Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Dismissal or removal for misconduct or inefficiency disqualifies employees from pension benefits, unless the removal is for other reasons, and even then, the pension is subject to specific rules and departmental recommendations ["Mohandas P. T. v. Kerala State Co-operative Employees Pension Board and Another - Kerala"].
Procedure and Conditions for Withholding Pension - Main points and insights:
For actions under Rule 43(b), the government can withhold or reduce pension, but such actions require adherence to due process, and any arbitrary or prejudiced decision can be challenged in courts ["State of Jharkhand VS Anandi Prasad Singh, son of late Jag Mohan Singh - Jharkhand"], ["State of Jharkhand VS Baldeo Ram, S/o. Shri Krishna Mahto - Jharkhand"].
Judicial Review and Disputes:
Analysis and Conclusion:- A Jharkhand employee dismissed for misconduct, insolvency, or inefficiency is generally not entitled to pension unless the dismissal is converted to compulsory retirement without such grounds, and even then, pension is subject to specific rules and departmental recommendations ["Mohandas P. T. v. Kerala State Co-operative Employees Pension Board and Another - Kerala"].- Employees who are compulsorily retired after qualifying service are eligible for pension benefits, often at least two-thirds of the pension, depending on service length and rules ["Shambhu Prasad Sah S/o Late Shivnandan Sah VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"].- Pension can be withheld or recovered only through proper departmental procedures, including notices and opportunity to be heard. Arbitrary or unilateral decisions are subject to judicial review and can be quashed ["Kaushal Kishore, son of Late R. N. Singh VS State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Road Construction Department - Jharkhand"], ["Sushil Kumar VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"].- Overall, entitlement to pension after dismissal depends on the grounds for dismissal, adherence to procedural rules, and whether the dismissal is for misconduct. Employees dismissed for misconduct are generally not entitled to pension benefits unless converted to retirement without misconduct grounds ["Mohandas P. T. v. Kerala State Co-operative Employees Pension Board and Another - Kerala"].
References:- ["Mohandas P. T. v. Kerala State Co-operative Employees Pension Board and Another - Kerala"]- ["Kaushal Kishore, son of Late R. N. Singh VS State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Road Construction Department - Jharkhand"]- ["Shambhu Prasad Sah S/o Late Shivnandan Sah VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"]- ["Narinder Nath Aggarwal VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"]- ["State of Jharkhand VS Anandi Prasad Singh, son of late Jag Mohan Singh - Jharkhand"]- ["State of Jharkhand VS Baldeo Ram, S/o. Shri Krishna Mahto - Jharkhand"]- ["Sushil Kumar VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"]- ["THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Vs BALDEO RAM AND ANR - Jharkhand"]- ["Virendra Kumar Srivastava VS State of U. P. , Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. - Allahabad"]- ["Rameshwar Prasad VS Jharkhand State Electricity Board, Ranchi - Jharkhand"]
Losing a government job due to dismissal can be devastating, especially when retirement benefits like pension are at stake. Many employees in Jharkhand wonder: whether a dismissed Jharkhand employee is entitled for pension? This question arises frequently in service law disputes, as pension represents years of dedicated service. In this comprehensive guide, we break down the legal principles, Jharkhand Pension Rules, judicial precedents, and exceptions to help you understand your potential rights.
Note: This article provides general information based on legal precedents and rules. It is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific case.
Under typical circumstances, a dismissed government employee in Jharkhand is not entitled to pension unless specific conditions are met. The employee must have rendered the minimum qualifying service as per applicable rules, and the nature of dismissal is pivotal. Dismissal or removal from service often leads to forfeiture of pension benefits unless statutory exceptions apply. Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Ltd. VS Shree Lal Meena - 2016 2 Supreme 165
Key distinctions include:- Resignation vs. dismissal: Resignation, being voluntary, generally results in forfeiture of pension rights. National Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Kirpal Singh - 2014 1 Supreme 210Reserve Bank Of India VS Cecil Dennis Solomon - 2004 2 Supreme 371- Dismissal for misconduct: This typically disqualifies the employee unless rules provide otherwise. Alice Usha Rani Singh VS State of Jharkhand - 2024 0 Supreme(Jhk) 315Indra Kumar Sinha VS State of Jharkhand - 2016 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1429
Pension is viewed as a valuable right earned through long and efficient service, and denial requires clear rule-based justification. Indra Kumar Sinha VS State of Jharkhand - 2016 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1429
The Jharkhand Pension Rules, 2000 are central to these cases. Key provisions include:
After retirement or grant of pension, if a pensioner is convicted of a serious crime or found guilty of grave misconduct, the government may withhold or withdraw the whole or part of the pension. This was invoked in a case where a Block Development Officer's entire pension was withheld post-conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act. However, the court allowed the writ petition, noting that conviction during service counts as past conduct, but proper application of the rule is essential. Chandra Shekhar Singh VS State of Jharkhand - 2023 Supreme(Jhk) 584
Pension can only be withheld after a finding of guilt in departmental proceedings initiated under Rule 43(b) post-retirement or upon criminal conviction. Mere pendency of a case or conviction without proceedings does not justify withholding. Baleshwar Singh VS Jharkhand State Electricity Board - 2014 Supreme(Jhk) 963Sagar Mehra, son of Late Toto Mehra VS State of Jharkhand - 2016 Supreme(Jhk) 693
For instance, Pension and gratuity of a retired employee can only be withheld upon conclusion of a finding of guilt in a departmental proceeding initiated under Rule 43(b) of the Jharkhand Pension Rules after his retirement or on conviction in any criminal trial. Baleshwar Singh VS Jharkhand State Electricity Board - 2014 Supreme(Jhk) 963
Resignation of the public service or dismissal or removal from it for misconduct... entails forfeiture of past service. This rule was applied to deny pension to a petitioner who resigned and joined another employer without lien. Basudeo Prasad Triyar VS State of Jharkhand - 2023 Supreme(Jhk) 87
During ongoing proceedings post-retirement, a provisional pension not exceeding the maximum admissible is sanctioned until final orders. State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Environment Forest and Climate Change, Officiating at Nepal House, P. O & P. S. Doranda, District Ranchi VS Laljit Prasad Sinha, Son of late Kailash Prasad Sinha - 2020 Supreme(Jhk) 814
These rules emphasize that arbitrary denial without due process is unlawful.
