Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Inherent Power under Section 151 - Section 151 of the CPC preserves the inherent powers of the court to do justice, especially in circumstances where the law is silent or no specific provision covers the matter. It is primarily a tool to prevent injustice, avoid multiplicity of proceedings, and ensure the ends of justice, but it cannot override express statutory provisions or create remedies not contemplated by law. Its exercise is limited to situations where no alternative remedy exists and must be exercised with circumspection Pooja D/o Mahendra Singh vs Mahendra Singh S/o Rankishore Saini - Rajasthan, Dinbandhu Dinanath Prajapati VS Devenbhai Mafatlal Patel - Current Civil Cases, DAYA ENGG. WORKS (SLEEPER) LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi, Jumman VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Daggubati Yeeswara Krishna Mohan VS M. V. Satyanarayana Rao - Current Civil Cases.
Scope and Limitations - The power under Section 151 is not a substantive source of jurisdiction but a supplementary power to be invoked to meet the ends of justice. It cannot be used as an alternative to filing suits, appeals, or revisions, nor to bypass procedural safeguards. It is also not applicable where statutory provisions explicitly prohibit certain actions, such as stay of proceedings under specific sections like Section 10 of the CPC. The power should be exercised cautiously, primarily to prevent abuse of process or rectify errors, such as correction of judgments or recalling orders obtained by fraud Sharad Kapoor VS Mani Chopra - Current Civil Cases, Debi Prasad Rayaguru vs Basanti Mishra - Orissa, SANJAY KALRA VS STATE - Delhi, Belamati Digal vs Pravabati Nayak - Orissa, Paminder Gujral VS Kiranjit Gujral - Delhi.
Judicial Interpretation - Indian courts have clarified that Section 151 is meant to supplement the CPC, not override it. Its exercise is limited to situations where no other remedy is available, and it cannot be invoked to create new rights or remedies. The power is to be exercised judiciously, especially in cases involving fraud, miscarriage of justice, or to prevent abuse, but not as a routine measure Gopi Krishan (2013) 11 SCC 296, Sanjay Kakkar.
Analysis and Conclusion:Section 151 of the CPC is an important safeguard that grants courts inherent powers to ensure justice is served when statutory provisions are silent or inadequate. However, its exercise is confined within strict boundaries, primarily to prevent injustice and abuse, and it cannot override explicit statutory provisions. The power must be exercised with caution and only when no other remedy exists, emphasizing that it is a supplementary, rather than a substantive, jurisdictional tool.
In the realm of civil litigation in India, courts often wield significant authority to ensure justice is served. But what happens when statutory provisions fall short? Enter Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), which preserves the inherent powers of courts. A common legal query arises: Judgement on Inherent Power under Section 151. This post delves into judicial interpretations, scope, limitations, and practical applications, drawing from landmark rulings to provide clarity.
Whether you're a lawyer, litigant, or law student, understanding these powers is crucial. They act as a safety valve for procedural fairness but come with strict boundaries. Note: This is general information based on precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for your case.
Section 151 CPC explicitly states: Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect the inherent power of the Court to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of the CourtGovt. of NCT of Delhi through its Secretary VS K. L. Rathi Steels Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 507. This provision recognizes courts' residual authority to act where the CPC is silent, primarily in procedural matters.
The main legal finding from various judgments is that these powers are supplementary procedural tools to do justice, prevent abuse, or correct errors—but they are limited by specific statutory provisions. Courts cannot use Section 151 to override final judgments, review appellate orders, or re-open settled issues Govt. of NCT of Delhi through its Secretary VS K. L. Rathi Steels Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 507Rayapati Audemma VS Pothineni Narasimham - 1969 0 Supreme(AP) 96.
Inherent powers under Section 151 are not a blank cheque. The Supreme Court has clarified they are in addition to, and not in substitution for, statutory remedies. They fill procedural gaps where no specific remedy exists Govt. of NCT of Delhi through its Secretary VS K. L. Rathi Steels Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 507Rayapati Audemma VS Pothineni Narasimham - 1969 0 Supreme(AP) 96.
