Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Gochar Land Cannot Be Transferred - Under legal provisions, Gochar (pasture) land is generally non-transferable, especially through settlement or sale, as it is reserved for grazing and public utility. The courts have consistently held that such land cannot be settled, transferred, or converted for non-agricultural purposes by unauthorized means. For example, the Santhal Pargana Tenancy Act explicitly prohibits settlement or transfer of Gochar land (
BUDHU DOM ALIAS BUDHU BANSFORE Vs COLLECTARIATE - Jharkhand
). Similarly, in Gujarat, Gochar land remains vested in the village community and cannot be transferred by the state or individuals contrary to its designated purpose (2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 233). The Rajasthan authorities also emphasize following proper procedures when considering change or allotment of Gochar land, ensuring that such land remains reserved for grazing or public utility (2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 1337).Illegal Transfers and Collusion - Several sources highlight instances where local administration and officials colluded to change the kisam (category) of Gochar land, facilitating illegal transfers to private parties or corporations. Such actions are deemed unlawful because they violate statutory restrictions on the transfer of Gochar land. For instance, allegations of secret conversion of Gochar plots for personal or commercial gain, often with administrative complicity, are common (2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 281, 2022 0 Supreme(Ori) 269, IND_ODHC010508682020).
Legal Position on Land Use and Demarcation - Courts have upheld that even if land is leased or demarcated as Gochar, it cannot be used contrary to its designated purpose, and any unauthorized use or transfer is illegal. The demarcation orders and land records, when showing land as Gochar, reinforce that such land is not available for settlement or sale, and any attempt to do so is subject to legal challenge (2025 0 Supreme(Ori) 231, 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 451).
Government and Judicial Safeguards - The legal framework emphasizes that only competent authorities, such as the District Collector, can approve changes or conversions of Gochar land, and only following due procedures. Unauthorized alterations or transfers are liable to be quashed, and illegal encroachments or conversions are subject to enforcement actions (2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 1337, 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 233).
Analysis and Conclusion:The consistent legal position across multiple judgments and statutes is that Gochar land is a public resource reserved for grazing and cannot be transferred, settled, or converted for non-agricultural purposes without strict adherence to legal procedures. Unauthorized transfers, especially those involving collusion with officials, are illegal and subject to judicial review. Proper demarcation, record-keeping, and adherence to statutory procedures are essential to preserve the protected status of Gochar land. Any attempt to transfer or convert such land outside the prescribed legal framework is invalid and can be challenged in courts.
In rural India, land classification plays a critical role in determining its use and ownership rights. Among these, —commonly known as pasture or grazing land—holds special significance for village communities, providing essential fodder for livestock. But a pressing question often arises: Can be transferred? This query frequently surfaces in disputes involving sales, allotments, or conversions for non-grazing purposes.
Indian courts, particularly in states like Rajasthan, have addressed this issue extensively, emphasizing the public utility of . While generally non-transferable, exceptions exist under strict conditions. This blog post breaks down the judicial stance, key statutes like the , and practical implications, drawing from landmark rulings. Note: This is general information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for case-specific guidance.
is village pasture land reserved exclusively for grazing cattle and other livestock. It is typically managed by the or state authorities and recorded as such in revenue records (e.g., or ). Its protected status stems from its communal importance, preventing privatization that could harm agricultural communities. 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 723
Courts have reinforced that serves a public purpose, and any deviation requires procedural compliance. For instance, belongs to the Panchayat and cannot be transferred without their involvement. 2002 0 Supreme(Raj) 760
The overriding judicial consensus is clear: cannot be transferred outright. This restriction prevents settlement, sale, or granting of proprietary rights like over such land. Key holdings include:
In one ruling, The legal position that had no right to transfer any interest over of land is not seriously disputed. 2025 0 Supreme(Ori) 231 2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 3595
Further, under the , cannot be transferred by way of settlement.
While transfers are barred, limited diversions for public purposes are permissible under safeguards. These ensure no net loss to grazing resources:
However, cannot be allotted for any other purpose without proper procedures and compensation. 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 1942
Courts vigilantly quash unauthorized actions:
In another instance, land for Shahid Smarak was approved only by converting equivalent area to gochar, noting central location made it unsuitable otherwise. 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 451
Gochar and lands are explicitly non-allottable. 1966 0 Supreme(Raj) 132
For landowners, panchayats, or developers:- Verify records: Check /RoR for gochar classification.- Seek approvals: Involve Collector and Panchayat; ensure replacement land.- Challenge illegally: Petitions can quash unauthorized diversions, as in expansion without offset. The District Collector acted well beyond jurisdiction while setting apart the land... without offsetting the loss. 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 3077
The State holds significant powers but must act transparently. It is crucial to ensure that any transfer of complies with all applicable laws. 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 723
Disclaimer: Laws vary by state and facts. This overview draws from judgments like those under Rajasthan Tenancy Act but is not exhaustive. Always seek professional legal counsel.
In preserving , India balances development with rural sustenance—a vital public resource demanding strict adherence to law.
