Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Indian courts may also consider the legal equivalence of foreign laws (e.g., UAE laws) when interpreting and enforcing foreign judgments, especially in commercial and contractual disputes ["SMT AMBIKA G NAYAK vs SRI GANESH S NAYAK - Karnataka"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["ASHOK KUMAR GOEL & ORS. Vs BNP PARIBAS SUISSE SA & ORS. - Delhi"]- ["Shri Mahila Grih Udyog Lijjat Papad VS Usha Sontake - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["Mohammed Shakeel Khan Pathan vs Hajra Kauser - Telangana"]- ["JAININDER JAIN VS ARIHANT JAIN - Delhi"]- ["Suryanarayana Penubolu vs The Union of India - Telangana"]- ["TRAMMO DMCC VS NAGARJUNA FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICALSLIMITED - National Company Law Tribunal"]- ["SMT AMBIKA G NAYAK vs SRI GANESH S NAYAK - Karnataka"]- ["Nael v Niamh Bank - DIFC"]- ["Emirates Bank International PJSC vs Sh. Vijay Talwar - Delhi"]
In today's globalized world, family disputes often span borders, especially between India and the UAE where expatriates and NRIs frequently reside. A common challenge arises when you hold a decree from an Indian family court—such as for maintenance, divorce, or child custody—but the opposing party is in the UAE and files an anti-injunction suit to block enforcement. How to enforce a decree from family court on anti-injunction suit from India to UAE? This question demands a nuanced approach involving Indian law, principles of comity, and bilateral relations.
This guide breaks down the process, drawing from the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), 1908, judicial precedents, and recent developments like UAE's status as a reciprocating territory. Note: This is general information; consult a qualified lawyer for advice tailored to your case.
Enforcing an Indian family court decree in the UAE typically requires recognition as a foreign judgment under UAE law. However, from an Indian perspective, the process often starts with protecting the decree domestically against interfering foreign proceedings. Key provisions include:
Indian courts treat UAE judgments similarly post-notification, reversing prior views on prospectivity: Presumption against retrospective operation is not applicable to declarative statute... the decree of UAE court covered by notification issued on or after 25.10.1999 can be executed in Indian Courts. Kadheeja Kalladi Puthanpurayil D/o K. P. Moideenkutty VS Mohammed Nazir Abdul Aziz S/o A. K. Abdul Aziz - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 406
While direct enforcement in UAE involves filing before UAE courts with authenticated copies (apostille under Hague Convention if applicable), Indian decree holders often first secure domestic protection:
If the UAE party challenges via anti-injunction, pivot to Indian courts for relief.
Anti-suit injunctions restrain foreign litigation interfering with Indian decrees. Indian courts may grant them under inherent powers (Section 151 CPC, Order XXXIX Rule 1) to prevent vexatious proceedings. An anti-suit injunction application, falls only under inherent powers of Court under Section 151 of Code... Courts would act in exercising their inherent powers in the interest of justice. Sandip Shankarlal Kedia VS Pooja Kedia - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 890
However, courts exercise caution due to comity: When parties have been in different jurisdictions, more specially in different international forums, Courts have refrained themselves from exercising the jurisdiction to restrain parties from proceeding in another forum. Sandip Shankarlal Kedia VS Pooja Kedia - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 890 In a Dubai-India family case, anti-suit was denied as the wife resided in Dubai: She has chosen the country. She must accept her choice... The Court must respect that jurisdiction on the principle of comity. Sandip Shankarlal Kedia VS Pooja Kedia - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 890
Types of injunctions include:- Anti-suit: Halts foreign main suit.- Anti-anti-suit: Counters foreign anti-suit.- Anti-enforcement: Blocks foreign execution. Interdigital Technology Corporation VS Xiaomi Corporation - 2021 Supreme(Del) 2032
