Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Interim Relief in Arbitration and Court Proceedings - Multiple cases involve petitions where parties seek interim relief or injunctions pending final judgment. Courts often consider applications for interim relief to maintain status quo or prevent irreparable harm during proceedings. For example, in ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"], the petitioner requested interim relief and exemption from filing certain documents, which the court considered alongside delay condonation applications.
Application for Appointment of Arbitrator - Several cases focus on interim relief related to arbitration, including nomination and appointment of arbitrators. The petitioner has nominated Mr. Justice Rajiv Narain Raina as arbitrator ["M/S. ELEKTA LIMITED vs POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH (PGIMER), CHANDIGARH - Supreme Court"], and courts have directed the consideration of interim relief in arbitration proceedings, sometimes emphasizing the need for proper appointment procedures, as highlighted in ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"].
Relief and Exemptions in Court Filings - Many petitions involve requests for exemption from filing certified copies of judgments (C/C) or other procedural relaxations, often granted to facilitate interim relief. For instance, ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"] and ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"] include prayers for interim relief along with exemptions from procedural filing requirements.
Delay Condonation and Procedural Flexibility - Several cases seek condonation of delay in filing petitions or appeals, reflecting the courts’ willingness to consider interim relief despite procedural lapses (IA No.114382/2018 in ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]). Courts have often emphasized the importance of substantive justice over strict procedural adherence.
Court Orders and Directions on Interim Relief - Courts have issued specific directions, such as directing parties to hear arguments on interim relief (["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]) or to consider the grant of relief based on pleadings (["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]). Some cases involve detailed proceedings for interim measures, including restraining parties or directing further hearings.
Legal Principles and Considerations - The courts generally evaluate the urgency, potential irreparable harm, and prima facie merits of the case when granting interim relief. In arbitration-related cases, courts have emphasized the need for proper appointment of arbitrators and the importance of maintaining the arbitral process (["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]).
The collected cases demonstrate that interim relief before arbitration or during court proceedings is a common and critical aspect of judicial and arbitral processes. Courts are inclined to grant interim measures to preserve rights, facilitate arbitration, or prevent irreparable damage, often considering procedural exemptions and delay condonation to ensure substantive justice. Proper appointment of arbitrators and adherence to procedural requirements are emphasized, but courts remain flexible to uphold the overarching goal of justice. This underscores the importance of interim relief as a vital tool in dispute resolution, balancing procedural formalities with substantive fairness.
References:- ["ONGC (M/S OIL NATURAL GAS CORPORATION) vs VALENTINE MARITIME LTD. - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["M/S. ELEKTA LIMITED vs POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH (PGIMER), CHANDIGARH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court"]- ["NARAYANASAMY vs GOMATHI NAGARAJAN(Died) 1). - Madras"]
In the fast-paced world of commercial disputes, time is often of the essence. Businesses and individuals frequently face situations where urgent action is needed to preserve assets, prevent irreparable harm, or secure disputed amounts before full arbitration proceedings conclude. A common query arises: Can courts grant interim relief before arbitration? Under Indian law, the answer is yes, but with specific conditions and limitations. This blog post delves into the nuances of obtaining interim relief under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act), focusing on Section 9, the 2015 amendments, and related judicial insights.
Note: This article provides general information based on legal principles and precedents. It is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific circumstances.
