Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Scope and Law of Remand
Legal Framework of Remand The scope of remand by appellate courts is primarily governed by Order 41 Rules 23, 23-A, and 24 CPC. These rules delineate when and how an appellate court can remand a case, emphasizing that remand should be exercised within specific legal contours to avoid unwarranted prolongation of litigation. The Supreme Court has clarified that Rules 23 and 23-A empower appellate courts to remand cases when necessary, especially when evidence is insufficient or further examination is required, with Rule 24 guiding the determination based on available evidence. 2023 0 Supreme(All) 836, 2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 566
Principles and Judicial Interpretation The courts have consistently held that remand is not a routine measure but a tool to ensure justice when the case's facts or evidence necessitate further proceedings. The Supreme Court, in cases like P. Purushottam Reddy and Jegannathan, has emphasized that remand must be based on lawful grounds, proper assessment of evidence, and within the scope of the relevant rules. Inherent jurisdiction under Section 151 CPC was historically recognized but now is supplemented by specific provisions, ensuring remand is exercised within statutory limits. 2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 621, 2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 108, 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1730
Conditions for Lawful Remand For a remand to be valid, the appellate court must be satisfied that:
The remand is within the scope of Order 41 Rules 23 or 23-A, and not arbitrary or routine. The courts also stress that remand should not be used to prolong litigation unnecessarily or to re-examine issues already decided unless justified. 2023 0 Supreme(All) 485, 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2308
Limitations and Propriety of Remand The courts have cautioned against unwarranted remand orders, highlighting that such orders should be based on legal and factual necessity. An improper remand can be set aside, and the original matter should be decided on merits without unnecessary delays. The scope of remand does not permit re-litigation of issues already settled unless new evidence or legal errors are identified. 2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 566, 2022 0 Supreme(AP) 379, 2023 0 Supreme(AP) 112
Judicial Discretion and Substantial Questions of Law While remand is a discretionary power, courts are expected to exercise it judiciously, ensuring that it aligns with the principles of justice and the statutory framework. Substantial questions of law are often examined to determine whether the remand was justified, with courts generally reluctant to interfere unless the remand order is clearly illegal or improper. 2023 0 Supreme(All) 836, 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2308
Analysis and ConclusionThe law of remand is circumscribed by specific procedural rules designed to balance the need for thorough examination with the avoidance of unnecessary delays. Courts must ensure remand is exercised within the scope of Order 41 Rules 23 and 23-A, based on sound legal and factual grounds. Improper or unwarranted remand orders can be challenged and set aside, emphasizing the importance of exercising this power judiciously. Overall, remand serves as a procedural safeguard to facilitate just adjudication, provided it adheres to the legal principles and is supported by sufficient cause.
In legal proceedings, the term often arises, raising questions about its purpose, limits, and implications. Whether in criminal or civil cases, is a critical used by higher courts to send matters back to lower courts or authorities for further action. But what exactly is the scope of ? This blog post delves into the nature of orders, their legal framework, conditions for validity, and limitations, drawing from established judicial principles and statutory provisions.
serves to ensure fair adjudication by addressing gaps in evidence, procedural errors, or the need for fresh consideration—without delving into the merits of the case prematurely. If you're a litigant, lawyer, or simply curious about court processes, understanding can help navigate complex litigation effectively.
is fundamentally a procedural order that directs a case to be returned to a lower court or authority for further proceedings 2015 0 Supreme(Gau) 823. It is defined as the act of sending back an accused or a case to custody or to a lower court for further proceedings 2015 0 Supreme(Gau) 823. The primary goal is to facilitate proper examination of evidence, clarification of issues, or compliance with procedural requirements, ensuring justice is served.
In both criminal and civil contexts, acts as a . For instance, in criminal cases, it aids investigation or trial, while in civil matters, it allows appellate courts to direct lower courts for re-examination after reversing a decree 2012 7 Supreme 97. Courts emphasize that must involve and be based on reasonable grounds 2012 7 Supreme 97.
The scope of is tightly regulated to prevent abuse and unnecessary delays. In civil proceedings, it is primarily governed by . These provisions empower appellate courts to cases when:- Evidence on record is insufficient for a final decision.- Further examination of evidence or issues is necessary for just adjudication.
The has clarified that should not be routine: Before passing the order of , the has to ensure that the circumstances set out in Rules 23 and 23A of Order XLI of the Civil Procedure Code are satisfied. If the purpose of outside the scope of these provisions, is discerned, then the shall avoid 2009 0 Supreme(Mad) 522.
