Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Cognizance of Offences by Designated Court - Under Section 27 of the BUDS Act, only the regulator's complaint can initiate proceedings; courts other than the designated Court lack jurisdiction to take cognizance of offences under the Act. The designated Court's authority to proceed is contingent upon a written complaint by the regulator, not private individuals ["2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 8157"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 26672"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 38506"].
Private Complaints and Proceedings - Several sources clarify that while the primary requirement for initiating proceedings under the BUDS Act is a complaint by the regulator, courts have recognized that proceedings initiated on private complaints can be valid if supported by sufficient prima facie evidence. However, such proceedings are generally subject to the jurisdiction and procedures of the designated Court, and the Act emphasizes the regulator's role in complaint filing ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 26672"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 38506"].
Role of the Designated Court - The Act establishes designated courts (Section 8) with exclusive jurisdiction over offences related to unregulated deposit schemes, including the power to try offences, pass orders, and confirm attachments. Appeals against orders of the designated Court are limited to specific orders under Chapter V (Section 19) and are not generally entertainable by other courts ["2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4579"].
Filing Private Complaints vs. Official Complaints - While the BUDS Act mandates that cognizance should be based on complaints from the regulator, courts have acknowledged that private complaints can sometimes serve as a basis for proceedings, provided they are supported by evidence and the case falls within the jurisdiction of the designated Court. Nonetheless, the primary and preferred route remains through the regulator's complaint ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 26672"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 38506"].
Summary and Conclusion - A Private Complaint can technically be filed and considered under the BUDS Act if it is supported by sufficient evidence and if proceedings are initiated before the designated Court. However, the Act explicitly states that only the regulator's complaint can initiate proceedings for offences under the Act, emphasizing the role of the designated Court as the exclusive forum. Therefore, while private complaints are not barred per se, the primary and statutory route is through the regulator's complaint filed before the designated Court ["2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 8157"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 26672"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 38506"].
In conclusion:A Private Complaint can be filed under the BUDS Act, but only the designated Court has jurisdiction to take cognizance of offences, and such proceedings are ideally initiated through the regulator's complaint. Private complaints may be entertained if supported by evidence, but the Act emphasizes the regulator's role as the primary initiator of proceedings.
In an era where lure unsuspecting investors with promises of high returns, victims often seek swift legal recourse. A common question arises: Can a private complaint be filed under the , directly before the ? This post delves into the legal framework, key judgments, and practical steps, helping you understand your options.
The BUDS Act aims to ban and protect depositors from fraudulent practices. It empowers competent authorities to provisionally attach properties linked to such schemes and seek confirmation from the under Section 8. Proceedings typically involve government-initiated actions like attachments under Section 7 and confirmations under Section 14. 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 813
Private individuals, however, may wonder if they can bypass authorities and file complaints directly. The Act's structure suggests otherwise, emphasizing official enforcement.
Based on analyzed legal documents, there is no explicit provision in the BUDS Act allowing directly in the . Proceedings are initiated by the through official processes, such as provisional attachments and applications for confirmation or sale. Private individuals lack standing to file such complaints. 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 813 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 750
The Act establishes a regulatory framework where the state acts against deposit takers. Processes include orders, confirmation applications, and property sales— all triggered by authorities. For instance, proceedings under the BUDS Act are initiated and conducted by the and the primarily through official, government-initiated processes. 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 813
The court's function is procedural: confirming attachments and approving sales based on authority applications. Challenges to provisional orders are deemed premature, as the proceedings are initiated by the authority, not private individuals. 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 813
Documents lack any mention of private filings. Enforcement remains with government bodies, limiting individuals to reporting violations.
Several judgments reinforce this authority-centric approach, integrating seamlessly with BUDS procedures:
These cases consistently show private parties pursuing remedies within authority-initiated frameworks, not starting proceedings independently.
While direct are unsupported:- Reporting to Authorities: Victims should report to the , who can initiate attachments. 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 813- Other Legal Avenues: Civil suits or general criminal complaints under (e.g., Sections 406, 420) may apply outside BUDS. 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 400- Directions: In some instances, courts direct authorities or police, but not private BUDS filings. 2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 13909
No documents suggest private prosecutions akin to cases, where complaints follow statutory notices. 2013 0 Supreme(AP) 401
Arrakuntal V. Ganeshan VS Sai Rama Cotton Syndicate
Consult a legal professional for case-specific advice, as this is general information.
