Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Continuous Offence - When an offence is ongoing from October 2023 to August 2025, the applicable penal and procedural laws depend on the specific legal context and jurisdiction. Generally, the law in force at the time of the offence's commission applies, including relevant procedural laws governing investigations, trials, and enforcement ["2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 1434"].
Penal Law Applicability - For criminal offences that are continuous or ongoing, the penal law in effect at the time the offence was committed will apply. If the offence spans multiple periods, the law in force during the initial commission and any subsequent periods may both be relevant, especially if the offence is deemed continuing unlawful activity as defined under specific statutes like the MCOC Act or similar laws ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 4176"].
Procedural Law Applicability - Procedural laws, such as the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) or specific procedural statutes like BNSS 2023, govern the process of investigation, trial, and enforcement. These laws are generally applicable based on the date of the proceedings or the law in force during the initiation of legal action. If proceedings commence during the period of the offence, the procedural law in force at that time typically applies ["2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 544"].
Legal Principle - The law must be actually in force on the date of the offence's commission, not merely deemed to be in force. This principle ensures that the applicable penal and procedural laws are those explicitly in effect when the offence occurred, especially relevant for offences spanning multiple periods ["2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 1434"].
Analysis and Conclusion:In cases where an offence is continuous from October 2023 to August 2025, the applicable penal law is the one in force at the time of the initial commission of the offence. The procedural law applicable is generally the law in force at the time proceedings are initiated or during investigation and trial. If the offence is considered a continuing unlawful activity, laws like the MCOC Act or similar statutes defining such activities will be relevant. Ultimately, the law in force at the time of the offence's commission governs the substantive aspects, while procedural laws depend on the timing of legal proceedings ["2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 1434"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 4176"], ["2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 544"].
India's criminal justice system underwent a major overhaul with the introduction of new laws—the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)—effective from July 1, 2024. This shift replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and Indian Evidence Act. A common query arises: Which Provision will Applicable if the Offence is Committed Prior to 02 07 2024?
If your case involves an offence from before this date, especially one spanning into the new regime like from October 2023 to August 2025, understanding substantive versus procedural law is crucial. This post breaks it down, drawing from legal analyses and precedents to guide you generally on applicability.
The foundational rule is that substantive criminal law—defining the offence and punishment—applies based on the law in force at the time of commission2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 1097. Article 20(1) of the Constitution prohibits ex post facto convictions: The prohibition under Article 20(1) is that no person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act charged as an offence... 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 1097.
This holds even for continuous offences like money laundering, where liability spans periods but ties to the initial act's law unless explicitly retrospective 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 1097 2010 3 Supreme 494.
Procedural law (investigation, trial, appeals) often applies retrospectively, per savings clauses in new laws 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1072 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1540 2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 544. Key scenarios:
Courts affirm procedural laws are retrospective unless stated otherwise, but they don't alter accrued substantive rights 2022 0 Supreme(Telangana) 396. In a Prevention of Corruption Act case, amended sanction requirements didn't apply retrospectively to pre-amendment offences, as they imposed new obligations 2022 0 Supreme(Telangana) 396. Similarly, for SC/ST Act offences pre-amendment, prior provisions governed 2019 0 Supreme(Guj) 205.
For offences from October 2023 to August 2025:
Continuous offences treat the continuum as one, governed by the law at initiation, but courts dissect for changes 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 1097.
Procedural shifts don't override substantive protections. In POCSO cases, once a victim turns 18, child-specific procedures (e.g., Section 33(2)) cease, shifting to general CrPC norms, as protections are tied to 'child' status at relevant times
Jasaram Pander VS State of Rajasthan
. This underscores procedural flexibility post-status change.In seizure matters, powers under old CrPC Section 102 require crime linkage at seizure time; mere suspicion fails 2024 0 Supreme(Telangana) 1031. For bank guarantees or civil executions, procedural compliance like CPC Section 44A enables parallel enforcement without retrospectivity issues 2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6917.
These reinforce: Substantive law locks at commission; procedures adapt via transitions 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1072 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1540.
Ashish Singh VS State of M. P.
.Courts urge examining specific clauses: Procedural laws generally have retrospective operation unless explicitly stated otherwise 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1072.
| Aspect | Pre-July 2024 Offence | Spanning Offences ||--------|-----------------------|-------------------|| Substantive | IPC in force then 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 1097 | Per act's date || Procedural | Transitional (e.g., BNSS post-FIR) 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1072 | Stage-dependent || Continuous | Initial law primary 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 1097 | Dissect if needed |
In summary, pre-July 2, 2024 offences generally follow IPC substantively, with BNSS procedures via transitions 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1072. This balances continuity and reform.
Disclaimer: This is general information based on analyses 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1072 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 1097 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1540 2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 544; not legal advice. Seek professional guidance.
Jasaram Pander VS State of Rajasthan
: Procedural shifts post-status change.
