Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 - Provides the legal basis for courts to condone delays in filing applications or appeals beyond prescribed periods, emphasizing discretion based on the acceptability of the explanation rather than the length of delay ["2024 0 Supreme(Guj) 1240"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Jhk) 306"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 140"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 468"].
Principles for Condonation of Delay - Courts consider sufficient cause, bona fide conduct, and approach of the litigant; delay should not be condoned mechanically, especially in cases involving penal consequences under Section 138 NI Act ["2024 0 Supreme(Bom) 363"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1138"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Jhk) 306"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 468"].
Inordinate or Excessive Delay - Courts tend to reject condonation when delays are substantial (e.g., 758 or 833 days) without satisfactory explanations, aligning with judicial caution to prevent abuse of process ["2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1138"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 468"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 63580"].
Impact of Settlement and Compromise - In cases under Section 138 NI Act, delays may be condoned if parties have settled the matter, and the delay is explained as non-willful, such as in the case of a settlement of 758 days ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 2885"].
Judicial Caution and Limitations - Courts caution against mechanical or liberal condonation, especially in penal proceedings, emphasizing adherence to legal parameters and the importance of satisfactory explanations for delays ["2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 1131"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1138"].
Special Considerations for Government/State - While courts are generally sympathetic, they still require valid reasons for delay, and condonation is not granted automatically even for government applicants ["2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1138"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Jhk) 306"].
Analysis and Conclusion:The legal framework under Section 5 of the Limitation Act grants courts discretion to condone delays, but this discretion is exercised judiciously, considering the sufficient cause, bona fide conduct, and merit of the case. Excessive delays without satisfactory explanations are typically rejected, aligning with judicial caution to prevent misuse. In the context of Section 138 NI Act, where delays are often scrutinized closely due to the penal nature of proceedings, the courts tend to favor condonation only when reasons are compelling and delays are minimal or justified by settlement or procedural delays. Therefore, a well-drafted delay condonation application should clearly articulate genuine reasons, demonstrate bona fide intent, and adhere to judicial parameters to increase the chances of acceptance.
In the fast-paced world of business transactions, cheque bounce cases under (NI Act) are common. However, missing the strict one-month deadline for filing a complaint under Section 142(b) can jeopardize your case. If you're facing a situation where you need to ask, Draft a U/s 142 B of N I Act, this guide is for you. We'll explore the legal framework, key principles, drafting essentials, and judicial precedents to help you navigate this process effectively.
Note: This article provides general information based on judicial precedents and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for case-specific guidance.
empowers courts to condone delays in filing complaints under Section 138 if the complainant shows . This provision balances procedural rigor with the interests of justice, allowing genuine delays—such as health issues or unavoidable circumstances—to be overlooked 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 2434 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 3918.
Courts emphasize that the explanation must be satisfactory, , and credible, inspiring confidence in the judicial mind 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 3918. Mere procedural compliance isn't enough; the court exercises discretion judiciously, examining the facts holistically 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2072.
Judicial precedents outline clear criteria for condonation:
As held in precedents, the primary criterion... is a satisfactory and explanation for the delay 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 3918.
File the condonation application along with the complaint or as soon as possible, disclosing reasons explicitly 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2072 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 3918. Courts must independently scrutinize these reasons 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2072.
Key procedural insights from cases:- Hearing Both Parties: demands hearing the accused before deciding condonation, especially for even short delays like three days 2016 0 Supreme(MP) 832. In one instance, the erred by registering the complaint without adjudicating the application, leading to quashing and remand 2016 0 Supreme(MP) 832.- No Fixed Procedure: Magistrates have flexibility but must consider peculiar circumstances, such as verifying statutory notices via envelopes in delay applications 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 1034.- Correct Provision: While may be invoked analogously, Section 142(b) is specific to NI Act complaints. Inconsistencies in delay calculations (e.g., 15 vs. 20 days) don't doom the application if reasons are 2017 0 Supreme(MP) 311.
Courts adopt a liberal stance for public interest matters, like pension claims, condoning 150-day delays where no willful neglect exists 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 1061.
To succeed, bolster your petition with:- Affidavits: Detailing specific reasons, e.g., medical certificates for health delays.- Documents: Hospital records, correspondence, or proof of natural disasters 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1269. A delay due to a natural disaster was condoned on grounds 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 1269.- Specificity: Avoid vagueness; explain day-by-day if possible 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 2434.
Courts reject mere assertions without proof 1922 0 Supreme(Mad) 190. In legal heir cases, delays by representatives are condonable if they qualify as 2017 0 Supreme(Tri) 351.
Tailor to facts, emphasizing justice over technicalities 2022 0 Supreme(Telangana) 441.
Not all delays qualify:- Frivolous Reasons: Vague or motivated explanations fail 2015 0 Supreme(Mad) 989.- Inexcusable Neglect: Willful delays aren't condoned 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 1061.- Post-Filing Issues: If no exists (e.g., no notice), discretion favors rejection 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 1034.
In one ruling, Section 5 doesn't directly apply to NI Act complaints, reinforcing Section 142(b)'s primacy 2017 0 Supreme(Tri) 351.
Drafting a under Section 142(b) NI Act requires precision, evidence, and alignment with judicial ethos of . While courts show leniency for genuine cases, success hinges on credibility and procedure 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 3918 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 2434.
Key Takeaways:- Provide specific, evidenced explanations.- File promptly with full disclosure.- Leverage court's discretion judiciously.- Always hear both sides for fairness.
