Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Courts have clarified that even if a member initiates a civil suit, it does not automatically mean the suit is maintainable; the suit must fall outside statutory restrictions or involve matters not exclusively assigned to cooperative tribunals ["T. U. Sanku v. State of Kerala and Others - Kerala"], ["MANHAR RATILAL BAGADIA V/s SHAMBHAJI SAKHARAM MHALSAKAR - Gujarat"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
In the world of cooperative societies, disputes among members or between members and the society are common. But what happens when a member wants to sue another member or the society itself in civil court? A frequent question arises: Member cannot file civil suits against another member and society in civil court. This stems from statutory frameworks designed to keep internal matters out of regular courts and channel them through specialized mechanisms. This blog post breaks down the general rule, key exceptions, and practical steps, drawing from established legal precedents. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Members of a cooperative society generally cannot file civil suits against other members or the society itself for rights or remedies tied to the society's internal affairs, such as membership disputes, transfers, or occupancy issues. Civil courts are typically barred from adjudicating these matters. O. N Bhatnagar VS Rukibai Narsindas - 1982 0 Supreme(SC) 106
Instead, disputes touching upon the management, constitution, or business of the society must be referred to the Registrar or relevant authority under cooperative laws. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, W. B. VS Krishna Kumarsinghania - 1995 0 Supreme(SC) 828T. P. Daver VS Lodge Victoria: S. C. Belgaunm - 1962 0 Supreme(SC) 429
The rationale? Cooperative Societies Acts (varying by state, e.g., Maharashtra, Karnataka) prioritize efficient, specialized resolution to avoid clogging civil courts with internal governance issues. For instance, the Supreme Court has clarified that such disputes relating to management or internal affairs must go to the Registrar or cooperative tribunals. T. P. Daver VS Lodge Victoria: S. C. Belgaunm - 1962 0 Supreme(SC) 429
Civil courts lack jurisdiction for disputes expressly or impliedly reserved for cooperative authorities. The legal framework under the Cooperative Societies Act emphasizes resolution through statutory channels like Registrar arbitration or cooperative courts, not civil suits. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, W. B. VS Krishna Kumarsinghania - 1995 0 Supreme(SC) 828T. P. Daver VS Lodge Victoria: S. C. Belgaunm - 1962 0 Supreme(SC) 429
In practice, a member's suit against the society or another member for internal issues—like expulsion or share forfeiture—is often deemed non-maintainable. For example, expulsion may involve share forfeiture, but such matters are handled internally or via the Registrar, who can call upon the member and society for explanations before deciding. Mohd. Asad Alvi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - 2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 20359
Even under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, courts have returned petitions improperly filed in civil courts, directing them to appropriate statutory provisions. In one case, a Society Original Petition (SOP) was filed under a repealed Act; the court held it should be returned for presentation under the correct law, like Section 6 for injunctions related to meetings or elections. President, Sri Vasavi Kanyaka Parameswari Arya Vyshya Nithyanna Sathra Sangham, Yadagirigutta Village VS Yelakanti Balesh - 2023 Supreme(Telangana) 276
While the bar is strong, exceptions exist where civil courts may entertain suits:- Extraneous or Personal Rights: Disputes involving fraud, ultra vires acts, damages, or property rights independent of internal management. ANJAN CHOUDHURY VS ANANDANEER CO-OPERATIVE REGISTEREDHOUSING SOCIETY - 1990 0 Supreme(Cal) 144O. N Bhatnagar VS Rukibai Narsindas - 1982 0 Supreme(SC) 106- Acts Beyond Society Scope: If the issue doesn't touch internal affairs, like personal defamation claims against officers in their individual capacity.- Mandatory Notice for Certain Claims: In Karnataka, suits for damages against a society or officers for business matters require prior notice under Section 125 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959. Failure leads to plaint rejection, but jurisdiction exists for personal capacity suits. Branch Manager VS Prabhu Trading Corporation - 2024 Supreme(Kar) 602
