Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Overall, the judgments reinforce that procedural lapses, defaults in sanctioning or FIR filing, and delays are critical factors in scam litigations, but courts balance procedural correctness with substantive justice.
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["SHASHI PAL MEHRA vs UOI & ORS - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["Shashikant Prasad VS State - Allahabad"]- ["SHASHI PAL MEHRA vs UOI & ORS - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["SHASHI PAL MEHRA vs UOI & ORS - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["Amadhi Investments Ltd. , In re VS - Company Law Board"]- ["SHASHI PAL MEHRA vs UOI & ORS - Punjab and Haryana"]
Imagine receiving a court notice about a default judgment against you, only to suspect it was obtained through deceit or a scam. The phrase judgement in default scam often arises when parties question the legitimacy of such judgments. But can you fight back? In Malaysian law, default judgments are typically robust, but fraud opens the door to challenges—if backed by solid evidence.
This post breaks down the legal landscape, drawing from key precedents and procedural rules. We'll explore when courts uphold these judgments, the strict proof required for fraud claims, and practical steps. Note: This is general information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
A judgment in default can be challenged on grounds of fraud or irregularity, but success hinges on strict procedural compliance and compelling evidence of misconduct. Courts presume default judgments valid if procedures were followed correctly. Mere allegations or minor procedural slips won't suffice—proof of deliberate fraud is essential. YEE LIU WEI vs YAP KIM HENG - 2025 MarsdenLR 461LEE HEAVY MACHINERY WORKS SDN BHD vs LISTARI MARINA (MM2H) SDN BHD & ANOR - 2024 MarsdenLR 1067
Default judgments arise when a defendant fails to respond to a claim, allowing the plaintiff to secure a win without a full trial. While efficient, they invite abuse claims, especially in scam scenarios where service of process or facts are manipulated.
Malaysian courts prioritize procedural adherence. In one case, the court dismissed irregularity claims after confirming lawful service, deeming the judgment regular. YEE LIU WEI vs YAP KIM HENG - 2025 MarsdenLR 461 Similarly, proper obtainment of the judgment was emphasized, underscoring compliance's role. LEE HEAVY MACHINERY WORKS SDN BHD vs LISTARI MARINA (MM2H) SDN BHD & ANOR - 2024 MarsdenLR 1067
This presumption protects the judicial process from endless challenges. Without it, litigation could drag indefinitely.
Fraud is a potent weapon but rarely wielded successfully without evidence. Citing Chee Pok Choy & Ors v. Scotch Leasing Sdn Bhd, courts note that deliberate fraud on the court warrants impeachment. LEE KEE FONG vs PENINSULAR INNOVATION SDN BHD & ORS - 2001 MarsdenLR 853LEE KEE FONG vs PENINSULAR INNOVATION SDN BHD - 2002 MarsdenLR 1542 However, procedural irregularities—like form defects—don't automatically invalidate unless tied to fraud.
Comparative insights from other jurisdictions reinforce this. In an Indian case, plaintiffs alleged fraud via misrepresentation to obtain a decree, but courts stressed the duty to recall only proven frauds, applying res judicata to bar repeat claims. Manickam VS Ragini Ganesh - 2021 Supreme(Cal) 242 This mirrors Malaysia's evidence focus, preventing abuse.
The applicant bears the burden. Courts reject unsubstantiated claims: unanswered allegations, without proof, do not suffice. LEE SIOK CHING vs EDEN REALTY SDN BHD & ORS - 2021 MarsdenLR 3434 In another instance, failure to produce fraud evidence led to dismissal. DE TEBRAU MAKMUR SDN BHD & ANOR vs BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD - 2017 MarsdenLR 939
Gather affidavits, documents, or witness statements showing deception, like forged service proofs or hidden facts. Mere non-appearance or default doesn't prove scam. DHAYA PRIMA HOLDINGS SDN BHD vs FIRDAUS KHAN PARIT KHAN & ORS - 2018 MarsdenLR 624
Act fast: File within 30 days of learning the judgment, showing fraud or a strong defense. Late applications risk denial. YEE LIU WEI vs YAP KIM HENG - 2025 MarsdenLR 461
Steps typically include:1. File a notice of application to set aside.2. Serve on the other party.3. Present evidence at hearing.
Courts balance fairness with finality, cautious of frivolous fraud claims that abuse process.
