Contractual Employees: No Vested Right to Post or Job Security

Hari Shanker Shankar Sharma son of Shri Moti Lal Sharma VS Union of India - 2024 Supreme(Raj) 180

Suresh (Supra), has categorically held that contractual engagement does not create a vested right of employment in favour of the workers, engaged through a placement agency. ... employees, shall not create a vested right of employment in their favour. ... The relevant extract of the said judgment is reproduced herein-under:- “The issue with which we are concerned in this petition is as to whether by working for a long period of time on contractual basis, the petitioners have acquired a....

The Respondent in the Statement In Reply contended that the lawful termination of the probationary employment of the Claimant which in accordance with the contractual right or privilege vested upon the Respondent under the Clause 2, Letter of Employment. ... It is well established that a probationer has no substantive right to hold any post and he holds no lien on the post. The probationer is on trial to prove his fitness for the post which he offers his service. ... ....

LIEW WEI LING vs GLADRON CHEMICALS SDN BHD

It is well established that a probationer has no substantive right to hold any post and he holds no lien on the post. The probationer is on trial to prove his fitness for the post which he offers his service. ... The Respondent in the Statement In Reply contended that the lawful termination of the probationary employment of the Claimant which in accordance with the contractual right or privilege vested upon the Respondent under the Clause 2, Letter of Employment. IS....

LIEW WEI LING vs GLADRON CHEMICALS SDN BHD

It is well established that a probationer has no substantive right to hold any post and he holds no lien on the post. The probationer is on trial to prove his fitness for the post which he offers his service. ... The Respondent in the Statement In Reply contended that the lawful termination of the probationary employment of the Claimant which in accordance with the contractual right or privilege vested upon the Respondent under the Clause 2, Letter of Employment. I....

Kamal Dilipkumar Aacharya VS State Of Gujarat - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 1170

Thus, the petitioner has no right to the post on which he has been appointed on contractual basis. Merely because, he has continued for so many years the same can not entitle him the benefit of having regularized in the same post. ... It is also well-settled law by several other decisions of this Court that appointment on ad hoc basis/temporary basis comes to an end by efflux of time and persons holding such post have no right to continue on the post and ask for regul....

Kanwar Singh Sharma VS State of Himachal Pradesh - 2020 Supreme(HP) 419

Law Officer of this Directorate on outsource basis against the post of Social Development Expert under SLTC PMAYHFA at Sundernagar in the Directorate of Urban Development at fixed emoluments @ Rs.45,000/- p.m. in the public interest, please." ... The contractual services are initially upto 07.03.2020 and are purely temporary against the assigned project. In case the project is abandoned/discontinued, due to any reasons before the said period, the contractual services shall be terminated at fifteen days' notice. ... Th....

Xerox vs Loc. 14A Rochester Reg'l Joint Bd. Xerographic Div. Workers - 2025 Supreme(US)(ca2) 60

lacked any vested contractual right,” id. at 210 n.4. ... When a party claims that a right vested under a CBA, “[i]n this Circuit, to reach a trier of fact, an employee does not have to ‘point to unambiguous language to support a claim. ... under the agreement, or where, under normal principles of contract interpretation, the disputed contractual right survives expiration of the remainder of the agreement. ... In Litton, the Supre....

Md. Rashid VS State of Jharkhand - 2023 Supreme(Jhk) 33

3 has submitted that the petitioner was a contractual employee and he does not have any vested right in the said post.

Santosh Kumar VS Rajendra Agricultural University - 2022 Supreme(Pat) 344

More over, this Court finds that the termination is in consequence of the regularly selected persons having joined the post. There is no right available to contractual employee to continue on the post. The petitioners after having participated in the regular selection and having failed therein can not claim continuation.

Pankaj Kumar VS State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary - 2018 Supreme(Jhk) 525

The petitioners are trained Computer Data Entry Operator and only as they have been appointed on contractual basis, steps are taken to throw them out of service by appointing another set of persons on the same post sponsored by JAP-IT. It is settled principle of law that a contractual employee, though, has no right to hold the post, but cannot be replaced arbitrarily by another contractual employee or through contractor's employee.

Dara Shikoh, son of late Syed Shujauddin Ahmed VS State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand - 2016 Supreme(Jhk) 1188

Normally, the Courts would not interfere with the decision of the executives, transferring an employee from one place to another place unless the order of transfer is shown to be issued in breach of statutory rules or it is shown that it is actuated with malice in law. No officer in his personal capacity has been made a party-respondent who alleged to have malice against the petitioner. In the present proceeding, the petitioner has failed to establish that the order of transfer vide Notification dated 29.06.2016 has been issued in breach of statutory provisions. No employee can cla....