Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Mukesh Kumar vs Sandeep Kumar - Central Administrative Tribunal (2018)
"].Mukesh Kumar vs Sandeep Kumar - Central Administrative Tribunal (2018)
"].References:- ["2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 14358"]- ["2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1382"]- ["2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 475"]- ["2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1897"]- ["2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 10576"]- ["2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5123"]- ["2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2889"]- ["
Mukesh Kumar vs Sandeep Kumar - Central Administrative Tribunal (2018)
"]- ["2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 631"]
In the realm of central government service, are a critical aspect of career progression, often governed by detailed policies from the (). A common query arises: What are the guidelines regarding the promotion of GZO? Here, GZO is presumed to refer to Gazetted Zone Officers, Group 'A' Gazetted Officers, or a similar category of central government personnel. This blog post delves into available legal documents and sources to provide clarity, highlighting the absence of specific guidelines while offering broader insights into promotion frameworks.
While this analysis draws from reviewed court cases and official references, it is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult official sources or a legal expert for personalized guidance.
The () plays a pivotal role in framing policies for central government employees, including matters like (DPCs), reservations, and service rules. Gazetted officers, particularly Group 'A', hold key administrative positions and their typically involve assessments, often through DPCs.
However, a thorough review of legal documents reveals no direct guidelines specifically addressing of GZO. Instead, in various sectors follow board-level policies or institutional rules, with occasional references to government guidelines. This gap underscores the need to check official circulars or (OMs) directly.
Key documents primarily cover promotion policies in banking, electricity boards, technical education, and universities, distinguishing from . None mention or GZO explicitly.
emphasize rationality and , but these are context-specific and not linked to for GZO. 2004 7 Supreme 244 1997 10 Supreme 34
A critical distinction exists: advance rank, grade, or honor, often with selection, while grant higher pay scales without post changes or selection if eligibility is met universally.
Where the advancement to a higher pay scale without change of post is available to everyone who satisfies the eligibility conditions, without undergoing any process of selection, it will be upgradation. 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 849 2020 0 Supreme(SC) 476
Boards can frame policies with government guidelines in mind, and valid regulations become . 2004 2 Supreme 1
Employees have no absolute right to promotion but a right to fair consideration. Policies must align with (equality) and be non-arbitrary. 2000 8 Supreme 385 1994 0 Supreme(SC) 943
While core documents lack GZO specifics, other references provide tangential insights, often related to DPCs, reservations, and procedural norms.
In academic/PSU contexts, equivalence for tests references clarifications (e.g., letter), but salary irrelevant for Class II officers. 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 1670
These highlight 's role in overarching principles like DPC timing, reservations, and fairness, but no GZO-specific promotion guideline emerges.
From the sources:
/ schemes for academics stress Ph.D., service, research—sector-specific, not general gazetted. 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 2741 2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 940
No explicit guidelines on GZO appear in reviewed documents, which focus on sector-specific rules like banking or upgradation distinctions. 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 849 However, general OMs guide DPCs, reservations, and fairness principles across services.
Key Takeaways:- Right to consideration, not promotion guarantee. 2004 7 Supreme 244- Check .gov.in for latest OMs.- effective from DPC/actual date. 2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 15229- Fair processes prevent violations. 2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 8203
For central government employees eyeing GZO , proactive engagement with official channels is essential. Stay informed, as policies evolve with judicial inputs.
#DoPTGuidelines, #GZOPromotion, #GovtJobs
However, as the applicants stood retired by that time, they were not given actual promotion in terms of the DoPT OM dated 12.10.1998. ... However, unfortunately since the applicants (who were in the zone of consideration) had retired by 27.09.2018; hence they were not given the promotion in terms of DoPT OM dated 12.10.1998. ... George and Jagdish Lal (Supra), the applicant is liable to be considered for promotion even after his retirement on notional basis. Even according to the DoPT ....
And whereas, in the DOPT circular No. AB 14017/2008- Estt. ... Now, after examination it has been found that the promotion of Sri Nipun Burman, Sri Rituraj Hazarika and Sri Sanjib Rajabanshi has been done in contravention of the above Recruitment Rule of the Board and the above mentioned circular of DOPT. ... to the cadre of Assistant Director of Tea Development being 08 years in terms of the DoPT Circular dated 24.03.2009 and 12.03.2010, proceeded to hold that the petitioners herein not having satisfied the said perio....
Vide DoPT OM dated 30.09.2016, all the DPCs were held up for outcome of the final judgement in respect of various SLPs on the issue of reservation in promotion filed in the Hon’ble Apex Court (Annexure R-4). ... PGIMER No. 060/00901/2017 in the case of decided on 10.01.2019 held that as per para 17.11 of the DoPT guidelines dated 10.04.1989, specifically provides that the promotions shall be effective from the date of DPC or from the date of actual promotion, whichever is later. ... promotion from the ....
gp glo; if gr;irag;g gzo; jUf;Fk; rp glo; if fnzr gzo; jUf;F; xJf;fg;gl;lJ vd;W brhd;dhy; mij gww; p vdf;F bjhpahJ. fnzr gzo; jUf;F brhj;j;ij mth; capUld; ,Ue;jnghJ mtUld; nrh;e;Jk; mth; ,wgg; [f;F gpdd; hy; ehd; vd; * FLk;gj;jpdUld; nrh ... ;e;J mDgtpj;J tUfpwnhk ; vd;W brhd;dhy; rhp/ fnzr gzo; jhpd; brhj;Jf;fis fwg; fk; Nw: ;Wk; eluh$Df;F ehd; bfhLgn; gdh vd;W nfll; hy ; bfhLf;fkhl;nlhk;/ eh';fs; Vd; bfhLf;fkhln; lhk; vd;W nfll; hy; fnzr gzo; jh; v';fSld; ,Ue;j fhuzj;jhYk; ,e;j brhj;ij eh';fs; jhd; m....
