Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Custom Must Be Pleaded and Proved - General Principle When a right or exception, such as a custom, is claimed, it must be explicitly pleaded with detailed particulars and rigorously proved through satisfactory evidence. Courts require the custom to be established as long-standing, continuous, reasonable, and not contrary to public policy. The burden of proof lies heavily on the party asserting the custom, and mere admission or vague evidence is insufficient.["2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2671"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 9819"], ["2022 0 Supreme(Chh) 430"], ["2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2740"], ["2021 0 Supreme(Chh) 341"], ["2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2637"], ["SUBU MURMU And ANR vs GARBI MURMU And ORS - Jharkhand"], ["2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2637"], ["2022 0 Supreme(Chh) 434"]
Strict Proof and Legal Requirements Customs, especially when they oppose the general law, must be proved with cogent, long-continued usage supported by evidence from knowledgeable members of the community or official records. They should not be extended by analogy or assumed without proper proof. The ingredients for a valid custom include continuity, certainty, long usage, and reasonableness.["2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2671"], ["2022 0 Supreme(Chh) 430"], ["2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2740"], ["2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2637"], ["2021 0 Supreme(Chh) 341"]
Legal and Judicial Standards for Proving Customs Courts emphasize that customs cannot be established by mere admission; they require thorough evidence. When pleaded, customs must be shown to be ancient, certain, reasonable, and not opposed to statutory law or public policy. Courts also consider whether customs have been recognized or acted upon in prior judicial rulings.["2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2740"], ["2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2637"], Naimun Nisha Bibi and Ors., AIR 1956 SC 548, AIR 1914 Bombay 120
Customs Opposed to Public Policy and Law Customs that are contrary to the law or public policy, such as certain forms of divorce, require especially strict proof and cannot be presumed. If not proven, they are deemed invalid and cannot form a legal basis for decisions.["2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2671"], ["SUBU MURMU And ANR vs GARBI MURMU And ORS - Jharkhand"], AIR 1928 Mad 299
Conclusion Overall, the legal doctrine underscores that customs are in derogation of general law and must be pleaded explicitly with detailed, credible evidence. They are subject to strict judicial scrutiny to ensure they are reasonable, ancient, continuous, and not against public policy. Failure to meet these standards results in the custom being unrecognized and invalid. Multiple sources including 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2671, ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 9819"], ["2022 0 Supreme(Chh) 430"], ["2021 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2740"], ["SUBU MURMU And ANR vs GARBI MURMU And ORS - Jharkhand"], AIR 1956 SC 548
In legal battles involving traditions, family practices, or local customs—think property inheritance, adoption, or divorce—parties often invoke as a defense or claim. But here's the critical question: Needs to be . Can you simply mention a longstanding family habit or community norm and expect the court to accept it? Generally, no. Courts demand specificity. This blog dives into this principle, drawing from judicial precedents, to help you understand why vague references fall short and how to build a solid case.
Whether you're facing a property dispute or challenging an adoption, knowing this rule can make or break your claim. We'll break down the main findings, key cases, exceptions, and practical tips—all while emphasizing this is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a lawyer for your situation.
The legal requirement that a must be isn't always a standalone rule but stems from the broader duty to clearly state and substantiate all . Courts consistently hold that pleadings must include every essential fact—statutory or customary—to support your case. Mere mention won't suffice; you need detailed allegations backed by evidence. 1997 0 Supreme(Ker) 339 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 1204
As one court aptly stated: It is well settled that in the absence of pleading, evidence, if any, produced by the parties cannot be considered. It is also equally settled that no party should be permitted to travel beyond its pleading and that all necessary and should be pleaded by the party in support of the case set up. 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 1204
This means if a is central to your argument—like an practice in property succession—it must be explicitly outlined in your pleadings. Failure to do so bars any proof. 2018 0 Supreme(AP) 306
Pusapati Laxmi Narasayamma VS Alamanda Narayana
Pleadings set the boundaries of the case. Facts not pleaded can't be proved, and evidence can't stray beyond them. Vague or omnibus claims about customs are routinely rejected. For instance, in a case involving form discrepancies, the court noted: except in the case of about 3 17C forms, no details of the discrepancies in the other forms have been given. In the absence of these details, of improper form 17C would not answer the requirement of furnishing . 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 1204
Similarly, in adoption disputes, courts insist: The needs to be strictly ... The evidence given by defendant No.3 and his witnesses is not at all sufficient and convincing to prove that there is such or usage in his community or in his family. 2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 969
Pandurang Shankar Shivankar VS Muktabai
Courts across jurisdictions, especially in India, reinforce this through various rulings:
Specificity in Pleadings: Customs must include . In property cases, defendants claiming title via (e.g., ) failed because they didn't plead the 's existence or agreement details with certainty.