Interim relief refers to temporary measures ordered to protect parties' rights during ongoing disputes. These can include injunctions, asset preservation, appointment of receivers, or securing disputed amounts. The Act balances party autonomy in arbitration with the need for effective judicial support when arbitral remedies fall short. Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC VS Future Retail Limited - 2021 5 Supreme 321
Courts have authority to grant such relief before arbitration commences, during proceedings, or even after awards but before enforcement. Section 9 explicitly empowers courts to order interim measures at any stage, provided the remedy under the arbitral tribunal's powers (Section 17) is not efficacious. Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC VS Future Retail Limited - 2021 5 Supreme 321State Of Gujarat VS Munta Aalamkhan Nurbeg - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2377
For instance, in cases involving dissipation of assets or urgent preservation needs, courts intervene to ensure the arbitration process remains meaningful. Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC VS Future Retail Limited - 2021 5 Supreme 321
Prior to the 2015 Amendment, courts frequently entertained Section 9 applications even after tribunal constitution, leading to parallel proceedings. The amendment introduced Section 9(3), restricting courts post-tribunal formation unless the tribunal's remedy under Section 17 is not efficacious. This promotes minimal judicial interference while safeguarding efficacy. State Of Gujarat VS Munta Aalamkhan Nurbeg - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2377Bharat Sewa Sansthan VS U. P. Electronics Corporation Limited - 2007 0 Supreme(SC) 1082
The 2015 Amendment clarified the relationship between court intervention and arbitral tribunal’s measures. Section 9(3) now restricts courts from entertaining applications after the arbitral tribunal has been constituted, unless the court finds that the tribunal’s remedy is not efficacious. State Of Gujarat VS Munta Aalamkhan Nurbeg - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2377
Courts typically defer to tribunals once constituted, but exceptions apply if tribunal orders are inadequate, unenforceable, or fail to prevent harm. State Of Gujarat VS Munta Aalamkhan Nurbeg - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2377
The cornerstone is efficacy—whether Section 17 measures are adequate and enforceable. If not, courts may step in. For example, if a tribunal's order lacks direct enforceability like a court decree, Section 9 remains available. Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC VS Future Retail Limited - 2021 5 Supreme 321Tufan Chatterjee VS Rangan Dhar - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 248
Judicial precedents affirm this: In Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel (2022), courts confirmed jurisdiction under Section 9 post-tribunal if measures are ineffective. State Of Gujarat VS Munta Aalamkhan Nurbeg - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2377 The Supreme Court has emphasized that Section 17 remedies must be practical; otherwise, court intervention is justified. Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC VS Future Retail Limited - 2021 5 Supreme 321
From related case law, courts have dismissed objections to awards where interim aspects were adequately addressed, underscoring limited judicial review. The court cannot act as an appellate authority in respect of an arbitration award and can only interfere if the award suffers from an error apparent on the face of the record or infirmity. NAGINA ENTERPRISES VS UNION OF INDIA - 1995 Supreme(Del) 864
Institutional arbitration rules, such as those of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), allow appointment of Emergency Arbitrators for urgent relief. Their orders are binding from the moment of passing but subject to review or vacatur by the constituted tribunal. Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC VS Future Retail Limited - 2021 5 Supreme 321Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd. VS Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. - 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 922
In India, these orders are enforceable per the Act and rules, yet courts may intervene if insufficient. Emergency Arbitrators, appointed under institutional rules like SIAC, have the authority to grant interim relief that is binding from the moment of passing, but such orders are subject to review and vacatur by the arbitral tribunal once constituted. Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC VS Future Retail Limited - 2021 5 Supreme 321
Supreme Court matters often seek such interim relief alongside substantive petitions, as seen in cases like SURENDER SINGH vs THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Supreme Court_SC_36823_2017, where petitions were heard with prayers for interim relief. GAUHATI HIGH COURT THROUGH THE REGISTRAR GENERAL vs JUMUNA GOGOI PHUKAN
Available reliefs include:- Preservation of assets or evidence.- Injunctions against dealings.- Appointment of receivers.- Securing disputed amounts. Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC VS Future Retail Limited - 2021 5 Supreme 321State Of Gujarat VS Munta Aalamkhan Nurbeg - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2377
These apply to parties and, in limited cases, third parties if tribunal measures fail. However, courts abstain if tribunal remedies are enforceable. State Of Gujarat VS Munta Aalamkhan Nurbeg - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2377
In arbitration challenges, like those under Section 34, courts have upheld awards directing specific performances (e.g., car park allotment) as within contractual scope, refusing interference absent patent illegality. Puruvankara Projects Limited, Rep. by its CEO VS Ranjani Venkatraman Ganesh - 2018 Supreme(Mad) 2428
Key rulings reinforce court powers:- Courts retain Section 9 jurisdiction pre- and post-tribunal if efficacy lacks. Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC VS Future Retail Limited - 2021 5 Supreme 321- Post-2015, exceptional circumstances justify intervention. State Of Gujarat VS Munta Aalamkhan Nurbeg - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2377
Limitations:- No intervention if Section 17 is efficacious. Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC VS Future Retail Limited - 2021 5 Supreme 321- Emergency orders reviewable. Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC VS Future Retail Limited - 2021 5 Supreme 321- Third parties generally outside unless measures ineffective. State Of Gujarat VS Munta Aalamkhan Nurbeg - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2377
Other precedents highlight procedural aspects, such as condonation for delays in interim applications. HEMA vs CHHOTU RAM DHATTARWALNIRMALA SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
In nuisance cases analogously seeking injunctions, courts stress proving substantial interference before granting relief, balancing convenience. Ramavtar Patwari VS Prasanta Kumar Roy - 1994 Supreme(Cal) 217
Interim relief before arbitration is a vital tool under Indian law, governed by Section 9 and tempered by the 2015 Amendment's efficacy test. Courts provide a safety net when arbitral remedies falter, ensuring justice isn't delayed by procedure. While emergency arbitrators offer swift institutional solutions, judicial oversight remains available in exceptional cases.
