Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
The court often emphasizes the importance of honesty in representing case diary contents; fabrications or false claims about submissions or entries can lead to charges of perjury or contempt ["INDHHC010182402012"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["Sheshnath Singh alias Shishu VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"]- ["SHASHIKALA T vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"]- ["SITARAM VS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Chhattisgarh"]- ["INDHHC010049552023"]- ["Shiv Kumar Gupta VS State Of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"]- ["INDHHC010182402012"]
In the high-stakes environment of court proceedings, accuracy in official records is paramount. Imagine a scenario where someone writes on a diary order sheet that a counsel submitted a particular statement or document—when no such submission occurred. Is this merely an oversight, or does it cross into criminal territory? This question, writing down falsely on the A diary order sheet saying a counsel submitted as such, raises serious concerns about falsification of records and its potential consequences under Indian law.
Court diaries and order sheets form the backbone of judicial documentation. Tampering with them, even subtly, can undermine the integrity of legal processes. In this post, we delve into the legal implications, drawing from established precedents and statutory provisions. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Falsification typically involves making false entries or statements in official documents, such as court diaries or order sheets. Under Indian law, this can amount to offenses like forgery if done with dishonest intent. The Indian Penal Code (IPC) addresses such acts through sections like 468 (forgery for cheating), 471 (using forged documents), and 477A (falsification of accounts).
Key elements include:- False Entry: Recording that a counsel submitted a document or statement when they did not. As noted, falsification of records includes making false entries or statements in official or court documents Chirag Sen and another etc. VS State of Karnataka - 2025 6 Supreme 283.- Dishonest Intent: The act must aim to mislead the court or authorities. Without this, it may not qualify as criminal.- Official Nature: Diaries and order sheets are official records, making false notations particularly grave.
In one instance, name of counsel for the petitioners was falsely written in the order-sheet whereas the fact is that the petitioners' counsel was conveyed on 06/09/2018 that the next date of hearing was 12/12/2018 Bhagwan Sahay VS Gopal - 2019 Supreme(Raj) 1871. This highlights how such errors—or deliberate falsities—can lead to challenges in proceedings.
When a false entry is made knowingly, it erodes judicial trust. Courts have held that false entries made knowingly and dishonestly can amount to offences under the Indian Penal Code, like Sections 468, 471, or 477-A, which relate to forgery and falsification Chirag Sen and another etc. VS State of Karnataka - 2025 6 Supreme 283.
The intent is crucial. If the notation misleads to gain an advantage, such as delaying proceedings or fabricating evidence, it becomes punishable. The intent behind such false entries is crucial; if done dishonestly to mislead, it can amount to criminal offence under relevant provisions Chirag Sen and another etc. VS State of Karnataka - 2025 6 Supreme 283.
Prosecution requires proof beyond reasonable doubt, but courts take a dim view of actions undermining proceedings. For example, in cases involving case diaries, discrepancies like unexamined witnesses or reliance on subordinate reports have led to scrutiny, as in Dy. Superintendent of Police neither examined any wit¬ness nor did he himself collect the statement of any witness in the case - He only relied upon the evidence so collected by the S.I. of Police - Charge-sheet submitted not in terms of statutory provisions Ranjit alias Rajat Kumar Das VS State of Orissa - 2003 Supreme(Ori) 273. While not identical, this underscores the need for authentic records.
Courts consistently condemn false records. In Chirag Sen and another etc. VS State of Karnataka - 2025 6 Supreme 283, the decision emphasized genuine documents, stating principles akin to a person shall be deemed to falsify a trade mark who... makes that trade mark or a deceptively similar mark without the assent of the proprietor, extending to official falsification.
Another relevant case involved false implications in records: Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case... petitioner Hira Thakur is not even named in the F.I.R., but he has been made accused and charge sheet has been submitted against him Alok Kumar Singh @ Munna Singh VS State of Jharkhand - 2012 Supreme(Jhk) 1358. This illustrates how false notations can cascade into broader injustices.
In Bhagwan Sahay VS Gopal - 2019 Supreme(Raj) 1871, the false recording of counsel's name in the order-sheet was contested, tying into delay and laches arguments, reinforcing that such acts invite judicial review. Similarly, Learned counsel further submitted that name of counsel for the petitioners was falsely written in the order-sheet Bhagwan Sahay VS Gopal - 2019 Supreme(Raj) 1871,
Case diaries face parallel scrutiny. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no recovery from the physical possessions of the appellant... perused the contents of case diary NATHUNI SINGH ALIAS NATHUNI JI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Courts examine diaries closely for authenticity.