Pusapati Laxmi Narasayamma VS Alamanda Narayana
2018 0 Supreme(AP) 306Proof Beyond General Knowledge: Even if a is prevalent in the locality, it must be in each case. One ruling clarified: prevalent in the locality is to be treated and proved in each case and in this case the plaintiff pleaded the prevail in...
SUBU MURMU And ANR vs GARBI MURMU And ORS
Exceptions to General Law: Customs opposing or general law (e.g., divorce customs) demand special pleading and proof. Thus such a being an exception to the general law of divorce ought to have been specially pleaded and established by the party propounding such ...
Rare: Ordinarily, customs need proof under , unless repeatedly recognized by courts, making further proof unnecessary. This proposition has been laid down by ... When a had been repeatedly recognized by the courts, it passes into law of the land... 2016 0 Supreme(Manipur) 41
In land acquisition matters, ownership under customary law was upheld only after proper pleading and reference to regulations.
Litigants often stumble here:
Unpleaded Evidence Ignored: A set up as a defence was dismissed because it was not proved in the present case.
Mutually Destructive Pleas: Claiming title via while also pleading can fail, as they contradict each other.
Pusapati Laxmi Narasayamma VS Alamanda Narayana
Lack of Particulars: No details in doom claims. 2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 969
Pro Tips:- Plead the 's facts clearly: origin, prevalence, specific application.- Gather evidence: witness testimonies, documents, expert opinions.- Review pleadings pre-trial to ensure all ingredients are covered. 1997 0 Supreme(Ker) 339
While strict, there are nuances:- : Customs of common knowledge or judicially recognized may need less proof. 2016 0 Supreme(Manipur) 41- Party Agreement or Court Permission: Unpleaded evidence might be admitted if parties consent or for justice. 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 1204- Community-Specific Customs: In tribal or hill areas, regulations like , may support pleaded customs. But still, plead them.
To strengthen your position:1. Explicitly Plead: Detail the 's facts in your or written statement.2. Substantiate with Evidence: Use credible proof; avoid generalizations.3. Anticipate Challenges: Be ready for opponents to question prevalence or validity.4. Seek Precedents: Reference similar recognized customs, but prove yours afresh.
In property suits, plaintiffs proving title via sale deeds succeeded against unproven defenses.
Pusapati Laxmi Narasayamma VS Alamanda Narayana
In summary, generally needs to be pleaded with and proved convincingly. Courts won't indulge vague claims—facts not pleaded cannot be proved. 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 1204 This upholds fairness, preventing surprise arguments.
Key Takeaways:- Always include details in pleadings.- Back them with solid evidence.- Exceptions are narrow; don't rely on them.
This principle applies across family, property, and succession law. For tailored advice, consult a qualified attorney. Stay informed, plead precisely, and let justice follow the facts.
References:1. 1997 0 Supreme(Ker) 339: Pleadings must set out all facts; evidence can't exceed them.2. 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 1204: Core on no proof without pleading, .3. Additional cases:
,
SUBU MURMU And ANR vs GARBI MURMU And ORS
,,
Pusapati Laxmi Narasayamma VS Alamanda Narayana
, 2018 0 Supreme(AP) 306, 2016 0 Supreme(Manipur) 41, 2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 969,Pandurang Shankar Shivankar VS Muktabai
. #CustomaryLaw #PleadingCustom #LegalProof
It is also well settled that, if a right is claimed based on a custom, it must be pleaded and proved with meticulous details. In Kochan Kani Kunjuraman Kani v. ... Thus such a custom being an exception to the general law of divorce ought to have been specially pleaded and established by the party propounding such custom since said custom of divorce is contrary to the la....
Thus such a custom being an exception to the general law of divorce ought to have been specially pleaded and established by the party propounding such custom since said custom of divorce is contrary to the law of the land and which if not proved will be a practice opposed to public policy. .... ... Custom cannot be extended by analogy and it cannot be established by a priori method. Uzag....
