Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Court's Power to Strike Out Claims - Courts have the authority to strike out a claim either on their own motion or upon application by a party, especially in cases of procedural non-compliance, abuse of process, or when claims are frivolous or vexatious ["
NAUTILUS TUG & TOWAGE SDN BHD vs DATO SRI SURESH EMMANUEL ABISHEGAM & ORS - High Court
"], ["MUHAMMAD AMMAR HARON vs SHARIFAH ZAHIDAH SYED NOOH & ORS - High Court
"], ["NADARAJAH LINGAM SINNADURAI & ORS vs DATO SRI DR SURESH RAJ LACHMANAN & ORS - High Court
"].Timing and Procedure - There is generally no specific time limit within which a court can strike out a claim; courts may exercise this power at various stages, including pre-trial case management or during trial, depending on circumstances ["
NAUTILUS TUG & TOWAGE SDN BHD vs DATO SRI SURESH EMMANUEL ABISHEGAM & ORS - High Court
"], ["MUHAMMAD AMMAR HARON vs SHARIFAH ZAHIDAH SYED NOOH & ORS - High Court
"], ["NAUTILUS TUG & TOWAGE SDN BHD vs DATO SRI SURESH EMMANUEL ABISHEGAM & ORS - High Court
"]. Orders to strike out may be made without liberty to refile, and such orders can be challenged or set aside upon application ["MUHAMMAD AMMAR HARON vs SHARIFAH ZAHIDAH SYED NOOH & ORS - High Court
"].Grounds for Striking Out - Courts may strike out claims if they are deemed unsustainable on their face, frivolous, an abuse of process, or if the claimant fails to comply with procedural directions or orders, such as failing to obey pre-trial directives ["
MUHAMMAD AMMAR HARON vs SHARIFAH ZAHIDAH SYED NOOH & ORS - High Court
"], ["SAMA ASSAVAAKUL vs CHOO KAH HOE & ANOR - High Court
"], ["HONG SHENG ENGINEERING SDN BHD vs MULTILINK RESOURCES SDN BHD - High Court
"], ["ELANG WAH SDN BHD vs PERBADANAN PEMBANGUNAN PULAU PINANG - High Court
"].Court's Discretion - The exercise of the court's discretion to strike out claims depends on whether the claim is clearly unsustainable or abusive, and courts are cautious to ensure that striking out does not deprive parties of their right to a fair hearing ["
HONG SHENG ENGINEERING SDN BHD vs MULTILINK RESOURCES SDN BHD - High Court
"], ["ELANG WAH SDN BHD vs PERBADANAN PEMBANGUNAN PULAU PINANG - High Court
"].Impact of Dismissals and Strikes - Dismissals for failure to state a claim or procedural non-compliance, especially when done without prejudice or with liberty to refile, can count as a strike, which may have implications for future proceedings or appeals ["2021 Supreme(US)(ca3) 150"], ["Lomax"], ["Thomas"].
Analysis and Conclusion:Courts indeed have the power to strike out a claim on their own motion, particularly in cases of procedural default, abuse of process, or when claims are frivolous or vexatious. This power is exercised to promote procedural discipline and efficiency within civil litigation, and it can be invoked at various stages of proceedings. However, courts must exercise this discretion judiciously, ensuring that claims are not struck out prematurely or unjustly, and that parties have opportunities to respond or set aside such orders if appropriate ["
NAUTILUS TUG & TOWAGE SDN BHD vs DATO SRI SURESH EMMANUEL ABISHEGAM & ORS - High Court
"], ["MUHAMMAD AMMAR HARON vs SHARIFAH ZAHIDAH SYED NOOH & ORS - High Court
"].
In the realm of civil litigation, parties often wonder about the extent of a court's powers. A common question arises: can a court a claim on its own motion? This refers to a court's ability to dismiss or a claim —Latin for of its own accord—without a formal application from any party. Understanding this power is crucial for litigants to navigate procedural pitfalls and ensure their cases withstand judicial scrutiny.
