Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Analysis and Conclusion:The overarching principle is that central legislation and notifications hold primacy unless specific constitutional provisions permit state laws to prevail. Notifications issued under central laws are subordinate and require proper publication and adherence to statutory procedures. State amendments or notifications cannot extend beyond their legal scope without explicit constitutional authority, and their enforceability depends on proper legislative or constitutional compliance. Therefore, in the absence of a valid notification or constitutional backing, no state law or notification can override or operate beyond the scope of central law ["Sri Sushil Kumar Singh vs Sri Gaurav Mehrotra - Allahabad"] ["Raman Sahni VS State of U. P. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko - Crimes"].
In India's diverse legal landscape, Scheduled Areas—home to indigenous tribal communities—operate under special constitutional protections. A common question arises: no state notification or legislation will central law apply? In other words, does a central law automatically extend to these areas without explicit state-level action? This blog post dives deep into the legal framework, judicial interpretations, and practical implications, drawing from authoritative sources. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice; consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Scheduled Areas, notified under the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, are regions predominantly inhabited by Scheduled Tribes, primarily in states like Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan, and others. These areas enjoy safeguards to preserve tribal autonomy, land rights, and customs.
The Fifth Schedule, particularly Paragraph 5, empowers the Governor to regulate the application of laws. It states: Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, the Governor may by public notification direct that any particular Act of Parliament or of the Legislature of the State shall not apply to a Scheduled Area or shall apply with modifications... Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action VS Union of India - 2023 3 Supreme 761. This provision establishes that laws do not automatically apply; explicit direction is required. Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action VS Union of India - 2023 3 Supreme 761
Without such a notification, central laws remain inapplicable, protecting tribal interests from external impositions. This principle ensures that legislative overreach is checked, aligning with constitutional federalism.
The settled legal position is clear: in the absence of a specific notification or legislation issued by the Governor or relevant authority applying a central law to a Scheduled Area, the central law does not automatically apply.Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action VS Union of India - 2023 3 Supreme 761.
This framework distinguishes Scheduled Areas from mainstream regions, preventing unintended erosion of tribal protections.
Paragraph 5 explicitly vests directive powers in the Governor: laws apply only if directed via public notification. This contrasts with general constitutional application, creating a protective buffer. The default is non-application unless overridden. Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action VS Union of India - 2023 3 Supreme 761
In this Supreme Court ruling, the Court reinforced that the applicability of laws to Scheduled Areas hinges on notifications or laws made by the competent authority, and the absence of such notifications means laws do not apply. Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action VS Union of India - 2023 3 Supreme 761. This decision quashed assumptions of automatic extension, emphasizing procedural compliance.
The Fifth Schedule evolves from the Government of India Act, 1935 (Section 92), which also required notifications. However, the Constitution strengthens Governor oversight, ensuring explicit actions for modern laws like the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA). Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action VS Union of India - 2023 3 Supreme 761
Similar principles echo in other domains where notifications determine law applicability, highlighting a broader pattern in Indian jurisprudence.
These cases illustrate that notifications are pivotal across central-state interfaces, reinforcing the Scheduled Areas rule.
In practice, invoking a central law (e.g., forest acts or land acquisition laws) in Scheduled Areas demands proof of Governor's notification. Absence invites legal challenges, often succeeding. The burden lies on authorities to publish accessible notifications. Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action VS Union of India - 2023 3 Supreme 761
Understanding these nuances is crucial for compliance in tribal regions. For tailored advice, engage legal experts familiar with constitutional law.
References:1. Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action VS Union of India - 2023 3 Supreme 761 - Core analysis on Scheduled Areas notifications.2. Confederation of Real Estate Developers Association of India (Credai) VS Union of India - 2025 Supreme(SC) 1683 - EIA notification principles.3. MECON Indraprastha Sahakari Avas Samiti Ltd. through its Secretary and Another v. State of U. P. through Principal Secretary Cooperative Development and Others - 2016 Supreme(Online)(All) 55 - Central law extensions.4. All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam VS Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 1195, All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, Represented by C. Ve. Shanmugam, District Secretary, Villupuram VS Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 824 - Reservation competence.5. Superintendent of Post Offices VS Regional Labour Commissioner - 2016 Supreme(Ker) 765 - Gratuity Act applicability.
#ScheduledAreas #FifthSchedule #TribalLaw
S.24 of Act, 1897 will not apply in the cases of 'State amendments', introduced in Central Legislation with respect to entries in List - III of Schedules 7th of Constitution of India. ... prevails over Parliamentary legislation or an existing law within that State. ... , the notification dated 16.7.2024, would have no bearing regarding continuation or enforceability of the State Legislation i.e. ... x) The only ex....
24 of Act 1897 will not apply in the cases of ‘State amendments’, introduced in Central Legislation with respect to entries in List-III of Schedules 7th of Constitution of India. ... over Parliamentary legislation or an existing law within that State. ... , the notification dated 16.7.2024, would have no bearing regarding continuation or enforceability of the State Legislation i.e. ... x) The only exception to t....
