SupremeToday Landscape Ad
AI Thinking

AI Thinking...

Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!

Scanned Judgements…!


AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Cooperative Societies and Securities Act - Main points and insights:
  • The provided sources do not explicitly state that Cooperative Societies come under the Securities Act. Instead, they focus on the governance, registration, and dispute resolution mechanisms under various Cooperative Societies Acts across different states (e.g., Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Delhi, and others) ["J.p.mishra vs State Of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh"] ["Vivek Dixit vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"] ["OM PARWAL VS DELHI ADMINISTRATION - Delhi"] ["P.K.RAGESH vs KERAL STATE COPERATIVE BANK LTD - Kerala"] ["A.LOGAMBAL vs THE PRESIDING OFFICER - Madras"].
  • Several judgments emphasize that Cooperative Societies are governed primarily by their respective Cooperative Acts and that statutory remedies and procedures (such as appeals, revisions, or arbitration) under these Acts are the proper channels for resolution, rather than external laws like the Securities Act ["Vivek Dixit vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"] ["P.K.RAGESH vs KERAL STATE COPERATIVE BANK LTD - Kerala"] ["A.LOGAMBAL vs THE PRESIDING OFFICER - Madras"].
  • There is mention of administrative decisions and statutory limitations within Cooperative Acts, but no direct reference to Cooperative Societies being classified as securities or falling under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) regulations ["J.p.mishra vs State Of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh"].
  • The courts have consistently reiterated that disputes involving Cooperative Societies should be addressed through the mechanisms provided in their respective Acts and that any attempt to treat these societies as securities under the Securities Act would be contrary to the statutory framework ["J.p.mishra vs State Of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh"].

  • Analysis and Conclusion:

  • Based on the provided case law and official communications, Cooperative Societies do not come under the Securities Act. Their regulation and dispute resolution are primarily governed by state Cooperative Acts and related rules.
  • There is no indication in the sources that Cooperative Societies are classified as securities or that they are regulated under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) or the Securities Act.
  • Therefore, the main insight is that Cooperative Societies are governed by their respective Cooperative Acts, and disputes or issues related to registration, management, or employment are to be addressed through statutory remedies available under those Acts, not under the Securities Act.

References:- ["J.p.mishra vs State Of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh"]- ["Vivek Dixit vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["OM PARWAL VS DELHI ADMINISTRATION - Delhi"]- ["P.K.RAGESH vs KERAL STATE COPERATIVE BANK LTD - Kerala"]- ["A.LOGAMBAL vs THE PRESIDING OFFICER - Madras"]- ["J.p.mishra vs State Of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh"]- ["J.p.mishra vs State Of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh"]

Do Cooperative Societies Fall Under the SARFAESI Act?

In the complex world of Indian financial law, questions about jurisdiction often arise, especially for entities like cooperative societies. A common query is: Do cooperative societies come under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act)? This issue pits central banking regulations against state cooperative laws, with significant implications for debt recovery.

This blog post breaks down the legal position, drawing from landmark judgments and statutory provisions. Note that this is general information based on established precedents and should not be taken as specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.

Main Legal Finding: Cooperative Banks Yes, Pure Societies No

Generally, cooperative societies engaged in banking—known as cooperative banks—are covered under the SARFAESI Act for recovering dues, a core banking function under Entry 45 of List I, Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. This stems from Section 2(1)(c) of the SARFAESI Act, notifications specifying cooperative banks, and Section 56(a) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (BR Act), which subjects their banking operations to central laws despite state oversight of incorporation under Entry 32 of List IIPANDURANG GANPATI CHAUGULE VS VISHWASRAO PATIL MURGUD SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED - 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 358.

Pure cooperative societies not involved in banking do not fall under the SARFAESI Act. For instance, state cooperative laws like the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act govern non-banking aspects such as management and winding up PANDURANG GANPATI CHAUGULE VS VISHWASRAO PATIL MURGUD SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED - 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 358.

Key Points on Applicability

Detailed Analysis: Legislative Competence and Pith and Substance

The SARFAESI Act's validity for cooperative banks hinges on the pith and substance doctrine. Recovery is integral to banking (Entry 45, List I), not encroaching on state cooperative regulation (Entry 32, List II). As held: The concept of regulating non-banking affairs of society and regulating the banking business of society are two different aspects and are covered under different Entries, i.e., Entry 32 of List II and Entry 45 of List I, respectively. The law dealing with regulation of banking is traceable to Entry 45 of List I and only the Parliament is competent to legislate. PANDURANG GANPATI CHAUGULE VS VISHWASRAO PATIL MURGUD SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED - 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 358

This distinguishes cases like service regulations upheld as incidental under state lists, affirming SARFAESI's application PANDURANG GANPATI CHAUGULE VS VISHWASRAO PATIL MURGUD SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED - 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 358. State acts, such as the U.P. Cooperative Societies Act or Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, handle incorporation and disputes like elections or inspections by Registrars SMT SHIVAMMA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKAV.J. JOSE vs JOINT REGISTRAR OF COPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL) - 2020 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 49313. However, banking trumps these for recovery.