Not every error is criminal. Consider these defenses:- Inadvertent Mistakes: Clerical errors without dishonest intent are typically excused. If the statement or record was made inadvertently or without dishonest intent, it may not amount to an offence.- Lack of Intent: Courts must prove knowledge and dishonesty. Mere clerical errors or honest mistakes, without fraudulent intent, are generally not punishable.- Procedural Compliance: In charge-sheet contexts, a charge-sheet filed by a competent public servant constitutes a report in writing and complies with the requirements of section 11 of the Essential Commodities Act STATE OF U P VS KARAN SINGH - 1977 Supreme(All) 251, showing technical validity matters.
However, speculation without evidence, like case diary in itself have no material except a speculation as to the lodging of FIR for false claim of insurance Mahesh Chandra Dwivedi VS State Of U. P. Through Secy. Home Lko. - 2021 Supreme(All) 965, won't sustain charges.
Broader contexts amplify risks. In investigations, lapses like untraceable diaries lead to adjournments: a statement was made by the Counsel for the State that the case diary is not traceable and case diary is being reconstructed RAMLAKHAN VS STATE OF M. P. - 2019 Supreme(MP) 709. Authentic records prevent such issues.
Witness discrepancies and procedural flaws can acquit: discrepancies in witness testimonies and procedural lapses can lead to acquittal if the prosecution fails to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt Shailesh Kumar VS State Of U. P. (Now State Of Uttarakhand) - 2024 Supreme(SC) 281. False entries exacerbate these.
In dowry cases, diary handwriting disputes were resolved by evidence: hand writing of diary produced by the prosecution before the trial court are different... some portion of diary was written by one hand writing Rakesh Kumar Gupta VS State Of U. P. - 2019 Supreme(All) 209, stressing verification.
To safeguard against pitfalls:- Verify Before Recording: Ensure all submissions are confirmed. Any person, including counsel, must ensure that all entries and statements recorded in official or court documents are accurate and authenticated.- Correct Errors Promptly: Rectify inadvertent mistakes immediately.- Scrutinize Intent: Courts should probe motives before charges. In case of inadvertent errors, corrective measures should be taken promptly to avoid legal complications.
Falsely writing on a court diary or order sheet that a counsel submitted something they didn't generally constitutes falsification if done dishonestly. It may trigger IPC offenses, jeopardizing careers and proceedings. Precedents like Chirag Sen and another etc. VS State of Karnataka - 2025 6 Supreme 283 and Bhagwan Sahay VS Gopal - 2019 Supreme(Raj) 1871 affirm that such acts undermine justice.
Key Takeaways:- Intent separates mistake from crime.- Authentic records are non-negotiable.- Seek corrections swiftly.
Prioritize accuracy to protect all parties. For tailored guidance, consult a legal expert.
Summary: Writing falsely on a court or diary order sheet that a counsel submitted a document, when such submission did not occur, is considered falsification of records. If done with dishonest intent, it can amount to an offence under the Indian Penal Code, notably Sections 468, 471, or 477-A.
#CourtFalsification #LegalRecords #IPCForgery
As rightly submitted by learned counsel for the appellant, in different States case diaries are maintained in different ways. ... The applicant was trying to collect relevant documents, including copies of the case diary, inquest report, postmortem report and the charge-sheet, but could not succeed in securing these, as the same were reported to be unavailable. ... The impugned order dated 16.03.2023 is hereby quashed. ... The complainant opposed it saying that the documents that were ....
Opposing the petition, learned HCGP submitted that after conducting detailed investigation, charge sheet is filed against accused Nos.1 and 2, who are the husband and mother-in-law of deceased. ... The deceased was in the habit of writing diary, wherein she has clearly noted the harassment meted out by the petitioner. Ultimately, she was forced to leave the matrimonial home. After the delivery and birth of the daughter also, she was not taken back. ... So far as the decisions relied upon by the learned counsel#....
I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 7. ... Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has been falsely implicated in offence in question. ... On the other hand, learned State Counsel opposes the bail application and submits that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case. ... Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for....