For instance, The inherent power under Section 151 of the Code, as a matter of fact, is a power inherent in the Court by virtue of its duty to do justice between the parties before itUdhey Verma VS Kamaljeet Singh - 2005 Supreme(P&H) 191 - 2005 0 Supreme(P&H) 191. This underscores their role in ensuring fairness without creating new substantive rights.
Key points from precedents:- Confers powers for justice or to prevent abuse, but not to bypass specific provisions Govt. of NCT of Delhi through its Secretary VS K. L. Rathi Steels Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 507Rayapati Audemma VS Pothineni Narasimham - 1969 0 Supreme(AP) 96.- Must be exercised with caution, only in procedural matters lacking alternatives My Palace Mutually Aided Co-operative Society VS B. Mahesh - 2022 7 Supreme 744Gorivelli Appanna VS Gorivelli Setthamma - 1970 0 Supreme(AP) 274.- Cannot review or alter final judgments from appellate jurisdiction Kaila Devi VS State Of Haryana - 1998 0 Supreme(P&H) 1572Sultan Saleh Bin Omer VS Vijayachand Sirimal - 1965 0 Supreme(AP) 147.
A recurring theme in judgments is restraint. Inherent powers cannot be invoked to review, modify, or re-open final judgments or orders, especially those from appellate or statutory proceedings Kaila Devi VS State Of Haryana - 1998 0 Supreme(P&H) 1572. For example, in State of W.B. and Ors. v. Karan Singh Binayak and related land acquisition cases, the Supreme Court ruled that Section 151 cannot alter such judgments, as review is reserved for statutory mechanisms Kaila Devi VS State Of Haryana - 1998 0 Supreme(P&H) 1572.
Thus, it is only in exceptional circumstances where there is no other remedy available under any statutory provisions, that can be taken to Section 151 CPCSATYA PRAKASH TIWARI @ KALLU VS CIVIL JUDGE (Jr. Div. ) ETAWAH - 2005 Supreme(All) 2421 - 2005 0 Supreme(All) 2421. Courts emphasize: if a statutory remedy exists, inherent powers must not override it Govt. of NCT of Delhi through its Secretary VS K. L. Rathi Steels Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 507Gorivelli Appanna VS Gorivelli Setthamma - 1970 0 Supreme(AP) 274.
Further, Section 151 does not confer any inherent power but it recognises or saves the inherent powerLALIT MOHAN THAPAR VS COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX - 2004 Supreme(Cal) 495 - 2004 0 Supreme(Cal) 495. It prevents misuse like circumventing appeals or creating remedies not contemplated by law.
While limited, these powers shine in procedural contexts:- Recalling ex parte orders or correcting clerical mistakes Gorivelli Appanna VS Gorivelli Setthamma - 1970 0 Supreme(AP) 274Ali Khan VS Special Deputy Collector Land Acquisition (Industries) Hyderabad - 1972 0 Supreme(AP) 149.- Consolidating trials between same parties, even for different reliefs, as Family Courts may do under inherent powers Sanjeev Indravadan Dani VS Rupal Sanjeev Dani - 2009 Supreme(Bom) 1506 - 2009 0 Supreme(Bom) 1506.- Preventing abuse like multiplicity of proceedings or fraud-induced orders Govt. of NCT of Delhi through its Secretary VS K. L. Rathi Steels Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 507.
We have no hesitation in taking the view that the Family Court has ample powers to order consolidation of trial of two petitions pending before it between the same parties even if the same were claiming entirely different reliefs. That power is in no way impacted by provisions such as section 21A of the Hindu Marriage Act. Such power can be exercised with reference to the inherent powers under section 151 of the CodeSanjeev Indravadan Dani VS Rupal Sanjeev Dani - 2009 Supreme(Bom) 1506 - 2009 0 Supreme(Bom) 1506.
