Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
A person or entity struck off the register or without a legal interest cannot generally claim locus standi to pursue appeals or litigation ["P. Prathap Goud VS N. P. Yerriswamy - Andhra Pradesh"], ["EMERALD UNITY SDN BHD vs SHINING CREST SDN BHD AND ANOTHER CASE - High Court"], ["Vinod Mathew Wilson S/o V. G. Wilson VS Union of India Represented by its Secretary, New Delhi - Kerala"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["C JAYAKUMAR S CHINNIAH vs DEV KUMAR SANTHIRAN (ENCLS 13 16 32 52 & 54) - High Court"]- ["Vinod Mathew Wilson S/o V. G. Wilson VS Union of India Represented by its Secretary, New Delhi - Kerala"]- ["Anil Kumar Mishra vs Punjab Singh - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MALAYSIA vs SABAH LAW SOCIETY - Federal Court"]- ["NIK ELIN ZURINA NIK ABDUL RASHID & ANOR vs KERAJAAN NEGERI KELANTAN - Federal Court"]- ["P. Prathap Goud VS N. P. Yerriswamy - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["EMERALD UNITY SDN BHD vs SHINING CREST SDN BHD AND ANOTHER CASE - High Court"]- ["Puran Chandra Mathpal VS Union of India - Delhi"]- ["Jagvati Devi vs Union of India - Delhi"]- ["R. VENKATACHALAM VS G. M. MASCARENHAS - Karnataka"]
In the world of law, terms like locus standi and interest often pop up in discussions about who can bring a case to court. But are locus and interest the same thing? Many people use them interchangeably, yet they carry distinct meanings that can make or break a legal claim. Understanding these concepts is crucial for anyone involved in litigation, whether you're a business owner challenging a decision or an individual seeking justice.
This post breaks down the definitions, differences, and real-world applications, drawing from key legal precedents. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Locus standi, Latin for place of standing, refers to a party's legal capacity or standing to initiate or participate in court proceedings. It's a procedural hurdle designed to ensure only those with a genuine stake can access the courts, preventing frivolous lawsuits.
For example, in judicial review applications, leave to apply often establishes locus, overcoming objections of no interest. ASSOCIATION OF BANK OFFICERS PENINSULAR MALAYSIA vs KETUA PENGARAH KESATUAN SEKERJA MALAYSIA & ANOR .... - 2004 MarsdenLR 1201
A dissolved company illustrates this starkly: once struck off the register, it ceases to exist and lacks locus standi to pursue appeals. PUBLIC BANK BERHAD vs GMP MASYHUR SDN BHD The court ruled, a company struck off the Register ceases to exist and loses legal rights.
Interest, on the other hand, is the substantive stake, benefit, or right a party has in the litigation's subject. It's broader, encompassing economic, governance, or legitimate expectations.
Courts recognize interest beyond mere ownership. For instance, under certain statutes, it includes governance and expectations, not just shares. VENKATESWARA RAO KRISHNAN vs FWG GLOBAL SDN BHD & ORS & ANOTHER CASE - 2024 MarsdenLR 1600 In creditor disputes, a creditor's rights confer sufficient interest. FEEDMEAL MALAYSIA SDN BHD vs TEH CHO YEOW - 2005 MarsdenLR 2358
'Right' can be defined as interest protected by rules, either moral or legal. Interests are things to a living being's advantage, like property or reputation, but rights and interests are not identical. Koyakutty Thangal VS Kavunni Raja - 2014 Supreme(Ker) 479
While interconnected, these aren't identical. Here's a clear breakdown:
| Aspect | Locus Standi | Interest ||---------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|| Core Focus | Procedural standing to sue | Substantive stake or right || Scope | Narrow: Who can litigate? | Broad: Economic, governance, etc. || Test | Sufficient nexus/special interest | Legitimate/substantial connection || Consequence | Dismissal if absent | Basis for granting locus |
Interest often underpins locus—a legitimate interest typically confers standing. VENKATESWARA RAO KRISHNAN vs FWG GLOBAL SDN BHD & ORS & ANOTHER CASE - 2024 MarsdenLR 1600TAI CHOI YU vs RR SETHU - 2001 MarsdenLR 1822
In public interest litigation (PIL), locus is relaxed; a petitioner may have standing without strict personal interest, as they represent public good. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II & Recovery officer VS Elysium Pharmaceuticals Limited - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 79 A person may have locus standi without having any litigative interest. There is a subtle distinction between 'to have a locus standi' and 'to have a litigative interest'.
