Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Analysis and Conclusion - Medium enterprises can/must file registration memorandum under Section 8 but cannot validly file petitions/references under Section 18 before MSEFC, as council jurisdiction (Sections 18-20) is limited to micro/small enterprises (per naming, Section 2(n) supplier definition, and court rulings rejecting medium claims). Filings by medium enterprises are entertainable but liable to jurisdictional challenge/rejection. ["Sterlite Power Transmission Limited VS Epc Solutions Llp - Delhi"] ["Raffles Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Enkon Engineering A Registered Partnership Firm - Karnataka"] ["Solar Designs Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, A. A. K. Apath Sakaayem VS M. M. C. Doortech Services Private Limited - Madras"] ["GUJARAT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT BOARD vs INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT - Karnataka"] ["Megha Engineering & Infrastructure Ltd. VS H. P. Micro Small Enterprises Facilitation Council - Himachal Pradesh"]
In the dynamic world of Indian business, Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) play a pivotal role in economic growth. However, when it comes to recovering delayed payments, many enterprises wonder: whether a medium enterprise can file a petition before the MSME council (Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council or MSEFC). This question arises frequently amid payment disputes with buyers. Unfortunately, the answer is generally no—medium enterprises are typically excluded from this forum under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006. This blog post breaks down the legal reasoning, key provisions, and practical alternatives, drawing from statutory text and judicial insights. NBCC (India) Ltd. VS State of West Bengal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 86
The MSMED Act, 2006, classifies enterprises based on investment and turnover thresholds outlined in Section 7. These include:- Micro enterprises: Lower investment/turnover limits.- Small enterprises: Moderate limits.- Medium enterprises: Higher limits, still within the MSME umbrella for certain benefits. NBCC (India) Ltd. VS State of West Bengal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 86
While the Act broadly supports all three categories—evident in cases recognizing medium enterprises as MSMEs for activities like loans or schemes—the protections for delayed payments under Chapter V are narrower. For instance, one source notes that an enterprise retains its previous classification (including medium) for three years post-reclassification for non-tax benefits, highlighting the Act's supportive intent for medium players too. Marine Electricals India Ltd. VS Union of India - 2024 Supreme(Bom) 904 However, this does not extend to dispute resolution via MSEFC. Silpi Industries VS Kerala State Road Transport Corporation - 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 299
No, a medium enterprise cannot file a petition (reference) before the MSEFC. The Act explicitly limits the definition of 'supplier' to micro or small enterprises that have filed a memorandum under Section 8. Section 2(n) states: a micro or small enterprise, which has filed a memorandum with the authority referred to in sub-section (1) of section 8. Medium enterprises are excluded, even if they file memoranda under Section 8(1)(c) for manufacturing. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. VS P. M. Electronics Ltd. - 2020 0 Supreme(All) 342NBCC (India) Ltd. VS State of West Bengal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 86
Chapter V, titled Delayed payments to micro and small enterprises, covers Sections 15-19. Section 15 imposes payment liabilities on buyers for suppliers (micro/small only), and Section 17 ties disputes to amounts due for goods/services by such suppliers: For any goods supplied or services rendered by the supplier, the buyer shall be liable to pay the amount with interest thereon as provided under section 16. NBCC (India) Ltd. VS State of West Bengal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 86
Section 18(1) allows any party to a dispute... with regard to any amount due under section 17 to make a reference to the MSEFC. The Council's name itself—Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council—under Sections 20-21 underscores its exclusive focus. No provision extends jurisdiction to medium enterprises. Silpi Industries VS Kerala State Road Transport Corporation - 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 299S. R. Technologies (Unit-II) VS Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council - 2023 0 Supreme(Telangana) 22
Judicial precedents reinforce this: MSEFC jurisdiction requires the supplier to be a registered micro or small enterprise at the relevant time, often verified by Udyog Aadhaar or memorandum filing. Medium enterprises lack standing. Vaishno Enterprises VS Hamilton Medical AG - 2022 4 Supreme 92Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. VS Vector Engineering Company, 10, Guindy Industrial Developed Plot, Ekkattuthangal, Chennai - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 3079