In tribunals or civil courts, powers extend to corrections like name amendments in plaints Udhey Verma VS Kamaljeet Singh - 2005 Supreme(P&H) 191 - 2005 0 Supreme(P&H) 191. However, they remain supplementary, not substantive Dinbandhu Dinanath Prajapati VS Devenbhai Mafatlal Patel - Current Civil CasesDAYA ENGG. WORKS (SLEEPER) LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi.
Exceptions are narrow:- Procedural gaps with no statutory remedy, e.g., interim relief or error corrections Rayapati Audemma VS Pothineni Narasimham - 1969 0 Supreme(AP) 96.- Fraud or gross errors to avert miscarriage, but not altering final judgments Govt. of NCT of Delhi through its Secretary VS K. L. Rathi Steels Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 507.- Never to bypass statutes like Section 10 CPC stays or res judicata Kaila Devi VS State Of Haryana - 1998 0 Supreme(P&H) 1572.
Courts must exercise circumspection: The power under Section 151 is not a substantive source of jurisdiction but a supplementary power to be invoked to meet the ends of justice. It cannot be used as an alternative to filing suits, appeals, or revisions (drawing from judicial summaries Sharad Kapoor VS Mani Chopra - Current Civil CasesDebi Prasad Rayaguru vs Basanti Mishra - Orissa).
Additional precedents reinforce this. Apart from that, section 151 confers inherent power in contexts like pecuniary jurisdiction transfers to tribunals, ensuring they aren't less powerful than civil courts Smt. Annai Jayabharathi VS The DEBT Recovery Tribunal - 2005 Supreme(Ker) 89 - 2005 0 Supreme(Ker) 89. Yet, the consensus: invoke sparingly to uphold finality Vareed Jacob VS Sosamma Geevarghese - 2004 3 Supreme 637REGISTRAR, MANIPAL ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION (DEEMED UNIVERSITY), VS SHAJI SREEDHARAN - 1997 0 Supreme(Kar) 401.
Indian courts, including Supreme Court rulings like Gopi Krishan (2013) 11 SCC 296, stress judicious use against fraud or abuse, not routinely Pooja D/o Mahendra Singh vs Mahendra Singh S/o Rankishore Saini - RajasthanDaggubati Yeeswara Krishna Mohan VS M. V. Satyanarayana Rao - Current Civil Cases.
Section 151 CPC empowers courts to safeguard justice in procedural voids but firmly prohibits overriding statutes or final orders. As jurisprudence evolves, its supplementary role remains pivotal—exercised cautiously to prevent abuse while honoring legal certainty.
Key Takeaways:- Supplementary for procedural justice only Govt. of NCT of Delhi through its Secretary VS K. L. Rathi Steels Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 507.- No review of final/apellate judgments Kaila Devi VS State Of Haryana - 1998 0 Supreme(P&H) 1572.- Exceptional use when no alternatives exist SATYA PRAKASH TIWARI @ KALLU VS CIVIL JUDGE (Jr. Div. ) ETAWAH - 2005 Supreme(All) 2421 - 2005 0 Supreme(All) 2421.
For deeper dives, review cited precedents. Stay informed, and remember: professional advice is essential.
#Section151CPC, #InherentPowers, #CPCIndia
(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 96, Order XXI Rules 103 and 98, Section 151 - Execution of decree - The executing court ... In such circumstances, the appellant moved an application under Section 151 of the CPC praying that the judgement debtors be directed to execute a gift deed in her name with regard to the shop No.3 so that she may obtain separate title or patta ... At this stage, it becom....
(A) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Section 151 – Inherent jurisdiction – Court has in many cases where circumstances ... (Paras 8, 9 and 12) (B) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Section 151 read with Section 54 – Recall of decree – ... Right of a third party to a final decree to file such applications, by invoking inherent powers of Court under Section 151 of CPC ... He would further submit th....