Additionally, jurisdiction isn't always ousted. In a Himachal Pradesh case under the 1968 Act, civil courts could grant injunctions where members' rights (e.g., livelihood via truck operations) were jeopardized by external actions, as Sections 72 and 92 didn't bar the suit. The court noted plaintiffs established a prima facie case. Ambuja Cement Ltd. VS Bimla Devi - 2024 Supreme(HP) 27
Another ruling under Order 7 Rule 11 emphasized that plaint rejection for lack of jurisdiction must rely solely on plaint averments, not external evidence—reinforcing careful assessment. Bansi Ram VS Tyali Cooperative Consumer Store - 2023 Supreme(HP) 472
From other precedents:- Civil courts handled inter-se rights not barred by specific acts like securitisation laws, analogously applying to cooperatives. MOHAN LAL VS DWARKA PRASAD - 2007 Supreme(Raj) 286- In membership challenges, evidence like receipts or cross-examinations matters, but still routed statutorily. President, Sri Vasavi Kanyaka Parameswari Arya Vyshya Nithyanna Sathra Sangham, Yadagirigutta Village VS Yelakanti Balesh - 2023 Supreme(Telangana) 276
These cases highlight a strict interpretation: Officers aren't equated to the society for jurisdiction bars, per Supreme Court principles. Branch Manager VS Prabhu Trading Corporation - 2024 Supreme(Kar) 602
Facing a dispute? Here's how to proceed:1. Exhaust Internal Remedies: Approach the society's managing committee first.2. File with Registrar: For membership, expulsion, occupancy—seek arbitration under cooperative laws.3. Civil Court Only if Exceptional: For fraud, damages (with notice if required), or non-internal issues.4. Seek Legal Counsel: State-specific acts vary (e.g., Maharashtra vs. Karnataka).
Pro Tip: Mediation or Lok Adalat can resolve some claims faster, but jurisdiction checks apply. Divisional Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division-I VS Raman Singh - 2018 Supreme(All) 2208
In summary, cooperative society members typically cannot file civil suits against each other or the society for internal affairs—jurisdiction lies with the Registrar or tribunals unless exceptions like fraud or extraneous rights apply. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, W. B. VS Krishna Kumarsinghania - 1995 0 Supreme(SC) 828O. N Bhatnagar VS Rukibai Narsindas - 1982 0 Supreme(SC) 106
Key Takeaways:- Prioritize statutory mechanisms for efficiency.- Civil courts for personal/external claims only.- Always check state-specific Cooperative Societies Act.
This framework protects societies while safeguarding genuine rights. For tailored advice, consult a legal expert. Stay informed, resolve amicably, and keep your cooperative thriving!
References:1. O. N Bhatnagar VS Rukibai Narsindas - 1982 0 Supreme(SC) 106: Civil courts lack jurisdiction over society business disputes.2. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, W. B. VS Krishna Kumarsinghania - 1995 0 Supreme(SC) 828: Internal affairs to Registrar.3. T. P. Daver VS Lodge Victoria: S. C. Belgaunm - 1962 0 Supreme(SC) 429: Management disputes barred.4. ANJAN CHOUDHURY VS ANANDANEER CO-OPERATIVE REGISTEREDHOUSING SOCIETY - 1990 0 Supreme(Cal) 144: Exceptions for extraneous matters.
#CoopLaw #CivilJurisdiction #MemberRights
... "44.(1) No society shall make a loan to any person other than a member or on the security of its own shares, or on the security of any person who is not a member. ... Provided that with the special sanction of the Registrar, a society may make loans to another society. ... , past member of a person claiming through a member, past member of a deceased member of society, or a society#....
An ill advised civil action against a society by a member cannot be regarded as sufficient reason to disqualify him. ... the society by filing civil suits against it for certain alleged irregularities. ... The 2nd respondent held that every person had a right to approach a court of law and the fact that the present petitioner filed suits against the society was no reason to disqualify him to be a member#H....
As regards the second objection that the petitioner is not a member of the 2nd respondent society, the Civil Court has observed that though the petitioner has not filed any receipt to show that he is a member or executive member of respondent No. 2 society, respondent No. 1, in his cross-examination ... He has also taken the ground that the petitioner in the S.O.P. was not a member of the society at the time of filing the petition a....
Application under Section 24 filed for transfer of O.S.No.29/2013 pending on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Puttur to File of Principal Senior Civil Judge and ACJM, Puttur is allowed. 7. ... KAMAL ORAL ORDER Petitioner who is the plaintiff in O.S.No.29/2013 pending consideration on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge & JMFC Puttur as well as in O.S.No.51/2016 pending consideration on the file of Principal Civil Judge ... SR....