V State of Karnataka And Ors., 1G87 (1) SCC 658] undertook a comprehensive survey of law relating to publication of subordinate legislation. ... Law, to bind, must first exist. And to exist, it must be made known in the manner ordained by the legislature. Delegated legislation, unlike plenary legislation enacted by the Parliament, is framed in the executive chambers without open legislative debate. ... The appellants sought relief to quash the Notification and in the ....
The requirement for registration with the State Medical Council serves to uphold accountability under State law, though it is true that doctors registered outside the State may be ineligible to apply. There has been no challenge to the validity of the Special Rules. ... In cases where the operation of State law does not create a conflict with Union law, the two can coexist, with the State law supplementing the prov....
The Court observed: "26...The relevant principles are: (i) The Central Government or the State Government (or any other authority) cannot make a subordinate legislation The Central Government or the State Government (or any other authority) cannot make a subordinate ... Parliament and the state legislatures are entrusted with the power to enact legislation under Articles 245 and 246 of the Constitution. ... “Where any law provides that any rule, regu....
It is a settled principle of law that while interpreting any legislation including a subordinate legislation, the first principle that has to be adopted is the literal rule of interpretation. ... State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1955 SC 781, which holds that a law rendered inoperative is not obliterated but remains in a dormant state, and does not automatically revive unless re-enacted or specifically revived. ... The Notification classified projects into two categories: ....
Preamble to the notification would state that impugned notifications are issued by the Central Government in exercise of power under Section 3 of FTDR Act. ... such a law. ... If power is available under the statute, misquoting of provision or an employment of wrong nomenclature or that instrument does not confirm to particular form, may not have any bearing on the validity of such subordinate or delegated legislation, be it Order, Notification or Bye-law. ... requir....
Once that is the position, the state legislature was not competent to legislate with respect to the same subject and to enact, by a legislative prescription of S.113 (2), that the central legislation would apply to all cooperative societies in the State. ... The Supreme Court held in the negative and laid down that on the issuance of a notification by the Central Government under the Part C States (Laws) Act extending a sales tax law in force in a Pa....
However, one must bear in mind that what is being challenged here under Article 14 is not executive action but delegated legislation. The tests of arbitrary action which apply to executive actions do not necessarily apply to delegated legislation. ... The test of manifest arbitrariness, therefore, as laid down in the aforesaid judgments would apply to invalidate legislation as well as subordinate legislation under Article 14. ... It is this power which has been exerci....
National courts being organs of the national State and not organs of international law must perforce apply national law if international law conflicts with it. ... Each State shall organise the Central Authority in conformity with its own law. ... The State cannot plead and rely upon internal law including judicial decisions as a defence to a claim for breach of an international obligation. Acts of legisl....
On a plain reading of sub-clause (1) of Clause 5 of the Fifth Schedule, the power of the Hon’ble Governor under the said sub-clause (1) extends to : i. directing by a notification that a particular Central or State legislation will not apply to a Scheduled Area in the State, and; ii. directing by a notification that a particular State or Central Act will apply to a Scheduled Area subject to certain modifications.
It is submitted that on matters on competence, the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Abhay Nath is solely and completely in favour of the Union of India only. If the state legislation is to apply, the writ petitions deserve to be allowed whereas if central laws and regulations are to apply, then the writ petitions deserve to be dismissed. In the instant case, the question before this Hon’ble Court is one of competence. The issue before this Hon’ble Court is whether the state legislation applied to All India Quota seats or whether Central laws will apply.
The issue before this Hon’ble Court is whether the state legislation applied to All India Quota seats or whether Central laws will apply. It is submitted that on matters on competence, the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Abhay Nath is solely and completely in favour of the Union of India only. In the instant case, the question before this Hon’ble Court is one of competence. If the state legislation is to apply, the writ petitions deserve to be allowed whereas if central laws and regulations are to apply, then the writ petitions deserve to be dismissed.
It is further submitted that judgment in the case of Va Tech Esher Wyass Flovel Limited (supra) was rendered per incuriam in view of later judgment in the case of L.G. Chaudhary Engineers and Contractors (supra). It is submitted that only Tribunal constituted under the State Act has jurisdiction to decide the disputes. It is submitted that even before the judgment of Va Tech Esher Wyass Flovel Limited (supra) was delivered on 14.01.2010, there was judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Anshuman Shukla (supra) delivered on 12.05.2008 interpreting similar legislation, wherein the....
Therefore, the only provision that could be considered for application is Section 1(3)(b). Section 1(3)(c) does not apply as there is no notification issued by the Central Government. According to the petitioners, service of the Postal Department cannot be considered as a service rendered by a shop or any other establishment within the meaning of State Law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