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Section 151 –Limitation Act, 1963 – Section 5 – Arbitration and Conciliation ... of Section 151 of Code is limited and the inherent powers enshrined therein can be exercised only where no remedy has been provided ... 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed on behalf of petitioner seeking relief – Held, It is evident that the scope ... Section #HL_....
of defendants as plaintiff, under its inherent power saved by Section 151 CPC – Order 23 Rule 1-A CPC is not applicable – Section ... Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Section 151 and Order 23 Rule 1-A – Transposition as plaintiff – Inherent powers ... 151 CPC saves inherent powers of Court to make such order as may be necessary for ends of justice and to prevent abuse of process ... … Under ....
The judiciary in India also possesses inherent power, specially under section 151 CPC, to recall its judgment or order if it is obtained by fraud on court. ... of the power under section 151 of the CPC being only in circumstances where alternate remedies do not exist. ... Such inherent power cannot override statutory prohibitions or c....
under section 151 of the Code. ... We however agree that section 151 of the Code cannot be routinely invoked for reopening evidence or recalling witnesses. The scope of section 151 has been explained by this Court in several decisions. ... In the absence of any provision providing for re-opening of evidence or recall of any witness for further examination or cross-examination, for purpos....
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Sections 151 and 152 – Correction of error in judgment and decree – Section ... 151 only supplements and does not override or evade other express provisions of CPC – Similarly, Section 152 CPC empowers Civil ... Code of Civil Procedure recognizes the inherent power of the court. It is not only confined to the amendment of the judgment or decree as envisaged under Section 152 o....
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Section 151 – Order XXXIX Rules 2A – Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 – Section ... 10, 12 – Merits and fairness of Family Settlement – instant application under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been ... Section 151 of the CPC can only be applicable if there is no alternate remedy available in accordance with the existing provisions of law. Such #....
It must also be kept in mind that apart from Section 152, the Court has inherent power under Section 151 of CPC which permits it to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of the Court while exercising the power of the Court under Section 151 of ... The Court below must therefore, be deemed to hav....
Stay - Partition Suit - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 151 - Section 10 - [Section 151, Section 10] - The court dismissed ... nature and section 151 of the CPC cannot override the express statutory provisions mandated in Section 10 of the CPC. ... nature and section 151 of the CPC cannot override the express statutory provisions mandated in Se....
We have no hesitation in taking the view that the Family Court has ample powers to order consolidation of trial of two petitions pending before it between the same parties even if the same were claiming entirely different reliefs. That power is in no way impacted by provisions such as section 21A of the Hindu Marriage Act. Such power can be exercised with reference to the inherent powers under section 151 of the Code.
Thus, it is only in exceptional circumstances where there is no other remedy available under any statutory provisions, that can be taken to Section 151 CPC. 6. Section 151 confers inherent power upon the Civil Court. It cannot be resorted to, to deal with an application for which there is a statutory provision.
Apart from that, section 151 confers inherent power. A question arises as to whether for higher pecuniary jurisdiction, which is now taken off from the civil court and invested in the Tribunals, Tribunals are made less powerful than the common law court, when the very purpose of setting up of Tribunals under the Act is not only for fast adjudication, but, for effective and early recovery of debts, which has got vital role in economic stability of the country. In fact, a presu....
The inherent power under Section 151 of the Code, as a matter of fact, is a power inherent in the Court by virtue of its duty to do justice between the parties before it. No illegality or infirmity thus, could be pointed out by the counsel so as to warrant any interference with the impugned order. It was merely a correction of the name of the company which was ordered to be made in the plaint and, therefore, such correction could certainly be sought by invoking the provisions....
Even without that section the High Court has power to rectify any error if it creeps in the order and if there are accidental errors or omissions the court has jurisdiction to correct those errors and rectify those omissions on the principle that no act of court shall ever injure a party. Therefore, the court does not have any inherent power. Section 151 does not confer any inherent power but it recognises or saves the inherent power. It was further held that the court has in....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