In criminal law, falls under provisions like or special statutes, focusing on custody extension for investigation. Illegal extensions, such as those without , can be challenged 1984 0 Supreme(Raj) 174.
Courts, including appellate and magistrates, exercise power judiciously within their . An order passed without or in a mechanical manner is invalid 2012 7 Supreme 97. For example, a magistrate's in criminal proceedings must be supported by reasonable allegations and based on the facts of the case 1984 0 Supreme(Raj) 174.
Appellate courts must apply : The power to is exercised by courts or tribunals, including appellate courts, to facilitate proper adjudication and ensure justice 1960 0 Supreme(SC) 124. However, this power is not unlimited. In one case, the appellant challenged orders as illegal and bad in law, in that, it has the effect of extending the 2023 0 Supreme(J&K) 421.
orders are typically , meaning they do not constitute final judgments on merits. They do not operate as and do not bar subsequent appeals or proceedings unless expressly stated 1960 0 Supreme(SC) 124. This allows flexibility but limits challenges to procedural or jurisdictional grounds, not merits.
The scope of over orders is narrow. Higher courts examine whether the order was:- Made within .- Non-arbitrary.- Compliant with 1960 0 Supreme(SC) 124.
Courts do not re-appreciate evidence: The courts do not re-examine the merits but ensure the order was made within and according to law 1960 0 Supreme(SC) 124. Improper remands can be set aside, as in cases where the scope of is limited and the Tribunal which has decided the Applications under had enlarged the scope 2008 0 Supreme(Mad) 536.
Key limitations include:- No for re-litigating settled issues unless new evidence emerges 2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 566.- Avoidance of unwarranted prolongation of litigation 2009 0 Supreme(Mad) 522.- In criminal contexts, illegal detention via can be rectified unless wholly without 1984 0 Supreme(Raj) 174.
The cautions: Nothing said by us in this judgment should be treated as expression of our opinion on the merits of the case... We make it clear that the is only for the limited purpose stated above and the scope of ... 2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 1426.
facilitates investigation, but orders must be lawful. An illegal order, such as one passed without proper or in excess of , can be rectified or set aside 1984 0 Supreme(Raj) 174. Challenges often invoke for violations.
Appellate remands focus on evidentiary gaps: The scope of exercising the power of by the is scrutinized under CPC 2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 1754. Tribunals must limit scope post- 2008 0 Supreme(Mad) 541.
orders can be contested if:- Lacking or arbitrary 2012 7 Supreme 97.- Violating procedural law or natural justice 1984 0 Supreme(Raj) 174.- Exceeding statutory limits, e.g., outside Order 41 CPC 2009 0 Supreme(Mad) 522.
Prompt challenges via writs or appeals are recommended, focusing on legality rather than merits.
The scope of is a procedural judicial act for fair adjudication, constrained by statutes like CPC Order 41 and principles. It is , reviewable on legal grounds, and aimed at justice without undue delay. Improper remands risk being set aside, underscoring the need for reasoned orders.
Key Takeaways:- is not final; no effect 1960 0 Supreme(SC) 124.- Limited to specific statutory conditions 2009 0 Supreme(Mad) 522.- Challenge on procedural/jurisdictional bases only 2012 7 Supreme 97.
This post provides general information based on legal precedents and is not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
#ScopeOfRemand, #RemandOrders, #LegalProceedings
Having noticed the scope of remand and applying the aforesaid principles to the facts of the case, it would indicate that the Lower Appellate Court has not exercised the powers of remand in its correct perspective. ... Before adverting to the respective submissions, it will be apposite to notice the scope of remand in terms of Order 41 Rule 23 and Order 41 Rule 23-A C.P.C. and for ready reference, the sam....
However, still it was a settled position of law before 1976 Amendment that the court, in an appropriate case could exercise its inherent jurisdiction under section 151 of the CPC to order a remand it such a remand was considered pre-eminently necessary ex debito justitiae, though not covered by any specific ... Ajit Singh (since deceased) through legal representatives and another", decided on 08.01.2024, this Court has examined the #HL_STAR....
However, still it was a settled position of law before 1976 Amendment that the court, in an appropriate case could exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 151 of the CPC to order a remand it such a remand was considered pre-eminently necessary ex debito justitiae, though not covered by any specific ... In fact, the scope of Order XLI Rule 23 and 23A CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in P. Purushottam Red....
