Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Interrogatories cannot be served to the opposite party at the time of filing the suit without prior leave of court. They are only permissible after obtaining leave, which must be granted by the court ["DEEPAK KOTHARI VS OMNILSM TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. - 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 84"] ["Glen Industries Private Limited VS United India Insurance Company Limited - Calcutta"].
The process involves filing an application for leave to serve interrogatories, which the court may allow at any stage of the suit, provided it is relevant and not prejudicial ["DEEPAK KOTHARI VS OMNILSM TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. - 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 84"] ["Glen Industries Private Limited VS United India Insurance Company Limited - Calcutta"] ["Zee Media Corporation Limited (Zee News Channel), Uttar Pradesh VS Mahendra Singh Dhoni - Madras"].
Once leave is granted, interrogatories are served on the opposite party, who then is required to answer them by affidavit within a specified period, typically ten days ["Glen Industries Private Limited VS United India Insurance Company Limited - Calcutta"] ["Zee Media Corporation Limited (Zee News Channel), Uttar Pradesh VS Mahendra Singh Dhoni - Madras"].
The court may call for a response from the opposite party before granting leave, and the opposite party has the right to oppose the application for leave ["Mamta VS Rishipal - Delhi"] ["IND_Delhi_CM(M)-265_2022"]-265_2022).
Serving interrogatories before obtaining court approval is generally not permitted; they must be preceded by an application and court order ["DEEPAK KOTHARI VS OMNILSM TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. - 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 84"] ["Glen Industries Private Limited VS United India Insurance Company Limited - Calcutta"] ["Zee Media Corporation Limited (Zee News Channel), Uttar Pradesh VS Mahendra Singh Dhoni - Madras"].
The stage of the proceedings influences the appropriateness of serving interrogatories; they are typically served during the pendency of the suit after leave, not at the time of filing ["Sanjiv Deepak Rahis @ Sanjiv Deepak Rais VS Rishab Rai Rahis - Punjab and Haryana"] ["IND_Delhi_CM(M)-265_2022"] ["AMMU AMMAL VS VENKITADRI IYER - Kerala"].
The purpose of interrogatories is to narrow issues, obtain admissions, and facilitate fair trial proceedings, but they should not be used as fishing inquiries or to serve irrelevant purposes ["Lombo Tayeng VS Muk Pertin - 2014 0 Supreme(Gau) 1033"] ["M. Kishan Rao VS R. Subramanyam - Current Civil Cases"] ["M. Kishan Rao VS R. Subramanyam - 2010 0 Supreme(AP) 274"].
Analysis and Conclusion:Interrogatories must be served only after obtaining leave from the court, which involves filing an application and receiving court approval. They cannot be served simultaneously with the filing of the suit or without prior permission, ensuring procedural fairness and relevance. The court's role includes scrutinizing the relevance and timing of interrogatories, and opposition from the opposite party is permissible before leave is granted. Serving interrogatories prematurely or without court approval is generally not allowed.
In civil litigation in India, discovery tools like interrogatories play a crucial role in narrowing issues and promoting fair trials. But a common question arises: whether interrogatories has to be served to the opposite party at the time of filing interrogatory petition? This uncertainty can lead to procedural missteps. Generally, under the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, the answer is no—you must first seek court leave before serving them. This blog post breaks down the procedure, judicial interpretations, and practical tips, drawing from key precedents and rules.
Interrogatories are written questions served on the opposite party to obtain admissions on material facts, aiding in disposing of suits fairly or saving costs. Governed by Order XI Rules 1 and 2 CPC, they prevent 'fishing expeditions' and ensure relevance. Premature service could invite objections or penalties, making the correct timing essential.