Definitions: How Cooperative Banks Fit In

Under SARFAESI Section 2(1)(c), 'bank' includes 'banking company' from BR Act Section 5(c) via Section 56(a), deeming cooperative banks as such. The term ‘bank’ has been defined in Section 2(1)(c) to mean ‘banking company’... Thus, the definition of ‘banking company’ stands incorporated in Section 2(1)(d) of the SARFAESI Act... Section 56(a) becomes part of Section 5(c). PANDURANG GANPATI CHAUGULE VS VISHWASRAO PATIL MURGUD SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED - 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 358Krishna Trading Company VS Vyavisayik Evam Audhyogik Sahakari Bank Ltd. - Madhya Pradesh (2012)

The Central Government notified cooperative banks under Section 2(1)(c)(v): The Central Government in exercise of powers... u/s 2(1)(c)(v) of the Securitization Act has issued the aforesaid notification... Krishna Trading Company VS Vyavisayik Evam Audhyogik Sahakari Bank Ltd. - Madhya Pradesh (2012). The Supreme Court in Pandurang Ganapati Chaugule confirmed: The cooperative banks under the State legislation and multi-State cooperative banks are banks under Section 2(1)(c) of the Securitisation... The recovery procedure prescribe under Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act... is applicable. Andaman and Nicobar State Cooperative Bank Limited VS Andaman and Nicobar Administration - 2021 0 Supreme(Cal) 336

Jurisdiction: DRT Takes Precedence

SARFAESI Sections 34-35 oust other courts: No Civil Court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which a Debt Recovery Tribunal... is empowered... Section 35... shall override other laws. Smt. Laxmibai VS Jalgaon Merchant Co-operative Bank - 2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 1750. Cooperative courts lack jurisdiction, even for post-notice fraud claims.

Contrast with Greater Bombay Coop. Bank on RDDB Act, where coops were excluded for member recoveries, but SARFAESI's notification overrides this NEEL OIL INDUSTRIES PARTNERSHIP FIRM VS UNION OF INDIA - 2015 0 Supreme(Guj) 950. State Registrars handle administrative matters like elections or records under acts like Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, but not SARFAESI dues Latin Catholic Fishermens Educational Society, Thoothoor, St. Judes College Campus VS The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai – 600 028 - 2007 Supreme(Mad) 1665.

Distinction from Non-Banking Cooperatives

Non-banking cooperatives remain under state laws. For example, primary milk producers or spinning mills disputes go to Registrars or state forums B. Narasimha Reddy VS State of A. P. , rep. by its Secretary to Govt. of A. P. - 2007 Supreme(AP) 505Andhra National Textile Workers Union VS Commissioner of Labour - 1997 Supreme(AP) 1299. State acts like U.P./Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Acts govern non-banking aspects (e.g., management under Sections 28-35), but banking/recovery shifts to central laws. PANDURANG GANPATI CHAUGULE VS VISHWASRAO PATIL MURGUD SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED - 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 358Virendra Pal Singh VS District Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Etah - 1980 0 Supreme(SC) 250

Societies Registration Act covers charitable or religious groups, but banking elevates them to central regulation Management Board, Windsor Park Residents Welfare Association Through Its VP Viplav Sharma VS State of UP - 2019 Supreme(All) 338Hindu Public VS Rajdhani Puja Samithee - 1999 2 Supreme 107.

Exceptions and Limitations

Practical Recommendations

Cooperative banks should invoke SARFAESI Section 13 for recovery; aggrieved parties appeal to DRT under Section 17. Verify bank status under BR Act Section 56 and notifications. Challenges to notifications rarely succeed post-PandurangAndaman and Nicobar State Cooperative Bank Limited VS Andaman and Nicobar Administration - 2021 0 Supreme(Cal) 336. Non-banking disputes? Approach cooperative forums.

Key Takeaways

  • Cooperative banks: Yes to SARFAESI for banking/recovery.
  • Pure cooperatives: No, state laws apply.
  • Jurisdiction: DRT exclusive; overrides state courts.
  • Central banking laws prevail over state incorporation rules via pith and substance.

Understanding this balance helps navigate debt recovery efficiently. For tailored guidance, seek professional legal counsel.

References

  1. PANDURANG GANPATI CHAUGULE VS VISHWASRAO PATIL MURGUD SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED - 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 358: Core on SARFAESI for coop banks.
  2. Andaman and Nicobar State Cooperative Bank Limited VS Andaman and Nicobar Administration - 2021 0 Supreme(Cal) 336: Pandurang Ganapati Chaugule ruling.
  3. Krishna Trading Company VS Vyavisayik Evam Audhyogik Sahakari Bank Ltd. - Madhya Pradesh (2012): Notification on coop banks.
  4. Smt. Laxmibai VS Jalgaon Merchant Co-operative Bank - 2010 0 Supreme(Bom) 1750: DRT jurisdiction.
  5. NEEL OIL INDUSTRIES PARTNERSHIP FIRM VS UNION OF INDIA - 2015 0 Supreme(Guj) 950: RDDB contrast.
  6. Virendra Pal Singh VS District Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Etah - 1980 0 Supreme(SC) 250: State vs. central competence.
#SARFAESIAct, #CooperativeBanks, #DebtRecovery
Chat Download
Chat Print
Chat R ALL
Landmark
Strategy
Argument
Risk
Chat Voice Bottom Icon
Chat Sent Bottom Icon
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top