Locus acts as a threshold; interest provides the justification. Courts grant standing where a party's position or constituents are affected. ASSOCIATION OF BANK OFFICERS PENINSULAR MALAYSIA vs KETUA PENGARAH KESATUAN SEKERJA MALAYSIA - 2004 MarsdenLR 2596
In wakf matters, a person interested under statutes gains locus, even in non-PIL contexts. M. H. Jawahirullah VS Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary, Backward Classes - 2013 Supreme(Mad) 1393
Modern courts interpret interest broadly to promote access to justice, especially in public rights cases. However, adjudicating authorities exercising quasi-judicial powers lack locus to appeal their own orders. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II & Recovery officer VS Elysium Pharmaceuticals Limited - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 79 Neither such authority has locus standi nor it can said to have litigative interest.
This balance maintains judicial integrity while allowing genuine claims.
In conclusion, grasping locus standi and interest empowers better navigation of legal challenges. Whether in corporate appeals PUBLIC BANK BERHAD vs GMP MASYHUR SDN BHD or PIL Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II & Recovery officer VS Elysium Pharmaceuticals Limited - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 79, these concepts ensure courts hear the right voices. Stay informed, and remember—this overview draws from precedents like ASSOCIATION OF BANK OFFICERS PENINSULAR MALAYSIA vs KETUA PENGARAH KESATUAN SEKERJA MALAYSIA - 2004 MarsdenLR 2596, VENKATESWARA RAO KRISHNAN vs FWG GLOBAL SDN BHD & ORS & ANOTHER CASE - 2024 MarsdenLR 1600, ASSOCIATION OF BANK OFFICERS PENINSULAR MALAYSIA vs KETUA PENGARAH KESATUAN SEKERJA MALAYSIA & ANOR .... - 2004 MarsdenLR 1201, TAI CHOI YU vs RR SETHU - 2001 MarsdenLR 1822, FEEDMEAL MALAYSIA SDN BHD vs TEH CHO YEOW - 2005 MarsdenLR 2358, but laws evolve.
References- ASSOCIATION OF BANK OFFICERS PENINSULAR MALAYSIA vs KETUA PENGARAH KESATUAN SEKERJA MALAYSIA - 2004 MarsdenLR 2596VENKATESWARA RAO KRISHNAN vs FWG GLOBAL SDN BHD & ORS & ANOTHER CASE - 2024 MarsdenLR 1600TAI CHOI YU vs RR SETHU - 2001 MarsdenLR 1822ASSOCIATION OF BANK OFFICERS PENINSULAR MALAYSIA vs KETUA PENGARAH KESATUAN SEKERJA MALAYSIA & ANOR .... - 2004 MarsdenLR 1201FEEDMEAL MALAYSIA SDN BHD vs TEH CHO YEOW - 2005 MarsdenLR 2358- BINU KUMAR A.P vs STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR - 2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 35867PUBLIC BANK BERHAD vs GMP MASYHUR SDN BHDRegional Provident Fund Commissioner-II & Recovery officer VS Elysium Pharmaceuticals Limited - 2022 Supreme(Guj) 79In the matter between : Pramod Premchand Shah VS Ratan N. Tata - 2017 Supreme(Bom) 887Koyakutty Thangal VS Kavunni Raja - 2014 Supreme(Ker) 479M. H. Jawahirullah VS Government of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary, Backward Classes - 2013 Supreme(Mad) 1393
#LocusStandi #LegalInterest #LawExplained
The Court will not grant locus, unless shown that it is necessary and expedient to protect and preserve the interest of the estate of the deceased. The threshold for the plaintiff is very high to satisfy the locus standi test. ... [5] In light of Al Rashidy's case the courts will not ordinarily grant locus unless it can be shown that it was necessary and expedient to protect and preserve the interest of the deceased's estate. ... In this suit, P seeks a declaration that his father has interes....
In view of the above, we find that the petitioner has failed to reveal any locus standi to prefer or maintain the above Writ Petition as a public interest litigation. ... Basing on the said dictum, learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that public interest litigation necessitates appreciation of doctrine of locus standi on a case to case basis. ... No. 114 of 1991 and he contends that in defining the rule of locus standi in public interest litigations, no ‘rigid litm....
Jain on Standing and Public Interest Litigation. 24. ... Reverting to the question of whether the Union of India has locus to file the review petition, we must immediately advert to Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) which, inter alia, postulates that “any person considering himself aggrieved” would have locus to file a review petition. ... These are some of the dangers in public interest litigation which the court has to be careful to avoid. ... Accordingly, preliminary objection raised by counsel for resp....
