Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Definition of Habitual Offender - Under Section 110(g) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), a habitual offender is described as a person who is so desperate and dangerous as to render his being at large without security, hazardous to the community ["E. Krishnamoorthy VS Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirutani, Tiruvallur District - Madras"]. The core idea is that such individuals pose a significant risk due to their dangerous and recidivist behavior.
Applicability and Conditions - Section 110 Cr.P.C. applies specifically to habitual offenders, defined as persons who have a tendency to commit offenses repeatedly, often supported by previous convictions or a pattern of criminal conduct ["Dipu Singh @ Hulo VS State Of West Bengal - Calcutta"], ["Sita Ram VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan"]. Proceedings under this section typically involve requiring the offender to furnish security for good behavior to prevent recidivism.
Criteria for Declaration as Habitual Offender - To invoke Section 110, there must be material indicating the person’s habitual nature, such as multiple criminal cases or convictions, and not a solitary offense ["Gayyur Hasan VS State of U. P. - Allahabad"], ["Sita Ram VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan"]. Evidence of general repute and previous criminal history are relevant factors (evidence of general repute must form the main basis ["Dipu Singh @ Hulo VS State Of West Bengal - Calcutta"]).
Legal Standards and Definitions - The term habitual offender is also defined in other statutes like the Tamil Nadu Restriction of Habitual Offenders Act, 1948, and the Rajasthan Habitual Offenders Act, 1953, emphasizing repeated criminal behavior and prior sentencing ["HARI PRAKASH vs STATE - Rajasthan"], ["HARI PRAKASH vs STATE - Rajasthan"]. The Supreme Court has clarified that a habitual offender is one who is a criminal by habit or by disposition formed by repetition of crimes ["BHIM SEN JAIN VS S. H. O. - Delhi"].
Main Points from Case Law - Courts have emphasized that proceedings under Section 110 are justified only if the individual is genuinely a habitual offender, with sufficient evidence of past criminal conduct. Initiating proceedings based on a solitary offense or without proper evidence can be challenged and may be deemed an abuse of process ["Hari Prakash VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan"], ["Virendra Singh @ Ravi S/o Sh. Vijay Singh Ji vs State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home - Rajasthan"]. The initiation of proceedings requires careful assessment of whether the person falls within the statutory definition.
A habitual offender under Section 110(g) Cr.P.C. is a person who is considered dangerous and likely to re-offend, based on their criminal history and reputation for recidivism. The section is invoked to secure good behavior from such individuals, primarily through security bonds. Courts consistently stress that the initiation of proceedings must be supported by concrete evidence of habituality—such as multiple criminal cases or convictions—and not based on isolated incidents. The definition aligns with broader legal standards, emphasizing repeated criminal conduct and the potential threat to society ["E. Krishnamoorthy VS Revenue Divisional Officer, Thirutani, Tiruvallur District - Madras"], ["Dipu Singh @ Hulo VS State Of West Bengal - Calcutta"]. Proper procedural and evidentiary requirements are essential to prevent misuse of Section 110 proceedings.
In the realm of preventive justice under Indian law, Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) plays a crucial role in maintaining public order. One key provision, Section 110(g), targets individuals deemed habitual offenders—those so desperate and dangerous that their freedom poses a hazard to the community. But what exactly constitutes a habitual offender under this section? This blog post delves into the definition, judicial interpretations, evidentiary requirements, and safeguards against misuse, drawing from authoritative case law.
Whether you're a legal professional, facing proceedings, or simply curious about criminal law, understanding this provision can clarify how courts balance individual liberty with community safety. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Section 110 empowers magistrates to require security for good behavior from certain persons. Specifically, clause (g) applies to whoever is so desperate and dangerous as to render his being at large without security hazardous to the community. The core question—what is the definition of a habitual offender under Criminal Procedure Code Section 110(g)—centers on interpreting habitual, desperate, and dangerous.
Courts have consistently held that this is not about isolated incidents but a pattern of dangerous or criminal behavior evidenced by repeated acts. As clarified, the term habitual implies a pattern of repeated acts, not isolated or stray incidents Sukanya Shantha VS Union of India - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 853. Mere accusations or pending cases won't suffice; concrete proof is essential Bhumiraj Ramswami Tewar VS Sr. Inspector of Police & another - 2003 0 Supreme(Bom) 386Mohan Parmanand Khatri VS M. G. Ingle & others - 2003 0 Supreme(Bom) 182.