The applicant has sought information regarding (i) the rules/provisions on caste validity certificates for availing SC/ST/OBC benefits at the time of promotion and after promotion in the Ministry of Jal Shakti and its subordinate office CWPRS, Pune; (ii) the prescribed format of such caste validity certificates ... Kindly provide the DoPT rules/provision for caste validity certificate for claiming SC/ST/OBC categories at the time of promotion and after the promotion in Ministry of Jal ....
UOI in the context of ‘status quo’ regarding ‘reservation in promotion’ and ‘own merit’ cases. ... UOI) in the context of ‘status quo’ order regarding ‘reservation in promotion’ and ‘own merit’ cases. The applicant was given regular promotion to the post of Under Secretary w.e.f. 01.07.2022 and as per Rule 2 (iii) of CSS Rules, 2009, his approved service would be counted from 01.07.2022. ... AG while adhering to the principles governing ad-hoc promotion in DoPT OM dat....
The entire case of the applicant is built upon the instructions issued by the DOPT vide OM dated 28.12.2023 regarding reservation in promotion to Persons with Benchmarks Disabilities (PwBDs). ... OM dated 28.12.2023 stipulates that the promotion on notional basis with effect from 30.06.2016 is subject to their fulfilment of the eligibility conditions as laid down in the DoPT OM of even number dated 17.5.2022 regarding reservation in promotion to PwDs. ... up to the lo....
Hence, as a matter of fact the applicant’s promotion was on ad-hoc basis and, in terms of DoPT O. ... By virtue of the promotion order dated 21.08.2023, the case differs from the application of the para 7 of DOPT OM dated 14.09.1992. ... Further regarding para 5(iv), the respondents submits that at the outset that the Respondents have not imposed any penalty on the applicant and he was not denied the benefit of promotion with retrospective effect either. ... We observe that it would ha....
regarding. ... After considering the case, the DPC observed that for promotion from the grade pay of Rs. 2400 to Rs. 4200, qualifying service, prescribed vide DoPT OM No. AB-14017/61/2008-Estt. ... As the qualifying service for promotion to stenographer Grade-II in the RRs notified in 1994 was 5 years, which was not amended to 10 years after issue of DoPT OM dtd. 24.3.2009 inadvertently. ... In fact the DOPT had never advised the respondents to keep the promotion of t....
05.2023 seeking information on the following points: I am writing to request information regarding the policy of promotion for government employees who have been penalized in India. ... OMs and instructions on the subject matter of promotion are available in Public Domain on the website of this Department viz. dopt.gov.in under link: Archive - Orders - 13. Establishment - Promotions and may be referred for information and guidance. ... (iii) Please provide details of any instances where an employee who has been penali....
The Petitioner's promotion to DIG was made as officiating in terms of the DOPT OM dated 14th September 1992. These results were declared on 15th November 2016 and the official Respondents issued promotion/posting orders dated 15th November 2016 and 30th November 2016. In the promotion orders Respondent No.4 herein was placed above the Petitioner at Sl. No.3 whereas the Petitioner was placed at Sl. No.4. According to the Petitioner, this error occurred on account of non-amendment and correction of the impugned gradation list of 1st April 2013.
In the said clarification for the queries (ix) and (x), it has been clarified as below: “(ix)How will be Income/Wealth Test apply in case of sons and daughters of parent(s) employed in PSUs etc., in which equivalence or comparability of posts has not been established vis-a-vis posts in the Government” In the year 2004, when several queries raised to DoPT regarding the determination of Creamy Layer amongst OBC's, the DoPT responded by way of clarification vide, its letter dated 14.10.2004.
It has, therefore, been decided with the approval of Hon’ble MLJ, to fill up the vacant post of DLAs by promotion rather than by direct recruitment and to seek one-time relaxation from DOPT/UPSC regarding the mode of recruitment from DR to promotion as well as the nature of qualifying service. Now, this Department feels that being a senior level post the officers with experience in this Department will be more suitable for appointment to DLA posts to discharge the duties attached to the post. In view of this decision, we have requested the UPSC vide our letter dated 25.5.20....
The Departmental Promotion Committee met and selected the officers on 25.02.2013 and 12.02.2013. The petitioner's name was considered and included in the promotional panel. 2. The respondents issued promotion policy after adopting DOPT OM dated 14.09.1992 on 08.02.2012.
That the DOPT guidelines do not prescribe for any relaxation for promotion of Malies to Garden Chaudhary and thus as per RR's and DOPT guidelines, promotion cannot be granted to Malies for the simple reason that they have been officiating on the said post for several years. The rules prescribe that unless they fall within the zone of consideration, they cannot be considered.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