In the facts and circumstances of the case and looking into the case diary so produced by the learned State Counsel, I am of the view that the charge-sheet so submitted by the Dy. ... Counsel the Dy. ... The learned State Counsel has also produced the case diary for my perusal. ... The Dy. Superintendent of Police in his aforesaid affidavit has disclosed : ... “4. ... Shri B.K.Jena has been appointed by the S.P., Bhadrak to take charge of the investigation of this c....
In this case a charge- sheet had been submitted by a competent public servant. All that has to be seen is whether a charge- sheet is a report in writing by a public servant or not. In my opinion, it is a report in writing by a public servant. ... According to him, the charge- sheet submitted against the respondents in this case was not a report in writing as required under S. II of the Essential Commodities Act and as such it was not open to him to t....
According to the petitioner, he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case, he having committed no offence. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the letter, forwarding charge-sheet, was issued on 18th September, 2004 along with the original sanction order. ... Learned counsel for the petitioner denied the aforesaid suggestion and submitted that the Sr. P.P. of CBI did not produce the case diary, inspite of specific order#....
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. ... Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner Hira Thakur is not even named in the F.I.R., but he has been made accused and charge sheet has been submitted against him. Learned counsel has placed reliance upon a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of State of M.P. Vs. ... It goes without saying#HL_....
Heard learned counsel Mr. D.P Singh appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel Mr. Saurabh Trivedi appearing for the respondent. We have perused the entire records placed before us, and taken due note of the synopsis notes submitted. ... Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the evidence of PW-1 ought not to have been accepted by both the courts. The report from the hospital had reached the police station much before. The person to whom PW-1 dictated the complaint has not been examin....
Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no recovery from the physical possessions of the appellant. ... We have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the contents of case diary as also the order passed by learned Sessions Judge-I, Latehar. ... In the backdrop of aforesaid facts, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that it is a....
It is also submitted that the concerning SHO. has also submitted a report to the Superintend of Police, Jhabua saying that the name of Thakur has been removed during the investigation. ... It is further submitted that Sub-Divisional Officer (Police) has enquired into the matter and found that the petitioner was not present on the spot and he has been falsely implicated in the matter. ... As per report of the Sub-Divisional Officer (Police, Jhabua submitted to the Senior Superintend of ....
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner further argued that the impugned order was passed only on consideration of the case diary submitted by the police station and the final report was accepted on the basis of materials on case diary, however, case diary in itself have no material except a speculation as to the lodging of FIR for false claim of insurance.
Learned counsel further submitted that name of counsel for the petitioners was falsely written in the order-sheet whereas the fact is that the petitioners' counsel was conveyed on 06/09/2018 that the next date of hearing was 12/12/2018. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the Board of Revenue did not give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and the order was passed at their back only on the ground of limitation although limitation does not apply to the provisions of Section 82 of the Act of 1956. It is submitted further that on 28/09/2018 again, t....
Shri R. D. Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. On 24-10-2016, a statement was made by the Counsel for the State that the case diary is not traceable and case diary is being reconstructed and accordingly, the following order was passed : 5. Notices were issued in the said petition on 10-3-2016 and the State Counsel was directed to file the status report, however, on 10-8-2016, 30-8-2016, 7-9-2016, 23-9-2016, 27-9-2016 and 7-10-2016, the case was adjourned at the request of the Counsel for the State and neither the status report, nor the case diary was produced.
He has further deposed that the relevant page of diary dated 7-8.4.1994 i.e. So far as the submission of learned counsel for the accused/appellants, that hand writing of diary produced by the prosecution before the trial court are different, is concerned, from perusal of material on records it transpires that a diary and other incriminating articles were recovered from place of occurrence by S.I. Govind Prasad Singh (P.W.7) and from the perusal of the alleged diary and its relevant page, it transpires that some portion of diary was written by one hand writing and the relevant porti....
Learned counsel has submitted that the petitioner had committed serious misconduct and on the basis of the same, she was given a charge-sheet and when the petitioner refused to accept the charge-sheet the same were sent through a registered letters and proof of such service on the petitioner were placed by way of documents before the Tribunal. 19.06.2012, was non-est in the eye of law and D.E.O. had no authority to cancel the order passed by the Management. Learned counsel has submitted that once the services of the petitioner were terminated after holding enquiry, the susp....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
