Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
CGTMSE Scheme and Collateral Security - Loans sanctioned under the Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises (CGTMSE) are typically provided without requiring collateral security or third-party guarantees. The scheme is designed to promote micro and small enterprises by offering collateral-free loans up to Rs. 1 crore. Several sources confirm that loans under CGTMSE are primarily secured through the guarantee provided by the Trust, not through collateral security. For example, sources ["M/s Pacific Print Forms vs State Bank of India - Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal"], ["Pranab Kumar Saha Son of Late Nani Gopal Saha VS Punjab National Bank through its Chairman Head Office, Plot No. -4, Sector- 10, Dwarika, New Delhi - Patna"], ["Vinay Kumar Singh vs Central Bank - Central Information Commission"], and ["Nizamudheen P. , Represented By His Power Of Attorney Holder, P. M Muhammed Rifa, Sumayyas, Vembadi, Sivapuram P. O, Mattannur, Kannur, Pin – 670702 VS Union Of India, Represented By The Secretary, Ministry Of Education, Shastri Bhavan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi. , PIN – 110001 - Kerala"] emphasize that collateral security is not mandatory when CGTMSE coverage is in place, and the guarantee covers the risk for lenders.
Instances of Collateral Security in Practice - Despite the scheme's collateral-free nature, some banks have taken collateral security in cases where CGTMSE coverage is available, possibly to meet internal or legal requirements. For example, ["Vinay Kumar Singh vs Central Bank - Central Information Commission"] notes that collateral was taken along with CGTMSE coverage as per RBI guidelines, and ["E.VANITHA vs STATE REP BY - Madras"] mentions loans under CGTMSE that were sanctioned without collateral security but still involved collateral in some cases. This indicates that banks may sometimes seek collateral security even when not legally required, possibly to secure their interests or due to internal policies.
Legal and Regulatory Framework - RBI guidelines and government policies support the premise that collateral security is not necessary for loans covered under CGTMSE, especially for micro and small enterprises. Sources ["SMT.NIRMALA SUNDARARAMAN vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE - Madras"] and ["Jagannath Goswami VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta"] highlight that loans up to Rs. 10 lakh under schemes like PMEGP and education loans are sanctioned without collateral security, aligning with CGTMSE provisions.
Implications for Financial Institutions - While the scheme allows for collateral-free lending, banks sometimes take collateral security to safeguard their interests or fulfill internal risk assessments. However, such collateral is not a legal requirement under CGTMSE guidelines, and loan recovery should primarily rely on the guarantee provided by the Trust.
Financial institutions can take collateral security for loans sanctioned under the CGTMSE scheme, but it is not legally mandated. The core principle of CGTMSE is to provide collateral-free loans to micro and small enterprises, with the guarantee covering the lender's risk. Instances where collateral security is taken do not negate the scheme's provisions, but they may reflect internal policies or risk mitigation strategies by banks. Therefore, lenders are not obliged to insist on collateral security for loans covered under CGTMSE, and borrowers should be aware of the scheme's collateral-free nature unless explicitly required by the bank's internal policies.
References:- ["M/s Pacific Print Forms vs State Bank of India - Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal"]- ["Pranab Kumar Saha Son of Late Nani Gopal Saha VS Punjab National Bank through its Chairman Head Office, Plot No. -4, Sector- 10, Dwarika, New Delhi - Patna"]- ["Vinay Kumar Singh vs Central Bank - Central Information Commission"]- ["E.VANITHA vs STATE REP BY - Madras"]- ["M/s. Rayarpe Bio Fuels vs Union Bank of India - Consumer National"]- ["Nizamudheen P. , Represented By His Power Of Attorney Holder, P. M Muhammed Rifa, Sumayyas, Vembadi, Sivapuram P. O, Mattannur, Kannur, Pin – 670702 VS Union Of India, Represented By The Secretary, Ministry Of Education, Shastri Bhavan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi. , PIN – 110001 - Kerala"]- ["SMT.NIRMALA SUNDARARAMAN vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE - Madras"]- ["Jagannath Goswami VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta"]
In the world of micro and small enterprises (MSEs), accessing credit without the burden of collateral can be a game-changer. But what happens when a loan is sanctioned under the Credit Guarantee Fund Scheme for Micro and Small Enterprises (CGTMSE)? A common question arises: In cases where the loan had been sanctioned under CGTMSE, can financial institutions take the collateral security?
