Generating Results...
Finding Result as Supreme Court Cases
Finding Result as Most Cited
Finding Result as Latest Records
Found 19 Rusult Successfully !
Generating Results...
Finding Result as Supreme Court Cases
Finding Result as Most Cited
Finding Result as Latest Records
Found 19 Rusult Successfully !
Illegitimate Child's Rights to Property - Generally, illegitimate children do not have automatic rights to inherit ancestral or joint family property, but may have rights to self-acquired property of the father or mother, depending on the applicable laws and circumstances Nagendra Kumar Joshi, son of Gulab Chandra Joshi VS Suklal Bandhe, son of late Bisahu Das Bandhe - Chhattisgarh, UKKU v. HORATHALA, Ashoke Bagdi @ Putu Bagdi VS Jayanta Banerjee - Calcutta, Rajendra Kumhar son of late Indru Kumhar VS Deputy Commissioner, P. O. & P. S. - Gumla, Dist. Gumla - Jharkhand, Amrik Singh VS Union Territory of Chandigarh Through Its Principal Secretary - Punjab and Haryana.
Guardianship and Custody - The welfare of the minor is the paramount consideration in custody disputes. Typically, the mother has priority for children under five years old, and in cases of illegitimate children, the mother is often recognized as the natural guardian, followed by the father Nagendra Kumar Joshi, son of Gulab Chandra Joshi VS Suklal Bandhe, son of late Bisahu Das Bandhe - Chhattisgarh, KM. SANAYA SHARMA (MINOR) AND ANOTHER Vs State - Allahabad, Sucheta Bhadoriya vs Ambarish Singh - Madhya Pradesh.
Rights of Illegitimate Children - Under Hindu law and statutes like the Guardians and Wards Act, illegitimate children generally do not inherit ancestral property and have limited rights, primarily to their parent's self-acquired property. Their status as illegitimate often results in social stigma and legal disadvantages concerning inheritance UKKU v. HORATHALA, Sudeep Suhas Kulkarni VS Abbas Bahadur Dhanani - Bombay, Raunak Yadu, S/o. Homeshwar Yadu, (Minor), Through Uncle Gulab Yadu VS General Public - Chhattisgarh, Rajendra Kumhar son of late Indru Kumhar VS Deputy Commissioner, P. O. & P. S. - Gumla, Dist. Gumla - Jharkhand, T. Mallika VS K. Mathivanam - Madras.
Inheritance from Paternal Grandfather - Illegitimate children are typically excluded from inheriting from grandparents or collateral relatives unless specific provisions or declarations are made. The law emphasizes legitimacy as a key factor in inheritance rights from ancestors Armour (Perera's Edition), Ashoke Bagdi @ Putu Bagdi VS Jayanta Banerjee - Calcutta.
Legal Interpretations - Courts generally uphold that illegitimate children do not possess the same inheritance rights as legitimate children, especially regarding ancestral or joint family property, unless explicitly provided by law or legal declarations. However, they may have rights in their parents' self-acquired property Nagendra Kumar Joshi, son of Gulab Chandra Joshi VS Suklal Bandhe, son of late Bisahu Das Bandhe - Chhattisgarh, Rajendra Kumhar son of late Indru Kumhar VS Deputy Commissioner, P. O. & P. S. - Gumla, Dist. Gumla - Jharkhand.
Analysis and Conclusion:Based on the legal provisions and case law, an illegitimate child typically has no automatic rights to inherit or claim rights in a grandfather's ancestral or joint family property. Their rights are primarily limited to their parents' self-acquired property, and they are often excluded from collateral inheritance. Custody and guardianship are determined with the child's welfare as the priority, with mothers generally favored for young children. While social stigma persists, legal reforms and court judgments acknowledge some rights for illegitimate children concerning their parents' property, but these are limited and context-dependent.
In family disputes over inheritance, a common misconception persists: Child has no Rights in Grand Father’s Property. This belief often stems from outdated notions of legitimacy and property rights under Hindu law. But is it true? In this comprehensive guide, we dive into Indian legal provisions, judgments, and nuances from various sources to clarify the rights of children born out of void or —often labeled ''—in their grandfather's estate.