This blog post delves into the legal framework, primarily under Malaysian (ROC), drawing from key judgments. While courts generally possess this authority, it is exercised judiciously to uphold fairness. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Courts in Malaysia have to manage proceedings efficiently, including dismissing claims on their own initiative. This is explicitly recognized in the ROC. For example, allows courts to pleadings that are , , , or otherwise unsustainable, either on application or on its own motion
.
The court in
clarified: Apart from , a case can be struck out by the Court on its own motion under of the Rules. This provision does not state that the Court can a pleading only on application of a party. In fact, in the manner the provision is worded implies the Court can on its own motion the pleadings.
Similarly, empowers courts during pre-trial case management to claims for with directions, either on its own motion or upon application
. This provision states: The Court, having given directions under or may either on its own motion or upon the application of any party, if any party defaults in complying with any such directions, dismiss such action, the defence or counterclaim or make such other order as it thinks fit.
These rules underscore that courts are not passive arbiters but active managers of justice.
dismissals are not whimsical. They require clear justification:
.
.
.
The court in
emphasized: A court may only summarily dismiss a claim if it is 'obviously unsustainable'; substantive issues warranting full trial cannot be dismissed as .
However, limitations exist. Claims cannot be struck out solely on limitation grounds without allowing the plaintiff to demonstrate exceptions under the . Full trial may be needed
. As noted: A claim cannot be struck out solely on limitation grounds without allowing the plaintiff to demonstrate exceptions to the statute; full examination at trial is necessary.
While empowered, courts exercise this authority with caution, guided by and :
.
.
In
, the ruled: The Judge improperly struck out the claim as counsel's absence did not justify dismissal, and the 'unless order' lacked clarity. It stressed: The SCJ wrongly assumed no party was present when a Plaintiff's representative was in attendance, constituting a misapprehension of facts.
Appeals often succeed if discretion is not exercised properly, remitting cases for trial
.
Several judgments affirm this practice:
and [: Courts struck out claims for procedural defaults or lack of merit, confirming inherent authority.
: Similar dismissal for .
Conversely, overreach is checked. In construction disputes, striking out without clear '' was deemed a misuse
.
.
.
.
To avoid dismissal:1. Plead robustly: Substantiate claims with facts to evade labels.2. Comply with directions: Attend hearings; clarify ''.3. Address limitations early: Anticipate defenses.4. Seek reinstatement promptly: If struck out, apply to set aside before reinstatement
.
Courts should wield this power sparingly, prioritizing access to justice.
Yes, Malaysian courts can a claim on their own motion, as affirmed by ROC provisions like Order 18 r 19 and Order 34 r 2(3), but only in clear cases of frivolity, vexatiousness, or default, with discretion tempered by fairness
. This balances efficiency and equity.
Key Takeaways:- Courts act judiciously.- Grounds: claims, .- Limits: No sole reliance on limitations; ensure hearings.- Always comply with ROC to safeguard your case.
For tailored advice, engage legal professionals. Stay informed on procedural rules to strengthen your litigation strategy.
#CourtDismissal, #SuaSponte, #MalaysiaLaw
[13] I therefore strike out the Notice of Motion without liberty to file afresh. This matter has been set down for trial and will be dealt with appropriately at the said juncture. ... If reasonable timely justice remains a goal of our public Court system judges of our Court hearing civil matters lack of the resources to spend much time on other civil matters, especially the unreasonable high number of process related interlocutory motion which our civil ... JUDGMENT Indera Mohd Arief Emran Arifin ....
on the Court the power to, inter alia, strike out a party's claim either on its own motion or upon the application of any party, in the event that such party defaults in complying with any order and/or directive issued by the Court under the said O 34 r 2(2). ... in nature as O 34 r (3) of the ROC confers on the Court the power to, inter alia, strike out a party's claim either on its own motion or upon the application of any p....