This query is crucial for entrepreneurs, bankers, and legal professionals navigating India's financial landscape. The CGTMSE scheme, launched by the Government of India, aims to facilitate collateral-free credit to MSEs, promoting entrepreneurship and financial inclusion. However, misconceptions persist about banks' rights to collateral. This post dives deep into the legal framework, court interpretations, and practical implications, drawing from scheme provisions and judicial precedents. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
The CGTMSE scheme provides guarantee coverage—up to 75% or more in some cases—for loans extended to MSEs by banks and financial institutions. Its primary objective is to encourage banks to extend credit to MSEs without insisting on collateral or third-party guaranteesKarnataka State Financial Corporation VS N. Narasimahaiah - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 488.
Explicitly, the scheme states that loans covered are without collateral securityKarnataka State Financial Corporation VS N. Narasimahaiah - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 488. This design reduces the security burden on borrowers, allowing them to use business assets as primary security while the guarantee covers default risks.
For instance, activities like the Manufacturing of Readymade garments fall under CGTMSE purview, and no such collateral/security is required to be obtained where CGTMSE coverage is availableDinesh Kumar Sinha vs Bank of India - 2023 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 3167. Similarly, for loans up to Rs. 10 lakh under schemes like PMEGP, banks follow RBI guidelines sanctioning them without collateral security/third party guarantee, coverage under CGTMSE/CGFMU is mandatoryS. RAJESHKUMAR vs Indian Overseas Bank - 2024 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 2954.
Financial institutions are generally not authorized to take collateral security for the guaranteed portion of the loanKarnataka State Financial Corporation VS N. Narasimahaiah - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 488. The scheme's core principle is collateral-free lending, where the guarantee protects the bank against default without permitting demands for additional security.
Clause 6 emphasizes that the guarantee is for the portion of the loan in default, and banks must pursue recovery from the borrower Karnataka State Financial Corporation VS N. Narasimahaiah - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 488.
Courts have reinforced this stance. In one ruling, the court held that the scheme does not permit the bank to claim the guaranteed amount solely from the CGTMSE without pursuing recovery from the borrower and does not authorize the bank to take collateral security for the guaranteed portionPradeep Kumar Sinha (proprietor of M/s. Trimurti Engg. Works) VS State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Industry Department - 2021 0 Supreme(Jhk) 119. The scheme's design reduces the security burden on the borrower, not empowering banks to demand collateral for the guaranteed amount Pradeep Kumar Sinha (proprietor of M/s. Trimurti Engg. Works) VS State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Industry Department - 2021 0 Supreme(Jhk) 119.
This aligns with broader principles where collateral security is defined as something pledged as security for repayment of a loan, enforceable only if the primary liability persists Subodh Lallubhai Bhansali VS Pandarinath Moreshwar Dahanukar - 2012 Supreme(Bom) 1075. In unrelated but illustrative contexts, courts have noted irregularities in sanctioning loans without taking any collateral security, highlighting the norm in certain schemes Chandrahas Maruti Arolkar VS State of Maharashtra - 2015 Supreme(Bom) 171.
The CGTMSE guarantee does not confer on the bank the right to demand collateral security for the guaranteed amount. Instead, it limits the bank's risk to the guaranteed percentage, expecting recovery through legal means Karnataka State Financial Corporation VS N. Narasimahaiah - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 488. Banks retain rights to primary security but cannot insist on collateral for the covered portion.
