ROBIN PHUKAN
North East Frontier Railways – Appellant
Versus
Lalnawta S/o Dengchhunga – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
1. Heard Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned counsel for the applicant; Mr. L. Khiangte, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 1 and Ms. L.L. Fambawl, learned Additional Advocate General for the opposite party Nos. 2, 3 & 4.
2. This interlocutory application, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, is preferred by the applicant, North East Frontier Railways for condonation of delay of 488 days in preferring an appeal, against the Judgment, Order and Decree dated 01.04.2022, passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kolasib, Mizoram, in Damage Suit No. 06/2019.
3. It is to be noted here that vide impugned Judgment, Order and Decree dated 01.04.2022, the learned trial court had directed the applicant to pay compensation, for causing damages to the crops and excess area of the plaintiff’s land, measuring about 2.62 Hectares, which was taken and destructed by the N.F. Railway in excess of the originally acquired area of 0.40 Hectare, while constructing a railway line from Bairabi to Sairang.
4. The opposite party/respondent No. 1 has opposed the petition and filed written objection for condoning the delay. It is stated that while the Judgment, Order and Decree was
Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag vs. Mst. Katiji
ICIC Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Rupnath Brahmachaudhury & Anr. 2017 (2) GauLT 487
N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy
Post Master General and Ors. vs. Living Media India Limited and Another
Pundlik Jalam Patil v. Executive Engineer, Jalgaon Medium Project
Sheo Raj Singh (Deceased) thorough LRs. & Ors. vs. Union of India & Anr. 2023 (0) AIR (SC) 5109
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.