Whether you're navigating a family succession case or simply curious about Hindu inheritance laws, understanding these rules can prevent costly misunderstandings. Note: This is general information based on statutes and case law; consult a qualified lawyer for advice specific to your situation.
The cornerstone of this issue is . Contrary to the myth, children born from void or are deemed for key legal purposes. state that such children are treated as , regardless of whether a has been granted, removing the stigma of illegitimacy and protecting innocent children.
This extends their rights beyond just . Importantly, limits rights to the property of their parents, but judicial interpretations have broadened this to include ancestral and , such as a grandfather's estate. The has clarified that these children are entitled to inherit in ancestral and , including that of their grandparents.
Indian courts have progressively affirmed these rights. In Revanasiddappa (2011) SCC 1, the held that legitimized children under Section 16 can claim shares in their parents’ self-acquired and ancestral properties, including joint family holdings from grandparents.
Earlier, in Jinia Keotin (2003) SCC 730, the Court emphasized equal inheritance in ancestral properties, noting the legislative intent to remove the stigma and provide equal rights. . A 2023 ruling further reinforces this, aligning with amendments to the , which equalize daughters' and sons' rights.
For grandfather's property specifically, coparcenary and ancestral estates pass to legal heirs via kinship. Section 16 supports claims here, as the restriction in 16(3) targets third-party properties, not ancestors.
While Section 16 provides strong protections, some sources highlight limitations, particularly for strictly children (not covered by void/voidable marriage legitimacy). For instance, one ruling notes: As child is not a , he can exercise his right in father's property only on his father dying . Consequently, such a child does not acquire any right by birth in any property, much less coparcenery or joint family property.
Another source states: There is no doubt that in an of the father, child cannot claim any share.. These apply to children outside Section 16's ambit, distinguishing self-acquired parental property (where rights may exist) from ancestral shares.
On , for children, the mother, and after her, the father is the order, excluding step-parents. . rights are clear: An child is also entitled to get from his father.. However, inheritance from grandparents remains limited without legitimacy conferral.
This nuance is critical: Children from void/ gain broader rights via Section 16, while purely adulterous or non-marital births face stricter barriers to .
Even with legitimacy, rights aren't absolute:- Property Type Matters: Full coparcenary birthrights may not apply; claims arise on death. - No Rights in Third-Party Property: bars claims against non-parents/ancestors. - Self-Acquired vs. Ancestral: No child whether or , acquires any right by birth in the separate property or the self acquired property of its parents. Rights vest post-death. - Proof Required: Biological ties and legitimacy must be proven via evidence or decrees.- Welfare Paramount: In , the child's best interest trumps legitimacy. Mothers often have priority for young children.
If pursuing a claim:1. Gather Evidence: Birth records, DNA, or court decrees establishing parentage and Section 16 legitimacy.2. Leverage Precedents: Cite Revanasiddappa and recent SC rulings for ancestral shares. 3. File Timely: Follow Hindu Succession Act procedures for partition or succession.4. Seek Expert Help: A lawyer can assess if the property is coparcenary and navigate state variations.
The statement Child has no Rights in Grand Father’s Property is largely incorrect for children legitimized under Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act. They typically enjoy inheritance rights in parental and grandparental ancestral properties, backed by affirmations. However, limitations persist for non-legitimized cases, emphasizing self-acquired parental assets over broader collateral inheritance.
Key Takeaways:- Legitimacy via Section 16 unlocks ancestral rights. - Judicial evolution favors equality, but proof and property nature are key.- Always prioritize professional legal counsel—laws evolve, and facts vary.
This analysis draws from statutes and precedents like , , and others, offering clarity in a complex area. Share your thoughts below!
(Word count: 1028. General info only; not legal advice.)
#IllegitimateChildRights #InheritanceLawIndia #HinduLaw
On 11.04.2022, statement of the child was also recorded before this Court, in which, minor child – Tanishq stated that he does not want to join the company of appellant/father and wants to stay with the respondent/maternal grand father. ... after him, the mother; Provided that the custody of a minor who has not completed the age of five years shall ordinarily be with the mother; (b) in the case of an #HL_....
