Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
TAN KEH HO vs TELIPOK LUMBER INDUSTRIES SDN. BHD. & ORS. - High Court
"] ["TAN KEH HO vs TELIPOK LUMBER INDUSTRIES SDN.BHD.
"].In the context of rental agreements, if the agreement is proven genuine and not fabricated or altered, charges of forgery cannot be sustained. Conversely, creating a fake agreement by copying signatures or superimposing text is considered forgery [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MYS_MARSDENLR_2007_2747) [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MY_MLRA_2006_2_MLRA_498).
Analysis and Conclusion:
In today's mobile world, passports are essential for travel, employment, and opportunities abroad. But what happens when supporting documents like rental agreements come under scrutiny? Many wonder: does the of a rental agreement in passport act trigger penalties under India's ? This question arises frequently during passport applications, where address proofs such as rental agreements are submitted.
This blog post breaks down the legal nuances, drawing from statutory provisions, case law, and expert analysis. We'll explore when such crosses into passport offences and what it means under the (IPC). Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
generally involves creating or altering a document with to deceive. Under , it means making a to cause damage or injury, or to support [
#PassportsAct #ForgeryLaw #LegalIndia
The offences of ‘forgery’ and ‘cheating’ intersect and converge, as the act of forgery is committed with the intent to deceive or cheat an individual. ... He further submits that the appeal under Section 11 of the Passport Act, 1967, preferred by the respondent wife before the concerned authority has been decided after considering each and every aspect of the matter. ... the duplicate passport. ... It is well known that every deceitful act is not unlawful, just as not....
Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. ... There is no reason to believe that the accused / revisionist / petitioner was unaware of such alteration / forgery. The burden of proving otherwise would lie upon the accused / petitioner in terms of Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act. ... So far as the offence under section 468 IPC is concerned, there is no material on record that the accused herself committed the act of forgery for the purpose of cheating. 11. In so far as the reliance placed by the Ld.....
However, the mere production of another person's passport will not amount to holding a forged passport. The term ‘forgery’ has not been defined in the Passports Act. Therefore the definition of the term forgery in the Indian Penal Code, 1860 has to be resorted to. ... Mere production of passport belonging to another person is not forgery either under the Indian Penal Code or under the Passports Act. Hence inclusion of the offence under section 12(1A)....
Until a false document is made either in whole or in part there cannot be in my opinion any forgery. Mere preparation for the commission of a possible crime of forgery without a false document in part or in whole cannot itself be either forgery or abatement of forgery." ... 17. ... In other words, it is not forgery simpliciter, but forgery of a document which purports to be a document made by a public servant in his official capacity. ... I very respectfully state, in agree....
Section 21 NDPS Act vide order dated 28.1.2012 passed by Special Judge, Chandigarh, and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 15 years along with a fine.
The learned counsel would submit that the trial Court erred in holding that for collateral purpose, the rental agreement can be marked as an exhibit despite the plea of forgery alleged. ... 8. ... According to the petitioner, the respondent has not paid the sum of Rs.8.00 lakhs as advance and also it is false to say that the petitioner had signed the rental agreement dated 14.05.1997. The alleged rental agreement is not binding on the petitioner and the same is not a ....
Passports Act, 1967 (in short, ‘Act’) for proceeding with the trial against the petitioner. Passports Act, 1967 . 3.
Passports Act, 1967 (in short, ‘Act’) for proceeding with the trial against the petitioner. 2. ... It is further alleged that accused Nos.1 & 2 forged such a bogus SSLC book and presented the same before the Passport authority, and managed to get the endorsement as stated above. ... The sanction under Section 15 of the Act is not required for taking cognizance, but for the conduct of the trial against the offender. ... The final report and the accompanying records produced by the investigating agency would prima facie....
The grounds raised by the petitioner counsel are that there is no evidence against the petitioner herein to prove the offence under Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code and thus, the case of forgery is not made out against the petitioner. ... Thus, the evidence of PW3 coupled with Ex.P13, the passport and the evidence of PW11 and PW19 coupled with Ex.P21/passport establishes the guilt against the accused No.4 that the accused No.4 has collected Rs.7,500/- for issuing duplicate passport/Ex.P13 and Rs.8,000/- for issuing #....
Cr.P.C ., alleging that the petitioners forged her signatures and created fabricated documents styled as a rental agreement dated 16.12.2023 and an addendum to the memorandum of understanding dated 25.03.2022.
Forgery made by the plaintiff in the alleged sale agreement can be easily found out, if the rental agreement signed by Arumugam is compared with the alleged sale agreement. Arumugam had entered into the rental agreement with the plaintiff in the year 1987 except that, there is no other agreement between the plaintiff and Arumugam. Neither Arumugam nor the first defendant borrowed any money from the plaintiff for the sale consideration of the suit property.
Only if the petitioner knowingly uses the false rental agreement as genuine then only offence of forgery is said to have been committed. The authenticity of the rental agreements and documents relating to title to the disputed property was to be confirmed by the legal advisor and not by the petitioner, who is neither qualified nor equipped in this regard. Further there should be dishonest intention to create wrongful loss or gain, which is absent in the present case. If the rental agreement is a false document, that alone would not amount to forgery. The p....
Be it rental agreement or rental receipts produced as additional documents get falsified on the very face of it considering the documents marked as affidavit, sale deed, sale agreement and power of attorney.
Therefore, already the grandfather of the plaintiffs and the Chandrahasu have divided their property and the share of the grandfather of the plaintiffs was already sold out and the plaintiffs have no share in the suit schedule property. Accordingly, both the courts below rightly concluded that the suit property is not an ancestral one and the plaintiffs have no share in the suit property and dismissed the suit. In fact, the said suit was decreed and the appeal was also confirmed. Further the defendants also marked the documents as tax receipts, except the document Ex.B.10, which wa....
That document was alleged the rental agreement duly signed between the petitioner and the respondent's husband on 01.08.1991. After the case was argued at length before the Rent Controller, the Respondent filed M.P.No.702 of 2005 for marking of Ex.P11 dated 1/8/1991.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