If reasonable timely justice remains a goal of our public Court system judges of our Court hearing civil matters lack of the resources to spend much time on other civil matters, especially the unreasonable high number of process related interlocutory motion which ... JUDGMENT Mohd Arief Emran Arifin J: (Enclosure 67) [1] The Appellants, the 1st and the 9th Defendants, have sought to strike out the Plaintiff's / Respondent's claim on the grounds that: (i) Timor has no capacity to act in a derivative ... ....
ROC confers on the Court the power to, inter alia, strike out a party's claim either on its own motion or upon the application of any party, in the event that such party defaults in complying with any order and/or directive issued by the b ... or strike out the defence or counterclaim or enter judgment or make such order as it thinks fit. ... ROC 2012 stipulate as follows: ROC 2012, the Order of this Court that struck out the Plaintiffs' claim, may be set aside on....
during pre-trial case management are peremptory in nature as O 34 r (3) of the ROC confers on the Court the power to, inter alia, strike out a party's claim either on its own motion or upon the application of any party, in the event that such party defaults in complying ... Instead, the Plaintiffs applied to reinstate the action without first applying to set aside the Court 's Order that struck out the Plaintiffs' claim. ... [9] Subsequently on 25 April 2024, following the Plainti....
v Milton were somewhat too wide, and where the Court of Appeal held that the statement of claim should be struck out, one of the reasons being, as stated in the headnote, that: (ii) it was open to the court to strike out a statement of claim as disclosing ... It must be appreciated, however, that in that case the application to strike out was not only on the ground that the statement of claim disclosedno reasonable cause of action but also on the ground that it was ....
This was especially so when the SCJ was functus officio upon pronouncement of the final judgment i.e to strike out P's claim. ... on 9 October 2023 in striking out the Plaintiffs' claim with cost. ... order made or direction given by the Court under paragraph (1), the Court may dismiss the action,strike out the defence or counterclaim or make such other order as it thinks fit. ... ROC 2012 is reproduced here: (3) The Court, having given directions under r 2(2) or r ....
Judge (SCJ) made on 9 October 2023 in striking out the Plaintiffs' claim with cost. ... ROC 2012 is reproduced here: (3) The Court, having given directions under r 2(2) or r 3 may either on its own motion or upon the application of any party, if any party defaults in complying with any such directions, dismiss such
has no defence to a claim included in the writ, or to a particular part of such a claim, or has no defence to such a claim or part thereof except as to the amount of any damages claimed, apply to the Court for judgment against that defendant... ... of a claim, to which the application relates that there is an issue or question in dispute which ought to be tried or that there ought for some other reason to be a trial of that claim or part, the Court may give such judgm....
But when a court dismisses a claim using two equally sufficient rationales, one of which is strike- qualifying, that claim has been dismissed on a strike-qualifying ground and its dismissal counts toward a strike. ... The parties agree that the District Court dismissed the sole federal claim for failure to state a claim, which is indisputably a strike-qualifying ground. However, as relevant here, the Cour....
It was further held that the right to compensation cannot be read into Schedule VII List III, Entry 42 which is not ambiguous at all. This Court also considered distinction between no compensation and nil compensation and pointed out onus to establish validity of law in such cases lies on the State. The statutes depriving a person of his property are subject to judicial review by constitutional courts on the grounds laid down by this Court. Court cannot however based merely on its own opinion, strike down such a law or statutory provision. Court cannot however bas....
The election petitioner, with the help of the presently made miscellaneous application, invites this court to apply to the present case the provisions of order VI, rule 16 for the purpose of striking out the pleadings leading thereby to the rejection of the election petition itself in exercise of this court's power under order VII, rule 11. Whether court, on its own motion, strike out pleading?
The election petitioner, with the help of the presently made miscellaneous application, invites this Court to apply to the present case the provisions of Order VI Rule 16 for the purpose of striking out the pleadings leading thereby to the rejection of the Election Petition itself in exercise of this Court's power under Order VII Rule 11. WHETHER COURT, ON ITS OWN MOTION, STRIKE OUT PLEADING?
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