Interestingly, while MSEFC handles diverse disputes like works contracts—even overriding arbitration clauses—these apply only to qualifying micro/small suppliers. For example, in a case involving pipeline erection (a works contract), the Council retained jurisdiction for an MSME supplier, emphasizing the Act's beneficial nature for micro/small entities. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited VS West Bengal State Micro, Small Enterprises Facilitation Council - 2023 Supreme(Cal) 1161
Medium enterprises face several limitations:- Post-Contract Registration: Filing a memorandum after the contract does not confer retroactive supplier status. Eligibility is assessed at contract inception. Vaishno Enterprises VS Hamilton Medical AG - 2022 4 Supreme 92 (no jurisdiction if not MSME when contract entered); Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. VS Vector Engineering Company, 10, Guindy Industrial Developed Plot, Ekkattuthangal, Chennai - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 3079 (registration post-Act insufficient for pre-Act contracts).- Filing Obligations: Medium manufacturing enterprises must file under Section 8(1)(c), but this grants no Chapter V rights or MSEFC access. NBCC (India) Ltd. VS State of West Bengal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 86- Counterclaims or Buyer Disputes: These do not expand supplier restrictions. Silpi Industries VS Kerala State Road Transport Corporation - 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 299
Broader MSME contexts, like loan restructurings during COVID-19 or NPA classifications, recognize medium enterprises but route disputes elsewhere, not MSEFC. Lala Sarai Steel Rolling Mills VS General Manager - 2021 Supreme(Telangana) 355Bharat Navnitlal Shah VS Punjab National Bank - 2021 Supreme(Guj) 727
Arbitration under MSEFC also has procedural nuances: Tribunals retain jurisdiction despite timeline extensions (90 days under Section 18(5) is directory), but counter-claims must be timely. These apply solely to micro/small cases. MAHARASHTRA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION vs VAST INDIA PVT. LTD - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 859Maharashtra Public Service Commission Vs Vast India Pvt. Ltd. - 2025 Supreme(Bom) 208
If you're a medium enterprise facing delayed payments:1. Verify Classification: Check investment/turnover against Section 7 thresholds before proceeding. NBCC (India) Ltd. VS State of West Bengal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 862. Alternative Remedies: Pursue civil suits, contractual arbitration, or debt recovery tribunals. Note: No compound interest (Section 16) or MSEFC's expedited 90-day process.3. Buyer Strategy: Challenge MSEFC jurisdiction if a supplier's status is disputed.
Buyers should ensure compliance with Section 15 timelines to avoid overriding effects under Section 24, applicable only to micro/small suppliers. Lifecare Innovations Pvt. Ltd. VS Union Of India - 2025 3 Supreme 124
This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Enterprise classifications and disputes turn on facts; seek professional counsel tailored to your situation. For MSME support, visit official portals or legal experts. Stay informed, as the Act continues evolving to bolster small businesses. Silpi Industries VS Kerala State Road Transport Corporation - 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 299
References:1. NBCC (India) Ltd. VS State of West Bengal - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 86: Core definitions and MSEFC provisions.2. Silpi Industries VS Kerala State Road Transport Corporation - 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 299: Chapter V scheme excluding medium.3. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. VS P. M. Electronics Ltd. - 2020 0 Supreme(All) 342: Supplier definition.4. S. R. Technologies (Unit-II) VS Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council - 2023 0 Supreme(Telangana) 22: Jurisdiction limits.5. Vaishno Enterprises VS Hamilton Medical AG - 2022 4 Supreme 92Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. VS Vector Engineering Company, 10, Guindy Industrial Developed Plot, Ekkattuthangal, Chennai - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 3079: Judicial affirmations on registration timing.
#MSMEAct #MediumEnterprise #MSEFC
(c) a medium enterprise engaged in the manufacture or production of goods pertaining to any industry specified in the First Schedule to the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (65 of 1951), shall file the memorandum of micro, small or, as the case may be, of medium ... Whether the Claimant is entitled for the interest as claimed in the claim petition? 3. Whether the Claimant is entitled for claim sought for? 4. ... Section 8 of the Act mandates that an....
more than Rs.5 crores but not exceeding Rs.10 crores to be Medium Enterprise. ... Documents available in the writ petition would show that petitioner has submitted an application under Section 18 of the MSME Act before the Facilitation Council on 11.03.2021 along with Schedule-I. ... Thereafter, proceedings under Section 18 (3) of MSME Act for arbitration was started by the Facilitation Council itself and time to file reply/written statement was gran....
— (1) Any person who intends to establish,— (a) a micro or small enterprise, may, at his discretion; or (b) a medium enterprise engaged in providing or rendering of services may, at his discretion; or (c) a medium enterprise ... Certain supplies were made by the respondent No.1-claimant before the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (“MSME Council” for short) under Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2....