The main legal finding is clear: No, interrogatories do not have to be served to the opposite party at the time of filing the interrogatory petition. Instead, a party files an application for court leave, submitting proposed interrogatories for approval. Only post-grant can they be delivered (served). Raj Narain VS Indira Nehru Gandhi - 1972 0 Supreme(SC) 172Lombo Tayeng VS Muk Pertin - 2014 0 Supreme(Gau) 1033
Order XI Rule 1 states: In any suit the plaintiff or defendant by leave of the court may deliver interrogatories in writing for the examination of the opposite parties... Raj Narain VS Indira Nehru Gandhi - 1972 0 Supreme(SC) 172Lombo Tayeng VS Muk Pertin - 2014 0 Supreme(Gau) 1033M. Kishan Rao VS R. Subramanyam - 2010 0 Supreme(AP) 274DEEPAK KOTHARI VS OMNILSM TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. - 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 84.
Rule 2 adds: On an application for leave to deliver interrogatories the particular interrogatories proposed to be delivered shall be submitted to the Court. In deciding upon such application, the Court shall take into account any offer... and leave shall be given as to such only of the interrogatories submitted as the Court shall consider necessary either for disposing fairly of the suit or for saving costs. Lombo Tayeng VS Muk Pertin - 2014 0 Supreme(Gau) 1033M. Kishan Rao VS R. Subramanyam - 2010 0 Supreme(AP) 274DEEPAK KOTHARI VS OMNILSM TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. - 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 84Laliteshwar Prasad Shahi VS Bateshwar Prasad - 1963 0 Supreme(Pat) 5.
Key points:- Submit proposed interrogatories to the court only at filing—no service on the opposite party yet.- The court assesses relevancy, necessity, and any offers by the opposite party (e.g., admissions or documents). Lombo Tayeng VS Muk Pertin - 2014 0 Supreme(Gau) 1033- Leave is granted selectively for relevant questions with a reasonably close connection with matters in question. Lombo Tayeng VS Muk Pertin - 2014 0 Supreme(Gau) 1033
This pre-service filter safeguards against vexatious queries.
Once leave is granted, interrogatories are delivered to the opposite party. Objections under Rules 6-7 arise post-service, not at the filing stage. Sree Padmanabha Dasa Marthanda Varma VS Moolan Thirunal Rama Varma - 1997 0 Supreme(Ker) 355Lombo Tayeng VS Muk Pertin - 2014 0 Supreme(Gau) 1033. For instance, a Delhi High Court case notes: It is only after the interrogatories are served on the opposite party... that the opposite party may, under Order XI Rule 6... IND_Delhi_CM(M)-265_2022_Delhi_CM(M)-265_2022 2022_DHC_1146 MAMTA vs RISHIPAL.
Another source emphasizes: seeking leave to serve interrogatories, calling for a response from the opposite party on the application. MAMTA vs RISHIPAL. This confirms the sequence: application → hearing (possible notice/objections to application) → leave → service.
Courts consistently apply this without requiring initial service:- In one case: They filed an application under O.11 R.1 of the Code... The learned Munsiff dismissed the application...—no prior service mentioned. P. S. Rajan VS K. P. John Kattarukudiyel - 2003 0 Supreme(Ker) 736.- THIS is a petition by the plaintiff for examination of defendant No. 1 on delivery of interrogatories under O. 11, Rr. 1 and 2—court granted selective leave post-petition. JANAKI BALLAV PATNAIK VS BENNETT COLEMAN AND CO. LTD - 1988 0 Supreme(Ori) 41.- By his petition dated 27th July, 1962, the petitioner sought leave of the Tribunal to deliver the following interrogatories... opposite party No. 1 raised objection after filing, confirming no service at petition stage. Laliteshwar Prasad Shahi VS Bateshwar Prasad - 1963 0 Supreme(Pat) 5.
Opposite parties may object during the leave hearing, but to the application, not the interrogatories. Laliteshwar Prasad Shahi VS Bateshwar Prasad - 1963 0 Supreme(Pat) 5Sree Padmanabha Dasa Marthanda Varma VS Moolan Thirunal Rama Varma - 1997 0 Supreme(Ker) 355. A Punjab High Court reference underscores: question of relevancy of the interrogatories sought to be served... grant of leave to serve interrogatories, at least, the Court should be in a... highlighting court scrutiny pre-service. M/S MUKESH KUMAR RAJESH KUMAR vs ASHOK KUMAR.