, in respect of any matter relating to the affairs of the society, any member of the society may proceed with the dispute under the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Central Act 26 of 1996), or may file an application in the District Court concerned and the said court shall after ... It was further averred that Section 23 of the Act, 2001, mandates that dispute arising among the committee or members of society in respect of any matter relating ....
(4) Expulsion of a member from a society may involve forfeiture of shares held by the member in such society." 12. ... in sub-section (1), he may call upon such member and the society, to explain within a period to be specified by him, why such member should not be expelled from the society. ... If the member or society fails to furnish his or its explanation, within the specified period or after considering the e....
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners being to extend the bar on the jurisdiction of civil court by way of interpretation by treating the officers or office bearers of the society to be on par with the society, such a submission cannot be accepted on the principle of strict interpretation ... rendered by the Supreme Court in the case referred to above and relied upon by the trial court, such a submission cannot be accepted. ... claiming t....
Hence, the jurisdiction of civil court to entertain the suits of the plaintiffs cannot prima facie be said to be ousted. 19. In addition, the facts suggest that the plaintiffs had been able to establish prima facie case in their favour. ... It has been submitted that the plaintiffs had a valid cause of action to file the suits against the defendants as their rights as members of the society were being jeoparadised by illegal acts of the company. ... Faced with peculia....
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS VADAKKEKKARA VEEDU, MANIYAR, PUNALUR, COMMITTEE MEMBER OF THE PATHANAPURAM TALUK SAMAJAM, VALACODU.P.O, PUNALUR-691305 10 C.P.SAMUEL AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS CHAMKKARA PUTHEN VEEDU, KARAVALOOR.P.O, COMMITTEE MEMEBER ... Shri.N.Satheesh further says that the appellants had, in fact, taken part in the elections to the subsequently registered Society and that it is only when they were elected in it that they filed the appeal. 4. ... THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER 6 PRADEEP CHANDRAN AGE....
, or deceased employee of the society; or (d) between the society and any other co-operative society, between a society and liquidator of another society or between the liquidator of one society and the liquidator of another society; or “(a) among members, past members and persons claiming through members, past members and deceased members; or (b) between a member, past member or person claiming t....
Whereas, in a case of claim put by a member of public for damages caused to him, for the fault of the electricity department, the matter would fall within the jurisdiction of the Permanent Lok Adalat, inasmuch as, "supply of power" by any establishment to the public is included within the meaning of "Public utility service" defined under Section 22-A of the Legal Service Authority Act, 1987. Such a direction would run contrary to the whole object of the Act, 1987. The claimant who belongs to the weaker section of society cannot be relegated to the tardy process of civil court for f....
In the meantime, three applications under Section 151 CPC were filed by the petitioners/defendants for recalling the order dated 4th July, 2016 incorporating the reasons due to which petitioner was not able to file the written statement within the stipulated time. Prayer was made for grant of another opportunity to file the written statement in both the civil suits.
The revision petitioner is prepared to deposit the said amount without prejudice to the case. The revision petitioner has obtained interim order restraining the respondent from making any complaints to the Banks and other authorities either directly or indirectly, in writing or otherwise alleging that the petitioner is due any sums to the respondent till they reconcile the figures as arrived between the parties. The learned counsel further submits that two Civil Suits have been filed in O.S.No.1206 of 2012, on the file of XV Assistant Civil Court, Chennai and another case in O.S.No....
Subject to all just exceptions including limitations, liberty is given to the plaintiff to claim relief by way of damages/mesne profits in a separate suit filed before the competent court 22. Only if law permits, can the plaintiff file another suit. The Honble Supreme Court held that a Civil Court cannot grant leave to file another suit.
( 7 ) ADVANCING the arguments for the side of the appellants Mr. G. P. Sharma, Mr. R. K. Agarwal and Mr. Parag Rastogi, Advocates submitted that Section 34 of the securitisation 9 of CPC, the aforesaid Section 34 cannot be construed as expressed or implied bar against such civil suits as far as inter-se civil rights of the parties are concerned. Act cannot bar the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts to decide the inter se civil rights and in view of general permission to file civil suits for determination of civil rights given u/s. They relied on various judgments of various H....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
