IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
Modugala Venugopala Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Jayadev Galla and Ors. – Respondents
Election Petition No. 2 of 2019
Decided On : 20-03-2024
(A) Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Section 100(1)(d)(iii) and (iv) - Election Petition challenging the election of the 1st respondent on grounds of improper rejection of postal ballots and discrepancies in counting - The court found that the rejection of postal ballots was in accordance with the Act and Rules, and discrepancies did not materially affect the election outcome. (Paras 2, 12, 36)
(B) Election Procedure - The court emphasized the necessity of strict adherence to election rules and the importance of proper pleadings in election petitions. (Paras 20, 32)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner contested the election results for No. 13 Guntur Parliamentary Constituency, alleging improper rejection of postal ballots and discrepancies in counting.
Findings of Court:
The court upheld the rejection of postal ballots and found no substantial discrepancies affecting the election result.
Issues: The main issues included the validity of postal ballot rejection and the impact of alleged discrepancies on the election outcome.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the rejection of postal ballots was valid under the rules, and discrepancies did not warrant setting aside the election.
Result: Election Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
R. Raghunandan Rao, J.
1. As part of the General Elections, 2019, elections were conducted for No. 13 Guntur Parliamentary Constituency. It may also be noted that there were simultaneous elections to the Legislative Assembly for the State of Andhra Pradesh also. Guntur Parliamentary Constituency contained seven (7) Assembly Constituency segments namely, No. 86 Tadikonda, No. 87 Mangalagiri, No. 86 Ponnur, No. 91 Tenali, No. 93 Prattipadu, No. 94 Guntur West and No. 95 Guntur East. Polling was conducted on 11.04.2019 and the votes were counted on 23.05.2019. The petitioner along with respondents 1 to 18 had contested this election. After the votes had been counted, the 1st respondent was declared elected with a majority of 4,205 votes over the petitioner herein.
2. The petitioner herein, being aggrieved by the said result, has filed the present Election Petition under Section 100(1)(d)(iii) and (iv) of the Representation of the Peoples Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'The Act'). The said provision reads as follows:
(a) .....
(b) .....
(c) ....
(d) that the result of the election, in so far as it concerns a returned candidate, has been materially affected__
(i) ......
(ii) .....
(iii).....
(iv) by any non-compliance with the provisions of the Constitution or of this Act or of any rules or orders made under this Act, (the High Court) shall declare the election of the returned candidate to be void.
3. The relief sought in the Election Petition is as follows:
B) Pass an order for summoning all 9,782 postal ballot papers including ETPBS in No. 13 Guntur Parliamentary Constituency and to declare the result after counting them;
C) Pass an order for recounting of the votes in No. 13 Guntur Parliament Constituency and to declare the result after counting them;
D) Award costs of the Election Petition;
E) Pass such other order or direction which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts of the case.
4. The grounds on which the election petitioner relies upon, in support of the reliefs sought by him are as follows:
2) About 4,252 employees of private educational institutions were originally drafted for election duty and had been issued postal ballots as they would not be able to exercise their franchise on the day of polling. These persons were removed from election duty by proceedings dated 02.04.2019. However, the postal ballots issued to these employees were not taken back nor proper steps taken to ensure that these persons do not vote again in the polling held on 11.04.2019. Since these persons were able to exercise their vote twice, the election process has become vitiated.
3) After removing the aforesaid 4,252 private employees from election duty, 1,763 government employees were drafted for election duty on 09.04.2019 and due to the paucity of time between 09.04.2019 and 11.04.2019, these persons were not given the option of exercising their franchise by postal ballots and as such, they could not vote and the denial of such voting rights materially affects the election which requires to be set aside;
4) The Act and the Rules provide for certain procedures to be followed to ensure that all the votes polled are accounted for and counted on the counting day and to ensure that there are no dis
A.C. Jose vs. Sivan Pillai and Ors.
Arikala Narasa Reddy vs. Venkata Ram Reddy Reddygari and Another 2014:INSC:76 : (2014) 5 SCC 312.
Ashwani Kumar Sharma vs. Yaduvansh Singh and Ors.
Dahiben vs Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali 2020:INSC:450 : (2020) 7 SCC 366
The rejection of postal ballots was valid under election rules, and discrepancies did not materially affect the election outcome.
An election petition must contain a concise statement of material facts to demonstrate grounds under the Representation of People Act; failure to do so results in dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 of....
An election petition must contain material facts; vague allegations without substantiation lead to dismissal.
As per provision of Section 31 of Registration of People Act, 1951 and Rule 2 (1) (g) of Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, the Returning Officer concerned did not published put on notice board for pub....
The election petition must contain concise statements of material facts and full particulars of any corrupt practice alleged, and failure to state material facts may lead to dismissal of the petition....
Important Point :Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts and particulars of corrupt practices; failure to comply results in dismissal.
An election petition must contain specific prayers and material facts; defective electoral rolls alone cannot invalidate an election, and the absence of full particulars does not preclude trial if ma....
Election petitions must plead concise material facts under Section 83(1)(a) RP Act to disclose cause of action; deficient, vague pleadings warrant dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 CPC without trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.