In patent cases, Indian courts granted anti-suit against Chinese orders: Court must protect the right to seek legal redressal in the appropriate jurisdiction... Defendants’ application was considered vexatious and oppressive. Interdigital Technology Corporation VS Xiaomi Corporation - 2021 Supreme(Del) 2032
For family matters, balance residence, convenience, and hardship: The convenience and hardship to the parties involved are the primary considerations for transferring a case. Persis Bhavin Shah, D/o. Bipin Shah VS Bhavin Kishorbhai Shah, S/o. Kishorbhai Shah - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 960 Transfer petitions under Section 24 CPC prioritize the wife's convenience. Persis Bhavin Shah, D/o. Bipin Shah VS Bhavin Kishorbhai Shah, S/o. Kishorbhai Shah - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 960
Recent notifications ease UAE decree enforcement in India, suggesting reciprocal goodwill. Kadheeja Kalladi Puthanpurayil D/o K. P. Moideenkutty VS Mohammed Nazir Abdul Aziz S/o A. K. Abdul Aziz - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 406
Enforcing an Indian family court decree in the UAE amid anti-injunction suits requires strategic use of CPC Sections 13/44A, anti-suit remedies, and comity principles. UAE's reciprocating status post-2020 bolsters mutual recognition, but success hinges on authentication, jurisdiction, and avoiding public policy clashes. Modi Entertainment Network VS W. S. G. Cricket Pte. LTD. - 2003 1 Supreme 709Kadheeja Kalladi Puthanpurayil D/o K. P. Moideenkutty VS Mohammed Nazir Abdul Aziz S/o A. K. Abdul Aziz - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 406
Prioritize protection via Indian courts before UAE execution. While challenging, precedents show viable paths—always with professional guidance.
Disclaimer: This article provides general insights based on statutes and cases like Modi Entertainment Network VS W. S. G. Cricket Pte. LTD. - 2003 1 Supreme 709, VIVEK RAI GUPTA VS NIYATI GUPTA - 2016 0 Supreme(SC) 1739, Sandip Shankarlal Kedia VS Pooja Kedia - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 890, Kadheeja Kalladi Puthanpurayil D/o K. P. Moideenkutty VS Mohammed Nazir Abdul Aziz S/o A. K. Abdul Aziz - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 406. It is not legal advice; laws evolve, and outcomes vary by facts.
#FamilyLawIndiaUAE, #AntiSuitInjunction, #DecreeEnforcement
‟ble Supreme Court of India. ... Al Quamar clarifies that Section 44A grants an independent right to enforce foreign decrees in India, irrespective of proceedings in the cause country. ... Section 44A (1) of CPC enables a foreign decree, rendered by a superior Court in a reciprocating territory, to be executed in India as if it were passed by a District Court in India. ... court in India to execu....
suit is pending in the same or any other Court in India having jurisdiction to grant the relief claimed or in any Court beyond the limits of India established or continued by the Central Government and having like jurisdiction, or before the Supreme Court'. ... The explanation appended to section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that the pendency of a suit in a foreign Court does not preclude the Courts in India from tryin....
UAE. ... In terms of explanation to Section 1 of Section 43A of CPC, a notification in this regard was only issued on 17.01.2020 which would amply show that till 17.01.2020, the judgment and decree passed by the Dubai Sharia Court was not enforceable at least in India. 10. ... Learned counsel for the appellant contended that the judgment and decree passed by the Dubai Sharia Court was not applicable in the Indian Territory as there was no notification issued declaring UAE#HL....
This correspondence requested the removal of the travel bans and lookout notices in India, on the ground that the underlying UAE court orders had been cancelled and that no Court in India had issued any such restrictive order. ... While the latter was remanded by the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi on 08.11.2022, the decree in Civil Suit No. 278 of 2020 stood confirmed on 31.05.2021 and finally on 24.08.2021. Execution Petition was filed on 27.09.2021, l....