June 19, 2025: The Sharjah Court of Appeal overruled the October 9, 2024 Correction, affirming the Decree’s validity and binding nature on all Judgment Debtors. xvi. ... In terms of the compliance necessitated by Indian law, the Decree Holder has complied with the procedural requirements prescribed under Section 44A of the CPC by furnishing certified copies of the Decree, as well as no-satisfaction certif....
Therefore, the legislatures felt that the existing legal framework i. e. the penal and procedural laws and the adjudicatory system was found to be rather inadequate to curb or control the mense of organised crime, therefore, the special law was enacted with stringent and deterrent provisions including ... On the basis of the said report, the Police have registered the crime vide Crime No. 194/2025. Initially, crime was reg....
While the age of the victim at the time of the alleged offence indisputably governs the substantive applicability of the POCSO Act —including the classification of the offence and the corresponding penal consequences — the procedural regimen applicable to trial proceedings is calibrated with reference ... of the offence. ... It is imperative to draw a principled distinction between the substantive and #HL....
Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 14-May-2025 18:57:31 20. Furthermore, the levy and capitalisation of penal interest were contrary to law as laid down in Ravindra (supra) and in violation of the RBI Circular dated 18.08.2023. ... The Petitioner expressly accepted the phased reduction of the credit limit as recorded in the sanction letter dated 14.12.2023. The said communication clearly stated ....
Furthermore, the levy and capitalisation of penal interest were contrary to law as laid down in Ravindra (supra) and in violation of the RBI Circular dated 18.08.2023. 21. Accordingly, both the Writ Petitions are allowed. ... The Petitioner expressly accepted the phased reduction of the credit limit as recorded in the sanction letter dated 14.12.2023. The said communication clearly stated that the limit would be reduced t....
Furthermore, the levy and capitalisation of penal interest were contrary to law as laid down in Ravindra (supra) and in violation of the RBI Circular dated 18.08.2023. 21. Accordingly, both the Writ Petitions are allowed. ... The Petitioner expressly accepted the phased reduction of the credit limit as recorded in the sanction letter dated 14.12.2023. The said communication clearly stated that the limit would be reduced t....
Consequently, the appropriate criminal code for the penal offenses committed under penal statutes, including under the BNS, 2023, from July 01, 2023, is BNSS, 2023, and the petitions that are filed for these incidents under the provisions of the CrPC, 1973, are just like flogging a dead horse and cannot ... [73] BNSS 2023 is admittedly a procedural law#HL_END....
The apex court holds that law must actually be in force on the date of commission of the offence and not deemed to be in force. It further holds that the object of article 20 of the Constitution is law in force, actually in force and not a law deemed to be in force. ... An agreement had been entered into on August 1, 1936 for carrying on diamond mining operation for 15 years. ... Therefore, as on the date....
But the High Court must see whether a dispute which is essentially of a civil nature is given a cloak of criminal offence. ... The inquiry shall specifically examine whether there was any wilful non-compliance with the order dated 28.03.2025 passed by this Court, and whether procedural safeguards under the applicable law were duly followed. ... ingredients of the penal offences alleged. ....
He claimed he had sneaked into Hong Kong on 27 August 2023 and made a non-refoulement claim by written signification dated 31 August 2023 (the “previous claim”). His previous claim was rejected by the Director’s Notice of Decision dated 15 November 2023 (the “2023 Notice”). ... This is the Applicant’s application by Form 86 filed on 27 August 2025#HL....
The defendant was incurring huge financial losses due to non-delivery of goods as the material movement planning was done by considering June, 2023 as date for completion of delivery. By reason of the failure of the plaintiff to confirm the delivery date or extend the advance bank guarantee the appellant/defendant would be compelled to invoke the bank guarantee. In view of the fact that the appellant had invested considerable time and resources in procuring the supply from the plaintiff and ow....
It was the duty of the Court to ensure that the property seized by the Police cannot be retained in the custody of the Police or the Court for a longer period. The property seized by the Police can be released to the person who is lawfully entitled to claim it or from whom it was seized, when no complaint was registered by the Police subsequently also, altering the section of law from Section 102 of Cr.P.C. to any penal offence. Section 102 of Cr.P. 13. However, as no cognizable offence was ma....
The rule regarding retrospective application of procedural laws is not absolute. In other words, if the amended procedural law affects the substantive rights, obligations, liabilities, privileges, protections of the parties, the same will apply retrospectively. The Supreme Court has time and again held that a procedural law will not apply retrospectively if such procedural law affects the already accrued rights, liabilities and interests of the parties.
The alleged offence is of 12.6.2017, which is prior to the amendment of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. This being a substantive and penal law, provisions prevailing as on the date of the offence will apply. Without discussing the evidence in detail, at this stage, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the appellant.
Where an act is an offence under a specific law and such an offence can also be punished under that specific law that law then general law would not apply and this is the principle laid down in Section 5 Penal Code. So it is settled position in law that a special law shall prevail over the general and prior laws. The principle expressed in the maxim generalia special bus non-derogant would apply which means that if a special provision has been made on a certain matter, that m....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.