Courts have consistently clarified these principles:
A Full Bench decision reinforced: Withholding without Rule 43(b) proceedings is unsustainable. Dr. Dudh Nath Pandey Vs. State of Jharkhand quashed such an order, entitling the petitioner to full benefits. Baleshwar Singh VS Jharkhand State Electricity Board - 2014 Supreme(Jhk) 963
In another case, suspension lifted post-superannuation entitled the employee to all retiral benefits, as Rule 43(b) is not mandatory without proceedings. Sagar Mehra, son of Late Toto Mehra VS State of Jharkhand - 2016 Supreme(Jhk) 693
While dismissal generally bars pension, exceptions exist:- No grave misconduct finding: If dismissal lacks proper departmental inquiry, pension may be preserved. Alice Usha Rani Singh VS State of Jharkhand - 2024 0 Supreme(Jhk) 315- Challenged dismissal: If the order is set aside, benefits revive.- Minimum service completed: Even post-dismissal, qualifying service might allow partial claims if not for misconduct.
However, consumer forums lack jurisdiction in service matters like pension withholding. A retired employee's complaint for gratuity and pension was dismissed as not a 'consumer dispute'. STATE OF HARYANA VS SUMITRA DEVI
Consultation with Jharkhand Public Service Commission may be required under Rule 43(b) proviso for withholding. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Vs BALDEO RAM AND ANR
If facing pension denial:1. Review your dismissal order and check for misconduct findings.2. Verify qualifying service under Jharkhand rules.3. Gather evidence of no grave misconduct or improper proceedings.4. File representations or writ petitions under Article 226.5. Seek interim relief for provisional pension.
Courts often direct release within timelines if withholding is unjustified.
Understanding these nuances can empower you in disputes. Stay informed on evolving case law, as interpretations may shift.
For personalized guidance, contact a service law expert in Jharkhand.
#JharkhandPension, #EmployeeRights, #ServiceLaw
P7 judgement and submitted that the conversion of punishment from dismissal to compulsory retirement itself will entitle the appellant to get pension which means full pension. However, the counsel for the Pension Board referred to Ext. ... The Second proviso to Clause 18(2) of the Pension Scheme does not specify as to whether the authority imposing the punishment should recommend, the extent of compassionate allowance within the limit of two third of the eligible pension#HL_E....
(II) Whether there is a requirement of initiating a departmental proceeding under Rule 43(c) of the Jharkhand Pension Rules and thereafter withhold the part of the pensionary benefits after complying the principles of natural justice? 23. ... From the facts narrated above and the arguments advanced by the parties, the common legal issue which has arisen in all these writ petitions are: (I) Whether the provision of Rule 43(c) of the Jharkhand Pension Rules in withholding the part of t....
First is whether the petitioner is entitled to pension in the promoted cadre or he is entitled to pension in the cadre of the Munsif. ... The second question is whether the scheme floated on 29.06.2010 shall be applicable to the petitioner and his pension should be calculated after grant of ACP as per the said scheme. 6. ... As far as the employees who have been given compulsory retirement are concerned, their case is covered by Rule 46A of the Bihar Pension Rules, 1950 (as adopted by ....