The hallmark of a habitual offender under Section 110(g) is desperation and danger posing a community hazard if unrestrained. Judicial consensus emphasizes:
In essence, it's preventive, not punitive—aimed at neutralizing threats before harm occurs, but strictly regulated to protect rights.
Habitual denotes depravity of character evidenced by frequent repetition or commission of offence, equating to a habitual criminal under Section 110 Faheem VS State of U. P. - 2021 Supreme(All) 1649Yogeshwar Tyagi VS State of U. P. - 2021 Supreme(All) 1470Ashok Kumar VS State of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home - 2020 Supreme(All) 336SURESH TEWARI VS STATE OF U P - 2018 Supreme(All) 1637ATIF ADNAN VS D. M. FAIZABAD - 2018 Supreme(All) 534. Courts stress it's a pattern**, not one-off events. For instance:
These terms aren't loose labels. They require evidence of real public risk: the words desperate and dangerous are not to be used loosely or irrationally; they must be understood in proper perspective Mohan Parmanand Khatri VS M. G. Ingle & others - 2003 0 Supreme(Bom) 182.
No casual orders: Proper enquiry and recorded reasons are mandatory Bhumiraj Ramswami Tewar VS Sr. Inspector of Police & another - 2003 0 Supreme(Bom) 386Mohan Parmanand Khatri VS M. G. Ingle & others - 2003 0 Supreme(Bom) 182Jaywant Gabaji Tambe VS State of Maharashtra - 2008 0 Supreme(Bom) 1369.
Case law reinforces caution:
These rulings prevent Section 110 from becoming an engine of oppression Ashok Kumar VS State of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home - 2020 Supreme(All) 336.
Misuse risks arbitrary detention, so courts quash routinely if unsubstantiated.
Under CrPC Section 110(g), a habitual offender is typically one with an evidenced pattern of desperate, dangerous conduct hazardous to society—far beyond stray acts. Proper procedure ensures fairness, as affirmed across cases like Bhumiraj Ramswami Tewar VS Sr. Inspector of Police & another - 2003 0 Supreme(Bom) 386, Mohan Parmanand Khatri VS M. G. Ingle & others - 2003 0 Supreme(Bom) 182, and others.
Key Takeaways:- Pattern over incidents: Repeated, proven criminality required.- Evidence first: Enquiry, reasons, no vagueness.- High bar: Protects against misuse.
Stay informed on preventive laws to navigate them wisely. For tailored advice, reach out to a legal expert.
References:1. Sukanya Shantha VS Union of India - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 853, Bhumiraj Ramswami Tewar VS Sr. Inspector of Police & another - 2003 0 Supreme(Bom) 386, Mohan Parmanand Khatri VS M. G. Ingle & others - 2003 0 Supreme(Bom) 182, Jaywant Gabaji Tambe VS State of Maharashtra - 2008 0 Supreme(Bom) 13692. Additional: Sita Ram VS State of Rajasthan, HARI PRAKASH vs STATE, Shankar lal S/o Shri Rama Kishan Ji VS State of Rajasthan - 2016 Supreme(Raj) 245, L. Ravindran VS The Commissioner of Police, Egmore & Others - 2010 Supreme(Mad) 1153, Faheem VS State of U. P. - 2021 Supreme(All) 1649, etc.
#HabitualOffender, #CrPC110, #CriminalLawIndia
On going through Section 110 Cr.P.C., the heading itself shows that security can be secured from a habitual offender for ensuring good behaviour. Section 110 Cr.P.C. reads as follows: 110. ... Section 110 (g) Cr.P.C. deals with a person who is so desperate and dangerous as to render his being at large without security, hazardous to the community. Therefore, the ....
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 110 – Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 – Section ... 110 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 third respondent Sub Divisional Magistrate – Held, Learned counsel petitioner that petitioners ... Mischief causing damage to public property – Learned counsel for petitioners instant petition is seeking quashing of impugned notices section ... That section 110 of Cr.P.C. applies only to habitual offend....