— (1) Any person who intends to establish,— (a) a micro or small enterprise, may, at his discretion; or (b) a medium enterprise engaged in providing or rendering of services may, at his discretion; or (c) a medium enterprise ... Certain supplies were made by the respondent No.1-claimant before the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (“MSME Council” for short) under Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2....
— (1) Any person who intends to establish,— (a) a micro or small enterprise, may, at his discretion; or (b) a medium enterprise engaged in providing or rendering of services may, at his discretion; or (c) a medium enterprise ... Certain supplies were made by the respondent No.1-claimant before the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council (“MSME Council” for short) under Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2....
ISSUE C: WHETHER A WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE Section 8 (1)(a) provides that, “a micro or a small enterprise may, at his discretion” and even a medium enterprise engaged in providing or rendering services, also “may at his discretion” file a memorandum with the authority as may be specified by the Government. ... A perusal of section 7 of the said Act stipulates when an enterprise would be a micro enterprise, small enterprise#H....
for supply of goods, respondent No.2 was not registered as Micro, Small or Medium Enterprise. ... Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the date of entering into the contract, respondent No.2 was not registered as Micro, Small or Medium Enterprise under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as “MSME Act”) and therefore, MSE Facilitation ... MSME facilitation council, Raipur passed in appli....
The present petition is filed against the impugned award dated 11.06.2021 passed by the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSE) Facilitation Council, Chennai Region in MSEFC/CR/230/2019. ... This revision petition rests on two important aspects one is the maintainability and the other is the limitation. Let us first deal with the maintainability issue. Whether registration of the supplier as a MSME unit under Section 8 of the MSMED Act, 2006 is mandatory to seek relief under the Act....
Shorn of unnecessary details, the respondent no.3 is a Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME). ... as a micro, small or medium enterprise for any other activity. ... The Andhra Pradesh High Court also clearly recorded that there is nothing in the MSME Act which provides that the registration for a particular activity will render an enterprise liable not to be regarded as a micro, small or medium enterprise for any other activity.....
a Medium Enterprise to “not an MSME”, then the word “medium” in the bracketed portion of Clause 8(5) would be rendered otiose. ... By the said emails, the Petitioner was informed that it would not be able to make a claim under the VSV Scheme as it was “not an MSME”. It is in these circumstances that the Petitioner has been constrained to file the present Petition seeking the reliefs set out above. 13. ... of the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise....
2. The Impugned Award has been passed under the statutory arbitration process conducted by the Facilitation Council (“Arbitral Tribunal”) formed under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSME Act”) – Vast India is a “small enterprise” for purposes of the MSME Act. Factual Matrix: 4. In order to deal with the challenge posed in this Petition, a basic overview of the factual context, mindful of the scope of Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, would be in order. It may be summarised as under:- [SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] Context and Background : ....
2. The Impugned Award has been passed under the statutory arbitration process conducted by the Facilitation Council (“Arbitral Tribunal”) formed under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSME Act”) – Vast India is a “small enterprise” for purposes of the MSME Act. Factual Matrix: 4. In order to deal with the challenge posed in this Petition, a basic overview of the factual context, mindful of the scope of Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, would be in order. It may be summarised as under:- 3. MPSC’s attack on the Impugned Award is based on two ....
Appellant being a micro, small and medium enterprise is entitled to the full protection under the MSME Act. 7.2. Setting aside of the award passed by the Facilitation Council in favour of the appellant has caused grave prejudice to the appellant.
3. It is stated that petitioner No.1 is a Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME) and is covered under the provisions of the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (briefly ‘the MSME Act’ hereinafter). In connection with its commercial activities, it had availed a loan from respondent No.4 i.e., Indusind Bank Limited. However, it is stated that giving a complete gobye to the beneficial provisions of the MSME Act and in a highhanded manner, the loan account of the petitioners was classified as Non-Performing Asset (NPA).
The respondent-Bank sanctioned and granted financial assistance from time to time which was enhanced lastly on 25th July, 2019 and thereafter on 21st September, 2020. The petitioner No.1 therefore approached the respondent-Bank for restructuring of the financial assistance as per the directives dated 6th August, 2020 for restructuring of financial assistance to MSME sector issued by the Reserved Bank of India. The petitioner No.1 is registered as Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (‘MSME’) under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise Development Act, 2006 (for short ‘the MSME Act’)....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
