RAMESH RANGANATHAN, U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
Kondakandla Yadaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
1. The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 ("the 2013 Act" for short), confers rights not only on those whose lands, and other immovable property, is to be acquired by the State, but also on families which do not own land, but one of whose members is an agricultural labourer, an agricultural tenant, an artisan or a share-cropper whose primary source of livelihood is adversely affected by the acquisition of land. Certain rights are also conferred by the 2013 Act on the Scheduled Tribes, other traditional forest dwellers who have lost their forest rights, gatherers of forest produce, hunters, fisher-folk and boatsmen, and on those who have been assigned lands by the State Government. While G.O. Ms. No. 123 dated 30.07.2015 claims to protect the interests of the land owners by offering them a compensation higher than their entitlement under the 2013 Act, do G.O. Ms. No. 190 dated 10.08.2016 and G.O. Ms. No. 191 dated 15.08.2016, which seek to provide certain welfare measures to such of those families w
Amalgamated Electricity Co. v. Ajmer Municipality
Amarjit Singh v. State of Punjab
Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Guntur v. Ramdev Tobacco Company
Amar Chandra Chakraborty v. The Collector of Excise, Government of Tripura
Ashutosh Gupta v. State of Rajasthan
B.N. Nagarajan v. State of Mysore
Bennett Coleman and Co. v. Union of India
B.R. Enterprises v. State of U.P.
Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan v. State of U.P.
Central Inland Water Transport Corpn. Ltd. v. Brojo Nath Ganguly
Dharappa v. Bijapur Co-op. Milk Producers Societies Union Ltd.
Delhi Transport Corpn. v. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress
Delhi Airtech Services (P) Ltd. v. State of U.P.
Erusian Equipment and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of W.B. (1975) 1 SCC 70 : AIR 1975 SC 266
G.D. Kelkar v. Chief Controller of Imports and Exports
Hindustan Lever v. State of Maharashtra
Hindustan Times v. State of U.P.
H. Anraj v. State of Maharashtra
Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar
Krishna Bahadur v. Purna Theatre
Kanaka Gruha Nirmana Sahakara Sangha v. Narayanamma
Kulwant Kaur v. Gurdial Singh Mann
Kapila Hingorani (I) v. State of Bihar
M. Karunanidhi v. Union of India
Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. v. Mathias Oram
Mannalal Jain v. State of Assam
Municipal Commissioner of Dum Dum Municipality v. Indian Tourism Development Corpn.
Ms. Siddeshwari Cotton Mills (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
NOIDA Entrepreneurs Assn. v. NOIDA
Naraindas Indurkhya v. State of M.P.
Patel Engg. Ltd. v. Union of India
Probhudas Morarjee Rajkotia v. Union of India
Pulin Behari Lal v. Mahadeb Dutta
Patel Engg. Ltd. v. Union of India
Probhudas Morarjee Rajkotia v. Union of India
Pulin Behari Lal v. Mahadeb Dutta
Radhakrishna Agarwal v. State of Bihar
Ramchand Jagdish Chand v. Union of India
Rai Sahib Ram Jawava Kapur v. State of Punjab
Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal
Sukhu Ram Tamrakar v. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Jammu and Kashmir v. Shri Triloki Nath Khosa
Senior Supdt. of Post Offices v. Izhar Hussain
St. Johns Teachers Training Institute v. Regional Director
Sant Ram Sharma v. State of Rajasthan
Scindia Employees’ Union v. State of Maharashtra
State of T.N. v. Adhiyaman Educational and Research Institute
Shalimar Tar Products Ltd. v. H.C. Sharma
Satwant Singh Sawhney v. D. Ramarathnam, Assistant Passport Officer, New Delhi
State of Rajasthan v. Vatan Medical and General Store
State of A.P. v. McDowell and Co.
Shri Krishna Gyanoday Sugar Ltd. v. State of Bihar
State of Bombay v. Ali Gulshan
State of M.P. v. Narmada Bachao Andolan
State of Haryana v. Mukesh Kumar
Tribhuwan Parkash Nair v. Union of India
V. Balasubramaniam v. T.N. Housing Board
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.