Section 110 - Challenge to Proceeding - Section 110 of the Code - Sections 106, 107, 108, 109, 112, 113, 116 of the Code, Punjab ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner challenged a proceeding under Section 110 of the Code, arguing that he was not a ' ... The court found that a previous conviction is not a prerequisite for maintaining a proceeding under Section 110 and that evidence ... Evidence in Proceedings under Section #HL_START....
110 Cr.P.C. ... 110 Cr.P.C. ... 110 Cr.P.C. ... of habitual offender envisaged under Section 2(a) of the Act of 1953. ... offender.
Whether the initiation of proceedings under Section 110 Cr.P.C. was justified? Ratio Decidendi: 1. ... CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - SECTION 110 - RAJASTHAN HABITUAL OFFENDERS ACT, 1953 - SECTION 2(A) - HISTORY SHEET - SURVEILLANCE REGISTER ... The Court also held that the initiation of proceedings under Section 110 Cr.P.C. was an abuse of the process of the Court. ... Before adverting to examine the afflictions of petitioner, it would be just and appropriate to examine the defin....
110 of Code, more particularly under Section 110(e) of the Code provides that when a person habitually commits, or attempts to commit ... 110 Cr.P.C. stating therein that he is residing within the jurisdiction of learned Magistrate and a habitual offender - Highlighting ... maintaining - bailable warrant - Facts of case are that SHO, Police Station Road submitted a complaint against the petitioner under Section ... In order to justify initiation of proceeding under Section ....
of proceeding under Section 110 Cr.P.C. ... 110 Cr.P.C. ... 110 Cr.P.C. ... 110 Cr.P.C. ... 110 Cr.P.C.
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 110—Habitual offender—Security for good behaviour—In order to implicate a person in proceedings ... under Section 110 Cr.P.C., there has to be material on record of case to show that a person falls in categories referred to in the ... 110 Cr.P.C. have not been satisfied in this case—Impugned order quashed. ... Learned counsel for the petitioner thus urged that the petitioner is neither a habitual offender nor a history sheeter so ....
(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 110 - Proceedings against habitual offenders - Petitioner not convicted in any ... ... ... Issues: Whether the petitioner qualifies as a habitual offender under Section 110 Cr.P.C. and if the proceedings against ... 110 Cr.P.C. ... Learned counsel for the petitioner thus urged that the petitioner is neither a habitual offender nor a history sheeter so as to justify the continuance of the proceedings under Sect....
Twice Conviction under S.110, Cr.P.C. Once (G.O.Ms.532, Judl,20 Feb, 1906 and SO 747. ... [Section 2(4)]. ... Note: (1) The demand of a security for good behaviour under section 110, Criminal Procedure Code will amount to the passing of a sentence of substantive imprisonment, for the purpose of the above definition. ... The active ones among these should be dealt with appropriately under Section 110(a) and (f) ....
The expression 'habitual criminal' is the same thing as the 'habitual offender' within the meaning of Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. This preventive Section deals for requiring security for good behavior from 'habitual offenders'. The expression 'habitually' in the aforesaid section has been used in the sense of depravity of character as evidenced by frequent repetition or commission of offence.
This preventive Section deals for requiring security for good behaviour from 'habitual offenders'. The expression 'habitual criminal' is the same thing as the 'habitual offender' within the meaning of Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The expression 'habitually' in the aforesaid section has been used in the sense of depravity of character as evidenced by frequent repetition or commission of offence.
The expression 'habitual criminal' is the same thing as the 'habitual offender' within the meaning of section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. This preventive Section deals for requiring security for good behavior from 'habitual offenders'. The expression 'habitually' in the aforesaid section has been used in the sense of depravity of character as evidenced by frequent repetition or commission of offence.
This preventive Section deals for requiring security for good behavior from "habitual offenders". The expression "habitual criminal" is the same thing as the "habitual offender" within the meaning of section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The expression "habitually" in the aforesaid section has been used in the sense of depravity of character as evidenced by frequent repetition or commission of offence.
The expression ‘habitual criminal’ is the same thing as the ‘habitual offender’ within the meaning of Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The expression ‘habitually’ in the aforesaid section has been used in the sense of depravity of character as evidenced by frequent repetition or commission of offence. This preventive Section deals for requiring security for good behavior from ‘habitual offenders’.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
