable or cannot be produced.
In property disputes, ancient documents like sale deeds from often surface, raising questions about their proof in modern courts. A common query is: of Sale deed in the Year how should Prove in Legal Manner? If you're dealing with legacy property titles, understanding how to admit as evidence is crucial. This post breaks down the legal process under Indian law, drawing from key statutes and precedents. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
of , such as registered sale deeds, qualify as under . These are admissible provided they comply with the , particularly Sections 57 and 76. mandates that public officers with custody of documents issue , signed, dated, and sealed, attesting they are true copies. Once produced, Section 77 presumes their genuineness, while Section 79 assumes accuracy if properly certified. 2005 0 Supreme(SC) 44 2001 2 Supreme 187 1996 2 Supreme 734
Under , registration officers can provide of register entries, deemed admissible to prove original contents if signed and sealed. This framework ensures old documents like sale deeds aren't dismissed solely due to age. 2005 0 Supreme(SC) 44
The vintage of a sale deed doesn't inherently bar its certified copy from evidence. Courts focus on certification quality and foundations. Documents over 30 years old may invoke for presuming —but only for originals from , not copies. must still meet statutory tests. 2023 0 Supreme(Kar) 975 2005 0 Supreme(SC) 44 2001 2 Supreme 187
For instance, the age alone doesn't disqualify if the copy is from a competent officer. Courts have admitted early 20th-century sale deed copies when conditions are met. 2023 0 Supreme(Kar) 103
To prove a certified copy:- It must be issued by an authorized public officer (e.g., Sub-Registrar) with signature, seal, and date. 2005 0 Supreme(SC) 44- Lay a foundation showing the original is lost, destroyed, or unavailable, and the copy comes from . 2023 0 Supreme(Kar) 103 2001 2 Supreme 187 2005 0 Supreme(SC) 44- Courts exercise discretion based on certification credibility and circumstances.
includes per Section 65, as affirmed in cases where originals were absent. In one matter, a defendant filed a certified copy of a sale deed from the District Sub-Registrar after stating the original wasn't in custody, and it was admitted under alongside . 2015 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1187
Another ruling clarifies: means and includes—(1) given under the provisions hereinafter contained... In the absence of , is admissible.
Courts routinely accept properly certified old sale deeds. Precedents emphasize statutory compliance over age. For example, were deemed admissible to evidence transactions when from . 2001 2 Supreme 187
In a 2010 , a defendant used a certified copy of a sale deed obtained from the Sub-Registrar's office, bolstering possession claims since . The court rejected objections, noting 's validity sans original. 2015 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1187
Similarly, of sale deeds were held admissible in court, even amid acquisition disputes, underscoring their evidentiary weight. 2013 6 Supreme 323
These align with broader rulings: age doesn't disqualify if certified correctly, but proof of loss or custody is key. 2005 0 Supreme(SC) 44 2001 2 Supreme 187
Admissibility isn't guaranteed:- Doubtful certification (e.g., missing seal) invites challenges.- Courts may demand proof of original's loss or origin.- Section 90 presumption doesn't extend to copies; originals get it from .
If certification lapses, fails. In unrelated but illustrative contexts, improper documents were scrutinized, reinforcing certification's role. 2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 3723
To strengthen your case:1. Obtain the certified copy from the relevant Sub-Registrar or archival office, ensuring full certification.2. File an affidavit detailing the original's loss/destruction and custody chain.3. Summon the custodian if feasible for verification.4. Cite Sections 65(c), 76-79 (Evidence Act) and 57 (Registration Act) in pleadings.5. Anticipate objections and prepare rebuttals with precedents like those above.
Courts value compliance; discretion favors credible evidence. 2005 0 Supreme(SC) 44
Property litigation often hinges on such proofs. While these principles guide generally, outcomes vary by facts. Seek professional counsel to navigate your specific scenario.
References:1. 2005 0 Supreme(SC) 44: Admissibility under Evidence Act Sections 76,77,79 and Registration Act Section 57.2. 2001 2 Supreme 187: as evidence from .3. 2023 0 Supreme(Kar) 103: Age doesn't disqualify if conditions met.4. 2015 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1187: Practical admission of old certified sale deed.
Last updated: Current as of latest precedents. Not legal advice.
#PropertyLaw, #EvidenceAct, #SaleDeedProof
The saledeed is asserted to be valid and binding on the Plaintiff and his legal heirs/ successors. With all these, the Defendant No.1 has prayed for dismissal of the Suit. 5. ... Thus, the Book in the registration office where copies of sale deeds admitted to registration are made is a public document. Under S.57 of the said Act, authority is given to grant certified copy of an entry in the register. ... This Ext.A being p....
, the defendant has miserably failed to prove that the sale consideration was ever paid by the defendant to the plaintiff while executing the saledeed and that there is a fraud committed by the defendant and there is a breach of trust where by the said saledeed has been executed by the plaintiff in favour ... Moreover, as per the well settled decisions of this Court as well as the Hon'ble Apex Court, the Court ordinary will not interfere wi....
