Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Pushpa Kejriwal VS Om Prakash Kejriwal - Current Civil Cases
When a family member passes away, their final Will is often the primary document guiding the distribution of assets. However, what happens if that document is challenged in court? A common legal question that arises in and succession disputes is whether the person presenting the Will—the —is legally obligated to provide evidence to prove its validity.
The short answer is yes. The legal system places a significant onus on the to establish the Will’s authenticity. It is not enough to simply produce the document; the must prove, through clear and satisfactory evidence, that the Will was executed according to the law.
In Indian succession law, the validity of a Will is not assumed upon presentation. Because the testator is no longer present to verify their intentions, the law requires strict proof to prevent fraud or undue influence.
The has consistently held that the person propounding a Will must prove its and 1957 0 Supreme(SC) 42. The burden does not shift to the contesting parties until the has established the essential facts. This is rooted in the combination of and 1957 0 Supreme(SC) 42 and 2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11479.
As famously articulated in the landmark Constitution Bench judgment of H. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N. Thimmajamma, the is required to show by satisfactory evidence that:* The Will was signed by the testator.* The testator was, at the time of execution, in a .* The testator understood the nature and effect of the dispositions and signed the document of their own free will 1957 0 Supreme(SC) 42 and 2021 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 141.
Proving a Will requires more than just verifying the testator's signature. According to , if a Will is required by law to be attested, it cannot be used as evidence until at least one attesting witness has been called to prove its execution, provided such a witness is alive and capable of giving evidence 1957 0 Supreme(SC) 42 and 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 3968.
The , mirroring the Supreme Court's stance, has repeatedly confirmed that the mandate under regarding must be established by the 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 173. Merely presenting the document is insufficient. Courts have emphasized that the must demonstrate that the attestations were made properly as required by law 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 2365.
Even in cases where the defendants remain (meaning they do not appear or file a written statement to contest the case), the is not automatically relieved of their burden. The Supreme Court has clarified that the statutory burden remains on the plaintiff to prove the Will as per ; they cannot simply take advantage of the defendant's absence 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 372.
A significant aspect of this legal burden involves . When a Will is shrouded in doubt—perhaps due to the testator's advanced age, a shaky signature, an unnatural disposition of assets, or the taking an active and prominent role in the Will's execution—the burden of proof becomes even heavier 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 3 and 2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 1831.
In such instances, the must not only prove the Will's execution but must also proactively remove all legitimate suspicions from the conscience of the court 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 173 and 2008 0 Supreme(P&H) 28. If the fails to dispel these doubts with cogent and satisfactory evidence, the court may refuse to grant probate or recognize the Will's validity 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 173 and 2021 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 141.
The law provides practical pathways if witnesses cannot be produced. While Section 68 mandates the examination of at least one attesting witness, the legal system acknowledges that circumstances can make this impossible, such as if the witnesses have passed away or are otherwise incapacitated.
In such scenarios, a may resort to , which allows for proving the handwriting of the executant and the attesting witnesses by other means 2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 490. Furthermore, the courts are not powerless if witnesses turn hostile or deny the execution; the court may look to other independent evidence, including testimony from the registrar or other circumstantial evidence, to determine whether the Will was properly attested 1957 0 Supreme(SC) 42 and 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 372.
If you are involved in a proceeding to prove a Will, keep the following legal principles in mind:
While the rules surrounding the proof of Wills are stringent, they are designed to protect the true intentions of the testator. Whether one is a or an objector, understanding that the burden of proof rests firmly on the is the first step in navigating the probate process.
This information is provided for general guidance and does not constitute formal legal advice. Succession laws are highly fact-specific; always consult with a qualified legal professional regarding your particular circumstances.
#IndianLaw #SuccessionAct #LegalAwareness #ProbateLaw
Drolia has relied on a judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court reported in AIR 1955 SC 566 in the case of Anil Behari Ghosh (Supra) and another judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Kaikhushru Jehangir vs. ... He also places reliance on a judgment delivered by the Orissa High Court in the case of Bishnupriya Mohapatra and Others vs. ... We find that the learned judge has also rightly held that it is not mandatory for propounder to ....
Drolia has relied on a judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court reported in AIR 1955 SC 566 in the case of Anil Behari Ghosh (Supra) and another judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Kaikhushru Jehangir v. ... He also places reliance on a judgment delivered by the Orissa High Court in the case of Bishnupriya Mohapatra and Others v. ... We find that the learned judge has also rightly held that it is not mandatory for propounder to ca....