#GocharLand, #LandLawsIndia, #PropertyLaw
The legal position that Lambardar Gountia had no right to transfer any interest over Gochar Kisam of land is not seriously disputed by the plaintiff. It is contended that the land leased out was not of Gochar Kisam. ... In this regard the first appellate Court has referred to the lease deed (Ext.1) and also the Hamid Settlement ROR (Ext.12) to find that the plot leased out was Gochar Kisam land#....
reserved for grazing purposes and on the strength theeof, it is alleged that the District Collector acted well beyond jurisdiction while setting apart the land in question for Aabadi expansion and that too without offsetting the loss caused to the Gochar land. ... Merely on the basis of inadvertently entering some wrong entry in respect of nature of land, the petitioner cannot be permitted to take advant....
Meters of Gochar land of Khasra No.4114/3723 for the purpose of construction of Shahid Smarak in village Patodi while converting 500 Sq. Meters of land of Khasra No.3717 as Gochar land. 6. ... It is also noticed that the land in question is situated in the centre of the village surrounded by the market and, in such circumstances, such land cannot be te....
the Gochar land. ... compensating the reduction in the Gochar land. ... At the same time, 451 Bighas of land from Khasra No.491, Village Kan Singh Ki Sid (classified as ‘Gair Mumkin Magra’) was allotted by way of compensating the reduction in Gochar land on account of above allotment. ... The petitioners seek to question validity of the action of the respondents in decl....
Here, in the instant case since, as per the Santhal Pargana Tenancy Act, the Gochar land cannot be transferred by way of settlement as such the settlement itself dehors permitted to be used and the user cannot be contrary to what is being permitted for Gochar land, which is a grazing land. ... ” as such under the provision of Section 69....
The essence of the argument is that in collusion with the officials of the local administration, the kisam of gochar plots were changed and then transferred to O.P.No.5. ... If there is no surplus gochar land available, then there may be a concern for the local administration. ... Mishra contended that the gochar plots have been illegally converted with kisam being changed and transf....
The essence of the argument is that in collusion with the officials of the local administration, the kisam of gochar plots were changed and then transferred to O.P. No. 5. ... Mishra contended that the gochar plots have been illegally converted with kisam being changed and transferred in favour of O.P. No. 5 by the order of O.P. No. 3 (Annexure-1). Furthermore, Mr. ... The Petitioner simply alleged that illegality has been....
State of Gujarat and Others (supra), the issue of unauthorised encroachment on the Gochar land of the village was under consideration. It was held that any use of Gochar land contrary to permissible use whether by the State or by third party cannot be allowed. ... The averments made in the petition filed by the petitioners are that by impugned order, all the Oran (forest land), Agore (wa....
The legal position that Lambardar Gountia had no right to transfer any interest over Gochar Kisam of land is not seriously disputed by the plaintiff. It is contended that the land leased out was not of Gochar Kisam. ... In this regard the first appellate Court has referred to the lease deed (Ext.1) and also the Hamid Settlement ROR (Ext.12) to find that the plot leased out was Gochar Kisam land....
A land of Khasra No.592 Rakba 65.03 Bigha of Village Thakar Kheda was reserved as Gair Mumkin Gochar and in the year 2010, a land of 1.10 Bigha was set apart as a Gair Mumkin Shamshan, as the old Shamshan was already existing in the nearby Nadi. ... Brief facts of the case are that this petition has been filed against the recommendation dated 20.08.2020 and proposal sent by Tehsildar Samdadi on 13.10.2020 with regard to allotment of the #HL....
This order, therefore, cannot be seen as one changing the use of the Gochar land into some other purpose.” The order itself provides for compensating the Gram Panchayat with commensurate area of gochar land to the extent the same is used for other purposes.
The land in question being an objectionable land meaning thereby, it is a “Gochar” land, that cannot be leased out in anybody’s favour. 2. The epitome of the facts of the case in hand is that the Tahasildar, Niali leased out area Ac.1.00 decimals out of area Ac.3.87 decimals from Sabik Khata No.262, Plot No.2156 of mouza Padatira in favour of one late Pari Mallick without inviting any public objection, without publishing any public notice and without observing mandatory provi....
The land in question is only under management of "Defence Estate Officer". According to the landlord unauthorised construction was not permitted by him. Admittedly there was no permission granted by the competent authority for the construction raised on the apertinent land of Bungalow No. 49, hence construction is illegal and unauthorised. The land in question belongs to Central Government and ownership of which cannot be transferred.
It is also submitted that no consent was given by the villagers for shifting of the Gochar land and transfer of the Gochar land to the respondent no.8. It is also submitted that the Government started taking action against respondent no.8-Company only when this Public Interest Litigation has been filed by the writ petitioner. It is also submitted that instead of taking action against respondent no.8 for purchasing the lands from Raiyats the action is being taken against the R....
If the land is not recorded as gochar or village grazing land, or if the land ceases to be shown as gochar or village grazing land in the Record-of-Rights for valid reasons, then the bar under section 38(1) will not apply. The High Court has also erroneously assumed that once a land is recorded as gochar, such land should forever be gochar. The High Court has erroneously assumed that as there is no provision in the Tenancy Act for dereserving gochar for other uses, the State ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
