IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Budi Habung, J.
Sanjit Kar S/o Shyama Pada Kar - Petitioner
Vs.
The State Of AP represented through Public Prosecutor - Respondent
AB No. 102 of 2024
Decided On : 19-07-2024
Bail - Pre-Arrest Bail - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 531(2)(a), 438 of Cr.P.C - The Court interpreted the saving clause in Section 531(2)(a) of BNSS, determining that pending applications must be governed by the old Cr.P.C, leading to the decision to treat the bail application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought pre-arrest bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 for an offence registered before its enforcement. The FIR was lodged prior to the BNSS coming into force, raising jurisdictional issues regarding the applicable law.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the FIR was registered before the BNSS came into effect, thus the case should be governed by the provisions of the Cr.P.C, 1973, specifically Section 438, not Section 482 of the BNSS.
Issues: Whether the bail application should be filed under Section 482 of the BNSS or Section 438 of the Cr.P.C given the timing of the FIR registration.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the saving clause in Section 531(2)(a) of the BNSS mandates that pending applications and investigations prior to its enforcement must be dealt with under the old Cr.P.C.
Result: The objection was sustained, and the petition was treated under Section 438 of Cr.P.C for pre-arrest bail.
ORDER :
Heard Mr. N. Ray, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
2. At the very outset, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, raised objection against the filing of this bail application under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking pre arrest bail in the offence committed and registered before 01.07.2024. It is submitted that since the alleged offence was committed and the case was registered prior to the enforcement of the new BNSS, the petition ought to have been filed under section 438 of Cr.P.C and not under 482 of the BNSS,2023.
3. The cause title of this anticipatory bail read as under:
4. However, on perusal of available record, it appears that on receipt of the written FIR lodged by the informant on 02.12.2023, by the Officer-In-Charge, Police Station Namsai, District Namsai, Arunachal Pradesh; a case was registered being Namsai, P.S. Case No. 71/2023 under Section 354A of IPC. On perusal of the above FIR clearly reveals that the FIR was registered on 02.12.2023 i.e., prior to coming into force of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) which came into force w.e.f., 01.07.2024.
5. In this regard, in view of the saving clause contained under Section 531(2) (a) of the BNSS, the petition ought to have been filed under the old corresponding Section 438 of Cr.P.C, 1973 and not under Section 482 of the Code, BNSS.
6. For ready reference the entire Section 531 of BNSS is reproduced hereinbelow:
(1) The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) is hereby repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal—
(a) if, immediately before the date on which this Sanhita comes into force, there is any appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation pending, then, such appeal, application, trial, inquiry or investigation shall be disposed of, continued, held or made, as the case may be, in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), as in force immediately before such commencement (hereinafter referred to as the said Code), as if this Sanhita had not come into force;
(b) all notifications published, proclamations issued, powers conferred, forms provided by rules, local jurisdictions defined, sentences passed and orders, rules and appointments, not being appointments as Special Magistrates, made under the said Code and which are in force immediately before the commencement of this Sanhita, shall be deemed, respectively, to have been published, issued, conferred, specified, defined, passed or made under the corresponding provisions of this Sanhita;
(c) any sanction accorded or consent given under the said Code in pursuance of which no proceeding was commenced under that Code, shall be deemed to have been accorded or given under the corresponding provisions of this Sanhita and proceedings may be commenced under this Sanhita in pursuance of such sanction or consent.
(3) Where the period specified for an application or other proceeding under the said Code had expired on or before the commencement of this Sanhita, nothing in this Sanhita shall be construed as enabling any such application to be made or proceeding to be commenced under this Sanhita by reason only of the fact that a longer period therefor is specified by this Sanhita or provisions are made in this Sanhita for the extension of time.”
7. In the instant case, we are concerned with the saving clause contained in Sub Section 531(2)(a) BNSS. A perusal of the said Sub Section 531(2)(A), it clearly reflects that not only the pending trial/appeal, but even an application, inquiry, or investigation which is pending prior to coming into force of the
The court established that pending matters under the CrPC, 1973, are preserved by the BNSS, 2023, while new incidents post-enactment must adhere to the BNSS.
The court ruled that bail applications filed after the BNSS's enforcement for FIRs registered before its enactment must comply with the BNSS provisions, emphasizing the retrospective application of p....
The savings clause in Section 531(2)(a) of the BNSS ensures that ongoing investigations initiated under the Cr.P.C. prior to the enactment of the BNSS are governed by the old law, thereby maintaining....
(1) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Section 531(2)(a) – Not only pending trial / appeal, but even an inquiry and/or investigation, which is underway prior to coming into force of BNSS, sha....
The repeal of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, effective from 01.07.2024, mandates that all new petitions must be filed under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
The repeal of the Cr.P.C. led to the dismissal of petitions filed under it after the enactment of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, emphasizing that future filings must comply with the ne....
Court affirmed closure of bail application post-investigation referral.
Pre-arrest bail application is maintainable even for newly added non-bailable offences against already bailed individuals under certain conditions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.