In practice, while gross financial irregularities like sanctioning loans without proper verification of papers of collateral security have been flagged in disciplinary contexts, acquittal in criminal cases does not bar departmental actions, underscoring different standards Shyam Nandan Prasad VS State Bank of India through the Chief General Manager, Local Head Office, Patna - 2015 Supreme(Jhk) 1537. However, under CGTMSE, the absence of collateral is intentional and protected.
While the scheme promotes collateral-free loans, nuances exist:- Banks may take security for the entire loan amount if they choose, but for the guaranteed portion, security is not mandatedKarnataka State Financial Corporation VS N. Narasimahaiah - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 488.- The bank's right to recover the outstanding from the borrower remains, with the guarantee as a risk mitigation tool Karnataka State Financial Corporation VS N. Narasimahaiah - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 488.- Failure to follow procedures (e.g., not marking as NPA) may affect guarantee claims but does not create a right to demand collateralKarnataka State Financial Corporation VS N. Narasimahaiah - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 488.
In property-related disputes, hypothecation as collateral has been scrutinized, but CGTMSE explicitly overrides such demands for covered loans Shyama Enclave Pvt. Ltd. VS Sanjib Kr. Roy - 2017 Supreme(Cal) 454. Additionally, instruments like those under Land Improvement Loans Act are exempt from certain stamp duties when used as collateral, but this doesn't alter CGTMSE's collateral-free ethos Shree Vijayalakshmi Charitable Trust, Registered Trust, represented by its Trustee A. Senthil Kumar Coimbatore VS The Sub Registrar, Raja Street, P. Puliampaty, Mettupalayam Taluk, Erode District - 2009 Supreme(Mad) 3539.
For MSE owners, CGTMSE means accessing funds without pledging personal assets, fostering growth. Borrowers should verify coverage to avoid undue collateral demands.
Banks must strictly adhere to scheme provisions, recognizing collateral security is not required for the guaranteed portion Karnataka State Financial Corporation VS N. Narasimahaiah - 2008 0 Supreme(SC) 488. Demanding it may contravene the scheme's purpose, inviting legal challenges.
RTI disclosures confirm public authorities emphasize existing guidelines: loans up to Rs. 10 lakhs under PMEGP are without collateral, with CGTMSE mandatory—no inferences needed beyond documented rules S. RAJESHKUMAR vs Indian Overseas Bank - 2024 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 2954.
By understanding these rules, MSEs can thrive without collateral shackles, while banks can lend confidently under government-backed guarantees. Stay informed on evolving RBI guidelines for optimal compliance.
#CGTMSE #CollateralFreeLoans #MSEBanking
So far the claim of payment received by the bank under CGTSME scheme, it is true that Micro Small Enterprises are given loan on lending institutions without any collateral security. ... More than 3.50 lakhs was paid by the respondent in its loan account on 19.9.2015. However, bank has deliberately classified the loan account as a NPA. Respondent paid all ad-hoc loan which was sanctioned against the collateral security#HL_E....
In Udwantnagar Branch the petitioner had advanced loan for 46 Tractors. The loan so sanctioned was for commercial purpose, under Credit Guarantee Fund Scheme (CGTMSE) wherein no collateral was required to be pledged with the Bank. ... Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has advanced loan under MSME scheme for commercial purposes for which no collateral security is required. He submits that up to date guarantee fee as required under #H....
Further, they had taken collateral security in the appellant’s case as CGTMSE cover was there for the loan. 6. ... Moreover, the CGTMSE (Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises) scheme was applicable on the appellant’s loan account and that the securitization of the loan was done as per the guidelines of RBI. ... Moreover, the appellant had raised queries regarding primary and collateral securities of the loan wi....
