Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
In the fast-paced world of civil litigation, ex-parte proceedings often arise when one party fails to appear, leading to orders passed in their absence. But what happens if the court record supporting that ex-parte order is found defective at the time it was set? A common question litigants face is: If the record is defective at the time of setting ex parte, but later correct record is discovered then the defect is cured?
This scenario raises critical issues under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), particularly regarding curable defects in pleadings, affidavits, and verifications. Generally, Indian courts take a pragmatic approach, allowing procedural lapses to be rectified if they do not go to the root of the matter. This blog delves into the legal principles, landmark judgments, and practical guidance to help you navigate such situations. Note: This is general information based on case law and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Ex-parte orders are issued under Order IX Rule 6 of the CPC when the defendant is absent despite proper service. The court's record at this stage typically includes the plaint, affidavits, vakalatnama, and proof of service. Defects might include unsigned pages, improper verification, missing affidavits of admission/denial, or unstamped documents.
Such defects can jeopardize the proceedings if not addressed. However, courts distinguish between incurable fatal flaws (e.g., lack of cause of action) and curable procedural irregularities. The latter are often remedied post-discovery, ensuring justice is not defeated on technicalities.
Yes, typically, a defect in the record at the ex-parte stage can be cured if the correct record is discovered and rectified later. Courts have consistently held that procedural defects do not render proceedings void ab initio unless they prejudice the opposite party or affect merits.
For instance, mere non-signing of pleadings pages is a defect but the same could very well be cured RAJESH WADHAWAN Vs SH NAVEEN SABHARWAL - 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 8413. Similarly, any defect in an affidavit supporting pleadings can be cured OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED Vs JOINT VENTURE OF M/S SAI RAMA ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES (SREE) & M/S MEGHA ENGINEERING & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (MEIL) - 2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 716. This curative approach aligns with CPC's objective under Section 148 and Order VI Rule 17, allowing amendments for bona fide mistakes.
Indian High Courts have clarified this in multiple rulings. Here's a breakdown:
In a Full Bench decision, if the verification of plaint was discovered to be defective the plaint may be amended, for such a defect would not of necessity result in the dismissal of the suit Wali Mohammad Khan VS Ishak Ali. Khan - 1931 Supreme(All) 78. The court emphasized curing via amendment without de novo trial if merits are unaffected.
The Delhi High Court ruled that mere non-signing of each and every page of the pleadings is per se a defect, but the same could very well be cured RAJESH WADHAWAN Vs SH NAVEEN SABHARWAL - 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 8413. In another case, post-ex-parte appearance, an application to set aside was filed the same day, reinforcing curative possibilities RAJESH WADHAWAN Vs SH NAVEEN SABHARWAL - 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 8413.
If the affidavit of admission/denial is not accompanying the written statement, however, upon the Registry pointing out the said defect, the same can be cured within 30 days. If the said defect is cured, it cannot be held that the written statement and the affidavit of admission/denial cannot be brought on record Cosco International Private Limited VS Jagat Singh Dugar - 2022 Supreme(Del) 1068. The court set aside an order rejecting the WS, holding it a curable defect, not non est (Cosco International Private Limited VS Jagat Singh Dugar - 2022 Supreme(Del) 1068).
Even unstamped vakalatnama defects discovered later were conceded as lapses curable upon re-filing OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED Vs JOINT VENTURE OF M/S SAI RAMA ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES (SREE) & M/S MEGHA ENGINEERING & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (MEIL) - 2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 716. The defect in the affidavits was curable and could be directed to be cured... after the passing of certain time even or within certain time GULSHAN KANDA vs MOHINDER SINGH AND OTHERS.
In cases of defective presentation, Once the presentation of the plaint is defective, but the defect gets cured in the course of time, the presentation relates back to the original date of filing Fehmida Usman Gani Shaikh VS Maqbool Munaf Gagan - 2019 Supreme(Bom) 1067. This prevents prejudice from technicalities.
Other sources note limits: uncured defects may lead to rejection, but applications under Order IX Rule 13 for setting aside ex-parte orders succeed if defects are rectified promptly M/S ROHIT SURFACTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs M/S KANODIA SALT COMPANY LTD.AND ANOTHER.
If facing a defective record scenario:1. File promptly: Move applications to cure defects immediately upon discovery, ideally same day for ex-parte matters.2. Seek amendment: Use Order VI Rule 17 or Section 151 for rectification.3. Document everything: Attach corrected records and affidavits explaining bona fides.4. Argue relation back: Emphasize that curing relates to original date, avoiding limitation issues.5. Avoid delays: Courts may refuse if laches prejudice the other side.
Pro Tip: Always check registry objections early. In ex-parte cases, appear post-order and file set-aside applications with curative steps.
Not all issues qualify. Incorrigible defects include:- Absence of jurisdiction.- Non-existent cause of action.- Fraudulent records.
Ex-parte evidence unchallenged due to prolonged absence without set-aside applications may stand firm Raj Kumar Raghuvanshi {Lakhera} VS Radha Lakhera - 2018 Supreme(MP) 486RajKumar Raghuvanshi Lakhera VS Radha Lakhera - 2018 Supreme(MP) 934.
In summary, Indian jurisprudence favors curing procedural defects in ex-parte records upon later discovery of correct documents, promoting substantive justice over form. Courts routinely allow amendments for verifications, affidavits, and signings if done bona fide and timely.