" The custom pleaded by defendants does not appear to me to form a defence in this case. It was set up as a defence in case No. 21,959, District Court, and was then pronounced to be untenable by the Supreme Court. ... Such a custom was held untenable by this Court in the case No. 21,959, District Court, Matara. Moreover, this alleged custom is not proved in the present case. The only evidence in s....
As customs, when pleaded are mostly at variance with the general law, they should be strictly proved. ... Therefore, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to prove the custom as alleged in the plaint. The custom has to be proved by proving the fact that the custom is long being continued. ... Mulla has categorically commented that where the evidence shows that the custom ....
prevalent in the locality is to be treated and proved in each case and in this case the plaintiff pleaded the custom prevail in ... In other words, the Judge would consult not his personal inclinations but the sense and needs and the mores of the itself to the needs of the changing society, it must be flexible and plaintiffs and the principal defendants are Santhals and are governed by #HL_S....
the said legal custom prevalent among them has not been proved satisfactorily. ... Chunilal Kishoredas Pandya and others, AIR 1914 Bombay 120, the Bombay High Court held that custom cannot be proved by admission and held as under: - ... 'A custom must be proved by evidence in the first instance and once it is proved, the Courts are entitled to recognize its existence. .....
pleaded by them. ... the said legal custom prevalent among them has not been proved satisfactorily. ... Chunilal Kishoredas Pandya and others, AIR 1914 Bombay 120, the Bombay High Court held that custom cannot be proved by admission and held as under:- "A custom must be proved by evidence in the first instance and once it is proved, the Courts are enti....
As customs, when pleaded are mostly at variance with the general law, they should be strictly proved. ... Naimun Nisha Bibi and Ors., AIR 1956 SC 548, has held that the burden of proving a custom in derogation of the general law being heavily on the party who sets it up, it was incumbent on the appellants to prove by clear and cogent evidence that there was such a custom as was pleaded by them. ... When a....
Thus such a custom being an exception to the general law of divorce ought to have been specially pleaded and established by the party propounding such custom since said custom of divorce is contrary to the law of the land and which, if not proved, will be a practice opposed to public policy. ... Ammakutti [AIR 1928 Mad 299], it was held that where custom is set up to prove that it is at ....
Thus such a custom being an exception to the general law of divorce ought to have been specially pleaded and established by the party propounding such custom since said custom of divorce is contrary to the law of the land and which, if not proved, will be a practice opposed to public policy. ... Ammakutti, AIR 1928 Mad. 299, it was held that where custom is set up to prove that it is at ....
As this is a custom, this has to be pleaded and proved with certainty. In a recent judgment of this Court, reported in Marripudi Narasimha Rao v. Marripudi Chenchaiah this Court has analysed the case law on the subject including the latest judgment of the Honble Supreme Court of India reported in Ratanlal @ Babulal Chunilal Samsuka v. Sundarabai Govardhandas Samsuka, in which it was held that the practice of bringing an illatom-son-in-law is confined to a couple of communitie....
It is a custom by which a son-in-law is brought into the family because of the lack of a male successor. Both the existence of the custom and the agreement between the father-in-law and son-in-law so as to enable the son-in-law to claim property will have to be pleaded and proved. As this is a custom, this has to be pleaded and proved with certainty. In a recent judgment of this Court, reported in Marripudi Narasimha Rao v. Marripudi Chenchaiah 2018 (4) ALT 301 this Court has....
This proposition has been laid down by Ujagar Singh -vs- Mst. Jeo, Air 1959 SC 1041. It would be worthwhile to note here that ordinarily custom pleaded needs to be proved under Section 57 of the Evidence Act but nothing need to be proved if the courts can take judicial notice. When a custom had been repeatedly recognized by the courts,, it passes into law of the land and proof of it then become unnecessary under Section 57 of the Evidence Act.
In the written statement no such pleading is there, giving the particulars. The custom needs to be strictly pleaded and proved. The evidence given by defendant No.3 and his witnesses is not at all sufficient and convincing to prove that there is such custom or usage in his community or in his family. This point is indirectly considered and it needs to be presumed as considered by both the Courts below.
The custom needs to be strictly pleaded And proved. And convincing to prove that there is such custom or usage in his community or in his family. In the written statement no such pleading is there, giving the particulars.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