In consumer disputes, similar principles hold: A complainant filed for directing replies to interrogatories, but the focus was post-service compliance, not filing service. Nitishree Victim’s Welfare Association VS Shourya Towers Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as M/s. Nitishree Infrastructure Ltd. ).
Interrogatories must be necessary for fair disposal or saving costs and not vague or fishing expeditions. One Malaysian-influenced ruling (adaptable to Indian context) dismissed leave for broad questions: Interrogatories deemed unnecessary... Questions posed were vague, broad, and amounted to fishing expeditions. KENANGA INVESTORS BERHAD vs ZULRAFQ CAPITAL SDN BHD & ANOR.
No exceptions mandate service at filing. Even for co-defendants with opposing interests, court leave precedes delivery. P. S. Rajan VS K. P. John Kattarukudiyel - 2003 0 Supreme(Ker) 736. Post-service non-compliance risks striking defenses (Rule 21). Modula India VS Kamakshya Singh Deo - 1988 0 Supreme(SC) 628Zaminder Dharmik & Shekshnik Nyas VS Siddhanath (dead) by Lrs - 2007 4 Supreme 307Babbar Sewing Machine Company VS Trilok Nath Mahajan - 1978 0 Supreme(SC) 197.
In real estate consumer cases, interrogatories were answered post-service via affidavits, aligning with CPC. SABITA, KALLIANPURKAR NURSING HOME VS SHREEPAD. Courts reject abusive use: Interrogatories must have reasonably close connection with... Lombo Tayeng VS Muk Pertin - 2014 0 Supreme(Gau) 1033M/S MUKESH KUMAR RAJESH KUMAR vs ASHOK KUMAR.
To navigate effectively:1. Draft a detailed application under Order XI Rules 1-2, attaching proposed interrogatories and justifying relevancy to pleaded issues.2. Anticipate hearings: Courts may notify opposite parties for objections to the application. Prepare responses to offers of admissions/documents.3. Serve promptly post-leave: Opposite party must answer by affidavit within 10 days; extensions possible.4. Avoid pitfalls: Ensure questions aren't oppressive or contradictory to documents. KENANGA INVESTORS BERHAD vs ZULRAFQ CAPITAL SDN BHD & ANOR.
Understanding this timing prevents procedural errors and strengthens your case. While this outlines general principles under CPC, procedures may vary by court or facts—consult a legal professional for tailored advice. This is not legal advice but informational guidance based on precedents.
References compiled from judicial documents including Raj Narain VS Indira Nehru Gandhi - 1972 0 Supreme(SC) 172, Lombo Tayeng VS Muk Pertin - 2014 0 Supreme(Gau) 1033, M. Kishan Rao VS R. Subramanyam - 2010 0 Supreme(AP) 274, DEEPAK KOTHARI VS OMNILSM TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. - 2023 0 Supreme(Guj) 84, Laliteshwar Prasad Shahi VS Bateshwar Prasad - 1963 0 Supreme(Pat) 5, P. S. Rajan VS K. P. John Kattarukudiyel - 2003 0 Supreme(Ker) 736, JANAKI BALLAV PATNAIK VS BENNETT COLEMAN AND CO. LTD - 1988 0 Supreme(Ori) 41, Sree Padmanabha Dasa Marthanda Varma VS Moolan Thirunal Rama Varma - 1997 0 Supreme(Ker) 355, IND_Delhi_CM(M)-265_2022_Delhi_CM(M)-265_2022 2022_DHC_1146, KENANGA INVESTORS BERHAD vs ZULRAFQ CAPITAL SDN BHD & ANOR, and others.
#CPCInterrogatories, #CivilDiscovery, #OrderXI
Corporations - Where any party to a suit is a corporation or a body of persons, whether incorporated or not, empowered by law to sue or be sued, whether in its own name or in the name of any officer or other person, any opposite party may apply for an Order allowing him to deliver interrogatories to ... (3) The Court may, on the application of any party to a suit at any time, and whether an affidavit of documents shall or shall not....
