Mahesh Chandra Dwivedi – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Through Secy. Home Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Case is called out.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri M.A. Siddiqui, Advocate and learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Balkeshwar Srivastava, Advocate are present.
2. The instant writ petition is moved under Article 227 of the Constitution of India invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court over its subordinate court against the impugned order dated 12.9.2006 passed by the Additional Session Judge/Fast Track Court No.12, Sultanpur in the capacity of the revisional court. The said revision was moved by the petitioner against the order dated 20.4.2006 passed by IIIrd, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Criminal Case No.386 of 2006 (Mahesh Chandra Dwivedi Vs. State of U.P.).
3. Before going through the aforesaid two impugned orders of the learned courts below namely the revisional court of Additional Session Judge/F.T.C. Sultanpur as well the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sultanpur so as to look into the vices crept into the impugned orders giving cause of action to file this petition.
4. It would be relevant to give a brief account of the matter. Petitioner was carrying on the business of Tent and Shamiana at Jamo Bazar, Sultanpur in the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.