Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Civil Court Jurisdiction in Election Matters - The primary stance across multiple sources is that disputes connected with elections of Devaswom institutions are generally within the domain of civil law. When election processes are ongoing or have been completed, aggrieved parties are advised to institute civil suits before competent civil courts, such as the Munsiff Court or other designated courts, depending on the case ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 47864"], ["2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 37701"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 37368"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15145"].
Nature of Disputes - Disputes concerning Devaswom elections are often viewed as private matters governed by bye-laws, and not necessarily involving the discharge of public duties or functions. Therefore, such disputes are not inherently within the jurisdiction of administrative or special tribunals but are to be settled through civil proceedings ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 47864"].
Role of Special Authorities and Tribunals - Election Tribunals or prescribed authorities are sometimes involved, but courts have emphasized that their jurisdiction is limited and that they cannot re-examine election validity once their orders become final or when they have become functus officio. Orders passed without adherence to legal principles or outside the scope of jurisdiction are subject to challenge in civil courts ["2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 37701"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 37368"].
Court Interventions and Writ Jurisdiction - Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution are generally not entertained for election disputes related to Devaswom matters, especially when statutory remedies or civil suits are available. Courts have reiterated that such disputes are better resolved through civil suits, and invoking writ jurisdiction is not appropriate unless statutory remedies are exhausted or specific public interest issues are involved ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 26167"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15145"].
Specific Cases and Orders - Courts have directed the conduct of elections through appropriate authorities, including the appointment of administrators or conduct of elections by designated bodies, often based on Supreme Court or High Court directions. However, these directions do not extend to allowing parties to bypass civil remedies or to challenge election results through writ petitions unless jurisdictional issues arise ["2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 22131"].
Summary - Overall, the consensus is that election disputes in Devaswom institutions are primarily civil in nature. Civil courts have jurisdiction to hear such matters, especially when election processes have been completed or are challenged on legal grounds. Administrative or special tribunals' jurisdiction is limited, and courts emphasize the importance of civil remedies over writ petitions in these contexts.
References:- 2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 47864- 2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 26167- 2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 37701- 2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 37368- 2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15145- 2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 22131
Elections within residential societies, apartment complexes (flats), and similar bodies like Devaswom institutions often spark disputes over nominations, voting, and results. A common question arises: does Not have Jurisdiction in Societies and Flats Election Matter. Homeowners and committee members frequently rush to seeking urgent relief, only to find their suits dismissed. This blog delves into why typically lack jurisdiction in such matters, drawing from constitutional provisions, statutes, and judicial precedents. Understanding this can save time, costs, and frustration by directing you to the right forums.
generally lack jurisdiction to entertain election-related disputes in societies, flats, and Devaswom institutions when statutes explicitly bar their role and mandate resolution through specialized or authorities. 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1723 2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 358 This principle ensures elections proceed smoothly without judicial interruptions, preserving democratic processes in these bodies.
Key reasons include:- Explicit statutory bars on civil court interference.- Availability of dedicated election petition mechanisms.- Judicial emphasis on restraint during ongoing elections.
The foundation lies in India's Constitution and state laws:
These principles apply to societies and flats governed by acts like the or state apartment ownership laws, where election rules often mirror these, directing disputes to registrars or internal tribunals.
Indian courts have consistently upheld this exclusion:
Additional precedents from other sources echo this:- become post-decision and cannot order recounts simultaneously or afterward. 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1385 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1386- under dismiss mid-election pleas, emphasizing post-. 2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 3313 The court held, electoral processes are shielded from urgent judicial scrutiny during elections; disputes must await completion. 2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 3313- Even pandemic-related pleas to postpone elections were rejected, affirming bars. 2020 0 Supreme(Pat) 167
For Devaswom institutions, statutes and mirror Panchayat laws, barring unless acts occur. 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1723
In societies and flats (e.g., under or ), election disputes like committee polls follow similar logic:- Registrar of Societies or designated authorities handle via .- step in rarely, only for gross illegalities not covered statutorily. 2000 0 Supreme(Ker) 403
Ongoing processes demand restraint: Courts quash suits that could obstruct polls. 1994 0 Supreme(Raj) 519 Post-election, file petitions timely, as delays lead to dismissal. 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1803 One ruling stressed, election petition was barred by limitation and... . 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1803
aren't absolutely excluded:- or : If actions are (e.g., beyond statutory power), writs may lie. 2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 358- Uncovered Disputes: Electoral roll challenges or voter eligibility might invoke writs cautiously. 2000 0 Supreme(Ker) 403- No Statutory Forum: If laws are silent, courts may fill gaps, but sparingly. 2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 1301
However, routine issues like recount demands post-petition are invalid, as tribunals can't revisit. 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1385 2024 0 Supreme(All) 1386
During elections, as one court directed, proceed with polls and resolve later to avoid hiatus. 2006 0 Supreme(AP) 883
In summary, generally do not have jurisdiction in societies and flats election matters, mirroring Devaswom and local body rules. Statutory tribunals provide the exclusive path, with courts exercising restraint to uphold electoral integrity. 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1723 2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 358
Key Takeaways:- File , not civil suits.- Act within time limits to avoid dismissal. 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1803- Mid-process interference is rare.