Under the BUDS Act, cannot be filed directly before the —enforcement is reserved for competent authorities. This protects systemic action against widespread schemes but may frustrate individuals. Key takeaway: Report promptly to authorities for official proceedings. Future amendments might expand private roles, but currently, collaborate with the state.
Disclaimer: This post provides general insights based on reviewed documents and is not legal advice. Laws evolve; seek qualified counsel for your situation.
This is an appeal filed under Section 19 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes (BUDS) Act, 2019. The appellants challenge Annexure A9 order of the Special Court, Thrissur. ... Court for making the provisional attachment absolute, and for permission to sell the property so attached by public auction or, if necessary, by private sale.” ... Section 14(1) of the BUDS#HL_END....
As per Section 27 of BUDS Act, no designated Court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under the said section, except upon a complaint made by the regulator. ... No Courts other than the designated Court shall have the jurisdiction in respect of any matters to which the provision of the BUDS Act apply. While trying the offe....
As per Section 27 of BUDS Act, no designated Court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under the said section, except upon a complaint made by the regulator. ... No Courts other than the designated Court shall have the jurisdiction in respect of any matters to which the provision of the BUDS Act apply. While trying the offe....
The learned Government Pleader submitted that, in view of Section 13 r/w Section 18 of the BUDS Act, the petitioner’s remedy is to approach the Designated Court for the redressal of her grievances. ... P3 reply, the petitioner was directed to approach the Designated Court. The offence committed under Section 4 of the BUDS Act, without previous sanction....
Further, the appeal provided under Section 19 against the final order of the designated court constituted as per Section 8 of the Act is only in respect of an order passed by the designated court under Chapter V of the BUDS Act. ... The defacto complainant relying on Sections 8, 19 and 34 of the BUDS Act would contend that this #HL_....
In the proceedings initiated against the petitioners under the BUDS Act, Annexure A5 order under Section 7(3) of the Act was issued. That order lapsed as it was not placed for confirmation before the Designated Court within the stipulated time. ... There being merit in the submission of the Public Prosecutor, the Crl.M.C. is disposed of by directing the District and Sessions Court-III, ....
Once the order is passed and the procedure under Section 14 of the BUDS Act is complied, the rest of the remedy lies before the Designated Court and the Designated Court can pass appropriate orders invoking Section 15(3) of the BUDS Act either by making attachment absolute, or varying it by releasing ... BUDS Act. ......
Once the order is passed and the procedure under Section 14 of the BUDS Act is complied, the rest of the remedy lies before the Designated Court and the Designated Court can pass appropriate orders invoking Section 15(3) of the BUDS Act either by making attachment absolute, or varying it by releasing ... BUDS Act. ......
After getting clarification from the designated court, Annexure 9 order was passed directing the court below to reconsider petitioner’s application as one filed under the provisions of the BUDS Act. ... Competent Authority under the BUDS Act. ... Therein, a doubt had arisen as to whether the vehicles were seized/attached in accordance with the provisi....
No.391/2023 in crime No.42/2023 of Thrissur East Police Station passed by the Designated Court (Additional Sessions Court-III, Thrissur) constituted under Section 8 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BUDS Act’). ... The learned Public Prosecutor further contended that the course open to the petitioner is to approach the Designat....
(2) The 'competent authority' under the BUDS Act shall exercise its powers under Section 7(3) of the BUDS Act by provisionally attaching the deposits held by the deposit takers either in their name or in the name of any other person on their behalf either independently or jointly, including all the properties which are under attachment under the provisions of KPID Act and all other assets directly or indirectly connected with the various firms run by respondent No.7 to 14 either independently ....
Making reference to the judgment of this Court in W.P. (Cr.) No.112/2015 between Smt. Achla D. Sapre Vs. Smt. Asha Mahilkar (Rajput) and Anr. decided on 25.02.2016, it is submitted that Section 14 of the amended Act, 1989, provides that Special Court can directly take cognizance in the cases of commission of offence under the Act, 1989. Act, 1989, the complaint can be directly filed before the Special Court. However, in the present scenario, after the amendment in SC/ST (Prev....
It is the discretion of the Magistrate either under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., to direct the Police to undertake investigation or under Section 200 Cr.P.C., he himself can enquire the complaint. There is no provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure for filing a petition under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Actually, a (private) complaint has to be filed before the Magistrate.
The said cheques, when presented, were returned due to insufficient funds. After complying with legal requirements as contemplated under the provisions of the Act, a private complaint came to be filed against the accused.
After complying with legal requirements as contemplated under the provisions of the Act, a private complaint came to be filed against the accused. The said cheques, when presented, were returned due to insufficient funds.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