(5) Where any party to a suit is a corporation or a body of persons, whether incorporated or not, empowered by law to sue or be sued, whether in its own name or in the name of any officer of other person, any opposite party may apply for an order allowing him to deliver interrogatories ... possession, power, control and custody of the plaintiff at the time of filing of the suit. ... O.XI R.2 - Discovery by interrogatories: (1) In ....
According to the aforesaid Rule, the plaintiff or the defendant with the leave of the Court is entitled to deliver interrogatories in writing for the examination of the opposite party or any one or more of such parties which are essential for the just decision of the suit. ... Learned counsel further argues that stage of trial is immaterial for filing of interrogatories as the same can be raised/filed as per mandate of the provisions contained under Order XI Rules 1 and 2 CPC during pendency of the sui....
It is only after the interrogatories are served on the opposite party, according to him, that the opposite party may, under Order XI Rule 6of the CPC, question the necessity of responding to one or more of the interrogatories served on him. ... The issue that arises for consideration in this case is as to whether, prior to granting leave to serve interrogatories on the opposite party#HL_....
on the opposite party. ... It is only after the interrogatories are served on the opposite party, according to him, that the opposite party may, under Order XI Rule 6 2022:DHC:1146 CM(M) 265/2022Page 2 only, therefore, by leave of Court. The sequitur would, therefore, be that the opposite party could oppose the grant of such leave. ... seeking leave to serve interrogatories#HL_END....
It is only after the interrogatories are served on the opposite party, according to him, that the opposite party may, under Order XI Rule 6 This is a digitally signed Judgement. ... on the opposite party. ... served on him. ... seeking leave to serve interrogatories, calling for a response from the opposite party on the application. ... Court was required to hear the #....
It is also to be noted that only for understanding the case of the opposite party and to strengthen their own case, a party will send interrogatories to the opposite party. ... In other words, interrogatories are confined to facts and it will not be conclusions of law. This provision grants a party “right to information”from the adversary. The process of interrogatories narrows the issues and makes the trial less time#HL_E....
It would be unjust and oppressive to allow interrogatories that require a party to prove assertive statements made by the opposing party. ... ; (b) Whether Muhammad Taqiuddin Halim communicated with the Plaintiff's representative, especially Datuk Wira Ismitz Matthew at the material time before the Plaintiff filed the Writ of Summons herein? ... Whether Taqiuddin communicated with KIB's representative before the filing of the Writ of Summons does not directly bear on ....
It is stated that the above interrogatories have actual bearing on the adjudication of the election petition and that filing of list of documents and list of witnesses would be dependent on the answers given by the opposite party to the interrogatories. ... Core issue which would require adjudication in the election petition is whether engagement of the opposite party as Central Government Counsel would amount to h....
of the opposite parties or any one or more of such parties, and such interrogatories question of relevancy of the interrogatories sought to be served. ... The interrogatories served must have reasonably close connection with grant of leave to serve interrogatories, at least, the Court should be in a service of interrogatories is to save the time of the Court and enable the p style="position:absolute;whi....
The builder has issued a repeated demand letters and reminders for depositing the required amount of instalments and getting the registered agreement for sale executed, but the members of the complainant association were avoiding payment of the instalment and execution of the agreement. 8. The complainant has filed an IA/1899/2016 for directing the opposite party to reply various interrogatories although the builder took time to file reply to the interrogatories, but no reply has been filed. The complainant filed Rejoinder Reply on 03.12.2014 and Affidavit of Evidence of Di....
The authority shall, as soon as possible cause a copy of the petition to be served on each opposite party."
The Opposite Party also filed evidence by way of affidavit and answered interrogatories served on her by the Complainants. his mother, his sister and one of his Advocate friends, who were present at the Nursing Home at the time of admission, delivery and death.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