—Secondary evidence means and includes—(1) Certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter contained; (2) Copies made from the original by mechanical The submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that only certified copies can be adduced by way of secondary evidence are bereft of any merit. ... In the absence of primary evidence, secondar....
so certified shall be called certified copies. ... This is the position even in regard to certified copies of entries in Book I under Registration Act relation to a private document copied therein. ... (iii) Production and marking of an original or certified copy of a document does not dispense with the need for proof of execution of the document. Execution has to be proved in a #HL_STA....
But defendant failed to prove the same. In fact the properties in question originally belonged to Heraj, Minaj, Khokon Bibi and Zeratun Bibi and all were tenants of the then zamindar Purna Chandra Trivedi. They defaulted in payment of rent and for which Rent suit 1862/1937 was initiated. ... Said Zamindar Purna Chandra filed a rent suit being no 1862 of 1937 against aforesaid owners for arrear of rent of Rs. 46/-. ... Since the plaintiff fa....
Per contra, the Learned Senior Counsel for the respondents submitted that, the suit properties are the absolute properties of the respondents which they got through a registered Will of the year 1937 and a registered settlement deed of the year 1949. ... The suit was filed by the appellant in the year 2004 suppressing the existence of these two instruments. The certified copy of these two documents were ....
To prove that, he is the son of Thottae Goundar. He had deposed that his father Thottae Goundar died in the year 1986. ... The Will Ex.B.5 is a document of the year 1937 and it may not be fair to expect the attesting witnesses to the will be alive. ... The defendant Nos.2 to 5 are the legal heirs of their predeceased son. 3. ... The suit was filed by the appellant in the year#HL....
The Will Ex.B.5 is a document of the year 1937 and it may not be fair to expect the attesting witnesses to the will be alive. ... The suit was filed by the appellant in the year 2004 suppressing the existence of these two instruments. The certified copy of these two documents were marked by the respondents as Ex.B-1 and Ex.B-5. ... Per contra, the Learned Senior Counsel for the respondents submitted that, the suit properti....
Learned Trial Court and Appellate Court shifted liability on appellant to prove that they have not purchased the disputed property which was liability of respondent No.1 and 2 which they have not complied with. ... As per saledeed, besides share of Kalawati and Sarwati, Ramjilal has also sold his complete share. ... the saledeed, it is clear that there is no mention regarding boundaries of the land neither any map was attached. ... Respon....
of the Act of 1872 and as such certified copies of the deeds are very much admissible in evidence without calling the registrar as witness. ... Therefore to prove the document, certified copy of the deed is admissible. 15. ... Thus, the Book in the registration office where copies of sale deeds admitted to registration are made is a public document. Under S. 57 of the said Act, authority is given to give....
The defendant filed certified copy of saledeed dated 21.08.1944 asserting that the original saledeed is not in his custody. The defendant after obtaining certified copy of saledeed dated 21.08.1944 from the Office of the District Sub-Registrar, Ranchi, filed the same in Title Suit No. 117/2010. The defendant purchased the suit property from the son of Late Sk. Jumman Mian in the year 1996 and since then he is in continuous and peaceful possession over the same.
The certified copies of the said sale deeds are admissible in evidence in court. Even if the allegations against Umesh Kumar, appellant are correct, there could have been a fair enquiry on the said allegations against respondent no.2. However, the State of A.P. discriminated against the appellant and has taken no action whatsoever till today to examine whether the said respondent has acquired disproportionate assets.
The Complainant was shown the certified copies of the purported mutation by the Petitioner and explained as to how BICICO was the legal owner. The BICICO accepted the offer by letter dated 14.06.2005. The Complainant learnt of the offer from the website of BICICO and enquired about it. Induced and encouraged by their version, the Complainant paid Rs.1,00,000/- as earnest money and offered to purchase the entire fixed assets including 90 decimals of free hold land for total co....
Though the applicant has given handsome sales figures in the application but not an iota of invoice has been filed. Mere existence of mark on the register cannot be proof of use of the mark. The Defendant, in the very same typed set of papers, dated 14.11.2009, has also filed the order copy of the IPAB, dated 31.10.2008, as referred to above, in which, in paragraph 19, the IPAB observed as follows, in the application filed by the Plaintiff for rectification of the Register of the Trade Marks, ....
The Defendant, in the very same typed set of papers, dated 14.11.2009, has also filed the order copy of the IPAB, dated 31.10.2008, as referred to above, in which, in paragraph 19, the IPAB observed as follows, in the application filed by the Plaintiff for rectification of the Register of the Trade Marks, which was rejected by the IPAB: 19. ...The applicant has, except copies of trade marks certificates/certified copies for legal use, has not filed a shred of documents to prove or sh....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
