SupremeToday Landscape Ad

AI Overview

AI Overview...

References:- Supreme Court observations on illegal mining: Manohar Lal S/o Shri Gopi Lal Mewada VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan- Rajasthan Department of Mines & Geology enforcement actions: NEWS ITEM TITLED RAJASTHAN MEI AVAIDH KHANAN KE 676 THIKANE CHINHIT DO DIN MEI 500 KARYAVAHI APPEARING IN ABHAY INDIA DATED 18.01.2024 VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - National Green Tribunal- Tribunal case details and inspection reports: SUNIL VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - National Green Tribunal, SONU VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - National Green Tribunal, SONU VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - National Green Tribunal, BHANWAR LAL GURJAR VS STATE OF RAJATHAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY - National Green Tribunal, BHANWAR LAL GURJAR VS STATE OF RAJATHAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY - National Green Tribunal, BHANWAR LAL GURJAR VS STATE OF RAJATHAN THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY - National Green Tribunal

Key Court Rulings on Illegal Bajri Mining in Rajasthan

Illegal bajri mining—referring to the unauthorized extraction and transport of bajri (river sand or gravel)—has become a pressing issue in Rajasthan, leading to severe environmental degradation, riverbed erosion, and governance challenges. With rising complaints from locals and strict judicial oversight, courts have issued landmark rulings balancing sustainable development with enforcement. If you're wondering about rulings on illegal bajri mining, this post breaks down key legal findings, compliance requirements, and practical insights from recent cases.

Note: This article provides general information based on public judgments and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific situations.

Overview of Illegal Bajri Mining in Rajasthan

Bajri mining is regulated under the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017 (RMNCR) and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (MMDR Act). Illegal activities often involve extraction without permits, bypassing environmental clearances, or night-time operations by locals. Courts, including the Rajasthan High Court and Supreme Court, have emphasized scientific studies, replenishment assessments, and penalties to curb these practices.

The issue gained prominence due to reports of heavy machinery like JCBs used in areas such as Kanasar Range under Aasai Pattern Tones Rivers, where Gram Pradhans and villagers were implicated. MADAN LAL VS - 2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4272 Weak enforcement and corruption have worsened environmental impacts like soil erosion. Jayant VS State of Madhya Pradesh - Supreme Court (2020)

Key Legal Findings on Compliance and Permits

1. Validity of Mining on Private and Government Lands

Rajasthan High Court rulings affirm that mining bajri on private khatedari lands or government lands away from riverbeds complies with sustainable principles if District Survey Reports and environmental clearances are obtained. Short-term permits were upheld as valid due to minimal excavation limits and compliance. Sanjay Kumar Garg S/o Bhagwati Lal Garg VS State of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary To Government Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan (2018)

The court dismissed challenges, noting that the requirements for District Survey Reports and environmental clearances had been complied with. Sanjay Kumar Garg S/o Bhagwati Lal Garg VS State of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary To Government Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan (2018)

2. Environmental Clearances and Replenishment Studies

Supreme Court directives mandate scientific replenishment studies for riverbed mining to prevent depletion. However, such studies are unnecessary for private agricultural or non-adjacent government lands, as replenishment is not applicable in those areas. Sanjay Kumar Garg VS Secretariat, Jaipur - Rajasthan (2018)

Non-compliance leads to halts in operations, underscoring the need for prior clearances under environmental laws.

Enforcement Against Illegal Activities

Vehicle Seizures and Penalties

A common enforcement tool is seizing vehicles like tractors transporting bajri without valid e-rewana (transit pass). For instance, the vehicle (Tractor) of the petitioner was seized when found to be transporting bajri without valid e-rewana on 30.04.2020 and hence such transportation of mineral comes under illegal mining. Hitesh Kumar S/o Sh. Mohan Lal VS State Of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 131Kishore Singh s/o Sh. Bheru Singh VS State Of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 139

Under MMDR Act Section 21, whenever any person raises, transports or causes to be raised or transported, without any lawful authority, any mineral from any land... such mineral, tool, equipment, vehicle or any other thing shall be liable to be seized. Hitesh Kumar S/o Sh. Mohan Lal VS State Of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 131

Penalties include compounding fees; one case required Rs 1,26,400/- for release. Kishore Singh s/o Sh. Bheru Singh VS State Of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 139 Recovery data from 2017-2020 shows penalties imposed, though night-time illegal mining by villagers persists. MEENU KANWAR RATHORE VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - 2023 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 720

