SANDEEP SHARMA
Inox Air Products Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sandeep Sharma, J.
Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with communication dated 13.01.2016 (Annexure P-2), whereby request made by petitioner vide communication dated 22.05.2015, (Annexure P-7) seeking change in the name of the Company from “INOX AIR PRODUCTS LTD” to “INOX AIR PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED” came to be rejected, petitioner-Company has approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying therein for following reliefs:-
b) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to record the name of the petitioner M/s Inox Air Products Pvt. Ltd in place of M/s Inox Air Products Ltd. in the revenue record as also all other relevant record of the State Govt.”
2. Precisely the facts, which are relevant for the adjudication of the present case are that M/s Superior Air Products Limited was granted permission for establishing industrial unit under S.118 of the Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act
Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur Versus M/s. Chetak Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
Chiranjitlal Chowdhuri v. The Union of India and Others 1950 SCR 869
Jai Narain Parasrampuria (Dead) and others Versus Pushpa Devi Saraf and others
Bacha F. Guzdar Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Kalipada Sinha Vs. Mahalaxmi Bank Ltd. (AIR 1966 Cal 585)
Re:- Emami Biotech Ltd. & Anr. [(2012)3 CHN 102]
Vali Pattabhirama Rao and another Versus Sri Ramanuja Ginning and Rice Factory (P.) Ltd. and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.