For tailored drafts, consult a legal expert. Stay compliant to protect your rights in cheque bounce disputes.
References:1. 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2072: Emphasized credible reasons and evidence.2. 2023 0 Supreme(Del) 3918: Judicial discretion on explanations.3. 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 2434: Prompt filing and credible support.4. 2022 0 Supreme(Telangana) 441: Condonation for unavoidable delays.5. 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 1061: Liberal '' construction.6. 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 1034: Procedural flexibility in verification.7. 2016 0 Supreme(MP) 832: Mandatory hearing of parties.8. 2017 0 Supreme(MP) 311: reasons prevail over provision errors.
#NIACT #DelayCondonation #ChequeBounce
The present application has been filed for condonation of delay of 109 days caused in filing the revision application. 2. Ms. ... of the NI Act, is quashed and set aside. ... By way of this application, the applicant – revisionist challenges the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 28.01.2020 passed by the learned 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot in Criminal Case No.10818 of 2017, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which came to ... The legislature has confer....
of 1259 days in filing the complaint for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act, 1881). ... As the accused committed default, despite giving promises, the complainant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Act, on 20 August 2020 along with an application for condonation of delay of 1259 days in filing the complaint. 3.5 A notice was issued to the accused. ... The submission which, however, deserves serious consider....
into consideration while considering the question of condonation of delay. ... State of Kerala, (1997) 7 SCC 556, the Apex Court while considering a case of condonation of delay of 565 days, wherein no explanation much less a reasonable or satisfactory explanation for condonation of delay had been given, held at paragraph-6 as under: p align="justify ... No.430 of 2022 on 11.09.2023 rejecting the delay condonation application as filed by the State Go....
This interlocutory application, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, is preferred by the applicant, North East Frontier Railways for condonation of delay of 488 days in preferring an appeal, against the Judgment, Order and Decree dated 01.04.2022, passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kolasib ... Railway furnished legal opinion on 26.07.2022 and on 15.03.2023, the case file was handed over to the CGC and thereafter, the CGC informed the railway official that the reason has to be provided to him to prepare the draft#H....
Thus the power of the Court to condone delay in filing application or appeal after the prescribed period under Indian Limitation Act 1963 is provided under Section 5 of the said Act. ... We accordingly allow the applications for conversion and for condonation of delay in both the special leave petitions and direct that the SLPs shall be treated as appeals filed under section 116 A of the Representation of the People Act.’26. ... Further the merits of a claim were also to be considered ....
The explanation as given in the affidavit in support of the application for condonation of delay filed by the Petitioners in the High Court does not make out sufficient cause for condonation of the inordinate delay of 337 days in filing the appeal 6 under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ... I am dealing with an application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for filing special leave to appeal against th....
Section 138 of the NI Act is compoundable in nature in view of Section 148 thereof. ... Instant petition is filed seeking condonation of delay since the revision is filed beyond the stipulated period. 3. A delay of 758 days is reported as per the SR. Section 138 of the NI Act is compoundable but on the terms agreed upon with the payment of Rs.5 lac in the shape of the demand draft to be received by the opposite party. 5. Accordingly, it is ordered.....
into consideration while considering the question of condonation of delay. ... State of Kerala, (1997) 7 SCC 556, the Apex Court while considering a case of condonation of delay of 565 days, wherein no explanation much less a reasonable or satisfactory explanation for condonation of delay had been given, held at paragraph-6 as under: p align="justify ... Thus, it is evident that while considering the delay condonation application, the Court of Law i....
Section 138 of a href="./.. ... Therefore, I do not find any reason to exercise my judicial discretion exercising judiciously so as to justify the condonation of delay in the present case. ... After perusal of the records, this Court finds that there is neither a satisfactory explanation nor any reasons for the inordinate delay of 833 days in filing the present Criminal Revision Petitions, seeking condonation of delay.
After obtaining the material papers and the draft affidavit, the draft of writ appeal was preferred on 25.07.2022. It is further submitted that the delay is not willful or deliberate. Time was consumed due to the departmental proceedings in obtaining necessary permission. ... In Amarnath Yadav (supra), referring to the Post Master General (supra) condonation of delay was refused. 15. We are of the considered view that for the delay of 126 days there is plausible explanation which has b....
In delay condonation applications, the accused have produced envelops in which purportedly statutory notices under the provisions of Negotiable Instruments Act were sent by the complainant to the accused persons. 2. The main applications are filed for condonation of delay caused in filing complaints for offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Act does not have any applicability for condonation of delay in filing the complaint U/s 138 of N.I Act.
The separate application for condonation of delay was filed along with the application under Section 138 of NI Act. That the complainant has authorised its manager Mr. S.N. The grounds made in the application for condonation of delay are reproduced as under:- "2.
It is also not out of place to mention here that initially, in the application filed under Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, it was mentioned that there is a delay of 15 days in filing the complaint under Section 138 of NI Act, 1881, however, in the application under Section 142 of NI Act, 1881, it was mentioned that there is a delay of 20 days. The applicants filed their reply and submitted that the application under Section 5 of Indian Limitation is not maintainable. Thereafter, another application was filed by the respondent under Section 142 of NI Act, 1881 seeking condonatio....
In that case, the complaint under Section 138 NI Act was filed with a condonation application seeking condonation of delay of only three days. It is held that it was mandatory for the learned JMFC to provide an opportunity to the accused to argue on the merits of the condonation application. The learned JMFC allowed the condonation application without hearing the accused.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
