Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Limitation of Desertion - The limitation period for filing divorce based on desertion is governed by specific laws, and the period must be adhered to strictly. For example, under the Hindu Marriage Act, the petitioner must file within the prescribed limitation period, typically two years from the date of desertion ["Hirabai Ramchandra VS Ramchandra Rawoo - Bombay"]. Failure to do so renders the petition barred by law of limitation ["Rajesh Kumar Srivastava VS Manisha Srivastava - Allahabad"].
Nature of Desertion - Desertion is characterized as a continuing and inchoate offence. It is not necessarily proven by physical separation alone but requires proof of animus deserendi (desire to desert) along with the act or omission of leaving the matrimonial home. The Supreme Court has emphasized that desertion involves inference from facts and circumstances, and the quality of permanence differentiates it from mere separation ["Uttamram Ledu Singh v. Kayaso Bai - Chhattisgarh"] ["ROHIT SHARMA vs SHIVANI KUMARI ALIAS SHARMA - Jharkhand"].
Essential Elements and Proof - To establish desertion, the petitioner must prove both factum (the act of leaving) and animus (intent to desert). The desertion must be without reasonable cause, against the wish of the deserted spouse, and must be continuous for a specified period (usually two years) before filing for divorce ["Rohini Kumari v. Narendra Sing - Allahabad"]. The desertion can occur even while living under the same roof if the conduct shows a clear intention to abandon the marriage ["Polisetty Sripadmavati VS Polisetty Srinivasarao @ Balaji - Andhra Pradesh"].
Impact of Subsequent Actions - The courts have held that desertion remains a continuous offence even after subsequent events, such as remarriage of the deserting spouse, unless there is clear evidence of revocation of the desertion or reconciliation ["Sanjit Kumar VS Manju Devi - Jharkhand"].
Legal Interpretations - The Supreme Court and various High Courts have clarified that desertion is a legal inference drawn from conduct and circumstances, not merely physical separation. The absence of cruelty or other grounds does not negate desertion if the requisite elements are proved ["Vinay Kumar Verma, Son of Basant Mahto vs Kiran Devi, Wife of Vinay Kumar Verma - Jharkhand"] ["Kiran Devi, W/o-Sanjay Kumar and daughter of Sushil Kumar vs Sanjay Kumar, S/o-Late Shivjee Rai - Jharkhand"].
Analysis and Conclusion:The limitation of desertion as a ground for divorce is strict, with a statutory period (commonly two years) within which the petition must be filed. Desertion is a complex, ongoing legal issue that involves proving both the act of leaving and the intent to desert (animus deserendi). It can be established even without physical separation if conduct indicates a clear intention to abandon the marriage. Courts emphasize that desertion is not simply about separation but about the continuous act and mental state of the deserting spouse, and the law requires timely filing within the prescribed limitation period to enforce the right to divorce on this ground ["Rohini Kumari v. Narendra Sing - Allahabad"] ["ROHIT SHARMA vs SHIVANI KUMARI ALIAS SHARMA - Jharkhand"].
In Hindu marriages governed by the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA), desertion is a common ground for seeking judicial separation or divorce. But what exactly is the 'limitation of desertion of Hindu'? Many spouses wonder: how long must separation last to qualify as desertion? Typically, courts require proof of continuous desertion for not less than two years immediately preceding the petition. This statutory period, along with key elements like intent and lack of reasonable cause, forms the backbone of such claims. This post breaks it down, drawing from statutory provisions and judicial precedents, to help you navigate this complex area of family law.
Note: This is general information based on legal principles and cases. It is not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Desertion isn't just physical separation—it's a deliberate abandonment. Under Section 10(1)(a) for judicial separation and Section 13(1)(ib) for divorce, the deserting spouse must have deserted the petitioner for a continuous period of not less than two years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition Lachman Utamchand Kirpalani VS Meena Alias Mota - 1964 0 Supreme(SC) 188Babu Ram VS Kanta Devi - 1988 0 Supreme(J&K) 182.
The HMA's Explanation defines desertion as the desertion of the petitioner by the other party to the marriage without reasonable cause and without the consent or against the wish of such party, and includes the wilful neglect of the petitioner by the other party to the marriage Lachman Utamchand Kirpalani VS Meena Alias Mota - 1964 0 Supreme(SC) 188.
This marks a shift from pre-1955 laws like the Bombay Hindu Divorce Act, 1947, which mandated four yearsBipinchandra Jaisinghbai Shah VS Prabbavati - 1956 0 Supreme(SC) 80. Post-HMA, uniformity applies across India with the two-year rule.