Armour (Perera's Edition), page 8, section 7, deals with the case of a man who had an illegitimate son. The father died first and then the grand-father. ... We would, accordingly, recommend that illegitimate children be declared to have no rights whatsoever to the paraveni property of their father, and that legitimate children or their issue should be ....
—In this section, the expression "father" and "mother" do not include a step-father and a step-mother" Section 6(a) of the said Act, therefore, preserves the right of the (b) in case of an illegitimate boy or an illegitimate unmarried girl—the mother, and after her, the father; (c)in the case of a married girl—the husband: Provided that no person shall be entitled to act as the natural guardia....
personality would be more prominent in guardianship of his father rather than in company of his maternal grand parents. ... child, as father. ... : provided that the custody of a minor who has not completed the age of five years shall ordinarily be with the mother; (b) in case of an illegitimate boy or an illegitimate unmarried girl—the mother, and after her, the father....
are not considered, merely because the personal law applicable to the minor child indicates that being an ‘illegitimate child’, she can have no rights towards inheritance or descent. ... as the father, although petitioner No.1 is the biological father of the minor child. ... Learned counsel for the petitioners has fairly brought to the notice of this Court the position ....
of their father and could only stake a claim in his self-acquired property. ... conferring legitimacy in terms of sub-section (1) on a child born from a void marriage and under sub-section (2) to a child born from a voidable marriage which has been annulled, the legislature has stipulated in subsection (3) of Section 16 that such a child will have rights to or in the property#H....
of an illegitimate boy or an illegitimate unmarried girl-the mother, and after her, the father”; 15. ... (3) Nothing contained in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be construed as conferring upon any child of a marriage which is null and void or which is annulled by a decree of nullity under section 12, any rights in or to the property of any person, other than the parents, ... i....
this Act, such child would have been incapable of possessing or acquiring any such rights by reason of his not being the legitimate child of his parents”. ... At the time of Admission of this appeal, the following substantial questions of law were framed vide order dated 07.09.2022 :- (i) Whether an illegitimate son from a concubine is entitled to inherit the property of his father? ... ....
The law thus did not extend to confer any right at par on father of an illegitimate child as have been conferred on father of a legitimate child. ... stigma of being an illegitimate child. ... being of the minor illegitimate girl child. ... The only check on the guardians act of giving child in adoption is under Sect....
rights in the property of any person other than the parent. ... claim a right to the property which does not belong exclusively to his father. ... Lakshmiammal and others, wherein the learned Judges have held that a father can make provision of property for an illegitimate son. d. Recognition of plaintiff as family member by defendants 1, 3 to 5. 14.5. ... While conferr....
No child whether legitimate or illegitimate, acquires any right by birth in the separate property or the self acquired property of its parents. Thus they acquire no title to such property by birth. Separate or self acquired property of a member of the coparcenary or joint family cannot be the subject matter of partition amongst the member of a co-parcenary or Joint family. They do not possess any antecedent title to such property.
As illegitimate child is not a coparcener, he can exercise his right in father's property only on his father dying intestate. Consequently, such a child does not acquire any right by birth in any property, much less coparcenery or joint family property. He has no right by birth and hence, he cannot be given any share even in the property of his parents till they are alive.
There, the question is whether the child has been begotten in a sexual intercourse with the person from whom maintenance is claimed. An illegitimate child is also entitled to get maintenance from his father. So, legitimacy of birth is totally irrelevant and insignificant while considering the right of the child to get maintenance from his father. In short, legitimacy and paternity are different and distinct.
However, he has equal right like his legitimate sibling in the property of his father. 10. Section 16 was introduced by the Act No.68 of 1976 to recognise the right of an illegitimate child in the father’s property. There is no doubt that in an ancestral property of the father, illegitimate child cannot claim any share. The Legislature has taken a progressive step by introducing this section with a view to remove certain social anomalies in respect of the child born to a coup....
10. Section 16 was introduced by the Act No. 68 of 1976 to recognise the right of an illegitimate child in the father's property. The Legislature has taken a progressive step by introducing this section with a view to remove certain social anomalies in respect of the child born to a couple in the void marriage. There is no doubt that in an ancestral property of the father, illegitimate child cannot claim any share. However, he has equal right like his legitimate sibling in th....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
