JUDGMENT :

Heard the parties.

2. No one turns up on behalf of the respondents in-spite of repeated calls. Hence, this appeal is heard ex-parte.

3. This second appeal has been preferred under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 10.01.2011 passed by the learned District Judge, Gumla in Title Appeal No. 13 of 2009 whereby and where under, by the said judgment of concurrence, the learned first appellate court has dismissed the appeal and confirmed the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial court being the court of Munsif, Gumla in Title Suit No.41 of 2002 dated 31.03.2009 by which the learned trial court dismissed the suit of the plaintiff on contest filed with a prayer for declaration of right, title and interest of the plaintiff over the suit land and for recovery of the possession of the suit land.

4. The case of the plaintiff in brief is that the record of right of the suit land is in the name of Anant Kumhar- the grandfather of the plaintiff as Kaimi. Anant Kumhar died leaving behind his only son Indru Kumhar who is the father of the plaintiff. Indru Kumhar died just after abolition of zamindari when the plaintiff was minor. In the mea