The period must be continuous and immediately preceding the petition. Courts stress: the desertion throughout the entire period of two years before the petition Lachman Utamchand Kirpalani VS Meena Alias Mota - 1964 0 Supreme(SC) 188DHARAM DEV MALIK VS SMT. RAJ RANI - 1984 0 Supreme(Del) 96.
In one case, a petition under Section 13 failed because mere departure didn't prove over two years of intent Babu Ram VS Kanta Devi - 1988 0 Supreme(J&K) 182.
Proving desertion requires four pillars, as per landmark rulings like Bipin Chandra:
Temporary separations don't count: If a spouse abandons the other spouse in a state of temporary passion... without intending permanently to cease cohabitation, it will not amount to desertion Lachman Utamchand Kirpalani VS Meena Alias Mota - 1964 0 Supreme(SC) 188Harpeet Kaur VS Amarjeet Singh - 2020 0 Supreme(Del) 1186.
From additional precedents, For the offence of desertion... two essential conditions must be there, namely, '(1) the factum of separation, and (2) the intention to bring cohabitation permanently to an end (animus deserendi)' Suvarna Korn Ratnakar Shet VS Ratnakar Vinayak Shet, Shimoga District - 2011 Supreme(Kar) 429.
The petitioner bears the entire burden on a preponderance of probabilities standard (not beyond reasonable doubt, despite some phrasing). They must prove: factum, animus, no consent, and no just cause throughout the two years Lachman Utamchand Kirpalani VS Meena Alias Mota - 1964 0 Supreme(SC) 188DHARAM DEV MALIK VS SMT. RAJ RANI - 1984 0 Supreme(Del) 96Harpeet Kaur VS Amarjeet Singh - 2020 0 Supreme(Del) 1186.
Even if the respondent doesn't justify their actions, petitioner must show the desertion was without just cause Lachman Utamchand Kirpalani VS Meena Alias Mota - 1964 0 Supreme(SC) 188. In a case, the petitioner failed to prove 'animus deserendi' on the part of the respondent Sunil Juneja VS Sonia - 2023 Supreme(Del) 4083.
Evidence like refusal to return despite requests, witnesses, or communications is crucial.
Courts rigorously scrutinize claims:
In another, Family Court rejected for no evidence of misappropriation or desertion specifics S. R. Suresh Babu, S/o. Raman VS Beena, D/o. Prabhakaran - 2022 Supreme(Ker) 139.
To strengthen your case:1. Document the exact two-year timeline with dates.2. Gather proof of animus (e.g., ignored reconciliation attempts).3. Prove no fault on your side—avoid actions giving cause.4. File promptly after two years to prevent 'staleness'.5. Use corroborative evidence: witnesses, letters, mediation records.
Desertion claims can be powerful but fact-specific. If facing marital abandonment, seek professional guidance early. Understanding these nuances may help preserve or end marriages thoughtfully.
References include core HMA provisions and cases like Lachman Utamchand Kirpalani VS Meena Alias Mota - 1964 0 Supreme(SC) 188, Babu Ram VS Kanta Devi - 1988 0 Supreme(J&K) 182, DHARAM DEV MALIK VS SMT. RAJ RANI - 1984 0 Supreme(Del) 96, among others cited.
#HinduDivorce #DesertionLaw #FamilyLawIndia
The view taken by the Madras Court is that the provision of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act No. 78 of 1956 and of the Hindu Married Women's Right to Separate Residence and Maintenance Act No. 19 of 1946 purported to give the trends, of what is claimed to be progressive thought in this country ... After referring to the right of a wife to claim separate residence and maintenance from her husband given to her under the Hindu Married Women's Right to Separate Residence and Maintenance Act (Act 19 of 1946) as well as Hindu#H....
The issue of desertion is a continuous process and any subsequent suit on the ground of desertion cannot cause impediment only on account of desertion being the primary ground in the earlier suit. Mr. ... (ii) Whether the suit is barred by law of limitation provisions of estoppel and waiver? (iii) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to get the decree of divorce against the defendant? ... PW-1 is the petitioner himself who has stated about his marriage having been solemnized with the respondent on 06.03.1987 as per #HL_ST....
AIR 1957 SC 176 the Supreme Court observed and discussed about "What is desertion?".Para 10 of the said dictum is quoted below for ready reference :(10) What is desertion? ... Desertion is a matter of inference to be drawn from the facts and circumstances of each case.
petition for divorce for the period of limitation that is allowed to him under the law of limitation. ... There can be no doubt that the right to obtain a divorce on the ground of desertion was conferred by a special enactment, namely, the Bombay Hindu Divorce Act, 1947. ... There was nothing that a party to a marriage was called upon to do in order to acquire the right under the Bombay Hindu Divorce Act to a divorce on the ground of desertion by the spouse for the period prescribed by....