This is general information based on precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
The election process had already commenced and any dispute would squarely fall within the domain of civil law. If the petitioners are aggrieved, the appropriate remedy is the institution of a civil suit. ... The election to the 3rd respondent is a private affair of the Devaswom governed by the stipulations of the bye-law. The matter in controversy is not connected with the discharge of a....
O.P.No.3821 of 1990 and connected matters. ... filed this writ petition invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under a href="./.. ... be entertained by the learned Ombudsman under Clause 9A added to the order of this Court dated 27.11.2007 in O.P.No.3821 of 1990 and connected matters, vide the order dated 19.10.2015 in O.P.No.3821 of 1990 and connected#....
(C)No.29342 of 2021, whereby that writ petition along with connected matters were disposed of with the directions contained therein. 2. ... also to conduct election to the Temple Advisory Committee. ... Today, when the case is taken up for consideration, the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board would submit that, after complying with the statutory requirements, the meeting of the 'registered mandalam' for....
He submitted that order of recounting has been done even without ballet paper having been produced or seen by the Court. He placed reliance on the decisions of this Court in Matters Under Article 227 No. 31424 of 2024 (Parshuram vs. ... [See also Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee & Anr. v. C.K. Rajan & Ors. ... extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. ... This #HL_S....
appointed by this Court to conduct election to the Pothu Bharana Samithi of the temple. ... Now, by Ext.P3 judgment in Civil Appeal Nos.13708-09 of 2024 , the Apex Court appointed the 4th respondent as the Administrative Head/Administrator to conduct election for the administration and management of the temple and its allied institutions, in a free ... Those SLPs were converted as Civil ....
He submitted that order of recounting has been done even without ballet paper having been produced or seen by the Court. He placed reliance on the decisions of this Court in Matters Under Article 227 No. 31424 of 2024 (Parshuram vs. ... [See also Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee & Anr. v. C.K. Rajan & Ors. ... extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. ... This #HL_S....
th respondent Administrator appointed in terms of the orders of the Apex Court in Civil Appeal Nos.13708-09 of 2024. ... In such circumstances, the petitioner, who is a devotee of Oachira Parabrahma Temple, cannot invoke the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2nd respondent Travancore Devaswom Board or the 3sup id ... t....
Taking note of the fact that earlier attempts to conduct election went in vain, this Court issued such directions. Taking note of the fact that the Devaswom Board has directed the Assistant Commissioner Audit to conduct the election, the writ petition was disposed of. ... Taking note of the fact that Chowallur Sivakshetra Bharanasamithi is a controlled institution under the Cochin Devaswom Board and the c....
Section 176 of the 1994 Act provides for presentation of an election petition to Civil Court having ordinary jurisdiction in the area within which election has been or should have been held. (3) All election petitions received under sub-section (1) in which the validity of the election of members to represent the same electoral division is in question, shall be heard....
The connected election petition (El. P. No. 5/2021) was filed on 31.08.2021. ... This Court has held that the right to vote or stand as a candidate for election is not a civil right but is a creature of statute or special law and must be subject to the limitations imposed by it. In N.P. Ponnuswami v. ... After the amendment, the jurisdiction of both the Election Commiss....
This brings about the issue of the scope of writ jurisdiction in election matters. The petitioner has laid great emphasis on the fact that the fundamental rights of the voters under Article 19(1)(a), as well as independent candidates under Article 14, are under threat, warranting the interference of this Court seeking a mandamus for delaying the elections to the Legislative Assembly of Bihar.
In the aforesaid case, after adverting to the question as to whether the law of elections in this country contemplates two attacks on matters connected with election proceedings: one, while they are going on by invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and another, after they have been completed by means of an election petition, the Supreme Court recorded the conclusions in paragraph 16 as under: "16. The conclu....
7. A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in N.P. Ponnuswami v. Returning Officer and others, AIR 1952 SC 64, held that the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution should not be invoked to question the election to either House of Parliament and the observations are as follows : “The law of elections in India does not contemplate that there should be two attacks on matters connected with election proceedings, one while they are going on by invoking the ....
(i) it is presented within thirty days from the date on which the result of such election or nomination was notified in the Gazette; and (iii) in the case of election of Mayor, by any voter of the Municipal area to the Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction (hereinafter referred as ‘the Court’) within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the election or nomination was held. (3) No petition presented under sub-section (2) shall be admitted unless - (ii) in the case....
"The law of election in India does not contemplate that there should be two attacks on matters connected with election proceedings, one while they are going on by invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court under Art. 226 of the Constitution (the ordinary jurisdiction of the Courts having been expressly excluded), and another after they have been completed by means of an election petition. Their Lordships of the Supreme Court referred to the judgments of Madras ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