The Hon’ble Supreme Court has considered the scope of power of Remand by Appellate Court under Order 41 Rule 23-A in various Judgments as under:- 10(a). The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mohan Kumar Vs. ... A conjoint reading of Rules 23, 23-A and 24 of Order 41 brings forth the scope as also contours of the powers of remand that when the available evidence is sufficient to dispose of the matter, the proper course f....
The appellant is aggrieved of and has assailed both the orders of remand passed by the NIA Court on 25.03.2023 and 11.04.2023, inter-alia, on the following grounds: (i) The remand order dated 25.03.2023 is illegal and bad in law, in that, it has the effect of extending the remand ... Hon’ble the Supreme Court, while deliberating on the scope of Section 20 (4) of the TADA, in Para 20 of the judgment held t....
In view of the pleadings and contentions, the following substantial questions of law arise for consideration: (1)Whether the remand made by the Lower Appellate Court is in consonance with Order 41 Rule 23 to 25? ... Keeping the scope of the appeal, in the light of authoritative expressions referred to sura, this Court must consider whether the remand made by Lower Appellate Court to Trial Court is sustainable in the facts ....
In case the Deputy Director of Consolidation was of the opinion that the findings recorded were bad in law, he could set aside the same after reappraisal of the evidence and could remand the case for decision afresh." ... While assailing the impugned order dated 22.12.2022, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the order of remand, under challenge, dated 22.12.2022 is unsustainable in the eye of law particularly i....
First appeal is a valuable right of the parties and unless restricted by law. The whole case is therein open for rehearing both on question of fact and law. ... Therefore, remanding on such issue is contrary to law for the aforesaid reasons, the appeal in A.S. No.1 of 2015 is hereby set aside and remand back to the lower appellate court to decide the matter afresh basing upon the observations made by this Court and the jud....
A distinction must be borne in mind between diverse powers of the appellate court to pass an order of remand. The scope of remand in terms of Order 41 Rule 23 is extremely limited. The suit was not decided on a preliminary issue. Order 41 Rule 23 was therefore not available. ... A conjoint reading of Rules 23, 23-A and 24 of Order 41 brings forth the scope as also contours of the powers of remand that whe....
There is no substantial question of law to entertain the appeal against the remand order. 11. I have considered the rival contentions. ... Accordingly, I do not find any ground or reason or any substantial question of law to interfere with the remand order passed by the First Appellate Court. 15. ... the matter back to the Trial Court for fresh consideration after obtaining a fresh Commission Report in accordance with #HL_....
(a) Scope of Sections 219 and 220 of the Code of Criminal procedure; (c) Question of prejudice that may be caused to the accused persons. (b) Scope of exercising the power of remand by the Appellate Court;
Nothing said by us in this judgment should be treated as expression of our opinion on the merits of the case. The High Court shall after hearing the appellants and the respondents consider the question whether the coconut trees are undervalued in the context of argument that there is diminution of value of entire land and having regard to the fact that the multiplier method is applied. We make it clear that the remand is only for the limited purpose stated above and the scope of rema....
Before passing the order of remand, the Appellate Court has to ensure that the circumstances set out in Rules 23 and 23A of Order XLI of the Civil Procedure Code are satisfied. If the purpose of remand outside the scope of these provisions, is discerned, then the Appellate Court shall avoid remand. To put it differently, the object of introduction of these provisions is to circumvent the powers of the Appellate Courts to take liberal view in remanding the matters to the Trial....
While so, the Applications preferred after the remand for amending the cause title, should not have been entertained by the Tribunal as contemplated under the Act. .(ii) under the said Act Section 7 contemplates filing of Appeal and Section 7 of the Act prescribes that against the order of the Settlement Officer within one year, the State Government has to prefer the Appeals if any. The scope of remand is limited and the Tribunal which has decided the Applications under Order 6, Rule....
.(ii) under the said Act Section 7 contemplates filing of Appeal and Section 7 of the Act prescribes that against the order of the Settlement Officer within one year, the State Government has to prefer the Appeals if any. While so, the Appeal has not been preferred by the State Government but the Appeal has been preferred only by the Tahsildar, Gudalur/Pandalur. The scope of remand is limited and the Tribunal which has decided the Applications under Order 6, Rule 17 had enlarged the ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
