TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Polimera Bharathi – Appellant
Versus
Kayapati Laxmidevi – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
The Plaintiff filed suit against the defendants for declaration of right and title over plaint A and B Schedule properties, for recovery of possession, mandatory injunction, removal of the structures made in Schedule-A and Schedule B properties and the compound wall constructed around Schedule A & B properties and for consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from over interfering with and disturbing in any way from the peaceful and lawful possession over the plaint B Schedule properties and for cost of the suit.
2. The detailed facts of the suit averments are not necessary for dispose of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. The Trial Court has framed the following issues:
2. Whether the plaintiff is entitle for recovery of possession from the defendants in respect of A & B Schedule properties?
3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for permanent injunction as prayed for?
4. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to grant mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove the unlawful construct
Ashwinkumar K. Patel v. Upendra J. Patel
Gottimukkala Ramachandrayya and others v. Kesari Chandramouli and others
H.P. Vedavyasachar vs. Shivashankara and Ors.
Jagarlamudi Rosaiah v. Daggubati Venkanna
Kesava Reddy v. A. Visupaksha Reddy
P. Purushottam Reddy v. Pratap Steels Limited
Santosh Hazari v. Purushottam Tiwari
Saraswathi Devi Vs. Jujjurn Satyanarayana Raju
Shivakumar and ors. V. Sharanabasappa and others
U. Manjunath Rao v. U. Chandrashekar and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.