Key Takeaways:- Defects are generally curable unless merit-affecting Wali Mohammad Khan VS Ishak Ali. Khan - 1931 Supreme(All) 78.- Act swiftly to file corrections and set-aside applications.- Leverage CPC provisions for relation-back benefits.- Consult counsel to assess case-specific viability.
Stay informed on evolving case law to safeguard your litigation strategy. For tailored advice, reach out to a civil law expert.
#ExParteProceedings, #CPCDefects, #LegalCures
If in fact he had his client’s authority to do so, then the defect is one which, in the absence of any positive legal bar, could be cured. ... Mather [1988] 1 Sri LR 12, the Supreme Court authoritatively held that, in the absence of a positive legal bar, the defective proxy can be cured. ... The dismissal of the plaintiff’s action unilaterally on the basis that the proxy is defective is erroneous. The plaintiff in the instant case has later filed a fresh proxy in the Commercial High C....
But further question is what happens when the defect is not cured. ... Sapa's case (supra) it was held that even though ordinarily a defective verification can be cured and the failure permitted to be cured, so as to constitute cause of action where defect can be cured on the application moved by the plaintiff under Order below was not correct in refusing the amendment.
later. ... Sapa's case (supra) it was held that even though ordinarily a defective verification can be cured and the failure to disclose the grounds or sources of information may not be fatal, failure to place them on record with promptitude may lead the Court in a given case to doubt the veracity of the evidence ... It is, therefore, a settled position in law that defect in verification or an affidavit is curable. But further question is what happens when the defect is not c....
The final filed and defect-cured version was served only on 29.08.2025, along with this Hon’ble Court’s notices and summons. ... REST OF THE OBJECTIONS WILL BE RAISED LATER ON AFTER MODIFICATION/ACCORDING TO CORRECT CLASSIFICATION/NOMENCLATURE OF THE CASE-IF ANY 7. PROPER BOOKMARKING BE DONE ALONG WITH THE DESCRIPTION OF THE ANNEXURES AND PAGE NO AS GIVEN IN THE INDEX 8. ... The present application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 has been filed by the Defendant No.2 for setting#HL_END....
On 23.10.2021, the petitioner did not appear before the learned Commercial Court and hence was proceeded ex-parte. Later that day, the petitioner appeared before the Court and was apprised of the order passed and an application for setting aside ex-parte order was moved on the same day. ... Ltd and Another vs Raj Kumar Tulsian, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 6058 had categorically held that mere non-signing of each and every page of the pleadings is per se a defect, but the same could very well be cured#....
According to him, after the said error was discovered, it was found that the complete arbitral record was not available and therefore, it was necessary to file a separate application seeking exemption from filing the complete arbitral record. The said process had taken some time. ... It is settled law that any defect in an affidavit supporting pleadings can be cured. It is seen from the record that the filing was also accompanied by an executed vakalatnama, however, t....
Katesar Nath [1896] 18 All. 396 : 1896 A.W.N. 102 (FB) it was laid down that if the verification of plaint was discovered to be defective the plaint may be amended, for such a defect would not of necessity result in the dismissal of the suit. 6. In the case of Basdeo v. ... The defect in its form should be cured as it was due to a bona fide mistake. As the defect does not affect the merits of the case, it is not necessary to have a trial de novo. 12. ... The Court would then have the d....
It is settled law that any defect in an affidavit supporting pleadings can be cured. It is seen from the record that the filing was also accompanied by an executed vakalatnama, however, the same was not stamped. ... This was discovered subsequently. He conceded that there was a lapse on his part and on the part of his office for not immediately re-fling the correct file. ... According to him, after Page 21 of 22 the said error was discovered....
Record perused. ... The defect in the affidavits was curable and could be directed to be cured. ... after the passing of certain time even or within certain time. ... The said defect stands cured by recording of examination in chief before the court later case, the source of information and the reasons for p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding:0;top:607pt;left:
Set as replacement from the dealer making liable both dealer and the manufacturer for supply of defective television and the defect was not cured by repeated rectification, Sm. Sabitri Devi Chaurasi v. ... The complaint was decided ex-parte and when the execution of the ex-parte order was initiated, the appellant came forward before the learned Calcutta District Forum alleging non- service of notice on it and prayed for setting aside the ex-parte order, although it is....
If the affidavit of admission/denial is not accompanying the written statement, however, upon the Registry pointing out the said defect, the same can be cured within 30 days. If the said defect is cured, it cannot be held that the written statement and the affidavit of admission/denial cannot be brought on record.
Once the presentation of the plaint is defective, but the defect gets cured in the course of time, the presentation relates back to the original date of filing. (e) Is the subsequent tenant a lis pendens inductee? A: Yes. (f) Can the subsequent tenant, in this case, resist the original tenant's efforts to regain possession? A: Section 26, read with Order IV of CPC and Chapter II of Civil Code, governs the institution the suit.
It has come on record that ex-parte evidence was recorded and it was never challenged through any cross-examination as the appellant remained absent despite service of notices. No application is on record seeking setting aside of ex-parte order.
It has come on record that ex-parte evidence was recorded and it was never challenged through any cross-examination as the appellant remained absent despite service of notices. No application is on record seeking setting aside of ex-parte order.
No application is on record seeking setting aside of ex parte order. It has come on record that ex parte evidence was recorded and it was never challenged through any cross-examination as the appellant remained absent despite service of notices.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