... (b) : A military officer, departmental officer, warrant or noncommissioned officer or soldier who is granted a pension under military rules while he is in civil employ, shall draw such pension while he is in civil employ but the authority competent to fix the pay and allowances ... The aforesaid act of the petitioner was noticed by the Additional Finance Commissioner, Government of Jharkhand and were found to be in clear contravention of Rules 157, 158 and 159 of the Jharkhand #HL_....
no. 2 by the order of the Hon’ble Governor, Jharkhand, whereby entire pension of the petitioner has been withheld by invoking the provisions of Rule 43(a) of the Jharkhand Pension Rules, 2000. ... He replied the said show cause notice on 02.06.2015, however, he was again issued show cause notice by the respondent no. 2 on 24.07.2019 for withholding his entire pension under rule 43(a) of the Jharkhand Pension Rules, 2000. ... The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned....
For ready reference, the provision of Rule 43(b) is being referred as under: “43(b).The State Government further reserve to themselves the right of withholding or withdrawing a pension or any part of it, whether permanently or for a specified period, and the right of ordering ... (S) No. 670 of 2016, whereby and whereunder, the learned Single Judge has quashed the order dated 28.12.2015 as contained in Memo No. 6347 by which the 10% from the pension has been ordered to be forfeited in exercise of power conferred under Rule 43(b) of the #H....
Rajendra Krishna, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 on the issue whether consultation with the Jharkhand Public Service Commission is mandatory in terms of proviso (c) to rule 43(b) of the Jharkhand Pension Rules 2000. 10. ... (II) For better appreciation, it would be apposite to refer Rule 43 B of the Jharkhand Pension Rules reads as under:- “Rule 43(b):-The State Government further reserve to themselves the right of withholding or withdrawing a pension or....
Rajendra Krishna, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 on the issue whether consultation with the Jharkhand Public Service Commission is mandatory in terms of proviso (c) to rule 43(b) of the Jharkhand Pension Rules 2000. ... of withholding or withdrawing a pension or any part of it, whether permanently or for specified period, and the right of ordering the recovery from a pension of the whole or part of any pecuniary The writ Court held that (i) ....
... “Hire” has been defined in the Concise Exford Dictionary as “employ person for wages or fee”. ... II with regard to the manner in which pension is payable. ... ... For the aforesaid reasons, we accept the appeal, set aside the impugned order and dismiss the complaint. ... Appeal allowed. ... – ... She submitted her pension papers. She, being under suspension, the amount in her credit in the General Provident Fund and the amount of Group Insurance Scheme was released to her but her gratuity and pension#HL_....
Such notice is also contemplated in terms of Rule 202 of Jharkhand Pension Rules. 9. ... The learned counsel has also referred to rule 202 of the Jharkhand Pension Rules to submit that even as per the said rule, prior to taking such action, a notice is required to be given. 5. ... as was fixed and paid in pursuance of 6 pay revision as adopted by the Government of Jharkhand which was subsequently lowered down to a less pension since May, 2010 without any appropriate order and without l....
7. Rule 101 of Jharkhand Pension Rule is quoted as under: 9. In view of the clear provision of Rule 101(a) of Jharkhand Pension Rules, resignation of the petitioner has led to forfeiture of his past service and therefore prayer of the petitioner for grant of pension on the sole ground that he had served the State of Jharkhand for a period more than 10 years, is devoid of any merit.” (a) Resignation of the public service or dismissal or removal from it for misconduct, insolvency, inefficiency not due to age, or failure to pass a prescribed examination entai....
For ready reference, the Rule 43 (c) of the Jharkhand Pension Rules, 2000 is quoted hereunder as: Where any departmental or judicial proceeding is instituted or continued against an officer/employee who has retired on attaining the age of compulsory retirement or otherwise, he shall be sanctioned by the Government which instituted such proceeding, during the period commencing from the date of his retirement to the date on which, upon conclusion of such proceeding final orders are passed, a provisional pension not exceeding the maximum pension which would have been admissibl....
In view of the decision of Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Dr. Dudh Nath Pandey vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors., it is no more res integra that under Rule 43(b) of the Jharkhand Pension Rule, there is no power vested with the Government to withhold pension and gratuity during pendency of the departmental proceeding or criminal proceeding. In the case in hand, neither departmental proceeding nor criminal proceeding has been concluded so as to arrogate the power to the Government to withhold part of the pension or gratuity, therefore, the action of the respon....
For better appreciation, it would be apposite to quote Rule 43(b) of the Jharkhand Pension Rules, which is quoted herein below: Therefore, proceeding ought to have been taken as per rule 43 (b) of the Jharkhand Pension Rules but the respondents even did not conclude the proceeding. The State Government further reserve to themselves the right of withholding or withdrawing a pension or any part of it, whether permanently or for specified period, and the right of ordering the recovery from a pension of the whole or part of any pecuniary loss caused to Government if the pension....
Pension and gratuity of a retired employee can only be withheld upon conclusion of a finding of guilt in a departmental proceeding initiated under Rule 43(b) of the Jharkhand Pension Rules after his retirement or on conviction in any criminal trial, under the relevant provision of the Jharkhand Pension Rules which also applies to the employees of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board as well. 5. In sum and substance, therefore, the withholding of Rs. 3,50,000/- from the gratuity of the petitioner and a sum of Rs. 18,032/- from the pension of the petitioner without any findi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