When a court restrains a party to a suit/proceeding before it from instituting or prosecuting a case in another court including a foreign court, it is called anti-suit injunction. ... The principles governing grant of injunction-an equitable relief-by a court will also govern grant of anti-suit injunction which is but a species of injunction. ... Ltd. ; (2004) 4 SCC 341, cited in support, on behalf of the petitioners, in exposition ....
Evidence of the nature required in a Family Court proceeding is allowed and legislated in the justice system prevailing in Dubai, UAE Courts as much as in Courts in Mumbai, India. ... award came to be passed which was sought to be enforced, an anti-suit injunction came to be granted. ... The Court would refrain itself from granting the anti-suit order claimed by her on the ground alleged. ... 29. ... ... (4) a court#HL_....
Moreover, the judgment of the UK High Court of Justice (Family Division) also had the little courtesy of directing the respondent to apply in India for discharge of the Indian anti-suit injunction order and gave permission to both parties to disclose the order of the UK High Court in full to their Indian ... Be that as it may, fact remains that in deference to the principle of Comity of Courts, this Court is of the opinion that since the UK Family #....
It is unnecessary for the disposal of this appeal to determine the issue and it is preferable to leave the issue to be determined on another occasion after fuller argument, given the potential effect on the Court’s jurisdiction to grant interim anti-suit and anti-enforcement orders. ... 29 were the sole permissible procedure for resolving conflicts of jurisdiction it would also mean that the DIFC Courts would be precluded from making anti-suit or anti-enforcement injunctions (in respec....
As per Section 7(a) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, 4 JUDGE AND ACJM, UDUPI, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND INJUCTION. ... OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, UDUPI, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND MANDATORY INJUCTION. ... Court, Udupi, to try the suit from the stage as it stood on the date of establishment of Family Court at Udupi; (iv) Learned ... Learned advocates on both sides submi....
(ii) Direct payment into the Court for furnishing of security. (iii) Impose conditions in respect of the trial of the suit. (iv) Decree the suit. (v) Dismiss the suit. ... and his family members. ... The Plaintiff has filed the present suit under Order XXXVII CPC praying for decree for a sum of USD 14,025,783 along with past due profit and late payment charges @ 2% for each days' delay. ... Finally, it is submitted that though the contract i....
The LOI authorized the appellant to commence the work including the detailed design pedestal and gangway foundation, including procurement of material, fabrication of pedestal and gangway foundation and installation of gangway pedestal, [the work]. Based on the request of the respondent, the appellant also obtained a confirmation letter from Telford pertaining to the said vessel and also provided the preliminary mobilization plan of the said vessel from Walvisbay, Namibia to UAE and from UAE to Kakinada, India. The respondent issued a Letter of Intent, [LOI] on 28.4.2022 to....
The aforesaid Family Suit No. 1216 of 2021 is ordered to be transferred from the Family Court, Vadodara to the Family Court at Rajkot.
Injunctions, of legal proceedings in foreign climes, may, plainly, take one of the three forms. There are anti-suit injunctions, in which the Court injuncts the party from proceeding with the main suit, pending before the foreign Court; "anti-anti-suit injunctions" [which, frankly, should more correctly be called "anti-anti-suit injunctioninjunctions"], where the Court injuncts the party from proceeding with the anti-suit injunction application filed before the foreign Court to injunct the "local" proceedings, and "anti-enforcement injunctions", where the Court injuncts one of the ....
The learned Single Judge in Manoj Moolekkudi Subramanyan's case (supra) held that notification dated 17.01.2020 is having only prospective application and it has no retrospective effect. The Central Government issued a notification on 17.01.2020 in exercise of the power conferred by Explanation 1 to Section 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. By virtue of this notification, the decree obtained from UAE has become executable in India. The decree of the UAE Court in this case admittedly was prior to the date of notification and therefore, the Family Court was ....
Girls, from Bangladesh, a neighbouring country, are being trafficked to Dubai (UAE), through India.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