Court Directions on Vehicle Release

Rajasthan High Court has clarified magistrates' powers under CrPC Sections 451 and 457 to release seized vehicles (tractors, trolleys, dumpers) if no confiscation proceedings are underway. Conditions include:- Depositing bank guarantee equivalent to compensation/compounding fee.- Furnishing vehicle photographs showing numbers and colors.- Undertaking not to use for illegal purposes; repeat offenses bar release until proceedings end. Hitesh Kumar S/o Sh. Mohan Lal VS State Of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 131Kishore Singh s/o Sh. Bheru Singh VS State Of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 139Irfan VS State Of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 320

Petitioners shall give an undertaking before concerned learned trial court along with bank guarantee, that they shall not use such vehicles for any illegal and unlawful purpose. Kishore Singh s/o Sh. Bheru Singh VS State Of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 139

In batch petitions, release was ordered with personal security, valid registration/permit, and no illegal use commitment. Irfan VS State Of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 320

Judicial Interventions and Broader Measures

Courts have intervened decisively:- Dismissing petitions against valid permits while halting riverbed mining sans studies. Sanjay Kumar Garg S/o Bhagwati Lal Garg VS State of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary To Government Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan (2018)Sanjay Kumar Garg VS Secretariat, Jaipur - Rajasthan (2018)- Directing officials like Director of Mines to explain anti-illegal mining steps, including transport department plans. Irfan VS State Of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 320- In other contexts, forming High Power Committees and Task Forces for monitoring, as seen in riverbed cases with soil erosion reports. Debabrata Saikia VS Union of India - 2019 Supreme(Gau) 908

Investigations confirm illegal operations alongside quarries, prompting calls for specialized enforcement. Debabrata Saikia VS Union of India - 2019 Supreme(Gau) 908

The Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953 (Sections 52-60) and IPC Sections 323, 353, 379 often apply to related offenses like theft or hurt during seizures. Hitesh Kumar S/o Sh. Mohan Lal VS State Of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 131

Challenges and Ongoing Issues

Despite rulings, illegal mining continues via local networks, with complaints against figures like Gram Pradhans using heavy machines. MADAN LAL VS - 2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4272 Night operations evade detection, as per mining department reports. MEENU KANWAR RATHORE VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - 2023 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 720

Courts stress RMNCR 2017 Chapter X, Rule 54 for compounding and MMDR Sections 4, 15, 21 prohibiting unauthorized operations. Kishore Singh s/o Sh. Bheru Singh VS State Of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 139

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

Judicial rulings on illegal bajri mining reflect a firm stance against violations while permitting compliant operations. Key takeaways:- Obtain environmental clearances and e-rewana for legitimacy.- Expect vehicle seizures and penalties for non-compliance; releases require guarantees and undertakings.- Riverbed mining demands replenishment studies; land-based may not.- Support enforcement through reporting to anti-illegal mining squads.

Recommendations:- Ensure operations follow RMNCR 2017 and MMDR Act.- Advocate stricter monitoring to combat corruption. Jayant VS State of Madhya Pradesh - Supreme Court (2020)- Engage stakeholders for sustainable practices.

Stay compliant to avoid legal pitfalls. References: Bajri Lease Lol Holders Welfare Society Through its President VS State of Rajasthan - Supreme Court (2021)Sanjay Kumar Garg S/o Bhagwati Lal Garg VS State of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary To Government Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan (2018)Sanjay Kumar Garg VS Secretariat, Jaipur - Rajasthan (2018)Jayant VS State of Madhya Pradesh - Supreme Court (2020)Glocal Medical College & Super Speciality Hospital & Research Centre VS Union of India - 2017 0 Supreme(SC) 1273MADAN LAL VS - 2024 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 4272MEENU KANWAR RATHORE VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - 2023 Supreme(Online)(NGT) 720Hitesh Kumar S/o Sh. Mohan Lal VS State Of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 131Irfan VS State Of Rajasthan - 2021 Supreme(Raj) 320Debabrata Saikia VS Union of India - 2019 Supreme(Gau) 908

#IllegalBajriMining, #RajasthanMiningLaws, #MiningRegulations
Chat Download
Chat Print
Chat R ALL
Landmark
Strategy
Argument
Risk
Chat Voice Bottom Icon
Chat Sent Bottom Icon
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top