Summarising the analysis therein, locus standi ought to be relaxed as much as possible to allow any public-spirited person to file a public law suit provided that he has some interest in the matter. ... It is further argued that this clearly a matter of public interest and novelty warranting the grant of leave. ... Menteri Tenaga, Air & Komunikasi & Anor; [2014] 3 MLJ 145; [2014] 2 CLJ 525; [2014] 2 AMR 101 ("MTUC") and Trellises to point out that the courts should take a broad and liberal approach to locus standi in res....
conferment of locus standi under the Order is being "adversely affected" instead of having "sufficient interest". ... especially in public interest litigation. ... Lim Kit Siang; [1988] 2 MLJ 12; [1988] 1 CLJ (Rep) 63 ("Lim Kit Siang") no longer represent the law on locus standi in Malaysia, particularly in public interest litigation. ... Summarising the analysis therein, locus standi ought to be relaxed as much as possible to allow any public-spirited person to file a public law suit ....
It argued that the Receiver and Manager failed to act in the defendant's best interest by disregarding its valuation, allegedly in contravention of s 257(1) of the National Land Code. ... The Plaintiff raised PO Locus Standi No. 4, which was allowed prior to granting the substitution. ... Current Proceedings (PO Locus Standi No 3) Once again, the defendant appointed solicitors and filed affidavits to oppose encl 1. The Plaintiff raised PO Locus Standi No 3, which was allowed by the Deputy Registrar on 23 November 2023. 7....
(j) when the plaintiff has no personal interest in the matter.” 19. As per Section 41(j) when the plaintiff has no personal interest in the matter, he is not entitled to seek equitable relief of injunction. ... Admittedly, Ex.A1 not stands in the name of the plaintiff to claim personal interest in the subject matter to get equitable relief of permanent injunction. ... Both Courts gave concurrent findings that the plaintiff has no locus standi to file a suit, and he failed to show the Government site on the southern side....
The third is where the public servant, while holding office, obtains for any person, any valuable thing or pecuniary advantage, without any public interest. ... , or without any public interest. ... Once the prosecution is able to show that the public servant has either abused his position or by corrupt or illegal means or without any public interest, had obtained a valuable thing or a pecuniary advantage in favour of a third person - like the petitioner/A4, who is a private contractor - the offence .......
The several ownership of a part is a different thing from the co-ownership of the whole. ... He, therefore, contended that so long as there is a legal concern of one joint owner with the estate of a deceased joint owner whose Will is sought to be probated, the surviving joint owner has the locus slandi and, therefore, a liberal construction is warranted in regard to the expression "interest ... Two or more persons may at the same time have ownership of the same thing vested in them. This may happen in several distinct wa....
The Locus Standi Issue [6] P raises an issue about D's locus standi (legal standing) to maintain this Appeal to Judge in chambers. locus standi is the right or capacity to appear in Court proceedings. ... [17] I am therefore compelled to decide on the threshold issue of D's locus standi to pursue this Appeal. And I am behoved to find that D does not have the locus standi to pursue its Appeal here. ... [4] At the hearing of D's Appeal, the fundamental issue of whether D has the requisite l....
For instance, in the matters of Public interest litigation the petitioner is perceived in law to have been clothed with a locus standi even though, a public interest litigant cannot be said to have a litigative interest stricto sensu. A person may have locus standi without having any litigative interest. There is a subtle distinction between "to have a locus standi" and "to have a litigative interest". The statutory Authority which functions as Adjudicating Authority and discharge quasi judicial powers, cannot claim for itself either a locus standi or a litigative interest ....
State of Punjab, AIR 1958 SC 465 : 1958 SCR 1495, which has stood the test of time. To put it shortly, the prosecution must prove the following facts before it can bring a case under S. 300 “Thirdly.” Paragraphs 12 and 13 of the said decision which are locus classicus read thus:
Going by the Explanation, at least one thing is clear and that is that “same interest” does not imply “same cause of action”. 8. That seems to be pretty clear as a matter of principle, but what is precisely meant by the expression “same interest in one suit”? For that purpose, one needs to examine the phrase in its essentials and in the context of its purpose.
'Right' can be defined as interest protected by rules of right, either moral or legal rules. Interests are things to a living being's advantage. We can say that a man has interest, in his property, in his reputation, in his freedom etc. At the same time, right and interest are not identical.
Of course, in those public interest litigations, it has widest amplitude and meaning to the concept of a locus standi. As pointed out earlier, in the writ petition, the petitioner has clearly averred that he is a person interested in Wakfs within the meaning of Section 3(k) of the Wakf Act. All the above decisions relied upon by the learned counsel for writ petitioner relates to public interest litigation. It is pertinent to note that W.P.No.33785 of 2012 was not filed as a public interest litigation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