To prove desertion as per law as I have already discussed above, the parties seeking divorce on the ground of desertion. The petitioner has failed to prove "animus deserendi" on the part of the respondent. ... From the evidence on record, the fault of desertion sought against the petitioner has not been proved on the ground of desertion also." 2. ... Meena, (2016) 9 SCC 455 had observed that it is not a common practice or desirable culture for a Hindu son in India to get separated from the parents upon ....
, AIR 1957 SC 176 , in which the expression 'desertion' as defined under Section 2(b) of the BOMBAY HINDU DIVORCE ACT was under consideration, the Hon'ble Apex Court held that the quality of permanence is one of the essential elements which differentiates desertion ... The case of the petitioner (husband) in O.P., was that the marriage with the respondent was solemnised on 16.11.1996 at Munipalli Village of Uppalaguptam Mandal as per the Hindu Rites and Customs. The marriage was consummated. ... What is deserti....
In the present case the wife among her pleas pleaded both desertion and cruelty, and whilst I have already dealt with desertion, I think it is necessary to consider the Hindu Law also as to legal cruelty, as a defence to a suit for restitution of conjugal rights. The text of Manu (Ch. ... This, in my opinion, is a correct statement of the Hindu Law on the subject of unlawful desertion of a wife by the husband, and it leaves no doubt in my mind that restitution of conjugal rights at the instance of the w....
The marriage between the petitioner/plaintiff and the respondent/defendant took place according to Hindu customary rites and ceremonies on 12.12.2009 at village Kanhwara within Godda (M) P.S. ... to adultery, cruelty and desertion. ... The desertion has also been taken as a ground but the desertion has been defined and interpreted by the Hon’ble Apex Court that the desertion will be said to be desertion if either of the party, on his/her own wish, has left the matrimonial house. ... Th....
A similar provision is incorporated in the Allahabad High Court Hindu Marriage and Divorce Rules, 1956. Rule 15 reads as follows: “15. ... A petition was filed by the appellant-petitioner before the Family court seeking divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, stating that both the parties are married according to Hindu religion, rituals and traditions. ... It appears that the petitioner has sought divorce on the ground of desertion and cruelty. Desertion 9. ... Counting from either date, the petition being f....
He deposed in his examination-in-chief that his marriage was solemnized with the Respondent-wife about 30 years back as per Hindu rites and customs. ... Family Court that alleged ground of cruelty and desertion have not been proved. ... ‘Desertion’ has been further explained by Hon’ble Supreme Court on various occasions. ... .-1, Ramesh Prasad Singh has deposed in his examination-in-chief that marriage between the Appellant and the Respondent was solemnized about 30 years back as per Hindu rites and customs. ... It is ve....
Under Hindu law, as revealed from the above explanation, if a spouse has a reasonable cause to live separately, such a separate stay or refusal to cohabitation cannot be construed as desertion. 13. ..On the other hand, there is sufficient evidence to show that the appellant used to ill-treat the respondent due to some mental disorder which can be corrected by taking medicines.. Desertion as a ground for divorce is recognized under law on the basis of the fault of a spouse to the marriage. Perhaps in this context the relevant observation of this Court in an earlier Mat. Appe....
22. Sri. Sadashivappa, learned counsel for the respondent contends that Section 13(1)(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act contemplates 'desertion' and not a wilful desertion. Therefore, the judgment and decree in MC No. 31/2006 does not come in the way of granting the decree for divorce. Thus, he justifies the decree of divorce, granted by the trial Court overlooking the findings in MC No. 31/2006.
Such leaving of matrimonial home cannot amount to desertion for furnishing that ground of desertion under Section 13 (1)(i)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955." In the circumstances which led to such filing of complaint and even conviction at the hands of learned trial court may give sufficient reason to the respondent wife to even leave the matrimonial home to save her life and acquire peace from such harassment.
For the offence of desertion, so far as the deserting spouse is concerned, two essential conditions must be there, namely, “(1) the factum of separation, and (2) the intention to bring cohabitation permanently to an end (animus deserendi). The Apex Court in the case of BIPIN CHANDER JAISINGHBHM SHAM VS. If a spouse abandons the other spouse in a state of temporary passion, for example, anger or disgust, without intending permanently to cease cohabitation, it will not amount to desertion. PRABHAWATI reported in AIR 1957 SC 176 while dealing with the question of desertion under the p....
Such leaving of matrimonial home cannot amount to desertion for furnishing that ground of desertion under Section 13 (1) (i) (a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. In the circumstances which led to such filing of complaint and even conviction at the hands of learned trial court may give sufficient reason to the respondent wife to even leave the matrimonial home to save her life and acquire peace from such harassment.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