Stay informed on evolving precedents, as arbitration law continues to prioritize efficiency. For tailored guidance, engage arbitration specialists early.
References:1. Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC VS Future Retail Limited - 2021 5 Supreme 321: Scope of party autonomy and enforceability.2. State Of Gujarat VS Munta Aalamkhan Nurbeg - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2377: Section 9 post-2015.3. Bharat Sewa Sansthan VS U. P. Electronics Corporation Limited - 2007 0 Supreme(SC) 1082: Amendment clarifications.4. Tufan Chatterjee VS Rangan Dhar - 2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 248: Efficacy and intervention.5. Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd. VS Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. - 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 922: Emergency arbitrators.6. Various Supreme Court dockets (e.g., GAUHATI HIGH COURT THROUGH THE REGISTRAR GENERAL vs JUMUNA GOGOI PHUKAN) on interim prayers.
#ArbitrationIndia, #InterimRelief, #Section9
Respondent(s) (WITH PRAYER FOR INERIM RELIEF AND IA No.174708/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) WITH SLP(C) NO. 32474/2018 (WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED ... Respondent(s) (WITH PRAYER FOR INERIM RELIEF AND IA No.174708/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) WITH SLP(C) NO. 32474/2018 (WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF AND EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
Respondent(s) (WITH INERIM RELIEF) Date : 08-12-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR.
RELIEF AND IA No.128925/2018- CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.128931/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) ... Chandigarh) HEMA Petitioner(s) VERSUS CHHOTU RAM DHATTARWAL Respondent(s) (WITH PRAYER FOR INERIM
Respondent(s) (WITH PRAYER FOR INERIM RELIEF AND IA No.114382/2018- CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.114385/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s) (WITH PRAYER FOR INERIM RELIEF AND IA No.117720/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C
RELIEF) Date : 31-10-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today. ... VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Respondent(s) (WITH IA No.63348/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND WITH PRAYER FOR INERIM
RELIEF AND IA No.135367/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.135368/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) ... Shimla) SURENDER SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Respondent(s) (WITH PRAYER FOR INERIM
IA No.126273/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 7319/2018 (II-A) GOVINDA YALLAPPA GUNJALKAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s) (WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF ... RElIEF AND IA No.124937/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.124939/2018- EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.126289/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.126288/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE
SLP(Crl) No. 7319/2018 (II-A) THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s) (WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF ... RElIEF AND IA No.124937/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.124939/2018- p
Respondent(s) (WITH PRAYER FOR INERIM RELIEF AND IA No.94923/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.94924/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) b
Therefore, the contention that the award is opposed to public policy cannot be accepted. According to the learned Single Judge, no other findings of the Sole Arbitratior can be said to shock the conscience of the Court. (c) The scope of public policy in the light of Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of ONGC vs. Saw Pipes, 2003 (5) SCC 705 was discussed and the learned Singe Judge held that the award cannot be set aside, if it is, slightly unfair or unreasonable, but it should be unfair or unreasonable to the extent of shocking the conscience of the Court. (d....
In this connection it is necessary to point out that so far as the observations of Division Bench of this Court in context of ad hoc appointment through direct recruitment against short term vacancy is concerned there is no quarrel with the proposition laid down by the Division Bench of this Court as earlier in Ashika Prasad Shukla case and decision rendered by the learned Single Judge in K.N. Whereas in case of ad hoc appointment against substantive vacancy there being no scope of approval, grant of financial sanction to such appointment without the aid of any interim order passed in a Cour....
329 of 1990, under Sections 147, 149/304, 323, 210 IPC will not be entitled to any pensionary benefits including Gratuity etc. However, he has been released his inerim pension to the tune of Rs. 7700/-.
The Arbitrator did not appreciate that the petitioner had failed to provide inspection facilities. The Arbitratior s finding that rejection of stores was unjustified was wrong. The security deposit had been duly forfeited and its refund was erroneous. Further that the Arbitrator erred in disallowing the counter claims.
It is also to be noted that in this court the parties have filed application far inerim relief, affidavit-in-apposition thereto affidavit in reply as also supplementary affidavit, whereby certain documents, which were not before the Trial Court but came into existence subsequently, have been sought to be placed an record. The defendant, in his premises, has an ail mill, the working of which allegedly creates sound nuisance and vibration by the running of the Ghanies far manufacture of mustard an and air pollution caused by the pungent smell emanating therefrom; such vibrati....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
