Back
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Rehmat Fatima – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi Through Principal Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background establishing employment and maternity leave. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. arguments presenting the petitioner's entitlement to maternity benefits. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 3. court analysis on maternity benefits entitlement and employment principles. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75) |
| 4. final conclusion regarding the grant of maternity benefits. (Para 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80) |
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. - The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by denial of maternity benefits and termination of petitioner who was working as contractual employee. By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the following reliefs-
"a) issue writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to allow the petitioner to continue on the post of stenographer on contractual basis and not to replace the petitioner
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