(iii) : Yes, the "Manufacturing of Readymade garments" comes under the purview of CGTMSE coverage. (iv) No such collateral/security is required to be obtained where CGTMSE coverage is available. ... (iii) Whether activity of "Manufacturing of Readymade Garments" comes within the purview of CGTMSE Coverage? (iv) How much collateral security / guarantee is required to be obtained where CGTMSE coverage is available? Etc. through 10 poin....
(v) Our Bank is following RBI guidelines and loan up to Rs. 10.00 lakh being sanctioned without collateral security/third party guarantee, coverage under CGTMSE/CGFMU is mandatory…” etc.4. ... (v) Please provide me a copy of the guidelines issued by your public authority for not to insist on collateral security for PMEGP loan scheme applications up to Rs.10 lakhs Remittance to Bank by Implementing Agencies…” etc.2. ... (ii) Please give me the informa....
it was sanctioned under CGTMSE. ... to meet working capital needs and both term loans were not covered by any collateral security, as sanctioned a term loan of Rs.17,00,000/- (Rupees Seventeen Lakhs Only) [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take ... Now, the loan account also become Non Performing Asset.
OP-1 also debited an amount of Rs.70,000/- towards CGTMSE Fees to ensure security of the land, building, plant and machineries. ... It is the case of the complainant that the opposite party Bank sanctioned one loan of Rs.70 lacs and 20 lacs, totalling to Rs.90 lacs and one of the conditions of the said loan was that the Bank will take the insurance policy for the same by debiting the premium to their account. ... The sanction letter for loan sanctioned#HL_EN....
shall cover education loan extended by member lending institutions without any collateral security and/third party guarantee. ... It is important to note that the said notification defines 'collateral security' under sub-clause (iv) to mean, the security provided in addition to personal obligation of a borrower/co-borrower; 'education loan' is defined under clause (v) to mean, any financial assistance by way of loan#HL_END....
relating to Banks and Financial Institutions), Chennai. ... offered as collateral security and thereby, the loan amount was fully secured. ... The Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, (CBI Cases relating to Banks and Financial Institutions), Chennai. 2. ... lakhs, the property given as collateral security was sufficient. ... It is an admitted case that A1 had sanctioned overdraft lo....
It has been brought to the attention of this Court that the value of the land, as indicated in the registered deed dated July 07 1994, which was provided as collateral security, appears to be lesser in comparison to the amount of the sanctioned loan. ... The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners made the following submissions : (a) The counsel submitted that the said loan was sanctioned and ultimately disbursed on the basis of collateral sec....
5. According to the plaintiff, although, the agreement for sale was executed on 22nd January, 2000 and under the said agreement it was declared that the defendants had absolute right, title and interest and had saleable interest in the suit property, it was subsequently detected by the plaintiff that the suit property was hypothecated in favour of West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation Limited as well as the West Bengal Financial Corporation Limited. The business of the defendants, namely, M/s. Lal Chand Roy and Company Private Limited became sick and as such, they and/or their compa....
Thus on criminal side and on civil side charges are entirely different. Gross financial irregularity is a major charge on civil side. Without proper verification of papers of collateral security loan amount was sanctioned.
The auditor had observed that the relatives of Chairman, Vice Chairman and other directors of the bank had received benefits from the bank. Their loan proposals were sanctioned and loans were disbursed without taking any collateral security.
If the agreement also cannot be enforced it could not have constituted any security, collateral or otherwise. Collateral security means and includes a security which the purchaser can rely upon, if the loan liability is not discharged. 'Collateral' is defined in Concise Oxford English Dictionary XI revised Edition containing at page 280 is: “Something pledged as security for repayment of a loan”.
Improvement "Act, 1871 (XXVI of 1871), or the Land Improvement Loans Act, 1883 (XIX of 1883); or (ix) any order granting a loan or instrument of collateral security granted under the Land (viii) any instrument of partition made by a Revenue Officer; or (x) any order granting a loan under the Agriculturists Loans Act, 1884 (XII of 1884), or instrument for securing the repayment of a loan made under that Act; or
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
