Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Checking relevance for Cox and Kings Ltd. VS SAP India Pvt. Ltd. ...
Checking relevance for Dhanasingh Prabhu VS Chandrasekar...
Dhanasingh Prabhu VS Chandrasekar - 2025 6 Supreme 385 : An LLP (Limited Liability Partnership) is not explicitly discussed in the document, but the document provides a clear legal distinction between a partnership firm and a company. It states that a partnership firm is not a separate juristic entity from its partners, as it has no legal recognition in the absence of its partners. In contrast, a company is a body corporate and a separate juristic entity distinct from its directors. This implies that, unlike a company, a partnership firm (and by analogy, an LLP, which shares structural similarities with a partnership) does not possess independent legal personality. Therefore, the document supports the legal principle that a partnership firm (and by extension, an LLP) is not a legal entity in the same way a company is, as it lacks separate juristic existence from its partners.Checking relevance for State of Karnataka VS Selvi J. Jayalalitha...
State of Karnataka VS Selvi J. Jayalalitha - 2017 4 Supreme 6 : An LLP (Limited Liability Partnership) is not explicitly discussed in the document. However, the document extensively discusses the legal status of companies and the doctrine of ''''piercing the corporate veil,'''' which establishes that a company is a distinct legal entity separate from its members. The landmark case of Aron Salomon v. A. Salomon & Co. Ltd. (1897 AC 22) is cited, which affirms that a company is ''''at law a different person altogether from the subscribers to the memorandum'''' and has a separate legal existence. This principle is reinforced by Indian case law, including Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. (1996) 4 SCC 622 and State of Rajasthan v. Gotan Lime Stone Khanji Udyog Private Limited (2016) 4 SCC 469, which confirm that while a company is a legal entity, the veil may be lifted when used to commit fraud, evade legal obligations, or circumvent statutes. Although the document does not directly address LLPs, the legal principle that a corporate entity (like a company) is a distinct legal person under the law supports the broader understanding that LLPs, as recognized under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008, are also legal entities distinct from their partners, similar to companies. The document''''s authoritative treatment of corporate legal personality provides strong indirect support for the conclusion that an LLP is a legal entity like a company.Checking relevance for AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED VS RAVINDRANATH RAO SINDHIA...
AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED VS RAVINDRANATH RAO SINDHIA - 2021 2 Supreme 490 : An LLP (Limited Liability Partnership) is not explicitly mentioned in the provided documents. However, the documents confirm that a ''''company'''' is recognized as a legal entity under Indian law, as evidenced by the reference to ''''limited liability company (LLC)'''' in the context of Amway distributorships. The documents state that a distributorship may be taken up as a ''''sole proprietorship concern, partnership firm or company'''', and further clarify that a Direct Seller may operate a distributorship as a ''''registered partnership firm or limited liability company (LLC)''''. While the term ''''LLP'''' is not used, the legal recognition of ''''limited liability company'''' (LLC) as a valid legal entity for business operations implies that such structures are legally recognized. Therefore, based on the document''''s recognition of ''''limited liability company'''' as a legal entity, and the fact that LLPs are a form of limited liability entity under Indian law (as per the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008), it can be inferred that an LLP is a legal entity similar to a company, though this specific inference is not directly stated in the text. The documents do not explicitly confirm or deny the status of an LLP, but they do affirm that limited liability structures are recognized as legal entities, which supports the broader legal principle that an LLP is a legal entity like a company.Checking relevance for Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) VS Mahagun Realtors (P) Ltd...
Checking relevance for Vinayak Purshottam Dube (Deceased), Through LRs VS Jayashree Padamkar Bhat...
Checking relevance for Jayamma Xavier VS Registrar of Firms...
Jayamma Xavier VS Registrar of Firms - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 684 : An LLP (Limited Liability Partnership) is a body corporate and a legal entity separate from its partners, as explicitly stated in Section 3 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008. It has perpetual succession, can sue and be sued in its own name, and is recognized as a ''''person'''' under Section 3(42) of the General Clauses Act, 1897. These characteristics confirm that an LLP is a legal entity in the same way as a company.Checking relevance for Manbhupinder Singh Atwal S/O Barinder Singh Atwal vs Neeraj Kumarpal Shah...
Manbhupinder Singh Atwal S/O Barinder Singh Atwal vs Neeraj Kumarpal Shah - 2025 0 Supreme(Guj) 1695 : Under the LLP Act, 2008, a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) is a body corporate formed and incorporated as a legal entity separate from its partners. Upon registration under Section 12 of the LLP Act, 2008, an LLP is capable of suing and being sued in its own name, which confirms its status as a legal entity akin to a company.
