How to Prove a False Affidavit in Court

Chhattisgarh

detention period of the applicant, statement of the victim under Section 164 of CrPC, the fact that victim has filed an affidavite

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 3253

ARJUN Annexure 3 THE AFFIDAVITE SWORN BY DR. ARJUN

Bombay

The Police have conducted an inquiry stating that the affidavite was in usual standard format.

2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 325

Rane learned Counsel for the Defendant at the outset submitted that onus to prove due execution of the said Will was upon the propounder. He submitted that the Plaintiff being the propounder of the said Will had completely failed to prove due execution of the Will. ... The Plaintiff has relied solely upon his Affidavit of Evidence and answers given in cross examination to prove due attestation. ... Learned counsel submitted that the only ev....

Federal Court Putrajaya

A must prove that B has committed the crime. (b) A desires a court to give judgment that he is entitled to certain land in the possession of B by reason of facts which he asserts and which B denies to be true. A must prove the existence of those facts. ... Thus, for the respondent to make out a prima facie case against the appellant or, to put it another way, to prove its case sufficiently to justify a judgment in its favour if there was n....

2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 3292

Therefore, the plaintiff has failed to prove the will by examining the attesting witnesses. Of course the plaintiffs examined one P.M.Ganesh, P.W.2 said to be the son of Munivel to prove the signature found in the will that of the Munivel. 16. ... In the present case, no death certificates of the attesting witnesses were filed by the respondent herein to prove the factum of their death. No summons were taken by the respondent herein to proc....

The learned Commissioner of Requests, after hearing all the evidence available, decided that, on the materials before him, there was just sufficient evidence to prove the execution of the deed by Dingiria. ... It is common ground that one of the attesting witnesses, Sendia, is now alive, and the defendants maintain that there is not sufficient evidence to prove that he cannot be found so as to make the deed provable under section 69. ... If the evidence of....

The onus was on the Crown to prove that there was no excuse. See Ratanlal's Law of Crimes (14th ed., p. 720 et seq.) and the cases referred to there. ... But it was held that the nature and extent of the injuries inflicted on other persons did not go to prove the malicious intention of the accused towards the deceased. ... Nalliah might have been called to prove that it was the appellant who in fact had made the affidvit Neither of the....

They have to prove it. ... So whilst it is not necessary to prove the documents, it would still be necessary to prove the truth of the contents of the documents. ... EACH OF THE RESPONDENTS PLAINTIFFS MUST PROVE THE LOSS SUFFERED All the 354 respondents plaintiffs are claiming damages and they must prove them. ... The burden falls on the respondents plaintiffs to show that the first ap....

2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 734

He was unable to prove that the testatrix was mentally or physically unfit at the time of execution of the Will. 27. ... Thus, Section 71 is a safeguard to the mandatory provisions of Section 68 to meet a situation where it is not possible to prove the execution of the Will by calling attesting witnesses, though alive. ... The distinction between failure on the part of an attesting witness to prove the execution and attestation of a will an....

2020 3 Supreme 644

2 All ER 712, the plaintiffs cargo ship sank in calm weather in the Mediterranean Sea. The burden of proving that the loss was caused by a peril insured against is on the assured. It is not necessary for him to prove precisely how the casualty occurred, but he must show the proximate cause falls within the perils insured against..." (Emphasis supplied) In Rhesa Shipping Co S A vs. Edmunds, [1985] The plaintiff sought to recover damages under two identical marine insurance p....

2002 0 Supreme(Del) 1524

Later affidavit is on behalf of respondents 2 and 3. It is not disputed in these affidavite that HMCT ia a technical course. In support of, this propoaition, reliance is placed upon the judgments of the Supreme court in the case of Bharathidasan University and Anr. However, the IGNOU claims that notwithstanding the AICTE Act or the powers and functions of the Council under the said Act, the IGNOU being a university created by an Act of the Parliament, namely, the IGNOU Act, 1....

2001 0 Supreme(All) 401

Heard Sri W. H. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Kant, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 2. ( 2 ) COUNTER and rejoinder affidavite have been exchanged.

1999 0 Supreme(Del) 223

This is how the matter falls for further determination. However, in the interest of justice, the matter was directed to be renotified for hearing on the question as to whether or not the claim of the first respondent company is within limitation.

1997 0 Supreme(Del) 708

Learned counsel could not state the year when the applicant graduated and as to what was his age. After the order was passed by the Minister it came on record that there were only two COCO outlets available at Delhi and both were running in profit as a model retail outlet to impart training for customer service. these facts have also not been disclosed in the affidavite filed in this court. there isnothing on the record of the ministry as to when the applicant graduated and ....