Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Main Points and Insights:
Legal Principles and Precedents:
The presence of a D-voter mother in the voter list generally indicates non-citizenship, thus barring her children from voting unless citizenship is proven otherwise.
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:["Chintham Ramakotamma VS Narella Anjamma - Andhra Pradesh"] ["R.A.PIYASENA v. A.J.M. DE SILVA et al"] ["Jaynab Bibi D/o Late Kasem Ali vs Union Of India - Gauhati"] ["NUR ISLAM vs THE UNION OF INDIA and othrs - Gauhati"]
In India's complex electoral landscape, particularly in regions like Assam grappling with National Register of Citizens (NRC) issues, questions about voter eligibility often arise. Imagine a family where the mother is marked as a 'D-voter'—a doubtful voter flagged for citizenship verification. In the case of a child whose mother is reflected as a D-voter, can he be allowed to vote? This query touches on critical intersections of family lineage, documentary evidence, and electoral laws. While this is not legal advice and individual cases vary, this post breaks down the general principles drawn from court judgments and tribunal opinions.
Voter registration hinges on proving Indian citizenship, age (over 18), and ordinary residence. For minors turning voters, parental status can influence scrutiny, but it's the totality of evidence that matters. Let's dive into the legal framework.
D-voters are individuals whose citizenship is in doubt, often due to discrepancies in documents amid Assam's border sensitivities. Under the Foreigners Act, 1946, Section 9 places the burden of proof on the person claiming citizenship. Tribunals assess evidence like voter lists, land records, and family certificates.
For children of D-voters, eligibility isn't automatically barred. Registration depends on independent verification of the child's citizenship and residence. Key documents include:- Voter lists from parents/grandparents showing continuous presence.- Birth certificates linking to Indian-origin family.- School records, land deeds, or local panchayat certificates.
Discrepancies in parental records, like a mother's D-voter status, may trigger deeper checks but don't preclude approval if the child's evidence is robust. As noted in tribunal cases, the petitioner failed to discharge her burden of proof as mandated under section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 [
#DVoterRights #VotingEligibilityIndia #CitizenshipLaw
The petitioners mother ranged herself against her daughter and gave evidence in support of the daughter-in-laws case. ... The report of the birth was given to the Village Munsiff two days after the child was born; but quite curiously the entry as to the birth mentions are name of the then two days old child. How could this name be entered when the mother (P. ... Kuppuswamy, J. , was of opinion that it is within the competence of the Election Tribunal to go into the question whether a person wh....
Presiding Officer that he should permit a man to vote for a woman, for that would not be a case of an error in the description of the voter but a complete metamorphosis or transformation of one person into another. ... Gunawardena, a man, to vote, while the electoral lists indicated that the voter was a woman. ... Gunewardena I would hold that the witness was not the person who was registered as a voter and that in this case too it was a case of ....
Now Jirfan is casting vote from Kandhbari. First child of Jirfan is girl, now about 20 years old. Jirfan did not go to school. No foreigner's case has been initiated against his other family members. Police did not ask him about Jirfan. ... He cast vote in the year 1966 for the first time from Khandhbari. In the year 1980-85 he cast vote from Sapkata. Now he is casting vote from Bardhap Boithabhanga. His father's name has been written as Arifulla in the voter list of ....
Now Jirfan is casting vote from Kandhbari. First child of Jirfan is girl, now about 20 years old. Jirfan did not go to school. No foreigner’s case has been initiated against his other family members. Police did not ask him about Jirfan. ... He cast vote in the year 1966 for the first time from Khandhbari. In the year 1980-85 he cast vote from Sapkata. Now he is casting vote from Bardhap – Boithabhanga. His father’s name has been written as Arifulla in the voter list o....
It goes to show that father of DW-2 died before 1997, so his name did not enter into the voter list along with the mother of the DW-2. A person whose name is not entered into 1997 he could not cast his vote in 1997. ... General presumption will be that the father of DW-2 whose name appeared in the Voter List of 1970 he cast his vote in 1970 and it negates the reply of DW-2 to the question of Member of the Tribunal that his father first cast vote in 1....
Apart from the above, the Tribunal also noted the fact that when the petitioner deposed on 18.01.2017, he projected one Rabia Khatun as his mother who expired about 18/19 years ago but he failed to produce any document wherein the name of his said projected mother was reflected. ... Akbar Ali, whose name appeared in the Voter List of 1965 (Ext.-C) and the voter list of 1970 (Ext.-B) 5. ... The names of these two purported paternal uncles were not reflected in the #HL_....
However, the petitioner could not produce any voter lists of her mother though her mother’s name is reflected in the 1951 NRC aged about 26 years. ... On being questioned by the Tribunal, the petitioner also stated that her mother had cast vote in the year 1970 and not in the year 1965 and that her mother died about 20/25 years ago i.e. ... Exhibit-D is the Voter List of 1997 where the name of the projected brother Sharifuddin Mandal’s is reflected ....
Apart from giving the names of the grandfather, mother, and stepmother, he has not disclosed the name of any other family members and he has clearly stated that his father casted vote in the year 1966 and his mother and stepmother casted vote in 1971 and his father's name is recorded in the NRC of 1966 ... and 4), Gaonburah certificate (Ext.7) and EPIC (Ext.8), came the stand that his father was not the person whose name appeared as his father in the voter list of 1966 and 1970. ... Ab....
She has stated that she and her husband had casted vote together and the name of her father-in- law was Pasan Ali and mother-in-law was Moonzan. She has stated that her father-in -law has casted her vote in 1965/1970. ... Dhing LAC of village-Muamari vide serial no.68, House No.20, part no.7 and he casted his vote regularly until his death and similarly the petitioner’s mother (DW-2) had also stated that she and her husband had casted vote together and her father in law, i.e, petitione....
She has stated that she and her husband had casted vote together and the name of her father-in- law was Pasan Ali and mother-in-law was Moonzan. She has stated that her father-in -law has casted her vote in 1965/1970. ... Dhing LAC of village-Muamari vide serial no.68, House No.20, part no.7 and he casted his vote regularly until his death and similarly the petitioner’s mother (DW-2) had also stated that she and her husband had casted vote together and her father in law, i.e, petitione....
The concept of one voter can only be allowed to vote in his constituency and that the voter cannot have more than one vote is now diluted. The concept of one voter can only be allowed to vote in his constituency and that the voter cannot have more than one vote is now diluted. The concept of one voter can only be allowed to vote in his constituency and that the voter cannot have more than one vote is now diluted. The concept of one voter can only be allowed to vote in his constituency and that the voter cannot have more than one....
If the voter votes in a different Constituency, he would be guilty of electoral offence punishable under the relevant provisions of the Act and the Indian Penal Code. When a Presiding Officer or other electoral staff in charge of a particular booth does something prohibited by law, they would not be discharging the functions enjoined on them, by law. It is also further stated that such voting cannot be made without the actual connivance and assistance of the Presiding Officer or the Assistant Presiding Officer. It is also known fact that a voter cannot exercise his vote in a Consti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.