/law/IND_MP_18721">Indian Evidence Act , 1872, requires the propounder to examine at least one attesting witness in order to prove the execution of the Will. ... /law/IND_MP_18721">Indian Evidence Act , 1872, is available to the court to compare the signature, it has been consistently held by the Supreme Court that the said power must be sparingly used. ... On 30.5.2017, this Court admitted the appeals and framed the following substantial question of....
A Will may be surrounded by suspicious circumstances and the burden is on the propounder of the Will not only to prove the document but to remove all the suspicious circumstances. The Supreme Court in the case of H. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N. ... The Supreme Court in the case of Gorantla Thataiah v. Thotakura Venkata Subbaiah and others, reported in AIR 1968 SC 1332, has held as it is for those who propound the Will to prove the same.16. The Supreme#HL_END....
A Will may be surrounded by suspicious circumstances and burden is on the propounder of the Will not only to prove the document but to remove all the suspicious circumstances. The Supreme Court in the case of H. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N. ... The Supreme Court in the case of Murthy and others v. C. ... In terms of Section 63(c), Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68, Evidence Act, 1872, the propounder of a Will must prove its execut....
The burden is on the propounder to prove the Will by removing all suspicious circumstances. ... to be finally arrived at on the disputed issue. ... It may, however, be stated generally that a propounder of the will has to prove the due and valid execution of the will and that if there are any suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of the will the propounder must remove the said suspicions from the mind of the Court by cogent and satisfactory ... Ordinarily....
The Supreme Court in the case of Murthy and others v. C. ... The Supreme Court in the case of Bharpur Singh and others v. ... In terms of Section 63(c), Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68, Evidence Act, 1872, the propounder of a Will must prove its execution by examining one or more attesting witnesses and propounder of Will must prove that the Will was signed by the testator in a sound and disposing state of mind duly understandin....
Taking guidance from the afore stated law, this Court finds that the Will being a unique document, the burden to prove the Will is on the propounder. The propounder is not only required to prove the Will, but is also required to dispel any suspicious circumstance. ... The same has been elaborately laid down by Supreme Court in the case of in H. Venkatachala Iyengar vs. B.N. Thimmajamma and others , 1959 AIR (Supreme Court) 443 laid....
The First Appellate Court relied upon the judgment of our High Court reported in 2010 3 LW 282 to arrive at a finding that when the projected Will is not disputed, it is not necessary to prove the Will by examining the attestors. ... The propounder of the Will cannot wriggle out of this burden just because the Will has not been disputed by other side. ... The First Appellate Court had relied upon the judgment of our High C....
This court as well as the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the long line of decisions has enumerated the principles wherefrom the suspicious circumstances can be drawn up. In the instant case, I do not find any such circumstances unnatural to doubt the integrity of the Will. ... deficiencies to prove the contents of the Will. ... They allowed the propounder of the Will to bring it into evidence without raising any objection against any part of the Will. ... What is more important, that the #HL....
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties in this appeal shall be referred to in terms of their status and ranking before the Trial Court. The propounder of a Will must prove its validity when disputed, as per Section 69 of the Evidence Act. (E.S. Indiresh, J.) This appeal is filed by the plaintiff challenging the judgment and decree dated 03rd December, 2019 passed in Regular Appeal No.23 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Basavana Bagewadi (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'First Appellate Court'), dismissing the appeal and confirming the ....
That cannot be done by simply proving that the signature of the Will was that of the testator but must also prove the attestation were also made properly as required by Clause (c) of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act. It is true that Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act does not say that both or all the attesting witnesses must be examined. In that case the Supreme Court held that the propounder has got to prove that the Will was duly and validly executed.
It is held that a propounder of the Will has to prove the due and valid execution of the Will and that if there are any suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of the Will, the propounder must remove the said suspicions from the mind of the court by cogent and satisfactory evidence. It is held that if a propounder himself takes a prominent part in the execution of the Will which confer on them substantial benefits, that itself is generally treated as a suspicions circumstances attending the execution of the Will and the propounder is require to remove the said su....
In view of categorical and unimpeachable evidence of attesting witnesses S.S.Butalia and Sukhbir Singh the inescapable conclusion which emerges is that Will Ex.T-D2/D1 was executed by the deceased out of his own free will and in a state of sound disposing mind. Vs. Subodh Kumar Banerjee it was held by the Supreme Court that the propounder of a holographic Will is only required to formally prove the Will and very little evidence is required to prove due execution and attestation of the Will. In the decision reported as AIR 1964 SC 529 Shashi Kumar Banerjee & Ors. In the inst....
That inevitably would be a question of fact in each case. Thus, a propounder of the Will has to prove the due and valid execution of the Will and that if there are any suspicious circumstances surrounding the execution of the Will, the propounder must remove the said suspicious from the mind of the Court by cogent and satisfactory evidence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