Scams extend beyond defaults. Indian cases highlight parallels: GST registration cancellations for tax evasion scams M/S SINGH TRADING CO Vs SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II / AVATO, WARD 79 ZONE 7 DELHI - 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 10051, or property attachments failing post-sale due to prior valid transfers. Meera Unnikrishnan VS Aashutosh Dyeing Mills Pvt. Ltd. - 2014 Supreme(Bom) 1728 In execution contexts, courts won't re-litigate concluded sales, emphasizing timing. These underscore fraud's narrow path—proof trumps allegation.
In broader scams, like rice milling embezzlement (Rice Scam), criminal breach of trust proceeded despite arbitration clauses, as fraud allegations demand judicial scrutiny. Davinder Singh and Jaspal Singh VS State of Punjab - 2006 Supreme(P&H) 3394 Similarly, stock scams or fake capital gains evade via low tax effects but persist on merits. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Ahmedabad VS Anand Natwarlal Sharda - 2021 Supreme(Guj) 579
To challenge a suspected default judgment scam:- Collect Evidence: Secure admissible proof of deception. LEE SIOK CHING vs EDEN REALTY SDN BHD & ORS - 2021 MarsdenLR 3434- File Promptly: Adhere to timelines for strength. YEE LIU WEI vs YAP KIM HENG - 2025 MarsdenLR 461- Document Thoroughly: Record all interactions to build your case.- Seek Expertise: Engage counsel experienced in civil procedure.
Proactive compliance—responding timely to summons—avoids defaults altogether.
Default judgments enjoy strong presumption but yield to proven fraud. Malaysian courts, like others, demand evidence over rhetoric, safeguarding integrity while allowing justice. Cases affirm: validity holds sans misconduct proof. LEE HEAVY MACHINERY WORKS SDN BHD vs LISTARI MARINA (MM2H) SDN BHD & ANOR - 2024 MarsdenLR 1067YEE LIU WEI vs YAP KIM HENG - 2025 MarsdenLR 461
If facing a judgement in default scam, assess evidence rigorously. Timely, evidenced action may succeed; otherwise, compliance prevails.
Disclaimer: Laws evolve; outcomes vary by facts. This overview draws from precedents like LEE SIOK CHING vs EDEN REALTY SDN BHD & ORS - 2021 MarsdenLR 3434, LEE KEE FONG vs PENINSULAR INNOVATION SDN BHD & ORS - 2001 MarsdenLR 853, and others—not substitutes for advice. Contact a Malaysian legal professional promptly.
References:1. LEE SIOK CHING vs EDEN REALTY SDN BHD & ORS - 2021 MarsdenLR 3434: Fraud proof essentials.2. DHAYA PRIMA HOLDINGS SDN BHD vs FIRDAUS KHAN PARIT KHAN & ORS - 2018 MarsdenLR 624: Fraud via non-defense.3. LEE KEE FONG vs PENINSULAR INNOVATION SDN BHD & ORS - 2001 MarsdenLR 853: Impeaching for fraud.4. LEE KEE FONG vs PENINSULAR INNOVATION SDN BHD - 2002 MarsdenLR 1542: Challenge requirements.5. DE TEBRAU MAKMUR SDN BHD & ANOR vs BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD - 2017 MarsdenLR 939: Evidence failure dismissal.
Stay vigilant against scams—knowledge empowers.
#DefaultJudgmentScam, #SetAsideJudgment, #MalaysiaLaw
He has also placed reliance on a judgement of the Bombay High Court in the case of B.R.Sound -N- Music v. O.P. ... CIT (1999) 237 ITR 376 and a judgement of Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Kakarala Krishnamurthy v. ... Actually subsequent judgement of full bench of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Bhairav Lal placed reliance on a Division Bench judgement of this Court in the case of judgement of Allahabad High Court in the case of p style="position:absolute....
In this regard paragraph 61 of the judgement of Vineet Narain's Case (Supra) is very important and so it is reproduced hereinbelow : ... "61. ... Hence in this case the court deemed that sanction has been accorded on account of default of State Government to take decision in the matter and issued process against accused including the petitioner to appear before court vide order dated 4.12.2012. ... Sri Bireshwar Nath, learned counsel appearing for CBI drew attention of this court towards the judgement of Division Bench of this Court deliv....
This criminal leave to appeal has been filed by the appellant going through the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not CRLLA-66/2013] not filing first information report in the police in some Post Office said cheques is Rs. 4,84,000/- and the amount involved in the Post Office Scam
There are two connected bail applications and with the consent of both the contesting parties, the Court is proposing to decide both the bail applications captioned above by a common judgement. ... IN CASE OF DEFAULT OF THIS CONDITION, IT SHALL BE OPEN FOR THE TRIAL COURT TO TREAT IT AS ABUSE OF LIBERTY OF BAIL AND PASS ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. ... The King pin of this scam is Sachin Dutta. Taking into account the job profile and the responsibility on the shoulder of the applicants is only propose, recommend and....
Therefore, he stated that his client cannot be said to have participated/involved in demat scam. He further stated that the compounding is under section 81(1A) of the Act and not under section 68A of the Act under which demat scam can come under. ... As per his opinion the said scam involved multiple applications by single party during the public issue of the Yes Bank Ltd., and he has stated that his client never applied for any shares in the Yes Bank Ltd. Therefore, it cannot be said that he has participated in the said demat s....
JUDGEMENT ... 1. ... Although, JPC has conducted a probe into stock market scam but no steps have been taken to bring culprits to book. ... 3. ... The Joint Parliamentary Committee recommended in its report that Unit Trust of India should conduct a review of instances of investments going into default within a short period of sanction indicating possible deficiencies in the investment decision making process. ... That the JPC was constituted to make a report to the Parliament with regard to stock market scam and matters....
Judgement. ... A perusal of the chargesheet, therefore, indicates that both the Petitioners were involved in the multi-person scam involving more than Rs. ... Apart from the question of prevention being the This is a digitally signed Judgement. ... The provisions of CrPC confer discretionary This is a digitally signed Judgement. ... Amit Chadha, learned APP for the State appearing in BAIL APPLN. 3921/2021, vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that this case is a multi-victim #HL_STAR....
JUDGEMENT [SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 19.09.2023, whereby, the GST registration of the petitioner has been cancelled. Said cancellation order was issued pursuant to a show cause notice for cancellation dated 20.07.2023. ... /CST-01/446-448 dated 17-07-2023 has inform that the firm is involved in a big scam of evasion of tax.” 3. Petitioner was thereupon called upon to submit a reply, however, no reply was submitted by the petitioner. 4. ... As per the respondents, there is material available to establish that the pe....
By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the validity of a judgement and order dated 11.08.2025 passed by the Special Judge Ayurveda Scam Case/C.B.I., Lucknow in Civil Appeal No.317 of 2024 whereby the appeal filed by the opposite ... There appears to be no error or illegality in the appellate order dated 11.08.2025 passed by the Special Judge Ayurveda Scam Case/C.B.I., Lucknow in Civil Appeal No.317 of 2024 warranting any interference by this Court in exercise of....
directing expeditious functioning of the special designated court in Alappuzha for conducting the trial of Popular Finance scam alone. ... JUDGEMENT This writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- “(i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing respondent No.1 to make the said establishment as stated in Exhibit P4 within 30 days;(ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus against the respondents
While holding the post of Chief of Intelligence and Head of Economic Offences Wing and Anti Corruption Bureau of the State of Chhattisgarh, he had lodged first information report (for short, FIR) in three very sensitive cases in which chargesheet was filed before the competent criminal court. One case was known as ‘Irrigation Scam’, another one as ‘Nagrik Apoorti Scam’ or ‘NAAN Scam’ and the third case was against the respondent No. 4 in the OA. He was awarded President’s Police Medal for Gallantry in the year 1996 as well as in the year 2011 because of his exemplary work.
However, in cases where some appellate fora have not given due considerations to position of law or facts investigated by the department there is no remedy available with the department for filing further appeal in view of the prescribed monetary limits. 2. Several references have been received by the Board that in large number of cases where organised tax evasion scam is noticed through bogus Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG)/Short Term Capital Loss (STCL) on penny stocks and department is unable to pursue the cases in higher judicial fora on account of enhanced monetary limits. 3. In this cont....
The plaintiffs further contended that the defendant no. By misrepresenting and playing fraud upon the court the defendants obtained the judgement/decree. 1 and 2 are not the successor interest of the late K.R. Ganesh as such they had no right to represent the suit. 1 and 2 also brought on record certain manipulated record such as record or right and WILL.
The decree passed by the Co-operative Court on 27/04/2001 was not challenged by the judgment debtor. The Special Recovery and Sale Officer (Co-operative department) had levied warrant of attachment on 08/11/2001 since the judgment debtor failed to pay the decreetal amount in spite of receipt of notice. The judgment debtor committed default in making payment.
In the State of Punjab, a scam known as “Rice Scam” received very wide publicity. This, of course, could not have been without the connivance of employees of agency. The mill is required to account for the rice and in case it is unable to do so, certainly it would expose itself to criminal liability, besides the civil liability that it may incur. The millers had apparently benefited to a huge extent by short supplying rice in return for the paddy that was entrusted to the Mills.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
